Tag the colour-independent status that was already built and unrecorded

NFR-A11Y-3 — no status conveyed by hue alone — read as untagged, and
outstanding.md said "no compliance work found". Both were wrong. Five places
already implement it, and four of them name the requirement in a comment
explaining the design; what none of them had was a TRACES line.

- `histogram.rs::percentage` states clipping as a figure and keeps `<0.1%`
  distinct from `0%`, so the text cannot say "none" while the marker beside it
  is lit.
- `histogram.slint`'s ClipReadout is the other half: a marker that appears and
  disappears rather than changing tint, and the figure next to it. Either alone
  reads.
- `library.slint`'s star strip is a solid star against an outline, differing in
  shape and luminance, over an achromatic palette.
- `library.slint`'s FlagMark is a tick against a cross, and a reject also dims
  its whole cell.
- `peaking.slint`'s colour chips say "Red" and "Cyan". A control for choosing
  between hues, presented only as hues, is unusable by exactly the person most
  likely to need it.

The tag is honest about being wider than the evidence, and outstanding.md now
records both gaps. Only the clipping clause has a test that would fail if the
behaviour were removed; the three Slint components are argued rather than
asserted. And the requirement's first named example — catalog colour labels —
has no interface at all: `label` is a nullable column nothing writes or shows.
That clause is untestable rather than satisfied, and closes when the label UI
is built with a shape from the start.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

ui/dr-ui/ui/histogram.slint

@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ component Trace inherits Rectangle {
     }
 }
 
+// TRACES: NFR-A11Y-3
 // A clipping readout: a lit marker and a figure.
 //
 // **Two affordances for one fact, and NFR-A11Y-3 is why.** No status in this