Put the developer docs under docs/dev and index the folder for users first

docs/ had 26 developer documents flat beside the manual, and the two
audiences are very differently sized: most readers want the manual and
the gesture reference, a few want the register, the designs and the
measurements. The manual and gestures.md stay at the top; everything for
someone changing the code moves to docs/dev/, and the two documents that
name their own successors — the v0.1 milestone and the UI-refinement plan
— go to docs/dev/archive/ rather than being deleted, since both are still
cited. docs/README.md is the index, users first.

Every reference follows: code comments, Cargo manifests, the workflows,
the pre-commit hook, the bench and traceability tools (which locate the
repo root by docs/dev/requirements.md now), packaging, the Docker READMEs,
CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md and the README. The matrix links one level
deeper and is regenerated. Links out of the moved documents into the tree
gain a level; a link checker over every Markdown file finds none broken.

core/dr-gpu/tests/frame_budget.rs

@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
 //!
 //! FR-DSP-3 says a slider updates the visible region within one frame budget at
 //! proxy resolution. Until this file existed nothing checked it, which made it
-//! a wish — `docs/display-and-extension.md` §3 is blunt about that, and §7 is
+//! a wish — `docs/dev/display-and-extension.md` §3 is blunt about that, and §7 is
 //! blunt about what tagging an unchecked requirement does to the coverage
 //! figure.
 //!
-//! The measurements this guards are in [`docs/frame-budget.md`], produced by
+//! The measurements this guards are in [`docs/dev/frame-budget.md`], produced by
 //! `examples/frame_budget.rs`. This file is the part of them that has to keep
 //! being true: it renders the **whole point-operation chain** through the real
 //! `render_detailed` for a hundred frames, moving a slider between each, and
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 //! **The neighbourhood stage is deliberately not in the asserted chain.** It is
 //! over the budget today — clarity alone is 34 ms at 4K, because its kernel is
 //! a fraction of the frame and reaches a 52-pixel radius there — and
-//! `docs/frame-budget.md` records that, names the fix (a base computed at
+//! `docs/dev/frame-budget.md` records that, names the fix (a base computed at
 //! reduced resolution) and does not pretend otherwise. Asserting a budget the
 //! code does not meet would produce a red suite that everyone learns to ignore;
 //! asserting it on a chain that quietly excluded the expensive stage *without
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ const SOURCE: (u32, u32) = (6000, 4000);
 /// The viewport the budget is asserted at: a 16:10 desktop display.
 ///
 /// Not 4K, and the reason is worth stating. At 4K the fused chain still passes
-/// with room to spare (4.5 ms of GPU; see `docs/frame-budget.md`), but a test
+/// with room to spare (4.5 ms of GPU; see `docs/dev/frame-budget.md`), but a test
 /// that renders 8.3 M pixels a hundred times twice over is four seconds of
 /// suite time to re-establish a conclusion 4.1 M pixels already establishes.
 const VIEWPORT: (u32, u32) = (2560, 1600);
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ impl Run {
             judged <= BUDGET_MS,
             "{case} at {}x{}: p99 of {FRAMES} frames was {judged:.2} ms, over the \
              {BUDGET_MS:.0} ms budget (cpu {:.2} ms, gpu {:.2} ms, total {:.2} ms). \
-             FR-DSP-3 is what this violates; docs/frame-budget.md holds the \
+             FR-DSP-3 is what this violates; docs/dev/frame-budget.md holds the \
              numbers it used to be.",
             viewport.0,
             viewport.1,