80 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	0cd3ef1b3f	Run a node declaration without compiling it ... `ops/*.yaml` plus `build.rs` has been the class-1 plugin format since the declarative nodes landed — it was simply resolved at build time. Nothing about a declaration requires the compiler: everything it produces is data plus a WGSL string, and the composer already assembles WGSL at run time from whatever operations are active. So this is not a new mechanism. It is the existing one, loaded later (FR-PLG-2). `DeclaredOp` implements `Operation` from an owned `Declaration` — one interpreter over many declarations, where `build.rs` emits generated code per node. The generated path stays, as FR-PLG-2 says it should: a generated `match` is faster than an interpreted one, the built-ins' declared `tests:` have to run under `cargo test`, and generated source is inspectable in a way an interpreter's state is not. **The reader is now one file, read by both.** `src/declared/decl.rs` and `src/declared/expr.rs` are `#[path]`-included by `build.rs` as well as being modules of the crate, and they produce a neutral `Declaration` that names no Rust type. The build script's job is reduced to *rendering* that declaration as Rust; `DeclaredOp` converts the same declaration into descriptors and `Expr::eval` walks the same tree the renderer writes out. There is one grammar, one set of validations and one set of error messages, so "a plugin is the same kind of thing as a built-in" is structural rather than aspirational. What remains genuinely written twice is the pair of backends — an arithmetic node rendered as Rust here and evaluated there — and that is what the parity test stands between. `tests/declared_parity.rs` parses every built-in declaration at run time and asserts the composed WGSL is byte-for-byte what the generated implementation produces, with the uniform block bit-for-bit identical, at both ends of every parameter's range and at four interior points; then again over the whole develop chain with the declared nodes swapped in, which is what covers uniform slot ordering and helper de-duplication between operations. A third test asserts the declared and hand-written nodes partition `ops/` between them, so coverage cannot shrink silently. Bit-for-bit rather than within a tolerance, because a tolerance is where a real divergence hides. The one thing that had to be got right for that to hold is number literals: `expr::as_f32` rounds a decimal exactly once, through the same shortest-round-trip text the compiler is handed, rather than rounding an `f64` a second time. Not in scope, and deliberately untagged: load-time WGSL validation (FR-PLG-11), id namespacing, a plugin directory read at startup, and pass nodes (FR-PLG-2a). Those are separate work, and tagging them from here would be the overstatement the spec's own §7 warns about. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-27 19:08:34 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	0c3b8cb1c4	Hand out descriptors a declaration could produce ... `Operation::descriptor()` returned `&'static OpDescriptor`, and that lifetime is the whole reason a build-time node is free and a run-time node is impossible: only a compile-time literal can satisfy it, so no amount of reading `ops/*.yaml` at startup could ever produce a descriptor the rest of the application would accept. FR-PLG-2 says a bundled operation and a third-party plugin are the same kind of thing, differing only in where the file was found — and a lifetime outsiders cannot meet is exactly the second, weaker format that requirement forbids. So a descriptor is now owned and handed out as `Arc<OpDescriptor>`, with `Vec` where it held `&'static` slices. `Arc` rather than a `&self`-borrowed reference because the callers want to *keep* it: the develop panel collects descriptors and then mutates the graph, and a borrow would tie the descriptor's lifetime to a borrow of the operation it came from, which is the one thing `&'static` was doing right. The identifier newtypes deliberately did not follow. `ParamId` is `Copy`, is compared in `match` arms against generated constants, is a map key in the sidecar and history, and reaches Slint model rows; an `Arc<str>` there would cost a refcount on every one of those and would take `match id { EXPOSURE => .. }` away from the generated code. They gain an interner instead, which is honest about its lifetime rather than pretending to one — the set of ids is bounded by deduplication and is process-lifetime by construction, because the sidecar on disk names its parameters and an id has to stay resolvable for as long as any edit naming it can be opened. No behaviour changes. Every descriptor that was a `static` is a `LazyLock` initialiser now, `Operation::helpers` borrows from `self` instead of being `'static` so a future run-time node can own its list, and `Warp` and `Framing` follow `Operation` so there is one shape rather than two. The one place a descriptor is read per frame is `compose_full`, which takes `descriptor().id` to prefix each active operation's uniforms, and `dr-ui` composes on every frame it draws. That is a dozen atomic increments beside a composition that is already building several kilobytes of WGSL on the same call; it is noted at the trait method rather than left for a profiler to find. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-27 19:02:25 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	ce201c7dd6	Name the two spaces a photograph lives in, so a turn cannot go the wrong way ... Every orientation bug this codebase has had has been the same bug: a turn of the right size applied in the wrong direction. That failure is worth naming precisely, because it does not look like one — a quarter turn applied backwards lands 180 degrees from right, so the result is a plausible transform of the picture rather than anything obviously broken, and on landscape frames it is not wrong at all. It was the straighten shear, and it was the segmentation overlay, and each time it was found by eye rather than by a test. The reason it keeps happening is that "rotate 90 degrees clockwise" cannot be checked by reading it. The reader has to hold in their head which of the two images is being rotated and which way the y axis runs, and there were four hand-written copies of the permutation to hold it for: the shader prologue, its CPU twin, the thumbnail path, and the segmentation. So nothing added here says clockwise, anticlockwise, horizontal or vertical. The functions say *which space they take and which space they return* — `into_shown` and `into_stored`, `source_pixel` and `shown_pixel`, `into_shown_rect` and `into_stored_rect` — and each takes the dimensions of the space it reads from, so no caller has to work out which pair it is holding. `StoredRect` and `ShownRect` are separate types because they are the same four numbers meaning different things, which is exactly the case where a mistake is silent: a shown rect measured against stored dimensions produces a rectangle in the wrong place, not an error. Underneath there is one permutation. `source_pixel` was already shared by the prologue and the thumbnails; `source_point` is its normalised twin, written beside it so the two cannot drift, and everything else is those two read forwards or backwards. `Orientation::inverse` is the group inverse rather than `4 - turns`: mirrors apply after the turn, so undoing means undoing them first, and a mirror seen from the far side of an odd turn is about the other axis. That is the diagonal-mirror case, tags 5 and 7, and getting it wrong renders as — again — 180 degrees. Three call sites lose their own copy: the thumbnail path, `dr-ui`'s segmentation, and `dr-gpu`'s `local` example. "Upright" now means one thing across the application rather than one thing per caller. The gate that matters most is `the_render_and_the_orientation_map_agree`. The shader prologue and `Orientation` answer the same question by different routes, and until now nothing checked that they answered it the same way. It now checks every EXIF tag against every user rotation and mirror on top of it, because the composition is where the two could agree singly and disagree together. The rest earn their place by having caught something. Writing these found two real errors in this commit's own new code before it ran anywhere: `shown_pixel` was handed the dimensions of the wrong space and overflowed, and the rect map turned the wrong way for the diagonal mirrors. A round trip that returns what went in is the only check worth having here, since every wrong answer is still a picture. No behaviour changes. The permutations are the ones that were already being applied; they are simply applied from one place now. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-27 09:46:24 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	d7a81375ee	List the steps, and let a photographer step straight to one ... Undo answers "take back the last thing", which is the question asked about a mistake just noticed. It is the wrong instrument for one noticed six adjustments later: eight presses, each changing the picture, with no way to see how far back the mistake is without passing through it. A step is a whole state, so arriving from six away costs what arriving from one does — which is what makes a row worth making clickable rather than decorative. `Edit::Discrete` had to go for the list to be worth drawing. Seventeen call sites recorded the same anonymous step, which is fine for deciding whether two changes are one gesture and useless for a panel: seventeen rows reading "Discrete" is not a history. Every variant now carries enough to name itself, and the compiler enumerated the sites that had to start saying so. A step that moved a parameter is still named out of the descriptor, so an operation added as a YAML declaration appears in the history correctly named with nothing written for it (FR-DEV-3c). Choosing a film stock was not undoable at all. The pick went straight to `choose_film`, which nothing on the history's path ever sees. `pick_film` records it, and is separate because the same call is also how a *restored* edit gets its tables back — recording that would push a step for the undo the photographer had just asked for. The list is rebuilt off a revision rather than off every redraw. A drag ends in a redraw per frame while folding into one step, so the unconditional version would tear down and recreate every row sixty times a second to arrive back at the list already on screen. The counter is process-wide: a per-instance one starts every photograph at the same number, so a frontend holding "the revision I last drew" would keep the previous image's steps on screen — invisible while every image opens with one identical row, and a wrong-photograph bug the moment persisted history means it does not. The step names that no descriptor can supply are constants with a roll, and a test walks the roll rather than a second copy of it. `resolve` splits so that "is this catalogued?" can be asked: `derive` turns `history.mask_toggled` into "Mask Toggled", which names a field rather than an act and, being perfectly readable, is a mistake nobody would look at twice. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 23:04:35 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	b89f1cfece	Snapshot the whole edit in the history, so a drawn mask can be taken back ... The undo stack snapshotted a `Preset` — the parameter map — and a mask layer is deliberately not a parameter. So drawing one changed nothing the history could see: `record` returned `false`, no step opened, and the layer the photographer had just painted had no way back. The interface went on calling `record` in good faith, including from the mask controls, and nothing failed. A film stock went missing the same way. The snapshot is an `EditState` now, so the history is complete by construction rather than by anyone keeping a list in their head. `undo` and `redo` return a `Step` rather than a `bool`. Stepping is not the only outcome a caller has to act on — a step across a change of film leaves the graph without its tables, and only the caller can bake them — and a `bool` would let that be dropped by writing nothing at all, which is the shape of mistake this module had already made once. `DevelopSession` settles the debt either way; a step that found nowhere to go is left alone, since clearing the film because undo hit the floor would take the stock off the picture. Five tests, all of which fail against the old snapshot: a drawn layer is undoable and redoable, a layer's own settings are a step of their own, a change of stock is a step and names what it needs baked back, clearing the film is undoable, and an exposure move does not deep-copy the mask stack. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:54:55 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	93efdf27a6	Keep the film stock when an edit is saved ... `Version::update` is the write path an automatic save goes through. It copied the parameters and the masks and said nothing about the film, so a photograph developed on a stock was written back without it and opened the next time without its emulsion. Nothing reported a failure — the line was simply not there. It is the third of the three routines that captured "the edit" and the only one that got it wrong, which is the argument for not having three. All of them now destructure one `EditState`, so `from_graph`, `update` and `apply` cannot disagree about what an edit consists of, and the next part of one cannot be lost by anybody writing a line too few. Two tests, both of which fail without the fix: the field survives `update`, and the stock survives the round trip through the file. `apply` returns the `FilmRebake` it always implicitly owed, so `apply_version` now reads the debt off the call rather than off `version.film` — and pays it in both directions, since a version with no film has to clear the adjust pass too or it keeps textures bound that nothing will sample. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:53:00 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	5622a58ce3	Give an edit one complete state, and make omitting part of it a compile error ... An edit used to be a bag of scalars. That stopped being true when the mask stack and the film stock arrived, both deliberately held apart from `ops` because a layer is not a scalar and a stock is not a scalar — and nothing announced the change. What happened instead is that three routines each captured "the edit" and each captured a different subset of it. `EditState` is all of it: the parameter map, the masks, the stock. What keeps it complete is not a comment. `EditGraph::state` destructures the graph exhaustively, `EditGraph::set_state` destructures the state exhaustively, and the fields are public so every construction site is a struct literal naming all of them. Adding a fifth kind of graph state — FR-DEV-8's spot removal is the one already asked for — fails to compile until somebody has decided whether an undo has to put it back. Verified both ways round by adding a field to each type and watching five call sites refuse to build. A compiler error rather than a runtime check, because the failure being prevented is silence: the missing halves produced no panic, no warning and no failing test. The stack is now shared rather than owned, and that is about the drag path rather than memory: `state` runs on every parameter change, which during a drag is once a frame, and deep-copying a painted brush sixty times a second to record an exposure move would be a cost paid for nothing. `masks_mut` is the one door a stack is modified through, so it clones on write. `FilmRebake` is the one thing a caller is still owed. Restoring a stock always needed the profile database this crate does not link (ARCH §6.5a); it was a comment before, and it is a `#[must_use]` return value now. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:50:11 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	4a82753d22	Show the detector the photograph, not the sensor's scanlines ... "Find subjects" was handed the proxy in the sensor's own orientation, so every frame shot on a body held sideways reached the model lying on its side — and a model trained on upright photographs is very bad at those. Measured end to end on a 22 MP frame of two people and a dog: `person 0.36` and nothing else, against `dog 0.82, person 0.61, person 0.49` for the same pixels stood up. Nothing failed; the panel simply offered one poor subject where there were three good ones. The orientation was never dropped on purpose. The proxy is deliberately rendered through a *neutral* graph — the detection has to survive an exposure change, or every slider would invalidate the masks built on it — and neutral took the file's orientation with it along with everything else. Landscape frames were unaffected, which is why it stood for as long as it did. The turn is `Orientation::source_pixel`, the same function the grid's thumbnails already go through, so the detector and the thumbnailer now agree about which way is up rather than holding two opinions. What it is turned by is `Framing::effective_orientation` — the file's EXIF tag and the photographer's own rotations composed into one permutation, by the group law rather than by adding the turns, which is a distinction `Framing` already had to make and had already tested. Rotating the picture and pressing the button again therefore does what it looks like it does. The proxy stays in sensor space and the masks come back into it. That is not a detail to be tidied later: the generated shader samples the mask array at `uv_src`, *after* the framing map, so a mask stored upright would sit a quarter turn off the subject it was drawn around. That is a wrong mask rather than a weak one, and nothing announces it. So the picture is stood up for the model and laid back down for everything else, and `upright`/`lay_down` are returned as a pair because calling one and forgetting the other is silent. Both directions are the one function: `upright` gathers through `source_pixel` and `lay_down` scatters through it. A quarter turn is a bijection of the pixel grid, so the round trip is exact — no filter, no resampling, and no hole to fill — and an inverse written out by hand would be a second thing to keep in step, whose way of being wrong is a mask mirrored about the wrong axis, which still looks like a mask. The orientation joins the confidence and the tiling flag in the segmentation signature, and for the same reason: turning the photograph changes what the model recognises, so two runs either side of a rotation are different instance lists. Two that happened to come out the same length would otherwise share a signature and a stored layer would be silently re-indexed from one into the other. The refine pass had it too — it re-runs the model over a crop rendered in the same sensor space — so it makes the same turn, and would otherwise have handed back a worse mask than the one it was asked to improve, on the subject the photographer had just pointed at. `dr-gpu`'s `local` example is fixed with it. It exists to be the shipping path with pictures attached, and a diagnostic that reproduces the bug it is meant to catch is a trap for whoever reads it next. Seven tests. The round trip is the identity over all eight EXIF tags on a non-square asymmetric grid; a turn carries whole pixels rather than shearing the channels apart; a sideways frame reaches the model upright; a box comes back in sensor pixels, worked out by hand for the one turn a portrait frame actually writes; a restored box still reads low-to-high for every tag, since the rest of the pipeline takes `x1 - x0` without checking the sign; and the eight tags cannot collapse into one signature key. The existing composition test now runs against `effective_orientation` itself, over all 8 x 16 baseline-and-user pairs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:40:58 +02:00
dtourolle	e0cb968e04	Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree-spot-removal ... # Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md	2026-08-26 21:56:32 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	e14bc34a9e	Ask which frame this was taken on, because grain is enlargement ... A crystal is a fixed size in micrometres. How grainy a photograph looks is therefore not a property of the emulsion alone -- it is film size against output size, and the frame is the half a digital file cannot supply. This assumed 35 mm for everything. The same emulsion on 4x5 averages about 3,800 crystals into the pixel that holds 300 on 35 mm, so it renders roughly 3.5 times smoother at the same print; every large-format photograph was being rendered as grainy as a half-frame. `Format` now carries the real image widths -- the gate, not the nominal inches, since a "4x5" exposes about 121 mm -- and the film node asks for it. It is a genuinely fixed list, unlike the stocks, so it is a declared `enum` parameter and gets its control, its sidecar entry and its undo step for nothing. It is also the first enum in the develop chain, and it broke two tests by being one. A row has to compare equal to itself across two builds or `sync_rows` replaces it on every parameter event -- destroying the elements built from it, including whichever TouchArea holds the current gesture, so the format picker would have fought every slider drag in the panel. `ModelRc` compares by identity and the row built a fresh choices model each call. `no_choices` already shares one empty model for exactly this reason, and the build site already said "see no_choices for why the identity matters". The fix follows it: memoise the model per variant list. Curve rows solve the same problem the other way, writing values through the existing model, which is not needed here -- a variant list is fixed at compile time, so one model can serve forever. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 21:47:19 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	8ab9440190	Put the repair tool on the photograph ... A third chip beside Crop and Local, and the mode strip's own comment predicted the shape: a mode that arms a gesture on the canvas and scopes the column. Click a mark to cover it, drag the disc to move the repair, drag the source circle to say where the patch comes from, Delete to remove it. The source starts two and a half radii towards the middle of the frame, which is FR-DEV-8's automatic placement in its cheap form — dust sits on skies and skies are smooth, so it is usually right and always one drag from fixed. Two things are drawn deliberately. The circles are the size the repairs actually are, because whether a disc covers a speck is the whole judgement being made and a fixed-size dot would say nothing about it; the reach around them is padded to a touch target so a spot on a dust mark can still be picked up on a phone. And only the selected repair shows its source: a dusty sky carries a dozen, and two dozen circles with nothing saying which belongs to which is less information rather than more. The panel edits what is stored while the canvas draws what is mapped, and the two are pushed separately for that reason — a slider deriving its value from the drawn radius would move differently at different zoom levels. It is also the one panel built from SliderRow rather than a live track: a repair has no OpId to coalesce a drag under, so a row that fires once per gesture is what keeps undo one step per decision. Verified as far as this environment allows: the strip renders and the column re-scopes, photographed under XWayland. Synthetic clicks do not reach this application, so the gestures are as-written rather than as-felt, and docs/spot-removal.md says so. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:58:13 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	2958444835	Let undo reach the repairs before the tool can make one ... A history state was a Preset — a map of scalars — which was right while every edit in the graph was a parameter. A spot is not one, and undo is the first thing anyone does with a repair: place it, dislike it, take it back. Left as it was, that press would have stepped some unrelated slider and left the spot on the photograph, which reads as undo being broken rather than as undo being absent. So a state is now the pair, params and spot set. The same door is the one the mask stack will come through: mask edits are outside undo today for exactly this reason, and FR-DEV-5 is not finished until they are not. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:27:34 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	f00b3ae924	Take the tone from the hole and the texture from beside it ... A clone gets the texture right and the level wrong. Dust on a gradient sky is copied from a patch a little lighter than the hole it fills, and the repair reads as a disc even though every grain in it is correct — which is why FR-DEV-8 asks for heal and not only for clone. Heal adds the membrane: the difference between the two neighbourhoods, sampled at twenty-four points around the rim and interpolated across the disc by inverse square distance. Solving the Poisson problem properly is tens of Jacobi iterations, and an iteration here is a dispatch — sixty dispatches to remove a dust spot is not a frame budget. The closed form costs one loop over the rim, no state, and no second pass. The spec called for mean-value weights; inverse squares are two transcendentals per sample cheaper and agree wherever the boundary difference varies smoothly, which is every repair anyone makes. What decides whether that trade holds is the measurement, so the measurement is the test: on a ramp steep enough to leave a clone wrong by 38 levels out of 255, the heal is wrong by 0. docs/spot-removal.md §6.1 records what shipped and what it would take to go back. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:22:10 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	5323608051	Draw the repairs, before anything sharpens what they removed ... A spot set now composes detail passes of its own, one per round, and they go ahead of every operation's kernel. That placement is the decision worth recording: a sharpening pass reads a neighbourhood, so sharpening a dust mark before removing it smears its edge into pixels the repair's disc does not cover, and what survives is a faint over-sharpened ring around an otherwise perfect patch. It also disagrees with ARCH §5.2, which draws spot removal after clarity — docs/spot-removal.md §5.1 is where that is argued out. Every length reaching the shader is in render pixels, converted here where the framing is in scope. Both the centre and the source go through `Framing::output_at` — the same map the fused pass applies to every pixel — so a rotated photograph rotates the offset with no trigonometry, and the radius is found by mapping a point one radius above the centre and measuring, rather than by multiplying by a ratio this function has no business knowing about. The tests turn and crop the frame and expect the mark to stay gone, which is the property that arrangement buys. compose_full now takes the spot set, because a photograph with a repair and no sharpening still has a detail stage: a fused pass that encoded its own output there would quantise twice and bind to a texture of the wrong format. compose_detail_for takes the source size for the same kind of reason — a RenderScale describes the region on screen, and a spot is stored against the photograph. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:17:51 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	6997c0f7ac	Let a detail pass carry a list, not only a kernel ... Every neighbourhood pass so far has been a convolution, whose whole description fits in the uniform block because its structure fixes how many numbers it needs. Spot removal is not that shape: sixty-four repairs and one repair are the same shader with a different buffer behind it. So a pass may declare `storage`, which arrives at binding 3 as `array<vec4<f32>>` with `arrayLength` in scope. The alternative — packing the list into uniforms — needs a fixed maximum paid for on every frame, a composer that can emit vec4 fields because a uniform array's stride is 16 whatever it holds, and it gives the next operation that wants a table nothing to build on. The property worth having is what stays out of the generated source: the count is in the buffer, so placing the tenth spot uploads 512 bytes and reuses the compiled pipeline, exactly as moving a slider does for the fused pass. `changing_the_list_does_not_recompile` is that, asserted. One bind group entry rather than two more layouts, and one placeholder buffer allocated in `new` rather than sixteen bytes per pass per frame — a zero-length storage buffer cannot be bound, and per-frame allocation is what this module's documentation exists to refuse. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:00:24 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	44444f7768	Write the repairs down, one line each, and merge them by id ... A spot is eight numbers, so it goes in the version block as a line rather than in a block of its own the way a mask does — sixty-four blocks would bury the rest of the file. A line per spot rather than one line for the set, because the line is what a diff shows and what a merge resolves. The parse arm sits ahead of the op.param arm deliberately: without it, `spot.abc123 = 0.4 0.6 …` reads as an operation called `spot` whose value will not parse, and the repair is dropped with a warning about a corrupt number. The prefix is safe precisely because a spot is not an operation, so no ops/ declaration can claim the name. Merging is merge_masks by id, one level down, and it is where the derived ids earn their keep: two devices that removed different marks hold different ids and both survive, while two that removed the same piece of dust hold the same id and the merge sees the one repair it is. A spot both sides dragged resolves whole to the higher revision — eight numbers describe one disc, and half of each is a repair neither photographer made. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 19:52:54 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	97479a0512	Hold the repairs a photographer makes, and say which may share a pass ... A spot is a disc, a source offset and four numbers, and it lives beside `ops` for the reason `masks` and `film` do: the operation trait is ParamId -> f32, and a list of repairs is neither scalar nor fixed. Two decisions here are not obvious. The id is derived from the position rather than counted, because two devices editing offline would each mint `spot3` for different marks and the sidecar merge would then treat two repairs as one — from the position, two devices that removed the same piece of dust agree, and two that removed different ones do not. And every length is in the frame's isotropic units, not a mixture of those and shorter-edge fractions: one unit for the radius, the feather and the offset agrees on a landscape frame and on a portrait one, where a mixture only agrees on the first. `rounds` is the arithmetic that keeps a source from reading a destination. Every spot in one pass reads the photograph as it stood before that pass, so a spot sourcing from an earlier spot's destination would copy the mark that spot was removing. Grouping is not a pass per spot — that is sixty-four dispatches for a case that almost never arises — it is a new round only when the sources actually collide. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 19:50:00 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	ce6458547a	Develop longer, from the measurements rather than from a contrast slider ... Pushing was not a thing to simulate. It was measured data being thrown away: Double-X and 2302 each ship five characteristic curves, one per development time, and this shipped the 6.5-minute column and discarded four. All five now ship and interpolate. The axis is real. Double-X runs 4 to 12 minutes, and across it the average gradient goes 0.472 to 1.034 while Dmax goes 1.19 to 2.56. The control is in stops, because that is what a photographer means, and one stop is a factor of about 1.41 in time. That mapping is checked rather than assumed: against Double-X's own axis it lands within 2% of the 9-minute column for +1, and near 12 minutes for +2, which are the times the datasheet gives for exactly that. There is a test. **Pushing must not recover shadow detail, and this does not.** Across the whole measured range the speed point moves about a third of a stop while the gradient doubles; three stops under mid-grey, density goes from 0.008 to 0.035, which is still nothing. Developing longer multiplies what was already recorded and cannot record what never hit the film. A push built as added exposure or global contrast brightens those shadows instead and looks convincing until someone who shoots film sees it, so that property has a test of its own. Interpolated in *log* time, because development is multiplicative: 4 to 5 minutes is the same amount of push as 9 to 12, and interpolating linearly would bunch the control at one end. Clamped at both ends, because past the published range there is no data and extrapolating a contrast curve invents an emulsion nobody tested. A stock measured at one process ignores the control entirely rather than inventing a curve for it -- Portra 800's pushes are separate *measured* profiles, which is the honest way to offer those. Costs nothing per pixel and changes no shader. The curves are a per-stock table, so the interpolation happens on the CPU at bake time, where choosing a stock and moving its sliders already rebakes. The Vulkan shader is untouched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 17:35:25 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	4b2ee0ac50	Count the silver instead of adding noise ... An emulsion is a suspension of crystals. Light sensitises some; development turns a sensitised one opaque, all or nothing. So a patch of film's density is a *count* of developed grains, and a count of independent yes/no events has a variance whether or not anyone wanted texture: mean = D variance = D * (Dmax - u * D) / N That expression is the whole feature. It peaks in the middle of the density range and vanishes at both ends -- clear film has nothing developed to vary, black film has nothing left to develop -- so grain lives in the midtones as a consequence rather than as a "midtone bias" slider. I was wrong earlier that this needs the detail stage. Nothing in it reads a neighbouring pixel; the only reason to move it was that grain must be fixed in film space rather than screen space, and that solves itself: N is grains *per pixel*, so it scales with the film a pixel covers. Zoom out, each pixel averages more grains, less variance -- correct, with nothing super-sampled and nothing filtered. It stays in the fused pass. Grain goes on the density and *before* the dye, which is the physical order and not cosmetic. Perturbing the finished colour -- what an effect does -- tints highlights wrong, because that noise never passes through the dye. Crystal habit lives in `rms_granularity`, the number every datasheet publishes, now a profile field. It measures exactly what differs between a cubic emulsion and a tabular one: at equal speed, tabular crystals present more area per unit silver, so the film reads finer. Delta 100 is quoted near 9 where HP5 is near 12, and that gap *is* the habit. Adding a stock whose grain is its whole reputation is therefore editing one line, not writing a model. Three things this cost, all of them worth writing down: - The default granularity is a colour negative's, blue coarsest. Applied to Tri-X it put *colour* speckle on a black and white photograph. Monochrome stocks collapse it at parse, where every other per-layer table is already replicated from the one measured channel. - Helpers cannot read uniforms. The composer prefixes a uniform with its operation's id and rewrites references inside a fragment body only; helpers are shared and deduplicated, so a bare `gn0` names nothing. `film_lut` already took its size as an argument for this reason, and now says so. - The end-to-end test compares the shader against the CPU model, and grain is stochastic, so that comparison now runs with grain off. Which means a grain that never left the CPU would look exactly like a passing suite -- hence a second test that grain off is bit-identical, one grain per pixel moves it, and ten thousand move it less. Not here, deliberately: no grain slider. The parameters are physical and `rms_granularity` is the honest place to scale one from, but its range wants choosing rather than guessing. Nor a film format -- 35 mm is assumed, and medium format at the same stock is far less grainy per unit of picture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 10:08:51 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	56978fdf35	Clear the clippy warnings that were failing CI before this branch ... Nothing here is film simulation. These are lints that fail master today, under the -D warnings CI runs with, mostly from a toolchain that learned new ones rather than from anybody's code -- `is_multiple_of` and the derivable `Default` did not exist as lints when this was written. They are fixed rather than allowed, and by hand rather than by trusting `cargo clippy --fix` wholesale: its automatic pass split a derive in two and left a stray blank line, which is the sort of thing that is correct and still wrong to commit. The four that needed a decision rather than a rewrite: - The distance transform's inner loop writes through its iterator now. `q` stays, because it is the position the parabola is evaluated at as well as the index it is written to -- the lint is about the write. - `to_source` and `to_proto` take `self` by value. Their receiver is `Copy`, so this is the same machine code and the honest signature. - The export path's return type is five levels deep and now has a name, plus a line saying why the `Option` wraps the `Result`: `None` is cancellation, which is not a failure and has no error to report. - A test fills a range instead of looping over one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 22:35:02 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	3b5952769b	Emit floats an f32 can hold, and drop the format! that formats nothing ... CI runs cargo fmt --check and clippy -D warnings, and this branch had never been through either. Both would have failed it. The bulk was the generated colour tables: eight significant figures where an f32 carries about 7.2, so the eighth is noise that rounds away at compile time and clippy's excessive_precision says so 109 times over. Fixed in the generator rather than only in the file, so it stays fixed -- and the file is trimmed in place rather than re-derived, because regenerating it needs a colour-science stack that has nothing to do with the defect. The format! in the composer is mine too, from extracting the rendering tail: the braces in it were escaped because the text used to live inside a larger template, and once extracted the escapes are noise and the call formats nothing. Also here, and clearly not mine: an unused import and a shadowed binding in dr-gpu, and an unused import in a test. They are pre-existing -- clippy has been failing on master before this branch existed, on lints like is_multiple_of that arrived with a toolchain rather than with anyone's code. Fixed because CI cannot go green around them, and called out because a merge commit is a bad place to quietly edit someone else's crate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 22:28:14 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	baa8957e80	Let a photographer choose the film, and remember which one ... The stock model rendered correctly and nothing could ask for it. This is the picker, and the sidecar key that makes the choice outlive the session. How the choice persists was the open question, and the answer was already written down twice in sidecar.rs: `rating` is a top-level key "because a rating is not an edit", and `masks` are one "because a layer is not a scalar". A stock is that kind of thing -- a choice of material, not a number a slider moves -- so it is a top-level key too. It stores the **id**, not an index. Stocks are files that users add, so an index would mean installing a profile silently changed which film every existing photograph had been developed on. A name this build has no profile for still round-trips untouched, because the alternative is that syncing to an older phone quietly un-develops the picture. Only the names travel. Turning one back into tables needs the profile database, which dr-pipeline deliberately does not link, so `Version::apply` clears the film and the session re-bakes -- after the parameters, because the bake reads the film's own exposure sliders and the print balance is solved against them. That is also why moving those sliders rebuilds the lookup where no other control in the panel does: an enlarger's filtration depends on how the negative was exposed. The panel keeps its rule. It still names no operation and still generates every control from a declared parameter kind; the stock gets a bespoke control beside those, exactly as the mask stack does, and for the same reason. The film's exposure and print exposure arrive as ordinary generated sliders. Two defaults worth stating. Picking a colour negative prints it, because an unprinted one is an orange strip and offering that as the first thing somebody sees after choosing Portra reads as a bug rather than as a choice -- the toggle is there for anyone who wants the scan. And a paste carries no film: a preset is a parameter map, and a stock is not a parameter, so pasting one would paste a choice the clipboard never took. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 19:57:41 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	4a2fcb6d22	Render a film stock on the GPU, and let it take over the rendering ... The stock model landed in dr-film with no way to see it. This is the pipeline node, the two texture bindings it reads, and the end-to-end test that proves the shader agrees with the model. The design point is that a film simulation is not an adjustment. Every other node changes a picture; this one makes it. A stock's characteristic curve does the camera profile's base curve's job -- from measurements rather than from a curve somebody drew -- so running both renders the scene twice: the camera's rendering, and then a film's rendering of that. It looks like neither, and it reads as a colour-management bug with no colour-management bug to find. So `Operation::renders` is new. A node declaring it takes camera RGB and hands back linear sRGB, and the composer emits neither the base curve nor the conversion out of camera space. Both halves move together, and the composer keeps them as one string precisely so that getting half of it right is impossible. The tables are not parameters, for the reason vignetting's coefficients are not: they are measurements. dr-pipeline declares the layout as a plain struct and keeps its no-dependency property; the two crates share no types on purpose. `EditGraph::set_film_tables` offers them to every node rather than to the one that wants them, because knowing which concrete type is which is what the graph is organised not to know. Bindings 4 and 5 follow the masks precedent: declared unconditionally so one bind group layout serves every generated shader, bound to 1x1 placeholders when no stock is loaded. Both are interpolated by hand with textureLoad -- this pipeline binds no sampler, and adding one for two lookups would cost a binding in every shader. Uploads are keyed on content so an unchanged stock does not push half a megabyte across the bus per frame. The end-to-end test earned its place immediately: it found the density lookup being filled z-fastest while a 3D texture upload wants x-fastest, so the red and blue axes were transposed. Green matched exactly, which is what that bug looks like -- a plausible photograph of the wrong colour, and one that every unit test on either side of the seam passes. dr-film now pins the layout in a test that needs no device, and states it where the field is declared. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 15:12:56 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	c75849040c	Format the tree the way the gate asks for it ... `cargo fmt --check` is a required step and had drifted across 45 files. Most of it arrived this week: several operations were written in parallel worktrees and merged by hand, and a hand-merge resolves conflicts without ever running the formatter over the result. No behaviour changes — this is `cargo fmt --all` and nothing else, kept as its own commit so the next reader can skip it wholesale rather than search it for one that matters. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 21:16:34 +02:00
dtourolle	ec4283e37f	Finish reconciling the whole-chain tests the three kernels each rewrote ... Sharpening, noise reduction and clarity were written in parallel and each rewrote the same two tests, which had counted one fused block per operation — true only while every operation was a point function. Kept the exclusive-or formulation: each operation must reach exactly one of the two stages. A count cannot tell "moved to the detail stage" from "vanished from both", and that ambiguity is what broke these tests three times over. The merge left two fragments of the versions it replaced — a loop over a set that no longer exists, and the tail of an assertion whose head was gone. The loop is not restored: `point ^ neighbourhood` already asserts per operation what it checked over the set. The assertion is, because it catches a different fault from the exclusive-or — a block in the shader that nothing in the chain asked for, rather than an operation in the wrong stage.	2026-08-22 19:34:24 +02:00
dtourolle	d800af049b	Merge branch 'worktree-agent-acd27f9b2974c67eb' into integration ... # Conflicts: # core/dr-gpu/src/adjust.rs # core/dr-pipeline/src/detail.rs # core/dr-pipeline/src/ops/mod.rs	2026-08-22 19:31:15 +02:00
dtourolle	5852e14a5c	Merge branch 'worktree-agent-a75c901968abfa183' into integration ... # Conflicts: # core/dr-gpu/src/adjust.rs # core/dr-pipeline/ops/README.md # core/dr-pipeline/src/lib.rs # core/dr-pipeline/src/ops/mod.rs # ui/dr-ui/src/develop.rs	2026-08-22 19:29:39 +02:00
dtourolle	7031352e85	Keep neighbourhood operations out of a mask layer's chain ... A layer holds a full chain and fuses it into the colour dispatch, so the panel - which names no operation - would have offered a noise reduction slider inside a local adjustment. It could not have worked: the detail stage is its own dispatch, running after the masks are already applied, with nowhere to be handed one layer's mask. The control would have moved and done nothing. Filter the layer's chain to the operations that can honour it.	2026-08-22 19:23:43 +02:00
dtourolle	690e76a51f	Let the fully-active chain test account for both stages ... Activating every operation now activates a kernel too, and a kernel emits no block in the fused shader. Assert that each operation reaches exactly one of the fused pass and the detail chain, rather than counting fused blocks against the length of the chain.	2026-08-22 19:21:59 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	c9305fd0e6	Write out the derivation behind every kernel width these tests assert ... A test that cannot be run cannot be checked by running it, and a number copied out of a test run agrees with whatever the code did on the day. Each asserted kernel width, tolerance and overshoot bound now carries the arithmetic that produces it -- the shorter edge, the sigma, the truncation at two sigmas, and where the rounding falls -- so a reader can verify the expectation against the recipe without a GPU or a compiler. Also records the two places where a bound is a bound and not a measurement: the tolerance in the frame-fraction test is exactly what rounding a kernel to a whole pixel costs on the smallest frame it uses, and the halo test's floor and ceiling bracket a peak derived from the step, the soft limit and the midtone taper rather than from a run. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 19:18:13 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	e44c929afc	Guard the sharpening kernel against WGSL reserved keywords ... The fused-fragment check in lib.rs cannot see a detail pass: it is a separate shader composed at a resolution compose() never knows. The kernel's own test now scans the block the composer wrapped, with comments stripped so prose about the keyword cannot fail a test about the code. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 19:17:05 +02:00
dtourolle	df3fe660e5	Finish the render when a kernel is too small to draw ... An active detail operation may emit no pass at a given render scale - the honest answer for a sensor-sized radius on a heavy proxy. The fused composer cannot see that, having no resolution to consult, so it had already stopped short of the output transform and the frame died on a storage-format mismatch. Compose a bodyless resolve pass in that case so the output transform still happens exactly once.	2026-08-22 19:14:57 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	00663a870b	Teach the chain test that a detail node has no fused fragment ... every_operation_can_be_activated_together counted one block per operation in the chain, which was true only while every operation was a point function. A neighbourhood operation is a dispatch of its own and emits no fused block, so the count now excludes the operations the detail chain names, and each of them is separately asserted absent rather than the comparison being loosened. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 19:14:54 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	b321556dbe	Sharpen the capture with a separable unsharp mask ... Capture sharpening as a two-pass unsharp mask in the detail stage: blur along x, then along y, each pass applying a one-dimensional high-pass to luminance so the composite preserves a flat field exactly and matches the textbook kernel on any locally one-dimensional edge. The radius is stated in source pixels and converted once per render, so a radius tuned on a fit view is the radius the exported file gets. Below one render pixel the operation declines to draw rather than showing sharpening the file will not contain, and emits a single pass-through that still carries the output transform. The develop session now renders through render_detailed, which is what lets an active neighbourhood operation reach the screen at all. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 19:13:00 +02:00
dtourolle	a9baebc396	Sync with integration	2026-08-22 19:04:27 +02:00
dtourolle	5db234bdf3	Sync with integration	2026-08-22 19:04:24 +02:00
dtourolle	f78c8b6959	Sync with integration	2026-08-22 19:04:13 +02:00
dtourolle	97d4bd9061	WIP: clarity and texture ... Checkpoint committed by the coordinator, not by the authoring agent: the session hit its API limit mid-task and left this work uncommitted. Committed so it survives, NOT because it is finished - expect failing tests and half-applied changes. The agent resumes from here.	2026-08-22 19:01:18 +02:00
dtourolle	b4e55b47c1	WIP: noise reduction ... Checkpoint committed by the coordinator, not by the authoring agent: the session hit its API limit mid-task and left this work uncommitted. Committed so it survives, NOT because it is finished - expect failing tests and half-applied changes. The agent resumes from here.	2026-08-22 19:01:18 +02:00
dtourolle	8ea427de3c	WIP: capture sharpening ... Checkpoint committed by the coordinator, not by the authoring agent: the session hit its API limit mid-task and left this work uncommitted. Committed so it survives, NOT because it is finished - expect failing tests and half-applied changes. The agent resumes from here.	2026-08-22 19:01:18 +02:00
dtourolle	0d9910efc6	Merge branch 'worktree-agent-a89309a856c8f4947' into integration	2026-08-22 19:00:56 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	d64a61d677	Give the tone curve a curve for each colour channel ... The declaration in ops/tone_curve.yaml has claimed per-channel curves since it was written — it is the justification for the operation carrying both `tone` and `colour`. Only the master curve existed. This is the other three. The master runs first and the channels grade its result. Both orders are real images and they differ visibly, so the choice is made and written down rather than left to the loop: a point placed on the blue curve should act on the tone the photographer can see, which is what the master has already produced. The other order anchors the grade to tones the master is about to move, so adjusting contrast slides a warm shadow up into the midtones. Every id that existed before today is spelled exactly as it was. The master curve keeps `p2_y` and the new curves take `r_`, `g_` and `b_` prefixes, so a sidecar written when there was one curve loads, means what it meant, and renders the same shader — asserted on the generated source, not on the parameter values. Nothing needed a version check because nothing was renamed. Each curve reaches the shader only when it has been moved off the diagonal, so an S-curve and no colour work generates what it generated when this operation held ten parameters instead of forty, down to the uniform names. The monotonicity guarantee is enforced per curve: a coincident pair on blue divides by zero exactly as thoroughly as one on the master. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 16:06:13 +02:00
dtourolle	c963dafd09	Merge branch 'worktree-agent-afd449f5e7a01e341' into integration ... # Conflicts: # core/dr-gpu/src/adjust.rs # core/dr-pipeline/ops/README.md # core/dr-pipeline/src/lib.rs # docs/traceability.md	2026-08-22 15:35:29 +02:00
dtourolle	7f60a2547c	Merge branch 'worktree-agent-a75dc051d9bf691de' into integration ... # Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md	2026-08-22 15:34:29 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	7407a82aa7	Let an operation read the pixel next to it, and settle where sharpening belongs ... The fused pass hands a fragment a colour and no coordinate. That is what buys one dispatch for a whole edit, and it is also a wall: sharpening, noise reduction, clarity, texture, dehaze and spot removal are each defined by what the neighbours are doing, and FR-DEV-3 and FR-DEV-8 ask for all six. None of them could be written at any price. So there is now a detail stage. An operation implements `Operation` for its parameters exactly as before — the panel, the sidecar, the history and the presets all work unchanged — and additionally returns `Affects::Detail` and a `DetailStage` yielding one pass per dispatch. `Affects` grows the third variant `docs/requirements.md:250` designed and nothing had cut. Where the stage sits is a colour-science decision, not an arrangement of convenience. It runs after every point operation and every mask layer, so an amount chosen against a tone curve survives the curve moving; in linear sRGB after the camera matrix, because camera RGB has no luminance to sharpen against; and before the output transform and the clip, because FR-DEV-2 allows one quantisation and a highlight clipped before a convolution grows a dark ring. The fused pass therefore ends one of two ways, and when a detail stage follows it hands on unclipped f16 and the last detail pass encodes. At render resolution rather than on the source, which is the whole of FR-DSP-1: a pass before the framing prologue would cost 24 MP to draw a 2 MP preview. `RenderScale` is what makes that survivable — a radius is stored as a fraction of the frame's shorter edge, exactly as a mask feather already is, or as a count of source pixels, and converted per render. It also reports when a radius is smaller than a proxy pixel rather than drawing a plausible lie; zooming to 1:1 makes the preview exact with no second path. `Invalidation` gives FR-DEV-3d something to mean. Moving a detail parameter leaves the colour key alone, so `AdjustPass` keeps the linear intermediate and skips the fused dispatch: dragging a sharpening slider costs a convolution. Moving exposure does re-run the detail passes, because they read what the colour pass wrote, and there is no arrangement of keys that avoids it while keeping sharpening after tone. Validated by a separable box blur that is not a develop operation, behind the `detail-probe` feature and absent from a shipping build. An abstraction with no consumer is a guess; a box blur's answer is known in closed form, so the tests assert every byte of the ramp rather than that the edge got softer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 14:39:35 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	743fefe7f1	Render each body through the profile its own files describe ... Colour came from whichever matrix rawler happened to key `D65`, the second one was discarded, and the rendering was left linear. That is the dcraw default, and FR-DEV-3e names it as the reason people abandon a converter in the first hour: correct in the abstract, flat and poor on skin in practice. The decoder now builds a camera profile. - `ColorMatrix1/2` and `CalibrationIlluminant1/2`. rawler surfaces these as an illuminant-keyed map — for DNGs from the tags, and for native formats from its own camera database — so a Canon CR2 arrives with a tungsten matrix and a daylight matrix exactly as an Adobe DNG of the same frame would. Dual-illuminant support is therefore not a DNG feature here. - `ForwardMatrix1/2`, read straight from the root IFD, because rawler parses them and never surfaces them. Where a file carries both, they replace the inverted colour matrix: the same relationship measured in the direction rendering actually wants, rather than an inversion that amplifies the measurement error exactly where skin lives. - `AsShotNeutral`, used to estimate what the scene was lit by and to interpolate between the two calibrations in mireds. The estimate is circular — the temperature needs a matrix and the matrix needs the temperature — so it is a fixed point, three rounds, as Adobe's SDK does it. Bodies calibrated at neither D65 nor A stopped rendering uncalibrated as a side effect: a Phase One IQ3 carries D55 and D75 and used to get no matrix at all. And a base curve, applied per channel in camera RGB between the last adjustment and the conversion out of camera space — a toe, a steep midtone and a shoulder, which is the difference between a photograph and a scan of one. It is not an edit: no slider, nothing in the sidecar, because it belongs to the body rather than to anything anyone decided, and a sidecar is shared between bodies. It is not a develop node either, and `ops/README.md` now records why. It evaluates on the tone curve's own spline rather than a second copy, so a profile author placing a control point and a photographer dragging one mean the same thing by it. The curves are data. `core/dr-decode/profiles/base_curves.yaml` ships inside the binary as a floor and is superseded by any copy on disk carrying a higher `version:`, so a body can be added and distributed without a release — and, under the GPL, contributed. The comparison runs both ways: a stale pack cannot hold an upgraded binary back at last year's rendering. Canon EOS 6D and R6, Nikon Z 6 and D750, Sony A7 III and Fujifilm X-T3 ship with their own curves. Every other body gets a conservative default, which is much closer to right than the identity is for any of them. A JPEG gets none — it has already been rendered once, by the camera. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 14:37:33 +02:00
dtourolle	5bcd0e0269	Merge branch 'worktree-agent-a22a049c461818dbe' into integration ... # Conflicts: # core/dr-pipeline/tests/mask_sidecar.rs	2026-08-22 13:23:34 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	96a7b405c2	Say which photograph the sliders are pointed at ... Selecting a mask layer silently re-points about thirty controls at that layer's chain. Same panel, same order, same sliders, different meaning — and the only thing that said so was a sentence in the panel above, which a photographer reaching for the exposure slider has no reason to read. An exposure change lands on the whole frame when it was meant for a face, or the reverse; both are silent, and both are discovered later. `ui-navigation.md` §1.1 calls it the dangerous one and it is: the others in that document cost time, this one costs work. The remedy is the classic one for a modal fault — make the mode visible — and the application already had the pattern. Crop arms a canvas interaction, draws an overlay, gives the column one job and is left by the control that entered it. Local masking is the same animal built as a peer panel, and that is what created the ambiguity. So `crop-mode` stops being a bare boolean and becomes one value of a three-state mode, which is the point: two modes could both be on before, and now that is not a state the interface can be in rather than one it is tested against. **One strip, not two.** The mode control was going to sit beside the group strip that filters the adjustments, which is two controls above one column answering the same question — what am I working on. They are one control now, `Crop · Local │ All · Light · Colour`, which is the shape Lightroom Mobile's bottom strip has for the same reason. The two halves are different kinds of state and are drawn differently: a mode is a chip that fills with the accent when it is on, a group is a word with a rule under it. That difference is what lets both be read at once, which they routinely are — picking Light while a mask is selected filters *that layer's* chain and does not leave the mode. Dropping the scope on a group press would be the same fault coming back from the other end, and would make Light mean two things depending on where it was pressed. The strip stays pinned above the develop column rather than moving to the top of the canvas as the document proposed. The half that filters the column belongs to the column, and the photograph is the subject. The canvas keeps one button, which now names the mode it leaves rather than saying "Done" — that was unambiguous with one mode and would not be with two — because the column can be closed on a narrow window and no mode may be inescapable. Entering a mode is a side effect, so Rust owns it rather than the strip writing the property: crop drops the zoom, local turns the overlay on, and leaving clears the selection. That last one is the fix. The "Overlay" and "Select" toggles are gone because they armed things that are simply what the mode *is* — a mode that has to be switched on separately is one you can enter and have do nothing. Escape and the Android back gesture join `back_step` as one `LeaveMode` rather than a second exit concept, and the mode is left before the zoom is: it was entered later, and it is the bigger step back. The heading is where the scope goes. Not a caption beside the panel, the heading *of* the panel that changed — `ADJUST` becomes the layer's name, the same string the selected row in the stack shows. That is the difference between describing a hazard and removing it. **Handles on the photograph.** A linear or radial mask could be created and then not moved, so a radial sat at the centre of the frame at its default size for ever. Three faults stood in the way of drawing one. The first is that a gradient did not render at all until the model had run. The rasteriser was built on the way out of `segment` and the array's size was read *off* the segmentation, so a gradient added to an unsegmented photograph produced nothing — silently, in the same way exports and thumbnails once did: the shader still emits the layer's block and the empty placeholder multiplies it by zero. The proxy size is a property of the photograph. Both are derived from it now, and deliberately at the same size rather than by coincidence, because a subject's distance field is sampled against that array. The second is hit-testing. A handle is drawn in output coordinates and stored in source ones, and between them lie the crop, the zoom, the pan, the straightening and the turns. `Framing::source_at` is `wgsl_prologue` evaluated on the CPU, kept in that file beside it so that keeping the two in step is one file's problem — a handle mapped through anything less drifts off the mask the moment the view moves, which is exactly what masks are rasterised in source space to avoid. The third is that a drag is a displacement, not a destination. Each handle answers to the movement of the pointer since the press, applied to where the mask was when the press landed. Snapping the handle to the pointer instead jerks it by up to half a touch target on the first press, and the target is finger-sized because a tablet has no hover to reveal a control and no modifier to qualify it. A ramp gets three handles — centre, width, angle. An ellipse gets three too: centre and one per semi-axis, the major one carrying the direction as well as the length, because where an axis is put says both. It had a fourth, and it is gone: standing off the shape by a fixed distance, the rotation arm began outside the photograph at the size a new radial is created at, so the first thing anyone saw was a control they could not reach without first shrinking the mask. Two faults here were found by looking at the screen rather than at the source, both of the kind that cannot be found any other way. A `1px` rule with a size and no position is *centred* by Slint, so the seam between the photograph and the column was a hairline down the middle of the panel, through the histogram and every slider under it — twice, once in `app.slint` and once in `AdjustPanel`. And handing Slint a fresh model for the handles on every pointer event made the repeater rebuild its items, taking the `TouchArea` holding the gesture with them: the handle jumped once and then went dead under a finger that was still down. `develop.rs` carries the same warning about the parameter rows, where it broke slider drags; the model is rewritten in place now. The tests worth having are the ones about ambiguity and about the map. That the same row reads the frame's value, then the layer's, then the frame's again is §1.1 in one assertion. That dragging a handle onto another gradient's matching handle *produces* that gradient closes the loop between the two directions of the framing map, through a view that is cropped, zoomed, panned, straightened and quarter-turned at once — a one-legged map is invisible when the framing is neutral, because then both legs are the identity. Not done here: the histogram still reports the whole frame while the sliders edit a layer. That disagreement is real and is N3's, which this unblocks. The strip has room for a Brush entry beside Crop and Local when the painted masks land in the core, and it needs nothing here but the canvas interaction. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 13:20:41 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	c75863c93f	Give a gradient the angle it was asked for ... A linear mask at 45° was not at 45°, and a radial with equal radii was an ellipse. Both on every photograph that is not square, which is all of them. The geometry is stored in normalised coordinates so that a mask survives a crop, a zoom and an export at another size — that part was right. What was wrong is that a *distance* was being measured in those coordinates too, and a fraction of the width is not the same length as a fraction of the height. So `dot(uv - centre, axis)` measured the ramp in a space one of whose axes is squashed against the other by the aspect ratio, and the iso-lines came out sheared: on a 3:2 frame a ramp asked for at 45° arrives at about 34°. Nothing announces it. The stored numbers are exactly what was written, the shader is doing exactly what it says, and the only place the fault exists is between the photographer's intent and the picture. It has been invisible so far because there is no way yet to place a gradient by eye — the handles that make it visible are what turned it up. So distances and angles move into the frame's own isotropic units: y spans `0..1` and x spans `0..aspect`, which makes a circle round and 45° a real diagonal. The centre stays a plain fraction of each axis, because it is a point and a point has no such problem — and because that is the space a click arrives in. `frame_delta` is the one conversion and must stay the only one; the mask array's own dimensions carry the aspect, so it costs no uniform. The sidecar format does not change. What changes is what the numbers mean, and the only geometry in the wild is a default that has never been movable. The two tests are at 96×64 rather than square, which is the whole point: on a square target this bug cannot be reproduced, and every existing mask test was square. Both fail without the conversion — the radial reaching 28px sideways where it reaches 19px down, and the diagonal landing on the wrong side of the line it is supposed to lie along. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 13:19:55 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	c396a22dfd	Paint a mask without ever rasterising one on the CPU ... The last line of FR-DEV-3, and the mask ARCH §5.4 was written for. darktable rasterises drawn masks on the CPU and users call the result unworkable; the architecture's answer is that a stroke arrives as *parameters* and the device draws it. This is that, from the model through the sidecar to the pixels — but not the finger: the canvas is somebody else's change, and this leaves it a seam rather than reaching into it. **A stroke is a swept disc along a polyline**, plus erase, radius, hardness and flow. `MaskSource::Brush` holds an ordered list of them, and the order is the mask: an erase after an add takes it away and the same pair reversed does not. Nothing about it is pixels, which is what makes a mask that costs a line of text, diffs by the gesture, and survives a crop, a straighten and an export at any size — the properties a stored raster has none of, and the same argument the region ids were chosen for. Two things keep the point count honest. While the finger is down, a position closer to the last than an eighth of the radius is dropped: a touch screen reports 120 a second, so a finger held still for five seconds is six hundred points in the same place, and simplification would only remove them once the gesture had ended — after every frame in between had drawn all of them. When it ends, Douglas–Peucker at an eighth of the radius removes what a disc that wide cannot express: a swept circle moved by r/8 moves its own edge by r/8, which is inside the soft part of any brush. Coordinates snap to a ten-thousandth of the frame on the way in *and* are written at that precision, so a round trip is exact rather than nearly exact — a file that drifts in the sixth decimal every save is a per-field merge conflict a day, over nothing. **Cost is why the strokes are not drawn by the full-screen triangle the other masks use.** A swept disc is the minimum distance to any of its segments, so a stroke over the whole frame costs `pixels × segments` and both terms grow together — the quadratic that is darktable's problem moved onto the GPU rather than solved. Each stroke is instead drawn over its own bounding box, grown by the radius, so the rasteriser never invokes the shader for a pixel the stroke cannot reach: `area(box) × segments`, which for a dab or a swipe is a small fraction of the frame. A gesture past 256 points continues as a second stroke for the same reason, since a shorter stroke has a smaller box. Add and erase are `dst + a(1 - dst)` and `dst(1 - a)`, which are exactly a source-over and a one-minus-source blend — so they are blend state, not arithmetic, and no pass ever reads the slice it is writing. That is what permits one draw per stroke at all. Within a stroke the coverage is the *minimum* distance over its segments rather than a sum: a path that crosses itself must not build up where it did, or every circle and every scribble would be blotchy wherever consecutive dabs overlap, which is everywhere. Not a distance field, deliberately. `dr-segment`'s transform documents the two conditions that make CPU work right there — once per mask edit, over input already CPU-side — and a stroke fails both: it changes while the finger moves, and its input is a handful of coordinates that never needed to be pixels. It also needs no transform, because the distance to a swept disc is closed form. A stroke is the one mask whose distance field is known without computing one. An unpainted brush layer is inactive rather than empty, which is not an optimisation: `invert` turns empty into everything, so a layer created with invert already set would apply its adjustment to the whole photograph before a single stroke was made. That is the loud, confident kind of wrong this codebase refuses everywhere else a mask can go missing, and there is a rendered test for it. The tests read pixels back off a device rather than checking that the two halves agree with each other. What they pin down is what is silent when wrong: the y flip between mask space and clip space, which a centred stroke would not notice; a bounding box not grown by the radius, which makes a tap draw nothing at all; an aspect ratio ignored, which makes a dab an ellipse on any frame that is not square; a stroke doubling back and building up; and an erase that lost its place in the order and put back paint the user had taken off. Not done here: the interaction. The canvas needs to begin, extend and end a stroke on the active layer, and `DevelopSession::rasterise_masks` still returns early without a segmentation — it takes the proxy size from one, and a brush needs no model to have run over the photograph first. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 12:37:42 +02:00