0a2c49dd10690504c36aafd3e6e39b456d3b54cd
24
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 dtourolle
|
1e171c6d31 |
Let a collection be picked up, rearranged, and emptied after the fact
Collections could be made and filled and never reorganised. Nesting had a drag; un-nesting had nothing, in either direction — "All photographs" refused every drop, which is right for a photograph and wrong for a collection, which has a top level to be returned to. So a collection put inside another was in there permanently. Right-click deleted an *empty* collection outright and refused otherwise, which is wrong in both directions at once: destructive with no confirmation, and no way at all to delete a collection that held anything without emptying it by hand, child by child. And a photograph could only leave the collection the grid was scoped to, since that is the only one a button in the header can name — the cell's badge says a photograph is in three collections and never which three. Three ways in, one vocabulary: **Hold a row.** The tree is inside a Flickable, which claims any drag beginning inside it, so with a finger a drag on a row is a scroll until something says otherwise. The hold is that something. It lifts the row — drawn before anything moves, so the gesture says it has been understood — and then what the user does decides which of two things they meant: move, and it is a rearrangement; let go, and it is the row menu. The same fork the grid already uses to tell hold-to-select from drag-to-file. `decide_release` is that fork, and it is tested, because getting it wrong one way puts a sheet over every tidied tree and the other way makes the menu unreachable by touch. **The row menu.** Rename, new collection inside, move to top level, keep offline, delete. Deleting asks once when there is anything to lose and says what survives: the photographs stay in the library, and nested collections move up rather than going with it — which is what the catalog does, and what a user would never assume. An empty collection goes on the first press, because a dialogue about losing nothing is how people learn to dismiss dialogues. **"Collections…" on a selection.** Every collection the selection is filed in, each with a count — "3 of 40", so nobody takes forty photographs out of a collection thirty-seven were never in — and a way out of any of them without navigating there first. The long press used to open the offline question by itself. That question is one item in this menu now: there is one hold per row, and while it was spent on a single action nothing else the tree can do had a touch route at all. Nothing is lost — the tray on the row keeps its tap, and the question gains a full-width control in place of a 30px icon in a row shorter than the touch minimum. The row-press handler moves to `collections_ui` with the rest of what a collection row does; it lived in `library_ui` only because it opened that prompt. |
||
 dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
b34e786f01 |
Give the drag a pick-up, so it stops losing to the scroll
Dragging a photograph out of the grid worked about half the time, and nothing on the screen explained the other half. `DragArea` and `Flickable` do arbitrate, but not evenly. The Flickable claims any press that travels more than eight pixels along its own axis within half a second of landing, and holds that claim until the finger lifts. So a drag toward the sidebar only ever began two ways: a flick sideways clean enough that the finger never wandered eight pixels vertically, or a wait of half a second before moving at all. Both are real gestures and neither was written down. The wait is now the gesture, and it has a mark. The long press that already turns on selection mode also picks the photograph up: a ring opens around the cell and the grid stops scrolling under it, so from that moment the drag is the only thing the finger can be doing. The cue can only arrive after the ambiguity has passed, which is the right way round — when the photograph lifts, dragging it works. Two details worth naming. The hold is now armed even when selection mode is already on; it used to be skipped there, on the grounds that there was no mode left to switch on — but that is precisely the state a forty-image drag starts from, so the one gesture that most needed a pick-up was the one with none. And the ring is drawn after the cell loop rather than on the cell: z-order inside a `for` is loop order, so a cell grown past its bounds would stand over two neighbours and be cut off by the other two. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
8e4e24ad09 |
Say what the drag payload actually is: the arming, not the cargo
`drag-payload` was documented as "called when a drag starts, so it always reflects the selection as it is at that moment". Neither half is true, and the comment is the only reason anyone would believe the drop reads it. `DragArea` tests `data.is_empty()` in its event filter — on every pointer event, the first one included, which arrives long before there is a drag. And a Slint binding that calls a callback has no dependency to be invalidated on, so it is evaluated once, when a finger first lands on that cell, and cached for the life of the cell. What it answers is therefore always an empty selection. None of the drop handlers read it; every one of them reads `dragging`, which `drag-started` fills in at the moment that matters. What this callback does is keep the `DragArea` armed, and it manages that only because `set_user_data` is called unconditionally — an empty `Vec` is still user data. Guarding that call, which reads as an obvious tidy-up, would silently stop the grid dragging at all. Comments only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
1a59fb33c1 |
Stop the press that starts a drag from deselecting what it grabbed
Dragging a selection of forty photographs onto a collection filed one. Selection mode reports every press as a ctrl-press — deliberately, so touch and pointer go through one set of rules rather than two — and ctrl toggled. So the press that took hold of one of the forty took it *out* of the selection on the way down. `drag-started` then looked at the cell under the finger, found it unselected, and did exactly what it is meant to do with an unselected cell: made it the whole selection and carried it alone. The only sign was the grabbed cell's ring blinking out at the moment the user began to move. A plain press has never had this problem, because pressing an already-selected cell has always been documented to leave the selection alone — for precisely this reason. Ctrl now does the same: adding still happens on the press, since the drag reads the selection immediately, but *removing* is handed back as `Press::Deferred` and applied by the click. Slint reports a click only for a press that stayed within `tap-slop`, so a tap still toggles and a drag never does. The unit tests now go through a `click` helper — a press and the release that follows it — because that is the only thing a user can perform, and calling `apply_press` alone would assert against half the policy. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
1ff52102b6 |
Drop the anchor bookkeeping the double tap took with it
`previous_anchor` existed for one gesture: a double tap in selection mode took the range from where selecting began, and both taps had already moved the anchor onto the cell being tapped, so the origin the user meant had to be remembered separately. That gesture is gone — "Select to…" says what it is about to do instead of hiding a forty-image range behind a thing a hand does by accident — and what is left is a field that four places write, `PressUndo` carries, `cancel_press` restores, and nothing at all reads. `apply_press` is `select_row`'s only call now that there is no anchor to remember, so the wrapper goes with it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
9e519eb8a6 |
Make the thin ring the only mark a selected photograph carries
Two treatments said "selected" and neither said it well. A selected cell got a 2px border and a lifted fill. The border is drawn on the outside of a cell whose content sits 6px in, so it ate into the thumbnail: selecting appeared to nudge the photograph. Inside it, a second thin ring marked the anchor — the end a shift-click measures from — and that ring was the clearest thing on the cell, so it read as *the* selection to everyone who had not written it. Worse, the ring outlived what it described. An anchor survives a deselection, so a thin box sat around the last photograph touched with nothing selected at all, indistinguishable from a cell that had stayed behind. That is the one thing a selection cue must never be: ambiguous about whether something is selected. So the ring is now what it already looked like. One mark, drawn inside the cell and 4px clear of its edge, so it never touches the thumbnail and never changes a dimension — selecting adds ink and moves nothing. Two pixels rather than one, because it is now carrying the whole cue across forty cells at arm's length against a thumbnail of any brightness. The outer border is hover alone. The anchor keeps no mark, and loses nothing it was earning: the bar says "Tap the last photograph" while a range is armed, which answers the question the ring existed to answer. The ordinal still lives in the controller and still decides where a range extends from; what is gone is the claim that the user needs to see it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
20c368d3fc |
Give each touch gesture one meaning, and give tap-to-open back
I broke opening a photograph. The dwell added in "Tell a tap on a photograph from a hand going past" required a finger to stay down 120 ms, and a deliberate tap is routinely quicker than that — so the grid stopped opening anything. Duration was the wrong discriminator: a tap and a brush are the same length. **Travel is what separates them, and a graze is by definition a moving contact.** A press now records where it landed and the release compares: within 12px it is a tap, beyond that the hand was going somewhere else. No dwell, so no deliberate tap can be refused, and the rule is the same for a finger and a mouse — one rule instead of two, and the `touch` argument the dwell needed goes away with it. Two real conflicts went with it, because a gesture set that overlaps itself is unlearnable however each half is documented. **A drag was also a hold.** Grabbing a cell and moving inside 450 ms left the hold timer armed underneath the drag, so it fired mid-gesture and put the grid into selection mode nobody asked for — the drag finished into a mode that changed what every later tap meant. Starting a drag now cancels it, exactly as a pinch already did. **A double tap was also a range.** In selection mode two taps on one cell selected everything back to where selecting began: no visible state, no warning, from a thing a hand does by accident. "Select to…" does that job and announces itself first, so the double tap is gone and two taps are now two toggles that land where they started. `extend_to_row` went with it — a second range implementation that only the double tap reached, where every other range goes through `apply_press`. The resulting vocabulary, one meaning each: tap opens, tap-and-slide does nothing, hold starts selecting, drag files, two fingers resize, and while selecting a tap only ever toggles. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
6d5de21fb7 |
Tell a tap on a photograph from a hand going past
A brush across the grid opened whichever photograph was under it. Travel was already answered — the Flickable claims the pointer and the press is cancelled — but a contact that neither travels nor lasts reaches a TouchArea as an ordinary press and release, and it was landing the user in develop. So a finger now has to stay down for `TAP_MIN_MS` before letting go counts as opening anything. That is the floor under a tap where the 450 ms `HOLD_DELAY_MS` is the ceiling: below is a graze, between is a tap, above is a hold that starts a selection. One scale, three gestures. Only a finger is held to it. A mouse click is a discrete decision made by a button and is routinely over in thirty milliseconds, so `cell-pressed` now reports whether a finger did it — the same finger-id convention the pinch arbitration beside it already uses — and the dwell applies to touch alone. A graze still *selects* the cell it landed on, because the press already did that. That is the right failure mode: something visible and reversible rather than a silent nothing, and rather than develop. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
f5edd49b6b |
Let a manual collection be put in the order it is meant to be seen in
`collection_members.position` and `Sort::CollectionPosition` have been in the catalog since collections were, and nothing above dr-catalog has ever written or read either: `collections::set_order` had no callers, and the grid ordered everything by capture time whatever it was scoped to — dr-ui does not construct a `Query` at all, it has its own `GRID_ORDER` constant. So a manual collection was a set with an order nobody could see or change. Three pieces, because it could not be fewer: `grid_order_for` decides the ordering from the scope, and both readers take it from there. That is the load-bearing part. An ordinal only names a photograph relative to an ordering, so the window read and the span read have to agree — a shift-click resolved through a different ORDER BY than the cells were drawn with selects a different run than the one on screen, and the user finds out when the export runs. `read_ids_span` already stated that invariant about `GRID_ORDER`; this widens it to an ordering that depends on the scope. Only a single manual collection has one. A set draws its descendants' images too, and two children's positions are unrelated integers that interleave arbitrarily; a smart collection has no member rows to carry a position at all. Both fall back to capture time and refuse the drop rather than pretending. The drop is on the cell, on whichever half of it the finger landed — the trailing edge is the only way to name the last place in a collection, since there is no cell beyond the last one to drop in front of. `reordered` is pure and the membership is rewritten whole. `set_order` sets the positions it is given and leaves the rest, so a partial write would interleave the moved run with rows nobody touched; and it is read unfiltered, so what the filter is hiding keeps its place relative to what the user can see. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
9d11554c71 |
Make the range gesture visible, and offer the whole grid at once
Touch has had a range gesture for as long as selection mode has: double-tap the far end. It is invisible, it is unreliable on a grid that scrolls under the second tap, and it extends from the anchor *before* the two taps moved it — a rule subtle enough that the code needs two paragraphs to explain it to itself. Nobody who was not told about it has ever used it. "Select to…" is the same operation with state you can see. Press it, the strip stops reporting and says "Tap the last photograph", and the next cell taken is the far end. It reaches Rust as shift on `cell-pressed`, so it lands in `apply_press` as the ctrl+shift it already is, and there is no third selection policy to keep in step with the other two. This is deliberately not the sweep gesture. A drag that paints cells can only reach what is on screen, and the ranges that hurt on a tablet are longer than a screenful — between the two taps here the user may scroll as far as they like, and the run is resolved by the catalog rather than by what happened to be loaded. A sweep is still worth having for short runs; it is not what this should have rested on. "Select all" beside it, asked of the catalog for the same reason: a select-all that quietly meant "the hundred cells that happen to be loaded" is a lie the user cannot see until the export runs. The double-tap stays. It is tested, and an accelerator that costs nothing is worth keeping for whoever has already learnt it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
d1f3b97245 |
Ask for the collection's name where the keyboard can reach it
"New collection from selection" created the collection under a placeholder name and then opened the rename field in the sidebar tree. On a tablet the sidebar is not on screen. It is instantiated all the same — app.slint collapses it to zero width and `visible: false` rather than using an `if`, because an `if` there is a layout loop Slint panics on — so the rename field was created, its `init` took focus, and Android raised the on-screen keyboard over a box nobody could see. Nothing else on the screen is focusable, so the keyboard had nowhere to go: it stayed, the name could not be typed, and the collection was already written under the name the user did not want. Asked in a sheet instead, on the same card as the filing and keywording sheets, before anything is written. That also fixes what was hiding behind it: an abandoned rename used to leave a "New collection" in the tree, because the collection existed before the name did. `Field` gains `take-focus()` so a sheet whose field is the only thing to do in it can answer the keyboard for the user — a function rather than a property, because focus is an event and a bound property would re-take it on every unrelated re-evaluation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
f12aece07e |
Make storage pluggable, and prove it with a folder backend
`RemoteBackend` existed from the first release and bought nothing it was
designed for. Seven files in `dr-ui` constructed a `NextcloudBackend`
directly, an account *was* a server URL beside a DAV user id, the local
cache directory was named after a hostname, and the launch screen knew
that signing in meant a browser handshake. The trait was real; the seam
was documentation.
A trait over operations is only a quarter of it. Pluggable storage needs
four things, and this adds the other three:
- **Capabilities** — already there, and the reason the engine can drive
two backends at the speed each actually runs at.
- **Configuration** — `dr_sync::Account`: where a library lives, in
whatever form its connector addresses, with no server in it. Loads
every existing config unchanged (`backend` defaults to `nextcloud`,
`endpoint` is stored under its historical `server` key), and
`Account::namespace()` reproduces the old catalog directory byte for
byte, because changing it would abandon a catalog, its thumbnail
shards, and the sidecars holding unsynced offline work.
- **Registration** — `BackendProvider` and `BackendRegistry`.
`ui/dr-ui/src/remote.rs` is now the only file above `dr-sync` that
names a connector.
`Connection` (an account plus an optional `Secret`) replaces the
credentials-and-user-id pair that was threaded through fifteen
signatures in an order that could be swapped. `Secret`'s inner string is
reachable only through `expose()` and its `Debug` prints `Secret(***)`,
so the indirect leak — a `{:?}` on anything holding one — no longer
compiles into a leak.
Nextcloud is unchanged and keeps every peculiarity: propagating ETags,
chunked upload v2, `oc:fileid`, the `oc:permissions` probe on a refused
PUT, the 423 retry classification, Login Flow v2. Those are what the
capability model exists to serve, not something to hide.
`dr-sync-folder` is the second connector: a local disk, a network mount,
an external drive, or a folder a Nextcloud client already syncs. No
account, no credential — the route that works where no secrets daemon
does. It declares `LocalEtags` rather than claiming propagation a POSIX
directory cannot provide, which costs nothing because 50k `stat` calls
are not 50k PROPFINDs. Identity is a path hash, not an inode: an inode
survives a rename but differs between devices and is reused after a
delete, so two machines would disagree about which photograph a
thumbnail belonged to. Re-deriving a thumbnail is a cost; showing the
wrong one is a bug.
docs/storage.md is the contract — the traits, the four steps to add a
backend, and what each connector declares. ARCH §8.0 and §8.4a, and
FR-NC-13, say why.
|
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
dce1e66746 |
Show which cell a shift-click is measuring from
The gesture had a hidden operand. A range runs from the anchor — the last cell plainly clicked — to the cell shift-clicked, and nothing on screen said which one the anchor was. A user who could not tell where the range was being measured from had no way to predict what it would take and no clue why a wrong one came out wrong; often the anchor is not on screen at all, which is itself the answer to "why did that select so much". The anchor is marked with an inner ring, drawn inside the selection ring rather than in a colour of its own: it has to stay legible against a thumbnail of any brightness, and a hue would read as a second kind of selection. It is an ordinal, so it marks a row only while the photograph it names is in the loaded window — off screen it marks nothing, which is the honest answer, and `anchor` rides in the cell model beside `selected` so both are pushed by the one pass that already keeps the grid in step with the selection. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
54f9cb54fb |
Take the whole run a shift-click names, not the part that happens to be loaded
Shift-clicking two photographs selected only the cells between them that were in the loaded window. The grid is a window of a hundred or so over a library of twenty thousand, and `apply_press` resolved the range against that window — `ids[lo_row..=hi_row]`, clamped to what was there. Everything else in the run had no id anywhere in the UI, so it was silently dropped. The user cannot see that: the selection count is off screen along with the photographs, and the gesture only announces itself when the drop files a dozen images instead of two hundred. The two ends are *ordinals*, and only the catalog knows what lies between them. `read_ids_span` asks it, through the same predicates, the same rating filter and the same ordering the window itself is read with — an ordinal names a photograph only relative to an ordering, so a run taken through any other one is a run through a different library. That ordering is now a constant, `GRID_ORDER`, shared by the window, the trash's own order beside it, and the run: capture time first, with the file name breaking ties and nothing more. A card written by two cameras interleaves names that have nothing to do with each other, and what "everything between these two" means to a photographer is a stretch of an afternoon. The query is reached through a closure handed to `CollectionsController` at wiring time rather than a catalog handle, because the scope and the filter that bound the run belong to the grid's controller. `apply_press` stays a pure function of what it is given, which is what keeps the selection rules testable with no library open — and the tests pass a run that reads a plain slice. Where there is nothing to ask, the loaded window is still used: a poorer answer than the catalog's and a far better one than a gesture that appears to do nothing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
b0b6dd559a |
Show what is selected, and let a collection be made of it
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 2m37s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 26s
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 4s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 5s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 40s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Failing after 6s
Three things a selection needed and did not have. **Seeing it.** The count existed — "12 selected" — in the header row, which scrolls sideways. On a tablet it sat past the right-hand edge along with every button beside it, so a selection was something you could make and then not see. A selection you cannot see is one you act on by accident. **Putting it down.** The only way to clear one was "Done", which also leaves select mode — so after filing forty photographs the next forty began by re-entering a mode the user had not meant to leave. Clearing is now its own action and keeps the mode. **Filing it somewhere new.** Making a collection of a selection took four steps: create one, find it in the tree, select the photographs again because creating it changed the scope, then add them. It is one press, which is how a selection is usually meant — it is gathered *because* it is going somewhere. The new collection is created at the top level rather than inside the current scope, unlike the tree's "+". A selection can be gathered from anywhere, including across collections, so filing it under whichever one happens to be open would put it somewhere its contents did not come from. It opens straight into its name field, for the reason `collection_new` already does: the placeholder name is nobody's choice, and making the user find the rename afterwards is asking them to finish a job we started. All of it on its own strip beside the date range's, appearing only while there is a selection — the third control this session that was invisible for being put in a row that scrolls. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
c75849040c |
Format the tree the way the gate asks for it
`cargo fmt --check` is a required step and had drifted across 45 files. Most of it arrived this week: several operations were written in parallel worktrees and merged by hand, and a hand-merge resolves conflicts without ever running the formatter over the result. No behaviour changes — this is `cargo fmt --all` and nothing else, kept as its own commit so the next reader can skip it wholesale rather than search it for one that matters. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
2fba685e16 |
Make a pinch zoom the grid and nothing else
Two faults left over from making the gesture reach the grid at all. **It still opened photographs.** Checking the finger id stops the synthetic release Slint emits when the *second* finger lands, but not the other end of the gesture: lifting one finger of two leaves the other one down, and Slint replays that survivor as a fresh `Pressed` on whatever is under it — which is how it hands the pointer back to ordinary handling. Under it is a cell. So the cell was selected, and lifting that last finger was a complete, well-formed click on the same finger that pressed. No part of the event stream distinguishes it from a real tap, so the grid now remembers that a pinch just happened: a latch raised when the gesture starts and lowered a beat after it ends, during which cells take neither presses nor clicks. The press that *opens* a pinch is undone rather than suppressed — it has already happened by the time a second finger makes it a pinch. Undoing it has to be exact, or a cancel that restored the selection but left the anchor moved would make the next shift-click select a run from a cell nobody pointed at, so capture and restore are a tested pair. **And it was not smooth.** Two reasons. The pinch was thresholded into ±1 steps of 25%, so the grid lurched and then sat still; it now takes the ratio since the last update and tracks the fingers, with the drawn cell still landing on whole column counts because the columns divide the width. And `zoom-cells` was the one geometry change still reloading inline — a full catalog re-read, 360-row model rebuild and thumbnail batch per step, on the thread drawing the frame. It goes through the same settle timer as the rest now. |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
f1cd6ed5b3 |
Make the drop decision a rule that can be tested
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 57m40s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 34s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Failing after 27s
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Failing after 9m28s
The gesture is Slint's and cannot be driven from a test — synthetic drags do not reach a DragArea at all — but the decision it leads to is where this can actually go wrong, and it was buried in a callback. `decide_drop` names the three outcomes and the order that separates them: an image drag always fills the payload, so photographs pressed after a row was clicked are still filed rather than read as a rearrangement. A row dropped on itself is a no-op here rather than a cycle error from the catalog, and an empty drag with nothing remembered — a file from another application — leaves the tree alone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
6acc73a9fa |
Drag a collection onto another to nest it
The tree could be built nested but never rearranged: `set_parent` existed, with its cycle check and its tests, and nothing in the UI called it. A collection created in the wrong place stayed there. Each row is already a drop target, so it becomes a `DragArea` too — wrapped at the instantiation site the way the grid's cells are, which keeps the row's own TouchArea nested underneath and a click still selecting. `allow-move`, not copy: a collection has one parent, unlike a photograph, which is filed in as many collections as you like. The drop is handed only the target's id, so the source is remembered from the press that precedes the drag — Slint builds the payload through a `pure` binding, which must not have side effects. An image drag always fills `dragging`, so an empty payload with a remembered row is unambiguously a rearrangement; the row is taken rather than read, or a later empty drop would move a collection nobody touched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
d913e50948 |
Select photographs with a finger, and take a collection with you
Two things a tablet could not do. Both existed for a pointer and had no touch form at all, which on Android meant the collection sidebar was somewhere to look at rather than somewhere to file into. **Selecting more than one.** Ctrl-click and shift-click are the only ways into a multi-selection, and touch has neither. Holding a cell now enters selection mode, where a tap toggles — reported to Rust as a ctrl-press, so it goes through the same `apply_press` as everything else rather than growing a second copy of the selection rules. A double tap takes the run between where selecting began and there: the touch form of shift-click, and the reason the anchor from *before* the double tap has to be remembered, since both of its taps move the anchor onto the cell being tapped. A "Select" button does the same thing where a gesture would go undiscovered (FR-UI-4). **Filing without a drag.** A one-finger drag beginning in the grid belongs to the Flickable that scrolls it — that is the arbitration working, not a bug to route around — so the selection can now be filed from a sheet listing the sidebar's own rows. Copy by default, as the drag has always been; moving out of the collection being shown is a switch, because it is the one that takes something away. **Taking a collection offline.** The machinery was there and reachable only by scoping the grid to a collection and finding a button behind a disclosure. Holding a collection's name now asks the question directly, and the tray on a row and the header button ask the same one — three affordances doing two different things is how a user comes to avoid all three. The question is asked rather than a toggle flipped because both answers are expensive: one downloads gigabytes, the other deletes them, and the counts and sizes go in the buttons where they are read before the tap. `Cache::release` is new and is the destructive half `unpin` deliberately is not. "Remove the local copies" is asked by someone whose device is full, and withdrawing a promise while leaving the bytes for a future eviction to notice is not an answer to it. It unpins before forgetting, or the next pin fetch would dutifully download everything it just deleted. The sidebar's trays read `tier_actual`, never `tier_desired`: the question is whether these will open on the aeroplane, and a pin whose download has not run yet answers no. TRACES: FR-CAT-7 | FR-NC-6a | FR-NC-6b | FR-NC-6c | FR-UI-2 | FR-UI-3 | FR-UI-4 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
65e6a96a65 |
Say what the application is doing, in one bar and one list
Every background job reported into a window property of its own — library-thumbs-done, library-pin-total, library-syncing — which only the grid ever read. A pin download that outlived the view it was started from drew nothing at all once the user opened an image, and there was no answer anywhere to "what is this busy with", because the answer was spread across eight properties nothing collected. They report to one register now (ui/dr-ui/src/activity.rs). It publishes an aggregate, which draws a three-pixel bar across the top of the shell in every view, and a row per job, which the settings page lists: scans, thumbnail batches, pin and open downloads, sidecar uploads, the sync and the trash. Failures stay on the list until they are cleared; routine successes do not, or a scroll would bury them. The handle removes a still-running job when it drops, so a worker that dies mid-transfer takes its row with it rather than leaving the bar sweeping for the rest of the session. Also carries in-flight work from a parallel session — the drawn icon set and the dr-pipeline ops split. dr-pipeline's build script does not compile at this commit; ui/dr-ui does, with clippy clean and its tests passing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
70435b712e |
Walk the grid with the arrow keys, and open with Return
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 17m36s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 34s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Failing after 25s
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Failing after 9m17s
A cull is thousands of decisions. The grid already bound 0-5, P, X and U so the judgement itself needs no mouse, and then made the photographer reach for one to move to the next frame — which is most of the gesture, most of the time. Arrows now move a cursor, shift+arrow extends the selection, Home/End and PageUp/PageDown cover ground, and Return opens what the cursor is on. The cursor is a library ordinal, not a row of the loaded window. The window is a few screenfuls around wherever the user is looking, so a cursor held as a row would stop at its edge or keep counting into cells belonging to other photographs; walking out of the window reloads it around the new position, exactly as scrolling does. This is the argument the selection already made by keying on ids rather than rows. The anchor had that fault for real: it was a window row, so a shift-click after a scroll extended from whatever image had since drifted into it. It is an ordinal now, and apply_press takes the window's offset to map between the two. A range longer than the loaded window truncates to what is loaded, since selection is by id and an image the catalog has not been asked for has none. The pointer and the keyboard share select_row so the two cannot drift apart. The one deliberate difference: a plain arrow collapses the selection onto the cursor, where a plain click on an already-selected cell leaves it alone — that exception exists so a multi-image drag can start from one of its members, and there is no drag behind a keystroke. The grid scrolls to the cursor only when the cursor leaves the viewport, and then by as little as will do it. Reusing the scrub's seek() would put the cursor's row at the top on every press, which makes a row unreadable as you walk along it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
03326242a1 |
Make the CI checks say what they mean, and format the workspace
The Android job's "Verify minimum API level" step has never verified the minimum API level. It took the first `*.so` anywhere under the target directory, which is a host proc-macro from debug/deps — an x86-64 object built by the runner's gcc, whose .comment section cannot mention Android and so can never contradict the expected value. It now reads the artifact under the target triple, compares against MIN_API parsed from the Dockerfile rather than a second copy of the number, and fails on a mismatch. Both sides are checked non-empty first: two failed parses would otherwise compare equal and pass, which is the same silent success in a new costume. The Android image installs one SDK package per layer and keeps the output. sdkmanager is a JVM program that aborts when it cannot get memory, and the single `> /dev/null` step reported that as a bare "exit code 134" while a retry re-downloaded everything that had already succeeded. tools/ci-local.sh runs all four jobs — desktop, android, layering, traceability — against the host toolchain, which is pinned to the same 1.92.0 CI installs. Its matrix check compares regeneration against the working tree rather than against HEAD: CI starts from a clean checkout, so git's answer is the right one there and reports every local run stale here. The rest is rustfmt across the workspace, and the clippy findings that surfaced once it did: manual_contains in dr-thumbs and collections_ui, a map iterated as pairs for its keys, an index loop over a slice, and two runtime assertions on a constant now made at compile time. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
8ad5c86ff9 |
Add the library, collections, and trash views; theme from style.yaml
The UI gains the views the catalog work was building toward: a windowed
library grid with ratings and flags, the collection tree with drag-to-add,
and trash with restore. derived_sync pushes thumbnail shards and the catalog
snapshot to the server's derived folder.
Tokens now have one source of truth. build.rs reads style.yaml and generates
theme.slint into OUT_DIR, which answers every existing
`import { Theme } from "theme.slint"` unchanged, because Slint resolves
imports against the importing file's directory first and the include paths
after. Generating into OUT_DIR rather than beside the hand-written Slint is
the point: a generated file sitting in ui/ looks exactly like the files
around it that are meant to be edited, and an edit to it would survive until
the next touch of style.yaml — a bug that hides for weeks. build.rs fails
loudly if a stale ui/theme.slint exists, which would otherwise shadow the
generated one silently and make every palette change vanish with no error.
The palette moves to near-neutral dark with achromatic signalling, so the
accent means "modified" or "active" rather than "heading". Shared components
land in widgets.slint: a token that binds several values into one concept is
a component, not a row in a YAML file.
Adds an optional live-style feature that makes the tokens in-out so they can
be written at startup — a feature rather than the default because it stops
the properties being constant-folded.
serde_norway is the YAML crate: serde_yaml and serde_yml are both deprecated,
and its mappings preserve insertion order, which is what lets the generated
Slint keep the token ordering the author chose.
Assisted-by: LLM
|