57 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
dtourolle 3f8f909e41 Make the colour mixer's saturation reach muted colours
Every photograph with a colour-mixer saturation edit now renders differently:
a raised band is stronger, most of all on muted colours.

The mixer matched bands and judged saturation on scene-linear values, and
scaled chroma by the same factor whatever a colour started at. Against the
photographer's earlier exports of two looks (~90 photographs, their raws, by
encoded hue), a sky band raised by 58 there lifted muted sky blues about
2.1×; here the mixer gave 1.15×, and less in the muted tones that carry most
of a sky or a shadowed snowfield.

Bands are now matched and saturation judged on display-encoded values. A
raised band pushes muted colours hardest and tapers to nothing at full
saturation, at a gain of 3.0, which at the same value lifts muted sky blues
about as those exports did. Lowering saturation still scales every colour
alike. Hue shifts work on the same encoded colour; luminance still scales in
linear light.

The bundled presets that use the mixer, and those whose colour was tuned
against the default rendering, are rescaled to the amount of colour they
had: Vivid 1.30, Vivid warm 1.30, Vivid landscape 1.38, Vivid, strong 1.45,
Vivid portrait 1.15, Punch 1.12, Blue sky 1.08, Deep blue sky 1.12, Polariser
1.26, Blue sky, golden land 1.13 — mean CIELAB chroma over the default
rendering, on 30 raws from the library. Negative values (skin protection)
are left as written.
2026-10-04 05:28:22 -04:00
dtourolle 5ffd54ba43 Leave the profile's look table off by default
Every raw rendered through a camera profile — the library's DNGs with an
embedded profile, and CR2s given one — now renders differently: more
colourful in near-neutral tones. The profile's look table is no longer
applied unless its slider is raised; PROFILE_LOOK names the strength the
profile states.

Against the photographer's earlier exports with no look applied, the default
rendering scores the same with the look table at 100, 50 or 0 (held-out MSE
140, 140, 143), and is 9 % more colourful at 0: the table lowers the
saturation of near-neutral tones, which is exactly where the default
rendering was short of those exports. The user chose more colour.
2026-10-04 05:28:15 -04:00
dtourolle 185e134ead Describe the measured tone and vibrance in DarkRoom's own terms
The calibration commits named DarkRoom's default curve after another
product and described vibrance as doing what another editor's does at
the same value. The curve is the DNG SDK's reference, so it is called
that; vibrance is scaled to deliver the strength its value names, as
measured against the photographer's earlier exports. Two test names
follow. The measurements and where they came from are unchanged.
2026-10-03 16:41:11 -04:00
dtourolle a4ff7ec2b9 Render raws through the DNG reference curve by default, at contrast 1.5
Decides D21 by measurement. The photo gallery holds Lightroom 6 exports of
raws in the library, each carrying its Camera Raw settings; clustered by
those settings, 663 had no look applied. On 60 of them with their raws,
a third held out, the held-out MSE against Lightroom's JPEG was about 1200
for 0.20.0's sigmoid (0.7 EV darker and flatter), 224 for the DNG reference curve
after baseline exposure, and about 140 once its input is bent by 1.5/1.4
about grey.

So the curve choice defaults to the DNG reference, keeping its index (sidecars
record it), and the default contrast is 1.5. Contrast under the DNG reference curve is
now a power relative to REFERENCE_CONTRAST (1.4), where the table is
untouched; the sigmoid at that contrast still matches the retired base
curve. JPEGs are unaffected: the view transform skips a rendered source.
2026-10-03 15:54:21 -04:00
dtourolle 8294e6b59f Call the reference curve what it is, and drop wording that reads as copying
The view transform's second curve is the DNG SDK's published reference
rendering — the ACR3 default curve applied by RefBaselineRGBTone — so
it is the "DNG Reference" curve in the panel, D21 and the code, not a
name borrowed from another product. Comments and docs that justified a
choice by another editor doing it ("as their Amount", "so a
photographer arriving from it finds the name") now give the actual
reason. The Vivid presets no longer describe themselves as reaching
for another editor's look; they are DarkRoom's own.

Factual mentions stay: which program wrote the library's DNGs, what
was measured against, and preset import. camera-profiles.md gains §15,
on starting a photograph from the edit it already carries.
2026-10-03 14:22:49 -04:00
dtourolle 1e8594724e Keep the sigmoid as the default curve; Camera Raw's tone is a choice
The Camera Raw default rested on comparing against Lightroom previews
of photographs that carry the user's Lightroom edits — HSL saturation
Blue +58, Aqua +50 and more, Highlights -40, Blacks -20, in every
DNG's XMP — so it measured the house look, not Camera Raw's base
rendering. Under the ACR3 curve _MG_9080 renders brighter than its
Lightroom preview (mean 0.39 against 0.31).

So the curve choice's first variant, the default, is the sigmoid again
and every raw renders as in 0.20.0 apart from baseline exposure. D21
and camera-profiles.md §12 now say the default is open, to be decided
by measuring against Lightroom exports of unedited photographs. Tests
that are about Camera Raw's tone choose it explicitly.
2026-10-03 14:22:48 -04:00
dtourolle db7593f3dc Render raws through Camera Raw's tone by default, after baseline exposure
The rendering half of camera-profiles.md §11-§12 (D21). The view
transform gains a curve choice — Camera Raw (the default) or D19's
sigmoid. Camera Raw converts to linear ProPhoto, clips to [0, 1], runs
the curve on the largest and smallest channel and places the middle
one at its old fraction between them (RefBaselineRGBTone), and
converts back: hue kept, saturation raised where the curve is steep,
which is where Adobe Standard's look desaturated. White sets the input
scale (1 at its default, so sensor white is display white) and
contrast bends the input about grey (1 at its default).

The curve rides in the profile buffer after the tables: the profile's
own, else the ACR3 default, which the placeholder every profile-less
source binds also carries — so a CR2 with no .dcp still gets Camera
Raw's tone. Baseline exposure is a gain folded into the rendering
matrix at upload; RawImage::color_matrix stays the file's for the
merge's linear DNG.

camera_raw::apply_reference is the CPU statement; GPU tests hold the
shader to it on 256 colours and on greys against the ACR3 table. The
sigmoid's own tests now choose it explicitly.
2026-10-03 14:22:47 -04:00
dtourolle 38d414912c Read baseline exposure and profile tone curves; carry the ACR3 curve
The decoding half of camera-profiles.md §11-§12. RawImage gains
baseline_exposure: the file's BaselineExposure plus the chosen
profile's BaselineExposureOffset, as the DNG SDK sums them (+0.25 for
the library's 6D DNGs). A profile copied out of a DNG carries that
DNG's baseline as its offset, so the body's CR2s, which have none,
land at the same total.

ProfileTables gains the profile's ProfileToneCurve, resampled at
decode onto 1025 points with a natural cubic spline; an identity curve
counts as none. dr-types now holds Camera Raw's ACR3 default curve,
RawTherapee's adobe_camera_raw_default_curve copied value for value,
for every raw whose profile has no curve. Nothing renders through
either yet.
2026-10-03 14:22:46 -04:00
dtourolle c02b401a9a Apply a camera profile's HueSatMap and LookTable after exposure
The second half of D20: a camera_profile scene operation at order 25
that converts working colour into linear ProPhoto, runs the DNG SDK's
HSV lookup through the HueSatMap and then the LookTable, and converts
back. Hue and saturation do not change under the uniform gains before
it, so a 2.5-D HueSatMap gives the same answer as straight after the
matrix, and the look sees the photographer's exposure as it does in
the SDK. Two departures for scene-referred values: value is not
clamped on the way out, and a colour outside ProPhoto passes through.

The operation holds only the switch (on by default) and a look
strength of 0-200 %. It is composed while the switch is on — a new
Operation::composes() separates "does something" from "moved from the
defaults", so an untouched raw renders through its profile and still
writes nothing. The tables come from the source: dr-gpu uploads the
ones DemosaicedImage carries into a storage buffer at @binding(8),
whose two-entry header tells the fragment whether there is anything to
apply, and binds a header of zeros for every other source.

apply_reference is the lookup on the CPU. The GPU test holds the
shader to it over 256 colours, through synthetic tables strong enough
that a wrong index shows, and through the library's real Adobe
Standard tables when the 6D DNG is present.
2026-10-02 22:38:06 -04:00
dtourolle affdaecaee Stop describing a base curve the pipeline no longer has
D19 retired the per-body base curve, moved the matrix ahead of the
edits and the film into the view transform's place, but a dozen doc
comments still listed the curve among what a pixel passes through, or
said the film skipped it. The detail stage's module doc still drew the
matrix after the edits and the last detail pass encoding, which the
view pass took over. The film crate's README gave the base curves as
its reason for being data, and the ops README's list of hand-written
nodes had neither the view transform nor three of the five kernels.

FR-MRG-2 gave the base curve as why the merge cuts below the profile;
the view transform is why now. The decision table still said colour
defaults were a per-body curve, and FR-DEV-3j said only the default
view transform skips a JPEG, where the node skips one whatever its
sliders say. frame-budget.md records the view pass as unmeasured.
2026-09-27 19:42:41 -04:00
dtourolle 0682d05f95 Let the tone curve continue past 1.0, and test that nothing clips
The tone curve clamped its input to [0, 1] and its output back to 1.0
around a 2.2 gamma, mid-chain — master and per-channel both. So any
edit with a curve made every scene value above 1.0 the same number
before the view transform ever saw it: D19's fourth finding. Beyond its
last point the curve now continues along its last span, whose secant
is the tangent the spline already gives that point, so the join is
smooth and an identity curve stays the identity to any height. The only
clamp left is the floor at zero, where there is no light to curve.

FR-DEV-2's acceptance test is how the rule stays true.
`scene_referred_until_the_view` wraps every point operation, at
non-neutral settings, between a gain of sixteen and one of a
sixty-fourth, with an identity in the view transform's place, and
renders a ramp from 0.4 to 15.2 times sensor saturation through it. The
output must still increase with the input and still separate the top of
the ramp. Run against the previous commit's tone curve it fails with
[21, 29, 33, 33, 33, 33, 33, 33]; every other operation already passed.
It renders on a device because dr-pipeline has none, and the spec's
pointer to it says so.
2026-09-27 16:52:55 -04:00
dtourolle 657f8f19ff Develop the film last, in the view transform's place
A film stock ran at order 25, after white balance and exposure, and
everything after it — contrast, the curves, the colour mixer, the
grading, every mask layer's tone — acted on the film's display-referred
output, as though the frame had been scanned and then worked on. That
was a display-referred rendering in the middle of the chain, which D19
removes (FR-DEV-3f, FR-DEV-3j).

`film_sim` is now in `Stage::View` beside `view_transform`. While a
stock is loaded the composer emits it in the view transform's place and
not the sigmoid; otherwise the sigmoid. So every edit is a decision
about the exposure the negative receives, and the film is the last
thing that happens to the picture — after the detail stage too, in the
view pass, which already binds the film's tables, the mask array and
the grain's source position. Its per-layer settings blend there as they
did in the fused pass.

`op_renders` goes: a rendering is chosen, not suppressed, and the only
render with no view transform is the camera-space tap. The YAML order
moves to 190 so the panel reads in pipeline order; the stage, not the
number, is what places it.

Existing edits that combine a stock with tone or colour operations now
render differently: those operations used to act on the print, and now
act on the scene.
2026-09-27 16:52:55 -04:00
dtourolle c07f81edcb Run the view transform after the detail stage, in a pass of its own
The fused pass stops at "linear working values" when a sharpener, a
blur or a repair follows, and the detail passes convolve what it hands
on. Until now it handed on the rendering: the base curve, and since the
last commit the view transform, ran before the store. So every kernel
worked on display-referred values while its comments promised the
opposite — D19's second finding.

A fused pass composed for a detail stage now stops before the view
transform, and carries a second shader, `ComposedShader::view`, composed
from the same inputs. It runs the same prologue, for the positions a
fragment reads (a film's grain seeds from `source_px`) and the corners
it blacks out, takes its colour from the detail stage's result bound
where the sample cache would be, and runs the view transform, the
output transform and the mask reveal. `render_detailed` dispatches it
after the last detail pass, in the same encoder.

So no detail pass encodes any more. Every pass writes an intermediate,
the last one included, which retires three things that existed only to
make the last pass encode: `writes_output` and the runner's second
layout, the body-less resolve pass for an active kernel with nothing to
draw at this scale, and capture sharpening's pass-through, which now
emits no pass at all. An empty chain is a whole render: the view pass
reads the fused result directly. The detail stage no longer takes an
output space either, so `compose_detail_for` folds into
`compose_detail` and the space is named once, on the fused half.

The cost is one full-render read and write per frame when a detail
stage exists, and a third intermediate for a one-pass chain.
2026-09-27 16:52:54 -04:00
dtourolle 92afaebd34 Make the view transform an operation the photographer can set
FR-DEV-3j gives the view transform two controls, contrast and the white
point in stops above middle grey, persisted and held per mask layer like
any other setting. A scene-referred pipeline whose white point cannot be
moved hands the photographer a shoulder they cannot place.

`view_transform` is a hand-written node in `Stage::View`, a new stage
the composer emits last and emits whatever the node's state: a neutral
operation is otherwise left out of the shader, but a photograph with no
view transform is a scan. "Active" keeps meaning "moved from the
defaults", so an untouched photograph writes nothing for it and
`every_node_starts_neutral` still holds. A caller whose chain holds no
view operation gets a default one.

The composer's loop becomes an ordered list of steps — camera nodes, the
matrix, scene nodes, layer-only nodes, the view — so each is emitted in
exactly one place. The base curve could not be a node because it
belonged to the camera; the ops README records why that argument went
with it (D19). The panel shows it in the Light group as "Tone Mapping".

Tests that counted the blocks of a neutral graph now count one, the
view transform, and the two chain-wide tests that load a film expect the
view transform to be absent, since a stock replaces it.
2026-09-27 16:52:54 -04:00
dtourolle db7b84795c Convert to the working space before the edits, not after
Every point operation ran in camera RGB and the camera matrix came after
them all, against the order ARCH §5.2 draws. So `luminance()` applied
Rec.709 weights to a body's own primaries, a band in the colour mixer
was a different hue on every make of sensor, and the vibrance skin guard
tested channel order in a space where skin does not have one.

Operations now declare a `Stage`. White balance is the only camera-stage
node — its multipliers scale the sensor's channels, and after a matrix
that mixes them the same numbers are a different correction — and says
so with `stage: camera` in its YAML, a key both the build-time generator
and the load-time declared op read. The composer emits the camera nodes,
then the matrix, then the rest, each group in graph order; an empty
chain still gets the matrix.

Film simulation stops converting out of camera space itself, since it is
now handed working-space colour like every other scene node. The base
curve stays where it was, after the operations, and so now acts on
working-space colour; the next commit replaces it (D19).
2026-09-27 16:52:53 -04:00
dtourolle 6b99f67f47 Develop a mask layer's film on its own settings
A layer offered the film's sliders and they moved nothing: its copy of
the node was never given the stock, so it stayed inactive. Film now
works in a layer the way the other adjustments do, as offsets to the
photograph's settings, but blended as settings rather than as results,
since a film is a rendering and cross-fading two developments is not
what a region on a pushed film looks like.

- dr-film bakes no slider. Exposure is a gain in the shader; push
  interpolates the stock's measured processes, one curve row each; the
  print is split at the paper's log exposure, so print exposure is an
  addition between two lookups and exact at any setting. The enlarger
  stays balanced at the photograph's exposure.
- film_sim reads all four settings as uniforms, format one-hot over a
  grain count per format, so every uniform is linear in what it does.
- Operation::blends_settings lets the composer average each overlapping
  layer's uniforms with the global ones by mask weight, the global
  setting taking whatever weight the layers leave, and run the fragment
  once. Three layers at full weight give the mean of their settings.
- The stock picker is hidden on a layer. Only the photograph's exposure
  re-solves the print balance; push, print exposure and format need no
  rebake at all now.
2026-09-26 23:29:13 -04:00
dtourolle bee5c5866f Erode dehaze's window in one pass per axis, and recover in the second
Dehaze cost 22.9 ms of a 2560x1600 frame on the reference laptop RTX 3050,
and 54.1 ms at 3840x2160, with the memory clock held at 810 MHz by the power
cap (graphics 1762 MHz). It ran five passes: a run and a span erosion along
x, the same along y, and the recovery. At those clocks a detail pass costs
what it reads and writes, not what it taps: a pass with an empty body -
one render-sized rgba16float read and write - measured 4.0 ms, and each
dehaze pass 4.4-4.6 ms, so the taps were about 2 ms of the 22 and the four
hand-offs between passes were the rest.

Each axis is now one pass that takes the minimum over the whole window
directly, and the recovery rides in the y pass, which already holds the
veil and the pixel's own colour. That is 36 texture reads per pixel at
2560x1600 in place of 12, nearly all of them cache hits, and two passes in
place of five.

The picture is the same bits. A minimum is exact in any order, and the
window is the one Split always covered, the surplus pixel on the far side
included (Split::first and Split::width). The veil crossing the removed
hand-offs was already exactly representable in rgba16float - a minimum of
channels read from rgba16float, floored at zero - so storing it between
passes never rounded anything that the fused form now keeps unrounded.

Measured with a scratch probe that renders the synthetic 60 MP frame from
examples/frame_budget.rs, only a detail parameter moving so the fused pass
is reused, 30 frames per scene after six of warm-up, five runs of each
binary alternated, median of the per-run p50:

  scene                   before     after
  dehaze      2560 fit    22.88 ms    9.06 ms
  dehaze      2560 1:1    23.41 ms    9.52 ms
  dehaze      3840 fit    54.09 ms   28.12 ms
  all detail  2560 fit    53.11 ms   39.97 ms  (NR, sharpen, clarity,
  all detail  2560 1:1    67.48 ms   56.42 ms   texture, dehaze)
  every op    2560 fit    57.59 ms   44.19 ms  (with film)
  every op    2560 1:1    71.83 ms   57.93 ms
  controls without dehaze (NR, sharpen, clarity, texture): within +-2%

The rgba8 output hashed identically before and after for every scene -
dehaze alone, all five detail operations, every operation with film, and
each other detail operation alone - at fit and 1:1, at 2560x1600,
3840x2160, 1917x1203 and 333x211: 64 of 64.
2026-09-26 14:18:42 -04:00
dtourolle 84fade99ec Put the developer docs under docs/dev and index the folder for users first
docs/ had 26 developer documents flat beside the manual, and the two
audiences are very differently sized: most readers want the manual and
the gesture reference, a few want the register, the designs and the
measurements. The manual and gestures.md stay at the top; everything for
someone changing the code moves to docs/dev/, and the two documents that
name their own successors — the v0.1 milestone and the UI-refinement plan
— go to docs/dev/archive/ rather than being deleted, since both are still
cited. docs/README.md is the index, users first.

Every reference follows: code comments, Cargo manifests, the workflows,
the pre-commit hook, the bench and traceability tools (which locate the
repo root by docs/dev/requirements.md now), packaging, the Docker READMEs,
CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md and the README. The matrix links one level
deeper and is regenerated. Links out of the moved documents into the tree
gain a level; a link checker over every Markdown file finds none broken.
2026-09-20 21:16:03 +02:00
dtourolle 81b1ae8c42 Measure the haze from the picture, and divide it back out
Four files named dehaze as a member of the compositional detail family —
`detail.rs` twice, `dr-gpu`'s detail module, `ops/README.md` and
`capture_sharpen.rs` — and no such node existed. Every one of them was
describing the family by listing clarity, texture and a control the
photographer could not reach.

Haze is the one degradation the controls already in the chain cannot
remove, and the reason is spatial rather than tonal. Scattering
composites an airlight over the scene in proportion to distance, so the
lift is per-pixel: a black point that clears the mountains crushes the
foreground, and a contrast curve that clears the mountains does the
same. So the node has to estimate the transmission at every pixel, which
is the dark-channel prior — the local minimum over the channels and over
a patch is the airlight that has been added there — and then invert the
scattering model with it.

The airlight is taken as neutral and as unit, which removes the one part
of the published method this stage cannot perform. Estimating it
properly is a whole-frame reduction, and the detail chain has none: it
hands each pass the pass before it. It is also unnecessary, because
white balance is the first node in the chain and has already driven the
illuminant to grey, so only the magnitude is unknown — and an unknown
magnitude on the veil is a scale factor on the amount slider, which the
photographer is setting by eye regardless.

The patch is a fraction of the frame's shorter edge, through
`RenderScale::frame_fraction`, and never a count of pixels. It has to be
wide enough to contain something dark and narrow enough that what it
measures is still local, and both of those are statements about how much
of the composition it covers — so it must cover the same proportion of
the picture on a proxy as in the export, or the file is sharpened for a
patch three times narrower than the one that was tuned on screen.

Affording it needs an identity a Gaussian does not have. Erosions
compose by adding their structuring elements, so the minimum over a run
of d followed by the minimum over k points spaced d apart is the exact
minimum over the whole kd window. At the square root that is 16 taps
rather than 61 at 4K, and it is the same filter rather than an
approximation of one — which is the difference from the strided kernel
`local_contrast` refuses, where sampling an image that is not
band-limited aliases into the base and comes back as mottling.

It runs first among the compositional detail nodes, at order 125: after
noise reduction, because dividing by a transmission below one amplifies
the noise in the veiled distance by exactly the factor it recovers the
contrast by, and before clarity and texture, coarse before fine, so that
their base is computed on the picture the veil has left rather than on a
modelling about to be divided out.

What it cannot honour is the placement dehaze most wants. It shifts
colour — it subtracts a grey term and rescales, so saturation changes
wherever the veil is thick — and the colour work would ideally be
correcting the picture that leaves here. The detail stage runs as a
group after every point operation, because a neighbourhood pass is a
separate dispatch over a texture the fused pass has finished writing, so
an order placing this node ahead of `vibrance` would be a lie the chain
cannot tell. Interleaving would mean splitting the fused pass in half
around it, at the cost of a second full-frame dispatch and intermediate
for every edit in the catalogue whether it dehazes or not. The
declaration records that rather than leaving it to be rediscovered.

FR-DEV-18 is added to the requirements register alongside it. The tag
had nowhere to point, and an orphan tag fails the traceability gate
rather than quietly counting for nothing.
2026-09-06 19:01:47 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 e235e99cce Move the film to Effect in the descriptor that is actually read
An earlier commit claimed to move `film_sim` from `[tone, colour]` to
`[effect]` and did not. It edited `ops/film_sim.yaml`, where `attributes:` is
read, validated against the vocabulary, and then dropped: a `rust:` node
publishes its own descriptor, and the type still said tone and colour. The
stock went on appearing in the Light group beside exposure and again in Colour
beside white balance, exactly as before, and every test passed.

Nothing caught it because nothing could. The declaration parsed, the parity
tests compare ids rather than attributes, and an operation filed under the
wrong groups renders perfectly. It surfaced only on screen, as a missing
Effects tab — which is indistinguishable from a category that genuinely has
nothing in it, and is precisely how `Optics` looked for as long as it was
empty.

So three changes rather than one:

`FilmSim`'s descriptor declares `Attribute::Effect`, which is the move the
earlier commit described.

`attributes:` joins the keys a `rust:` node may not carry, beside `params`,
`uniforms`, `wgsl`, `helpers`, `define` and `label`. The rule was already
written — "its descriptor comes from the type" — and attributes were the one
field that slipped past it. A key that is silently ignored is worse than one
that is rejected, because it reads as though it worked; the eight hand-written
declarations lose a line that never did anything.

And a test asserts that every attribute the chain carries reaches the tab
strip. That is the property that was actually broken, and its failure mode is
invisible from every direction: the controls exist, they are in the shader,
and there is no way to filter to them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 18:28:59 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 c4ddcbe0f7 Look the lens up and say plainly whether one was found
`dr-lens` has held a complete Lensfun lookup — distortion, TCA and vignetting
coefficients from a lens name, a focal length and an aperture — with no
dependents anywhere in the workspace. The three corrections it feeds now
exist in the graph, so this connects the two and finishes the chain.

The coefficient structs stay duplicated. `dr-pipeline` is organised around
having no dependencies so its codegen is testable without a device or a
database (ARCH §6.5a), and `dr-lens` carries an XML parser and 5.5 MB of
profile data. Neither crate can convert to the other, so the conversion goes
above both, in `develop.rs`, which is the only place that sees them together.

Both traits grow the same defaulted door. The optical corrections do not sit
on the same side of the fetch — distortion and CA rewrite coordinates and are
`Warp`s, vignetting applies a gain to the pixel already there and is an
ordinary node — and fanning a profile out by which trait each happens to
implement would make the caller reason about that distinction. Each correction
takes its own share of the whole profile instead, and `set_lens_profile` walks
both lists identically.

The lookup happens in `set_source_metadata` rather than in its caller, because
that is the one place a session is told which file it came from. Doing it
there makes it unforgettable, in the shape `FilmRebake` already uses for the
other derived thing — and, more to the point, makes *clearing* unforgettable:
a session that opened a second photograph while still holding the first one's
profile would correct it for the wrong optics, invisibly, in a way that looks
exactly like the lens.

It needs the whole shot and not just a name. Distortion is interpolated across
a zoom's focal range and vignetting depends strongly on aperture — a fast
prime can be two stops down in the corners wide open and clean by f/8 — so a
lookup missing either returns coefficients measured for a shot nobody took.
Missing any of the three refuses rather than guesses.

A profile is derived, not persisted: it comes from the file's EXIF and a
database, so it is not a parameter, not in the sidecar and not undoable. What
is an edit is the manual trim beside it, which each correction composes with
the measurement — so a photographer can lean on it, override it, or work
without one.

`InfoPanel` gains a lens line, and it distinguishes three cases rather than
two. `dr-lens` states the rule it exists for: an automatic correction that
silently did nothing is worse than one the user can see is unavailable. A
session with no header draws nothing, a header naming no lens reads "Lens not
recorded", and a lens the database has never heard of reads "· no profile".
Collapsing the last two would send somebody hunting for a profile that was
never missing — which, for third-party and adapted glass, is the ordinary case.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 15:11:32 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 e17b909d41 Connect the lens vignetting correction to the pipeline
`ops/vignetting.rs` has carried a complete descriptor, polynomial, helper
and test suite without an entry in `ops/`, so it was never in `chain()`.
It reached no photograph and no panel, and `Attribute::Optics` was an empty
category in consequence — filtered out of the tab strip for having no rows,
by a chain that had never been given its only member.

Declaring it needs the one thing the operation was written against and
which did not exist. `wgsl_body` reads `radius`, and the module claimed
"the composer publishes `radius` in the shader prologue for exactly this
reason". It did not. `sample_source` now does, in both sampling branches,
beside the `source_px` it already published for the same class of caller.

It is corner-normalised there, which is the part that is easy to leave out.
`p` spans ±0.5·aspect, so its length at the corner is 0.5·length(aspect) —
about 0.901 on a 3:2 frame, not 1. Lensfun's polynomials are fitted against
a corner radius of 1, so passing `length(p)` straight in evaluates every one
of them short of where it was measured, by a factor that changes with the
aspect ratio. It would have read as a correction that is simply too weak,
which is indistinguishable from a bad profile. Both `lens.rs` and
`framing.rs` asserted the normalisation `p` does not have; corrected.

`order: 5` puts the correction ahead of the tonal stages, and the ordering
is load-bearing rather than tidy. Recovering a corner means dividing by an
attenuation below one — about two stops for a fast prime wide open — so run
after the highlights have been rolled off and clipped, the lift has nowhere
to go and the corners posterise instead of brightening.

`layer_chain` now drops `Optics` as well as the neighbourhood operations.
A local vignetting slider would have worked, which is what makes it worth
excluding: `radius` measures from the centre of the whole photograph and a
mask cannot move the optical axis, so it would lay a frame-centred radial
ramp across the picture and multiply it by the mask. The existing exclusion
covers operations that move and do nothing; this one covers an operation
that moves and does something its name does not promise. The rule both
share is now written down.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 14:34:24 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 bff95e25ad Let clarity's base be computed where it is still fully determined
Clarity's Gaussian sigma is 1.2% of the frame's shorter edge, so its radius
is a property of the viewport: 52 render pixels at 4K, two separable passes
of 105 taps each over 8.3 M pixels. That measured 33.9 ms — seven times the
entire fused point chain, for one slider — and is docs/technical-debt.md TD-4.

A detail pass may now declare `output_scale`, and clarity's base is computed
on a grid a quarter the size on each axis.

The pass that combines needs the blur *and* the full-resolution colour, and a
colour that has been through a quarter-scale target is no longer full
resolution. So a scaled pass cannot simply join the ping-pong: there are two
chains now. The full-resolution one carries the colour and no scaled pass
touches it; the reduced one carries the base and reaches the combining pass
through a second binding as `reduced_at()`.

The reduce is a dispatch of its own rather than something the first blur half
does on the way past, and that is the whole difference between this and the
strided kernel the module documentation rules out. A stride samples an image
that is not band-limited and aliases high-frequency content down into the
base, which is then subtracted, and arrives in the output as mottling across
smooth gradients. This band-limits first and samples after. What is discarded
is content the base could not represent at any resolution, because a Gaussian
at sigma = 26 px holds nothing above one cycle per 26 px and the quarter-scale
grid carries one per 8 — so the reduced base is not an approximation of the
full-resolution one, it is the same function sampled where it is still
determined.

Which is also why the scale belongs to the band rather than to the stage.
Texture's sigma is a decade finer, so the reduce pass's own box would be wider
than the Gaussian it was prefiltering; texture never reduces. And clarity
steps 4 -> 2 -> 1 as sigma falls, because a quarter of a small sigma is not a
Gaussian either — the case that gives up is the one that was already cheap.

`radius` stays in each pass's own pixels and `ComposedDetail::radius` multiplies
it back up, so 13 reduced pixels at scale 4 still report the 52 render pixels a
tile would have to be grown by. The halo a scheduler sees does not move.

The halo tests pass unchanged, which was TD-4's stated bar; they render at
1024 px and so exercise the reduced path rather than stepping around it. Added
`crossing_the_reduction_threshold_does_not_change_the_picture`, because
nothing yet compared the reduced form against a *less* reduced one — every
other test measures one form against itself. It renders the same edit either
side of the 4 -> 2 step-down and holds the peak excursion to 0.03 stops and
the reach to 2% of the frame.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 13:12:29 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 0c3b8cb1c4 Hand out descriptors a declaration could produce
`Operation::descriptor()` returned `&'static OpDescriptor`, and that lifetime
is the whole reason a build-time node is free and a run-time node is
impossible: only a compile-time literal can satisfy it, so no amount of
reading `ops/*.yaml` at startup could ever produce a descriptor the rest of
the application would accept. FR-PLG-2 says a bundled operation and a
third-party plugin are the same kind of thing, differing only in where the
file was found — and a lifetime outsiders cannot meet is exactly the second,
weaker format that requirement forbids.

So a descriptor is now owned and handed out as `Arc<OpDescriptor>`, with `Vec`
where it held `&'static` slices. `Arc` rather than a `&self`-borrowed
reference because the callers want to *keep* it: the develop panel collects
descriptors and then mutates the graph, and a borrow would tie the
descriptor's lifetime to a borrow of the operation it came from, which is the
one thing `&'static` was doing right.

The identifier newtypes deliberately did not follow. `ParamId` is `Copy`, is
compared in `match` arms against generated constants, is a map key in the
sidecar and history, and reaches Slint model rows; an `Arc<str>` there would
cost a refcount on every one of those and would take `match id { EXPOSURE =>
.. }` away from the generated code. They gain an interner instead, which is
honest about its lifetime rather than pretending to one — the set of ids is
bounded by deduplication and is process-lifetime by construction, because the
sidecar on disk names its parameters and an id has to stay resolvable for as
long as any edit naming it can be opened.

No behaviour changes. Every descriptor that was a `static` is a `LazyLock`
initialiser now, `Operation::helpers` borrows from `self` instead of being
`'static` so a future run-time node can own its list, and `Warp` and `Framing`
follow `Operation` so there is one shape rather than two.

The one place a descriptor is read per frame is `compose_full`, which takes
`descriptor().id` to prefix each active operation's uniforms, and `dr-ui`
composes on every frame it draws. That is a dozen atomic increments beside a
composition that is already building several kilobytes of WGSL on the same
call; it is noted at the trait method rather than left for a profiler to find.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 19:02:25 +02:00
dtourolle e0cb968e04 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree-spot-removal
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 2s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 2s
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 20m9s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 39s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 26s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Failing after 33m10s
# Conflicts:
#	docs/traceability.md
2026-08-26 21:56:32 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 e14bc34a9e Ask which frame this was taken on, because grain is enlargement
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 19m6s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 28s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Failing after 26s
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 2s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Failing after 33m7s
A crystal is a fixed size in micrometres. How grainy a photograph looks is
therefore not a property of the emulsion alone -- it is film size against
output size, and the frame is the half a digital file cannot supply.

This assumed 35 mm for everything. The same emulsion on 4x5 averages about
3,800 crystals into the pixel that holds 300 on 35 mm, so it renders roughly
3.5 times smoother at the same print; every large-format photograph was being
rendered as grainy as a half-frame.

`Format` now carries the real image widths -- the gate, not the nominal inches,
since a "4x5" exposes about 121 mm -- and the film node asks for it. It is a
genuinely fixed list, unlike the stocks, so it is a declared `enum` parameter
and gets its control, its sidecar entry and its undo step for nothing.

It is also the first enum in the develop chain, and it broke two tests by
being one. A row has to compare equal to itself across two builds or
`sync_rows` replaces it on every parameter event -- destroying the elements
built from it, including whichever TouchArea holds the current gesture, so the
format picker would have fought every slider drag in the panel. `ModelRc`
compares by identity and the row built a fresh choices model each call.

`no_choices` already shares one empty model for exactly this reason, and the
build site already said "see no_choices for why the identity matters". The fix
follows it: memoise the model per variant list. Curve rows solve the same
problem the other way, writing values through the existing model, which is not
needed here -- a variant list is fixed at compile time, so one model can serve
forever.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 21:47:19 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 5323608051 Draw the repairs, before anything sharpens what they removed
A spot set now composes detail passes of its own, one per round, and they
go ahead of every operation's kernel. That placement is the decision worth
recording: a sharpening pass reads a neighbourhood, so sharpening a dust
mark before removing it smears its edge into pixels the repair's disc does
not cover, and what survives is a faint over-sharpened ring around an
otherwise perfect patch. It also disagrees with ARCH §5.2, which draws
spot removal after clarity — docs/spot-removal.md §5.1 is where that is
argued out.

Every length reaching the shader is in render pixels, converted here where
the framing is in scope. Both the centre and the source go through
`Framing::output_at` — the same map the fused pass applies to every pixel
— so a rotated photograph rotates the offset with no trigonometry, and the
radius is found by mapping a point one radius above the centre and
measuring, rather than by multiplying by a ratio this function has no
business knowing about. The tests turn and crop the frame and expect the
mark to stay gone, which is the property that arrangement buys.

compose_full now takes the spot set, because a photograph with a repair
and no sharpening still has a detail stage: a fused pass that encoded its
own output there would quantise twice and bind to a texture of the wrong
format. compose_detail_for takes the source size for the same kind of
reason — a RenderScale describes the region on screen, and a spot is
stored against the photograph.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 20:17:51 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 6997c0f7ac Let a detail pass carry a list, not only a kernel
Every neighbourhood pass so far has been a convolution, whose whole
description fits in the uniform block because its structure fixes how many
numbers it needs. Spot removal is not that shape: sixty-four repairs and
one repair are the same shader with a different buffer behind it.

So a pass may declare `storage`, which arrives at binding 3 as
`array<vec4<f32>>` with `arrayLength` in scope. The alternative — packing
the list into uniforms — needs a fixed maximum paid for on every frame, a
composer that can emit vec4 fields because a uniform array's stride is 16
whatever it holds, and it gives the next operation that wants a table
nothing to build on.

The property worth having is what stays out of the generated source: the
count is in the buffer, so placing the tenth spot uploads 512 bytes and
reuses the compiled pipeline, exactly as moving a slider does for the
fused pass. `changing_the_list_does_not_recompile` is that, asserted.

One bind group entry rather than two more layouts, and one placeholder
buffer allocated in `new` rather than sixteen bytes per pass per frame —
a zero-length storage buffer cannot be bound, and per-frame allocation is
what this module's documentation exists to refuse.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 20:00:24 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 ce6458547a Develop longer, from the measurements rather than from a contrast slider
Pushing was not a thing to simulate. It was measured data being thrown
away: Double-X and 2302 each ship five characteristic curves, one per
development time, and this shipped the 6.5-minute column and discarded
four. All five now ship and interpolate.

The axis is real. Double-X runs 4 to 12 minutes, and across it the average
gradient goes 0.472 to 1.034 while Dmax goes 1.19 to 2.56.

The control is in stops, because that is what a photographer means, and one
stop is a factor of about 1.41 in time. That mapping is checked rather than
assumed: against Double-X's own axis it lands within 2% of the 9-minute
column for +1, and near 12 minutes for +2, which are the times the datasheet
gives for exactly that. There is a test.

**Pushing must not recover shadow detail, and this does not.** Across the
whole measured range the speed point moves about a third of a stop while the
gradient doubles; three stops under mid-grey, density goes from 0.008 to
0.035, which is still nothing. Developing longer multiplies what was already
recorded and cannot record what never hit the film. A push built as added
exposure or global contrast brightens those shadows instead and looks
convincing until someone who shoots film sees it, so that property has a
test of its own.

Interpolated in *log* time, because development is multiplicative: 4 to 5
minutes is the same amount of push as 9 to 12, and interpolating linearly
would bunch the control at one end. Clamped at both ends, because past the
published range there is no data and extrapolating a contrast curve invents
an emulsion nobody tested. A stock measured at one process ignores the
control entirely rather than inventing a curve for it -- Portra 800's pushes
are separate *measured* profiles, which is the honest way to offer those.

Costs nothing per pixel and changes no shader. The curves are a per-stock
table, so the interpolation happens on the CPU at bake time, where choosing a
stock and moving its sliders already rebakes. The Vulkan shader is untouched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 17:35:25 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 4b2ee0ac50 Count the silver instead of adding noise
An emulsion is a suspension of crystals. Light sensitises some; development
turns a sensitised one opaque, all or nothing. So a patch of film's density
is a *count* of developed grains, and a count of independent yes/no events
has a variance whether or not anyone wanted texture:

    mean     = D
    variance = D * (Dmax - u * D) / N

That expression is the whole feature. It peaks in the middle of the density
range and vanishes at both ends -- clear film has nothing developed to vary,
black film has nothing left to develop -- so grain lives in the midtones as a
consequence rather than as a "midtone bias" slider.

I was wrong earlier that this needs the detail stage. Nothing in it reads a
neighbouring pixel; the only reason to move it was that grain must be fixed in
film space rather than screen space, and that solves itself: N is grains *per
pixel*, so it scales with the film a pixel covers. Zoom out, each pixel
averages more grains, less variance -- correct, with nothing super-sampled and
nothing filtered. It stays in the fused pass.

Grain goes on the density and *before* the dye, which is the physical order
and not cosmetic. Perturbing the finished colour -- what an effect does --
tints highlights wrong, because that noise never passes through the dye.

Crystal habit lives in `rms_granularity`, the number every datasheet
publishes, now a profile field. It measures exactly what differs between a
cubic emulsion and a tabular one: at equal speed, tabular crystals present
more area per unit silver, so the film reads finer. Delta 100 is quoted near 9
where HP5 is near 12, and that gap *is* the habit. Adding a stock whose grain
is its whole reputation is therefore editing one line, not writing a model.

Three things this cost, all of them worth writing down:

  - The default granularity is a colour negative's, blue coarsest. Applied to
    Tri-X it put *colour* speckle on a black and white photograph. Monochrome
    stocks collapse it at parse, where every other per-layer table is already
    replicated from the one measured channel.
  - Helpers cannot read uniforms. The composer prefixes a uniform with its
    operation's id and rewrites references inside a fragment body only;
    helpers are shared and deduplicated, so a bare `gn0` names nothing.
    `film_lut` already took its size as an argument for this reason, and now
    says so.
  - The end-to-end test compares the shader against the CPU model, and grain
    is stochastic, so that comparison now runs with grain off. Which means a
    grain that never left the CPU would look exactly like a passing suite --
    hence a second test that grain off is bit-identical, one grain per pixel
    moves it, and ten thousand move it less.

Not here, deliberately: no grain slider. The parameters are physical and
`rms_granularity` is the honest place to scale one from, but its range wants
choosing rather than guessing. Nor a film format -- 35 mm is assumed, and
medium format at the same stock is far less grainy per unit of picture.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 10:08:51 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 3b5952769b Emit floats an f32 can hold, and drop the format! that formats nothing
CI runs cargo fmt --check and clippy -D warnings, and this branch had
never been through either. Both would have failed it.

The bulk was the generated colour tables: eight significant figures where
an f32 carries about 7.2, so the eighth is noise that rounds away at
compile time and clippy's excessive_precision says so 109 times over.
Fixed in the generator rather than only in the file, so it stays fixed --
and the file is trimmed in place rather than re-derived, because
regenerating it needs a colour-science stack that has nothing to do with
the defect.

The format! in the composer is mine too, from extracting the rendering
tail: the braces in it were escaped because the text used to live inside a
larger template, and once extracted the escapes are noise and the call
formats nothing.

Also here, and clearly not mine: an unused import and a shadowed binding
in dr-gpu, and an unused import in a test. They are pre-existing --
clippy has been failing on master before this branch existed, on lints
like is_multiple_of that arrived with a toolchain rather than with
anyone's code. Fixed because CI cannot go green around them, and called
out because a merge commit is a bad place to quietly edit someone else's
crate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 22:28:14 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 baa8957e80 Let a photographer choose the film, and remember which one
The stock model rendered correctly and nothing could ask for it. This is
the picker, and the sidecar key that makes the choice outlive the session.

How the choice persists was the open question, and the answer was already
written down twice in sidecar.rs: `rating` is a top-level key "because a
rating is not an edit", and `masks` are one "because a layer is not a
scalar". A stock is that kind of thing -- a choice of material, not a
number a slider moves -- so it is a top-level key too.

It stores the **id**, not an index. Stocks are files that users add, so an
index would mean installing a profile silently changed which film every
existing photograph had been developed on. A name this build has no
profile for still round-trips untouched, because the alternative is that
syncing to an older phone quietly un-develops the picture.

Only the names travel. Turning one back into tables needs the profile
database, which dr-pipeline deliberately does not link, so `Version::apply`
clears the film and the session re-bakes -- after the parameters, because
the bake reads the film's own exposure sliders and the print balance is
solved against them. That is also why moving those sliders rebuilds the
lookup where no other control in the panel does: an enlarger's filtration
depends on how the negative was exposed.

The panel keeps its rule. It still names no operation and still generates
every control from a declared parameter kind; the stock gets a bespoke
control beside those, exactly as the mask stack does, and for the same
reason. The film's exposure and print exposure arrive as ordinary
generated sliders.

Two defaults worth stating. Picking a colour negative prints it, because
an unprinted one is an orange strip and offering that as the first thing
somebody sees after choosing Portra reads as a bug rather than as a
choice -- the toggle is there for anyone who wants the scan. And a paste
carries no film: a preset is a parameter map, and a stock is not a
parameter, so pasting one would paste a choice the clipboard never took.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 19:57:41 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 4a2fcb6d22 Render a film stock on the GPU, and let it take over the rendering
The stock model landed in dr-film with no way to see it. This is the
pipeline node, the two texture bindings it reads, and the end-to-end test
that proves the shader agrees with the model.

The design point is that a film simulation is not an adjustment. Every
other node changes a picture; this one makes it. A stock's characteristic
curve does the camera profile's base curve's job -- from measurements
rather than from a curve somebody drew -- so running both renders the
scene twice: the camera's rendering, and then a film's rendering of that.
It looks like neither, and it reads as a colour-management bug with no
colour-management bug to find.

So `Operation::renders` is new. A node declaring it takes camera RGB and
hands back linear sRGB, and the composer emits neither the base curve nor
the conversion out of camera space. Both halves move together, and the
composer keeps them as one string precisely so that getting half of it
right is impossible.

The tables are not parameters, for the reason vignetting's coefficients
are not: they are measurements. dr-pipeline declares the layout as a plain
struct and keeps its no-dependency property; the two crates share no types
on purpose. `EditGraph::set_film_tables` offers them to every node rather
than to the one that wants them, because knowing which concrete type is
which is what the graph is organised not to know.

Bindings 4 and 5 follow the masks precedent: declared unconditionally so
one bind group layout serves every generated shader, bound to 1x1
placeholders when no stock is loaded. Both are interpolated by hand with
textureLoad -- this pipeline binds no sampler, and adding one for two
lookups would cost a binding in every shader. Uploads are keyed on content
so an unchanged stock does not push half a megabyte across the bus per
frame.

The end-to-end test earned its place immediately: it found the density
lookup being filled z-fastest while a 3D texture upload wants x-fastest,
so the red and blue axes were transposed. Green matched exactly, which is
what that bug looks like -- a plausible photograph of the wrong colour,
and one that every unit test on either side of the seam passes. dr-film
now pins the layout in a test that needs no device, and states it where
the field is declared.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 15:12:56 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 c75849040c Format the tree the way the gate asks for it
`cargo fmt --check` is a required step and had drifted across 45 files. Most of
it arrived this week: several operations were written in parallel worktrees and
merged by hand, and a hand-merge resolves conflicts without ever running the
formatter over the result.

No behaviour changes — this is `cargo fmt --all` and nothing else, kept as its
own commit so the next reader can skip it wholesale rather than search it for
one that matters.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 21:16:34 +02:00
dtourolle d800af049b Merge branch 'worktree-agent-acd27f9b2974c67eb' into integration
# Conflicts:
#	core/dr-gpu/src/adjust.rs
#	core/dr-pipeline/src/detail.rs
#	core/dr-pipeline/src/ops/mod.rs
2026-08-22 19:31:15 +02:00
dtourolle 5852e14a5c Merge branch 'worktree-agent-a75c901968abfa183' into integration
# Conflicts:
#	core/dr-gpu/src/adjust.rs
#	core/dr-pipeline/ops/README.md
#	core/dr-pipeline/src/lib.rs
#	core/dr-pipeline/src/ops/mod.rs
#	ui/dr-ui/src/develop.rs
2026-08-22 19:29:39 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 c9305fd0e6 Write out the derivation behind every kernel width these tests assert
A test that cannot be run cannot be checked by running it, and a number
copied out of a test run agrees with whatever the code did on the day.
Each asserted kernel width, tolerance and overshoot bound now carries the
arithmetic that produces it -- the shorter edge, the sigma, the
truncation at two sigmas, and where the rounding falls -- so a reader can
verify the expectation against the recipe without a GPU or a compiler.

Also records the two places where a bound is a bound and not a
measurement: the tolerance in the frame-fraction test is exactly what
rounding a kernel to a whole pixel costs on the smallest frame it uses,
and the halo test's floor and ceiling bracket a peak derived from the
step, the soft limit and the midtone taper rather than from a run.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 19:18:13 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 e44c929afc Guard the sharpening kernel against WGSL reserved keywords
The fused-fragment check in lib.rs cannot see a detail pass: it is a
separate shader composed at a resolution compose() never knows. The
kernel's own test now scans the block the composer wrapped, with comments
stripped so prose about the keyword cannot fail a test about the code.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 19:17:05 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 b321556dbe Sharpen the capture with a separable unsharp mask
Capture sharpening as a two-pass unsharp mask in the detail stage: blur
along x, then along y, each pass applying a one-dimensional high-pass to
luminance so the composite preserves a flat field exactly and matches the
textbook kernel on any locally one-dimensional edge.

The radius is stated in source pixels and converted once per render, so a
radius tuned on a fit view is the radius the exported file gets. Below one
render pixel the operation declines to draw rather than showing sharpening
the file will not contain, and emits a single pass-through that still
carries the output transform.

The develop session now renders through render_detailed, which is what
lets an active neighbourhood operation reach the screen at all.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 19:13:00 +02:00
dtourolle a9baebc396 Sync with integration 2026-08-22 19:04:27 +02:00
dtourolle 5db234bdf3 Sync with integration 2026-08-22 19:04:24 +02:00
dtourolle f78c8b6959 Sync with integration 2026-08-22 19:04:13 +02:00
dtourolle 97d4bd9061 WIP: clarity and texture
Checkpoint committed by the coordinator, not by the authoring agent: the
session hit its API limit mid-task and left this work uncommitted. Committed
so it survives, NOT because it is finished - expect failing tests and
half-applied changes. The agent resumes from here.
2026-08-22 19:01:18 +02:00
dtourolle b4e55b47c1 WIP: noise reduction
Checkpoint committed by the coordinator, not by the authoring agent: the
session hit its API limit mid-task and left this work uncommitted. Committed
so it survives, NOT because it is finished - expect failing tests and
half-applied changes. The agent resumes from here.
2026-08-22 19:01:18 +02:00
dtourolle 8ea427de3c WIP: capture sharpening
Checkpoint committed by the coordinator, not by the authoring agent: the
session hit its API limit mid-task and left this work uncommitted. Committed
so it survives, NOT because it is finished - expect failing tests and
half-applied changes. The agent resumes from here.
2026-08-22 19:01:18 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 d64a61d677 Give the tone curve a curve for each colour channel
The declaration in ops/tone_curve.yaml has claimed per-channel curves since
it was written — it is the justification for the operation carrying both
`tone` and `colour`. Only the master curve existed. This is the other three.

The master runs first and the channels grade its result. Both orders are
real images and they differ visibly, so the choice is made and written down
rather than left to the loop: a point placed on the blue curve should act on
the tone the photographer can see, which is what the master has already
produced. The other order anchors the grade to tones the master is about to
move, so adjusting contrast slides a warm shadow up into the midtones.

Every id that existed before today is spelled exactly as it was. The master
curve keeps `p2_y` and the new curves take `r_`, `g_` and `b_` prefixes, so
a sidecar written when there was one curve loads, means what it meant, and
renders the same shader — asserted on the generated source, not on the
parameter values. Nothing needed a version check because nothing was
renamed.

Each curve reaches the shader only when it has been moved off the diagonal,
so an S-curve and no colour work generates what it generated when this
operation held ten parameters instead of forty, down to the uniform names.
The monotonicity guarantee is enforced per curve: a coincident pair on blue
divides by zero exactly as thoroughly as one on the master.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 16:06:13 +02:00
dtourolle 7421837c8a Let an operation say what it is about, so the panel can group without naming
Tool tabs need a taxonomy, and the taxonomy was the problem: a table in
`ui/` mapping operation to tab breaks FR-DEV-3a, and a `group:` field risks
what `ui-refinement.md` condemned `starts-group` for — the core deciding
where the panel draws things.

`Attribute` threads the needle. It says what an operation *is* — tone,
colour, detail, optics, geometry, effect — which is the same category as
`ParamKind` and squarely on the core's side of ARCH §4.3a's line. What is
drawn, where it sits and whether it is visible stay the frontend's. There is
no attribute for "the third tab", the enum's order is declaration order
rather than screen order, and a frontend may render these as tabs, as
headings, or ignore them.

The payoff is that a tab strip can be *derived*: the groups are the
attributes present in the capability list, so the interface names no
operation and needs no table to keep in step. An operation joins the right
group by declaring what it is, which is the one thing its author is well
placed to say.

Plural, because the tone curve is genuinely both — an RGB curve is tonal and
the per-channel curves are chromatic, and filing it under one would hide it
from half the people looking for it.

Required and non-empty, enforced in `build.rs`, and the failure was checked
by removing the line rather than assumed. An operation with no attribute is
invisible to a panel that groups by them; a build that stops costs ten
seconds, a control nobody can find costs more. The vocabulary is closed for
the same reason: a typo would otherwise invent a category holding exactly one
operation, which looks like a deliberate one until somebody counts.

Six tests over the real chain, including the hand-written operations that
`build.rs` never sees and so cannot check.
2026-08-22 10:10:00 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 ca833b6d2b Give every colour band its own compiled shader
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 5s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 5s
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 57m33s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 35s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Failing after 35s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Failing after 9m42s
The colour mixer emits a code block and a uniform only for the bands that
are set, so which bands are adjusted is part of the shader's structure. The
pipeline cache key was not: it hashed the set of *active operations*, which
is "colour_mixer" whichever band that is.

So a red adjustment and a blue one hashed alike. The second render was handed
the first's compiled pipeline while its uniform was uploaded into a slot that
shader had assigned to another band — whichever band compiled first kept
acting on every subsequent move, and every other slider did nothing at all.
Red is the first band declared, and the one reported as the only one working.

The hash is now taken over the generated WGSL, because the source is what
gets compiled and therefore is the structure. A summary of what went into it
has to be kept in step with every operation's code generation by hand, and
this one had fallen out of step. Values still do not enter it: no operation
writes a parameter value into its source, so a slider drag regenerates
identical text and reuses the pipeline, and one that did inline a value would
have to recompile to be correct anyway.

`each_colour_band_gets_its_own_pipeline` in dr-gpu renders a blue pixel
through one pass with red set first and then blue, and fails on the old hash
with the reported symptom — the blue slider returning the pixel unchanged to
the byte.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 15:23:04 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 5e4b8de18d Stop the mixer's bands from dividing one budget between them
Each band's delta was scaled by the summed weight of the bands that happened
to be adjusted:

    d_hue = d_hue / w_total;
    d_sat = d_sat / w_total;

The divisor is the wrong quantity, and it fails in two directions.

A band adjusted on its own divides by its own weight and cancels it — w*v/w is
v — so the falloff does nothing. Green saturation at +100 hit a pixel at 179°
exactly as hard as one at 120° and not at all at 181°: full strength across the
whole window, then a cliff. That seam is the thing the overlap exists to
prevent, and it was there the moment a single band was touched.

Worse, the divisor counts a band's weight even for a channel that band says
nothing about, so the controls compete. `red_hue` at +100 shifts a pure red
pixel +30°. Set `orange_sat` as well and the same pixel shifts +20°, while
orange's saturation bleeds into pure red at a third strength. Hue and
saturation on *neighbouring* colours were trading against each other — the two
sliders behaving as though only one of them could be spent.

The real fault is upstream of the division: the falloff window was ±60° while
the bands sit 30° apart, so the twelve weights sum to 2.0 rather than 1.0 and
*something* had to correct for it. Narrowing the window to the band spacing
makes them a partition of unity, and then nothing has to. The division is gone;
`w_total` stays, demoted to what it should always have been — the test for
whether any adjusted band reaches this pixel at all.

Everything the module header claimed is now true rather than aspirational: a
band reaches zero at its neighbours' centres, a hue halfway between two gets
half of each, twelve bands at +100 equals global +100, and a band pushed alone
reaches the full 30° of travel its own comment documents instead of whatever
fraction the other sliders left it.

`overlapping_weights_are_normalised` asserted the broken arithmetic verbatim,
so it is replaced rather than repaired. In its place: no delta may be divided
by w_total, the guard must survive, two adjacent bands must emit independent
terms, and — the property the rest now rests on — the twelve weights must sum
to one, swept at 0.1° around the wheel. That last test carries a Rust mirror of
`band_weight`, so a third test pins the mirror to the shader's own constants;
a copy nothing checks is how the window and the spacing drifted apart in the
first place.

Also gone: the red branch of `rgb_to_hcl` computed its hue twice and threw the
first away.

This changes how existing edits render. Mixer adjustments are more selective,
and where they were quietly cancelling each other they no longer are, so a
saved sidecar will not come back looking the same.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-16 23:36:52 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 0a331c717e Give the controls a vocabulary, and let a node ask for one
widgets.slint set the rule — screens consume components, and a bare `Theme.*`
at a call site means a component is missing — and it set it for chrome only.
The controls never got the same treatment, so they were written wherever they
were first needed and copied from there.

**The slider was private to the develop panel.** `SliderTrack`, with the
fifty-line preamble explaining how it wrests a drag away from a Flickable,
lived inside adjust.slint and no other screen could reach it. It shows: export
quality is a 1-to-100 value, and the settings page offered a free-text box for
it, with the range written in a hint and enforced nowhere. `to-float()` answers
0 for anything it cannot parse, so a typo saved a quality of 0 and the page
displayed the 0 back as though it had been asked for.

The tick-box was written twice, in launch.slint and settings.slint, from the
same 18px box and the same handler; the second carried a comment deferring the
lift until a third caller appeared. The label-and-hint header was written three
times inside settings.slint alone.

controls.slint is the input layer beside widgets.slint's chrome layer, and the
constraint that makes it reusable is that **nothing in it knows about
`ParamRow`** — that struct is the develop panel's flattening of the capability
model, and a control that imported it could only ever be used by the develop
panel. The primitives take plain numbers; the ParamRow-shaped wrappers stay in
the panel that owns the model. 658 lines came out of the three screens.

`SliderRow` is the slider-plus-number-box ARCH §4.3 names as the pointer
presentation of a bounded scalar, and quality is its first adopter. It commits
on gesture end rather than on every movement, because the settings page saves
to disk on change and a two-second drag is a couple of hundred writes where a
text field committed once. The develop panel keeps the live stream — that is
what its pipeline is for — so `SliderTrack` now reports both.

**The other half is the descriptor.** FR-DEV-3a and ARCH §4.3a already specify
more than was built: an ordered preference list of widgets rather than one, the
demands a widget makes, and kinds beyond scalar and bool.

- `Presentation.widgets` is now a list, walked by `choose`, falling back to
  plain sliders. Falling off the end is not an error, and there is a test
  asserting an operation asking only for an unimplemented widget still yields
  one control per parameter.
- `WidgetDemand` carries what a widget inherently needs — two-dimensional
  dragging, precise pointing — and no pixels, breakpoints or platform names.
- `WidgetKind` grows to the specified set. There is deliberately no `Colour`
  *kind*: a colour is three numbers, and a value type that is not an `f32`
  would reach through the graph, the uniform block and the sidecar format to
  buy what `ColourWheel` over three scalars already describes. Every widget
  here is a hint over ordinary scalars, which is what keeps the fallback
  honest.
- `ParamKind::Enum` is the one new shape, and it fits because a variant index
  is exact in binary32. `kind: enum` with a `variants:` list works in
  `ops/*.yaml`, so a node declaring one gets a segmented control with no UI
  file edited — which is the promise ops/mod.rs already makes.

The panel's dispatch was duplicated: a lone parameter and a grouped one each
wrote out their own list of kinds, so `enum` would have had to be added twice
and a kind added to one would appear or vanish depending on how many parameters
its operation happened to declare. `ParamControl` is now the only such chain.

`rows_from` is free-standing rather than a method, which is what lets the
FR-DEV-3c acceptance test requirements.md asks for actually be written: an
operation the frontend has never heard of, appearing in a generated panel, with
no GPU in sight.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-16 23:21:35 +02:00