Specify panorama merging: §3.11, D18, S15, and the design in panorama.md
A merge writes a new source file beside its sources (D18) rather than a multi-source Version, which answers the schema question §7 had been holding open for panorama, HDR merge and focus stacking together. The panorama is undeferred as FR-MRG-1 … 11; the other two stay in §7 with their data model decided. FR-MRG-10 and 11 fix where the work runs — every per-pixel stage on the GPU, the composite never held as one texture — because the output exceeds max_texture_dimension_2d before it exceeds memory. panorama.md carries the stage table, the chunked output driver, the model licences and the porting sources. S15 gates all of it. Coverage falls from 83.0% to 77.2%: thirteen requirements entered with no code, and outstanding.md §11 says so.
This commit is contained in:
+14
-1
@@ -455,7 +455,20 @@ whether something *should* be built — which is the opposite of the order §9 a
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 11. D12, which governed all of the above
|
||||
## 11. Merging — specified 2026-09-19, nothing built
|
||||
|
||||
§3.11 was written on 2026-09-19 under D18, undeferring the panorama from §7 and leaving HDR merge
|
||||
and focus stacking there with their data model decided. Eleven `FR-MRG` clauses and two `NFR-MRG`
|
||||
figures entered the register at once with no code behind any of them, which is why the coverage
|
||||
figure fell from 83.0% to 77.2% on the same day — a specification, not a regression.
|
||||
|
||||
[panorama.md](panorama.md) is the design, and its §10 is the order of work. Nothing starts before
|
||||
**S15**: whether rawler reads back a linear DNG the application writes, whether XFeat loads under
|
||||
tract at a fixed shape, whether the working-space texture can be tapped where FR-MRG-2 needs it,
|
||||
and what a chunked blend of a 100 MP composite costs on the tablet. The first two are a day each
|
||||
and either can change the design, which is the reason they come first.
|
||||
|
||||
## 12. D12, which governed all of the above
|
||||
|
||||
> **Decided 2026-09-19, by events.** The scope stands as calibrated, v1 has no date, and `(post-v1)`
|
||||
> in §7 is the one way a clause leaves the count — used for the plugin API and nothing else. The
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user