On the phone the D100 was found, listed, and completely unreachable: it
sat below the fold and nothing scrolled.
.screen declared grid-template-rows: auto auto 1fr but has four children
— header, ClickPanel, the trainer gate, the list. The gate is
conditional, so whenever it rendered it took the 1fr track and the list
fell into an implicit auto row past the bottom of the screen. overflow-y
was on the list, which was not the box overflowing, so there was nothing
to scroll. On a desktop window everything fit and the bug never showed;
on a 412px viewport the Click panel alone is taller than the screen.
Flex has no fixed track count, so a conditional child cannot displace
anything — the same reason .ride is a column and not a grid.
On compact the whole screen scrolls as one document rather than pinning a
header above a scrolling list. Giving the list its own scroll region
there would leave it a few pixels tall: technically scrollable, still
unusable.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The ride screen was built for a 1440x900 window and expressed its type
scale in vw. On a phone that fails twice over: 7vw of a 412px viewport is
29px, well under what is readable from the bars, and five side-by-side
readouts do not fit across 412px at any type size. Shrinking is not the
answer to a small screen — showing less is (FR-9.17, FR-9.18).
So screen size becomes a measured input. viewport.ts is a pure function
from a measurement — width, height, DPR, whether the pointer is coarse —
to a layout plan: type sizes in pixels, column counts, and which sections
earn their space. viewport.svelte.ts measures and publishes it as CSS
custom properties and data-* attributes; the stylesheets read those. The
three max-width media queries are gone, so there is now exactly one
definition of "narrow" in the codebase rather than four that can disagree
about where a phone starts.
The sizes are absolute rather than relative, and that is a physical
argument, not a preference. A number has to subtend enough visual angle
to read from the riding position. Desktop is ~96 CSS px per inch at about
a metre; Android's CSS pixel is the dp, ~160 per inch, and a bar-mounted
phone sits at roughly 0.6 m. (160/96) x (0.6/1.0) is almost exactly 1, so
the same pixel size is about as readable in both places — which is why
the floors are plain numbers with no per-platform correction, and why a
small screen is a content problem.
What gets dropped, and in what order: anything the rider cannot act on
mid-ride goes before anything they can. Sparklines first — they are
history, and a 60px chart is a smear. Then average / normalised / work /
burned, which is what the summary screen is for. The detail row survives
longer, because "climbing left" is the question a rider on a hill is
actually asking, and elapsed time stays on a phone while covered and
ascended go. The route profile is the screen's whole point (FR-9.7) and
goes only in landscape on a phone, where keeping it would leave nothing
for the numbers.
Touch is treated as an input, not a narrower mouse (FR-9.19): 48px
targets, hover styling suppressed so it does not stick after a tap, and
keyboard hints hidden — with a word added to the help button, which
carried only a key cap and would otherwise have become unpressable.
Being a pure function is the point: "does this fit on a Pixel 7" is now
answerable in CI on a machine with no phone attached. 15 tests, run by
`npm --prefix ui test`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Speed now comes from the drivetrain and the load from the road, which is
the way round a bike actually works.
Speed is cadence x development, filtered lightly. Power, not cadence,
decides whether the rider is driving it: on a direct-drive trainer the
flywheel keeps the cranks turning after they stop, so cadence alone reads
a healthy 80 rpm for someone doing nothing. Below 15 W the speed runs
down to whatever the gradient sustains on no power - zero uphill, a real
freewheeling speed on a descent. Stopping on a 3.5% climb used to settle
at 22 km/h and stay there, because the model wanted to decelerate and a
blend toward the flywheel speed outvoted it; that blend is gone.
The D100 sends no cadence over FTMS - it is a rebadged Magene T110 with
cadence disabled in firmware (qdomyos-zwift#3282) - so it is inferred
from wheel speed, which one sprocket and no freewheel make exact. Its
Zwift channel does carry cadence, and is now greeted with RideOn and
subscribed on every notifying characteristic, so a measured value is used
where one arrives.
The load is commanded as power, not gradient. The trainer declares
50-600 W in 1 W steps against 0-6% inclination in 0.1% steps refusing
negatives, and whether it acts on 0x11 at all is still unconfirmed. Its
power target is a ceiling rather than a setpoint, which is very nearly
what a road is: exceed it and the surplus becomes speed. Gravity travels
on the same channel as watts, so nothing is lost by leaving 0x11 alone.
LoadChannel keeps the gradient path selectable and tested.
Virtual shifting reaches the trainer for the first time. The physics
load model was written but never called, and a paddle press both shifted
a gear in Rust and nudged the gradient in the webview - the shift
silently, the tilt visibly, so the paddles looked like a gradient trim.
Also: a fixed 12 W drivetrain loss, held as a power because that is how
it presents; crank length, so a gear can be reported as the force it puts
under the foot; gear and pedal force on the ride screen; a drag-race
profile for testing gearing on the flat.
Two readout bugs fixed on the way. The rolling windows were trimmed by
timestamp but fed on a fixed timer, so every second spent on the ride
screen before starting pushed samples at t=0 that could never expire -
speed read a fraction of the truth for the first 45 s. And the headline
speed was a 45 s mean, which took most of a minute to show a gear change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Gears are expressed as an offset to the commanded gradient, leaving the
physics on the route's true gradient so shifting changes effort, not speed.
Neutral gear commands exactly the route gradient, so an un-shifted ride is
unchanged.
Cadence is not in FTMS on this trainer but is on its Zwift channel, decoded
against captured frames. The undeclared FTMS trailing bytes were ruled out:
wheel RPM restated at a fixed 73.8x speed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Standalone binary embeds the frontend, avoiding the dev-server dependency
that made the window fail to load.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds backing state for Resistance and Erg control modes, which had no
value to hold and so could never satisfy FR-4.3/FR-4.6.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5