Commit Graph
139 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
dtourolle a7b090cf36 Ship presets with the application instead of seeding them
The six starter presets were copied into the photographer's own library
on a first run and were theirs from then on. That cannot grow into a
real collection: a copy is frozen at the release that wrote it, so an
improved preset reaches nobody who had the old one, and re-seeding would
overwrite a preset someone had tuned.

`dr_pipeline::bundled` now holds the shipped presets as `.drpl` files
compiled into the binary, in sections — Essentials (the former six) and
three sections of film presets, one per measured stock in dr-film,
printed on the paper its profile names — and never writes them to the
user's file. Every shipped preset is a look (`Reach::Named`), so applying
one keeps the corrections a photograph already has.

A name links a photographer's copy to a shipped preset. Saving over a
shipped name makes their version the one that name applies; it is listed
in the shipped section, marked as changed, and deleting it reverts to the
shipped one. Renaming it makes it one of their own and the shipped preset
reappears. Keyed on the name because that is what the photographer sees
and chooses by.

Copies an older first run seeded are forgotten on load where they are
still exactly as seeded — otherwise all six would list as changed and
stay frozen at their old values. A tuned one is kept and now overrides.

The sheet lists "Yours" first, then each shipped section, with headings.
Shipped rows apply and nothing else; a changed row offers Revert where
the photographer's own offer Delete. A dr-ui test checks every shipped
film names a stock this build can bake, on that stock's own paper,
because dr-pipeline does not link the profile database.

The film presets name stocks by id; the measurements behind them are
spektrafilm's (CC BY-SA 4.0), attributed in each file as in dr-film.
2026-09-26 13:44:32 -04:00
dtourolle 90c0695c05 Let a preset name its film, and let a look reach only what it names
A preset could not choose a film stock. The stock is a choice of material
rather than a parameter, so `Preset` — a map of `op.param = value` — had
nowhere to hold it, and "Portra 400, printed" could not be saved, copied
or shipped as a look. Worse, the film node's own sliders *were*
parameters: a paste moved one stock's exposure and push onto whatever
stock the target was on, and left the target's tables baked from the
values it had just replaced.

A preset now carries a `FilmRef` beside its parameters. It travels under
whichever scope carries the film node, so the stock and its sliders are
never split, and by the replacement rule every other parameter follows:
applied at that scope, a preset without a film develops the target
without one. `Preset::apply` returns the `FilmRebake` it owes, as
`EditGraph::set_state` already did, because this crate cannot bake a
stock; the develop session pays it before recording the step, and the
batch paste writes the stock into each sidecar through `film_for`. The
library file spells it `film =` / `film_print =`, as a sidecar does, and
an older build keeps those lines as ones it does not understand.

`EditState` keeps the film in its own field only: the parameters it
captures leave it out, so one edit has one place to say which stock it
is on.

Second, a preset now has a reach. Replacement is right for a copy of a
whole edit — "make these match" — and wrong for a look: a stock-only
"Portra 400" applied that way would put the photograph's exposure, white
balance and noise reduction back to default. `Reach::Named` replaces only
the operations a preset names (whole operations, so a look that sets the
blacks resets the whites beside them) and the film only if it names one.
Saved edits and the clipboard keep `Reach::Whole`; the line `reach =
named` is written only for the other, so existing libraries write the
same bytes.
2026-09-26 13:44:32 -04:00
dtourolle d430ec9528 Drop a detail pass that changes nothing when it sits between two others
Capture sharpening at a scale too coarse to draw its radius emits one pass
with an empty body (`nothing_to_sharpen`), so that a chain still ends in
something that performs the output transform. At fit on any modern sensor
that is most of the time. When another neighbourhood operation follows it
- dehaze, clarity, texture - the pass is not last and does nothing: it
reads the rgba16float intermediate and writes the same texels to the other
one. It still cost a full render-sized read and write every frame:

  scene                           before     after
  sharpen+clarity 2560x1600 fit   18.66 ms   14.16 ms
  sharpen+clarity 3840x2160 fit   37.93 ms   27.88 ms
  every operation 2560x1600 fit   71.80 ms   67.24 ms
  clarity alone   2560x1600 fit   14.23 ms   14.20 ms  (control)
  sharpen+clarity 2560x1600 1:1   23.01 ms   22.97 ms  (control: resolves)

(Laptop RTX 3050 held at 420/810 MHz by its power cap, synthetic 60 MP
source, median of five alternated runs of forty frames each.)

`compose_detail_with` now drops such a pass where dropping it is exact:
not the last pass, whose output transform would otherwise move onto the
previous pass's f32 result and round differently; and not a pass right
after a reduced one, because a full-resolution pass is what closes the
reduced chain for the operation after it. `DetailPass::is_identity` says
what "changes nothing" means: full size, nothing bound at binding 3, and a
body with no code in it.

The rgba8 output is bit-identical: every scene above hashed the same
before and after, and the sharpen+clarity frame hashes the same as clarity
on its own, which is the claim in one line. A new dr-pipeline test pins
the three cases - dropped ahead of another operation, kept when last, kept
when alone.
2026-09-26 07:10:41 -04:00
dtourolle 1dc7b45cfe Read the fit view's source gather once per framing, not once per frame
At fit, every output pixel of the fused pass loads one texel from a source
three or four times its width, on a stride. The memory system fetches the
texels it skips along with the one it wanted, so on a 60 MP rgba16float
source that gather was most of what the fused pass cost: 10.6 ms of a
2560x1600 frame against 3.8 ms for the same shader reading a contiguous
window (the 1:1 view). At 3840x2160 it was 21.1 ms. Those are the laptop
RTX 3050 with its clocks held at 420/810 MHz by the power cap; unthrottled
the same frames were about 2.0 and 3.2 ms, and the gather is the same
share of them.

Which texel an output pixel reads depends only on the framing prologue,
the framing and warp uniforms, the source and the render size. None of
those move during a slider drag, so the gather is the same work every
frame. The fused shader now takes a render-sized rgba16float cache of it
(bindings 6 and 7, declared in every generated shader like the masks) and
a pair of uniform flags: write what was gathered, or read it back at the
pixel's own coordinate. AdjustPass keeps the cache and decides per
dispatch. The composer supplies `ComposedShader::sample_key`, a hash of
the prologue and those uniforms, and AdjustPass adds the image and the
size; an image gets a process-unique id for this rather than being held
alive by the key.

The picture is bit-for-bit the same. The source is rgba16float and so is
the cache, so the stored texel is the texel, and only the path that reads
a texel whole takes part: an interpolated sample (straightening, lens
warps, CA) is a blend that f16 could not hold exactly, so the composer
gives it no key and it reads directly as before.

The cache is written on the second frame with a given key, not the first:
a crop or zoom drag changes the key every frame, and writing then would
add a render-sized write to exactly the gestures that can afford it least.
It is kept only up to 3840x2400, so an export never parks a full-frame
copy on the device, and `release_caches` drops it.

Measured with a scratch probe rendering the synthetic 60 MP frame from
examples/frame_budget.rs, forty frames per run after six warm-up, five
runs of each binary alternated, median of the per-run p50 (GPU idle apart
from the power cap):

  scene                    before     after
  neutral   2560x1600 fit  10.62 ms   3.88 ms
  exposure  2560x1600 fit  10.83 ms   3.87 ms
  nr chroma 2560x1600 fit  19.84 ms  12.69 ms
  neutral   3840x2160 fit  21.05 ms   7.11 ms
  exposure  3840x2160 fit  21.08 ms   6.94 ms
  clarity   3840x2160 fit  42.20 ms  27.88 ms
  neutral   2560x1600 1:1   3.83 ms   3.84 ms  (control: nothing to gain)

The rgba8 output of every scene hashed identically before and after, in
isolated runs and across all 38 scene/size/view combinations of the
probe. New tests walk a pass through direct, write and read frames, a
slider move, a neighbourhood operation and a framing change, and compare
every frame with a fresh pass that can only have read directly.
2026-09-26 07:10:35 -04:00
dtourolle 5a500118ae Correct converging verticals with a keystone in framing
There was no perspective transform anywhere in the pipeline: framing
offered a ±45° straighten, quarter turns and flips, and a building shot
looking up kept its leaning walls.

Framing gains a vertical and a horizontal keystone (-100..100). They are
parameters of framing rather than a new stage, so they carry its Compose
attribute, persist in the sidecar under framing, and are withheld from a
default paste exactly as the crop is. In the prologue the keystone runs
after the crop and the straightening and before the stored orientation
and the lens warp, so "vertical" is the photograph's displayed height and
the lens still sees its whole frame.

The map takes the output frame onto a trapezoid inside the source, built
as a homography from four corners and uploaded as three columns in the
framing uniform block (which grows from two vec4s to five). A keystone on
its own therefore never exposes an empty corner and leaves any crop valid.
Combined with a straightening angle the empty area is a pulled-back
quadrilateral the closed-form inscribed rectangle cannot describe, so
max_inscribed_crop searches for the largest centred rectangle whose
corners all have a source pixel behind them. source_at and output_at
apply the same map, so masks, gradients and spot handles follow it.
2026-09-24 22:13:11 -04:00
dtourolle d748527a4c Keep colour labels in the sidecar so they survive and travel
A rating and a flag are written to DarkRoom's sidecar as well as the
catalog, because the catalog is a disposable index and the sidecar is
how a judgement reaches the photographer's other devices. A label had no
place there, so once labels could be set, one would have lived only in
the catalog of the device it was set on and gone with it.

The sidecar version now carries `label` (0 none, 1-5 as the catalog
codes it), written only when set. It merges under the rating's rule, so a
device that never labelled a frame cannot clear another device's label,
and a code this build does not know reads as none rather than as some
other colour. A judgement write carries the catalog's label with the
stars, and the scan takes a sidecar's label into the catalog when it has
one. An older build keeps the line as an unknown key and writes it back.
2026-09-24 21:52:23 -04:00
dtourolle fc0ea8824d Format the crop-orphan measurement
rustfmt wraps two tuples in dr_pipeline::orphan that the previous commit
left on one line past the width limit. No change in behaviour.
2026-09-24 21:52:02 -04:00
dtourolle 9772785f81 Measure which mask layers a crop takes out of the frame
Mask geometry is stored in source coordinates, so re-cropping tighter
never destroys a layer. It makes it invisible: the layer stays in the
panel and the sidecar, its adjustment lands on pixels nobody will see,
and nothing says so. The spec had no clause for this; FR-DEV-17 now
states it, under the ID issue #10 reserved.

dr_pipeline::orphan samples each layer's mask on a 64x64 lattice over
the source, with the gradient, radial, brush and model-raster geometry
the mask shader uses, folds the parts by their joins and inversions, and
maps the samples through the framing to see how much of the coverage
the crop keeps. `hidden_by_crop` reports the layers whose share fell
below a tenth, and only those the change newly hid, so an already
stranded layer is not announced again on every later adjustment.

Ranges follow the picture and region selections need a label map this
crate does not hold, so a layer that adds either is never reported: a
false alarm on the common path would teach the notice to be dismissed
unread.
2026-09-24 21:52:02 -04:00
dtourolle 8cdad3863d Keep only where two selections agree, as a third way to join a mask part
A layer's parts could be added to the mask or taken out of it, and nothing
else. The selections that need composing most are the ones that are
neither: the sky that is also bright, the subject that is also skin. With
union and subtract alone, "this and that" had to be spelled as "this minus
everything that is not that", which needs a second part that selects the
complement and rarely exists.

Join gains Intersect, stored as "intersect" in the part block of a sidecar.
It is the product of the two coverages, dst * src, which is one more
fixed-function blend state beside union's max and subtract's
dst * (1 - src) (mask-editing.md 5.2): the same scratch texture, the same
three vertices, no shader arithmetic. The product equals the minimum
wherever either side is fully in or out, and is the softer reading where
two soft edges overlap. Join::apply spells the three operations on the CPU
so the GPU tests can be held to one definition.

A layer that intersects with a part covering nothing now reports that it
covers nothing, so it is not rasterised as an empty slice. Old sidecars
never contain the word, so they read as before; a build from before this
reads "intersect" as a union, the existing unknown-join fallback, which
keeps the part visible rather than dropping it. Join::ALL keeps union and
subtract at indices 0 and 1 so a stored panel index still means the same
join.
2026-09-24 21:25:48 -04:00
dtourolle 84fade99ec Put the developer docs under docs/dev and index the folder for users first
docs/ had 26 developer documents flat beside the manual, and the two
audiences are very differently sized: most readers want the manual and
the gesture reference, a few want the register, the designs and the
measurements. The manual and gestures.md stay at the top; everything for
someone changing the code moves to docs/dev/, and the two documents that
name their own successors — the v0.1 milestone and the UI-refinement plan
— go to docs/dev/archive/ rather than being deleted, since both are still
cited. docs/README.md is the index, users first.

Every reference follows: code comments, Cargo manifests, the workflows,
the pre-commit hook, the bench and traceability tools (which locate the
repo root by docs/dev/requirements.md now), packaging, the Docker READMEs,
CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md and the README. The matrix links one level
deeper and is regenerated. Links out of the moved documents into the tree
gain a level; a link checker over every Markdown file finds none broken.
2026-09-20 21:16:03 +02:00
dtourolle 12f8990e09 Average a patch under the white balance picker, not one photosite
The probe's comment said a 192px render "averages a small neighbourhood
into each of its pixels". It does not: the composed shader fetches the
source at one position per output pixel - nearest for an unrotated
frame, four photosites blended otherwise - so the probe was a point
sample of a noisy sensor, and two painted-white air conditioners on the
same wall answered +37 and -50.

The tap is now narrowed to the patch of the canvas around the click, a
couple of percent of its width and square on screen, and rendered at
64x64 with interpolation forced on, which puts a sample on every sensor
pixel under it at any ordinary zoom. The samples are averaged, with the
void and clipped ones left out rather than allowed to pull the mean, and
fewer than half surviving is refused. compose_camera_probe takes the
patch; the merge's compose_camera_linear keeps its nearest sampling. The
readback shrinks from six megabytes to sixty-four kilobytes.

A frame of alternating warm and cool columns, averaging neutral, moves
the controls by at most two units; a point sample swung them to sixty.
2026-09-20 15:24:25 +02:00
dtourolle 4576499c3b Refuse a clipped highlight as a neutral
Sampling the overcast sky on a Canon 6D frame set tint to -100 and
temperature to -15 for a patch the canvas showed as pure white. A clipped
photosite is sensor white, not a colour: every channel stopped counting,
so what the tap hands back is the as-shot multipliers themselves, which
are strongly magenta, and the solver dutifully drove green to its stop.
The display shader already fades such a pixel to a neutral of the same
brightness before any operation runs, so the picker was balancing against
something the photographer could not see.

The probe now refuses a sample with any channel at or above the onset the
shader fades from, the way the solver already refuses black. The threshold
is one constant, CLIP_ONSET, formatted into the shader and read by the
probe, so the two cannot drift apart.
2026-09-20 13:41:17 +02:00
dtourolle 2f47087223 Measure the white balance probe in camera RGB, where the gains multiply
Pressing "pick" and clicking a near-neutral wall on a Canon 6D frame set
tint to -77 and turned the whole photograph green. The white balance
operation runs first in the chain, on camera RGB, before the body's base
curve and colour matrix; the probe was read off a display render after
all three, and the solve treated that sRGB triple as if the gains
multiplied it directly. On a JPEG the two spaces coincide, which is why
the existing tests passed while the picker was broken on every raw file.

The probe now reads the camera-space tap a merge stitches from, composed
under the edit's own framing so a fraction of the canvas is a fraction of
the probe, and puts the as-shot balance on itself - exactly the value the
operation's gains are about to multiply. No operations run in the tap, so
nothing has to be stripped and restored, and the display target is left
alone, so a sample that found nothing usable no longer needs a redraw.

A raw-frame test with the 6D's matrix and a typical as-shot balance
samples a warm grey and asserts the rendered pixel comes back neutral; it
fails on the previous probe.
2026-09-20 13:41:11 +02:00
dtourolle 2fd7690b6f Mark a pixel the lens correction pushed off the sensor with alpha 0 in the camera-space tap
The fused shader stored black with alpha 1 for a pixel whose source
coordinate left the frame, and the merge's warp averaged it in like any
other: a dark, badly interpolated fringe along every frame's edge, visible
as a seam wherever a frame ended and, later, as the edge the border fill
continued. The display keeps its opaque black; CameraLinear stores alpha 0
and the warp weights each sample by the alpha it interpolated, dropping a
sample that has none.
2026-09-19 20:41:20 +02:00
dtourolle 42d11d919b cargo fmt and clippy across the panorama work, and one lint master carried
The dr-face comparison is master's: a negated partial-order test on the
eye box's width, rewritten as the two conditions it meant.
2026-09-19 15:53:06 +02:00
dtourolle 75d2ceb23c Provenance in the sidecar, a launch hook for the page, and where it stands
derived_from and merge are top-level sidecar fields (FR-MRG-6): one line
per source in order, and how the composite was made. A build that
predates them keeps the lines as unknown and writes them back. The job
writes the sidecar beside the composite and stages it with its own
record when the composite goes through the outbox.

DARKROOM_START_MERGE=a.CR2,b.CR2 lands on the merge page at startup with
the job running on local files, on the model of DARKROOM_START_IDENTITY,
for looking at the page where synthetic clicks do not reach it. The fetch
and the start are shared with the grid's button.

panorama.md §11 records what exists, the fixture's figures, and the six
things still open, auto-crop first.
2026-09-19 15:24:20 +02:00
dtourolle 9b6b4942cf The camera-space tap: OutputMode::CameraLinear, composed with no operations
compose_camera_linear composes the fused pass with an empty operation
list, the file's orientation as the baseline, a view rect for the tile,
and a store of rgba32float. On the GPU, render_camera_linear is the only
entry that accepts it: it fills the profile uniforms neutral — unit white
balance, identity matrix, curve off — so what lands in the texture is the
sensor's numbers after the lens warp and nothing else (FR-MRG-2). A third
bind-group layout carries the format, as the linear one does, and the
readback is generalised to any pixel width for the f32 copy.

Thirty-two bits because the composite is written back at the sensor's
scale: a 14-bit sensor has 16 384 steps to white and f16 keeps 2 048 of
them in the top octave.
2026-09-19 15:24:12 +02:00
dtourolle ed4460cb9c Tag three requirements the code already meets
R5 says in its own note that zoom_resolution.rs establishes it as a
pixel equality; that file was tagged FR-DSP-5 alone. FR-DEV-19's three
sub-clauses carry eighty-three tags between them while the parent had
none; MaskLayer, which is the thing they edit, now carries it. And
NFR-R3 — a crash in decode does not take down the application, the
image is marked failed — is exactly what the decoder's panic guard and
the face sweep's unreadable mark do, tagged FR-RAW-4 and NFR-SEC-1 and
not the clause that asked for them.
2026-09-19 12:25:04 +02:00
dtourolle 696bafa9d5 Undefer AI subject masking, which shipped, and give it a clause
§7 still listed "AI subject masking — deferred per D11" while
MaskSource::Subject and MaskSource::Category, backed by dr-segment's
instance and semantic models, had been the primary way a local
adjustment is made for weeks. The code was tagged FR-DEV-3, which
names gradients and brushes and says nothing about a model.

FR-DEV-3i now states what exists: a subject or a category found by a
local model, stored as identity with the run's signature so that it
merges per field and reads as stale rather than wrong, then treated as
any other layer by the edge, stroke, composition and reveal clauses.
The one place it departs from FR-DEV-19 — coverage written run-length
coded beside the layer, so a stored subject renders without a model —
is recorded in the clause instead of left for the next audit to find.
The segmentation crate and the UI's selection module are tagged to it.
2026-09-19 12:25:03 +02:00
dtourolle d3b6127db6 Let a photographer name the state they liked, and go back to it or look at it
FR-DEV-5 asked for named snapshots of an edit state and FR-DEV-7 for a
comparison against a chosen one, and neither existed. The history stack
is per sitting and forgotten with it, on purpose — the gap that mattered
was an automatically saved mis-drag with no way back, and that was closed
first. What was left was the other half: a state the photographer wants
to keep *because* it is worth keeping, which is a different thing from a
step and is not served by making the steps last longer.

A snapshot is an edit state, and an edit state is exactly what a sidecar
version stores, so it is stored as one: a `[version]` block carrying
`snapshot-of = <uuid>`. The parameters, the masks and their parts, the
repairs and the film all arrive through the blocks that already carry
them, a merge keys on the uuid as it does for any version, and a build
that predates the key reads the block as a named version and keeps it —
the right failure. Only the pointer is new. The one reader that has to
know is `default_version`, which must never answer with a snapshot: a
file whose edit is missing is not a file whose edit is one of its saved
moments. The snapshots of an edit are listed by that pointer, oldest
first, the same on every device.

Writing them back removes what this sitting deleted and puts in what it
holds, and leaves standing whatever it never saw — a snapshot the other
device took since the photograph was opened here is not this device's to
remove by not knowing about it. That is the rule the version merge
already keeps, applied one level down, and it is why the save carries
the deleted ids rather than replacing the list wholesale as the masks
are. Each is re-pointed at the uuid the save settled on, because the
default may have been fused onto its canonical identity since the
snapshot was taken.

Restoring is one history step, so undo takes it back whole, as a paste
is. Taking and deleting are not steps: they change nothing about the
photograph, and an undo that removed a snapshot would be undoing a
decision to remember. Holding the eye beside one renders the snapshot
and hands the edit straight back — the same suspension "Before" uses,
against a point the photographer chose rather than the file. Two
sessions on the same photograph get ids that cannot collide, stamped
with the second and a random word, because the merge folds equal ids
into one.
2026-09-12 01:08:10 +02:00
dtourolle 4574c35236 Let a part be left out of a mask without being taken out of it
A layer built from parts was missing the one control a correction most
often wants: seeing what it did. The question a subtracted gradient
raises is whether it took only the sky, and the question a stroke raises
is whether it filled the shoulder — and the only way to ask either was
to remove the part and look, which answered the question and lost the
part. The layer's own ring answers a different question, about the
adjustment, and hiding eight layers to check one correction is not an
A/B anybody performs.

So a part carries `hidden`. It is an edit and a history step, as the
layer's switch is, and it is folded into the render fingerprint because
hiding a part changes the mask as surely as removing it does. Where the
mask is built the shown parts are walked rather than the parts, which
is what makes a hidden base hand the fold to the first part that is
shown — and a revealed layer whose every part is hidden clears its slice
rather than leaving whatever the last rasterisation put there to be
read back. `covers` asks the same shown parts, so a layer whose only
adding part is hidden costs no slice at all.

In the sidecar the key is `hidden`, in the part's block or, for the
base, in the mask block — under a word that cannot be confused with the
layer's `enabled`, which has always meant the layer. Absent means shown,
so no file written before the switch existed reads any differently.

The row wears the same ring the layer does, one row down, because it is
the same question about a smaller thing.
2026-09-12 01:08:10 +02:00
dtourolle a87139b838 Give every mask an eye and a colour, and put the brush where the mask is
The first build of seeing a mask showed the selected layer's, in one global
style, from a strip at the top of the panel. It answered the wrong question and
answered it somewhere nobody looked. What a photographer asks of two masks is
how they meet — where the sky's edge sits against the building's — and that
needs both on screen at once, in colours that can be told apart.

So each row of the stack has an eye, drawn in the colour its mask is shown in,
and each mask has six swatches to choose that colour from. Several can be open
at once; a new one comes up open, in the first colour nothing else is using.
The style — tint, alpha, outline — is the one setting that stays global, above
the stack, because three styles at once are three pictures that cannot be read
against each other. Alpha now draws every shown mask, each in its colour, on
black. In the pipeline a `Reveal` is a list of `(layer, colour)` rather than
one layer, and every reveal block carries its own colour.

The brush moves too. Select, Paint and Erase and the three sliders under them
sat at the top of the panel, appeared only once a row was selected, and said
nothing about which mask they acted on — so "how do I paint" and "how do I
correct the model's outline" both had the same answer and nobody found it.
They sit under the selected mask's parts now, beside the swatches, and on a
subject or a category the hint says what a stroke there does: it becomes a
part of this mask, joined to the model's, and can be taken out again.

Eyes and colours are viewing state, on the session and not on the layer, so a
photograph reopened has every eye closed — the stored-mask round-trip test
asserts it.
2026-09-11 19:03:51 +02:00
dtourolle c045702a47 Show the photographer the mask they are shaping
Nobody can refine an edge they are not being shown. The only thing drawn on
the canvas was the region overlay — a false-coloured picture of what the model
*detected* — which knows nothing of a layer's feather, its falloff, its
morphology, its invert or its opacity, and nothing at all about a gradient, a
range or a stroke. Every control added for mask editing therefore acted on
something invisible, which is why the whole feature reads as absent rather
than as unfinished.

A layer's finished mask now draws over the photograph in one of three styles:
a tint for whether the right thing is selected, an alpha for where the edge
is, an outline for whether that edge is registered against the detail the
other two hide.

The hard part is not the shader. A selection with no adjustment on it changes
no pixel, so it is not active, so it holds no slice of the mask array and is
never rasterised — and that is exactly the layer somebody wants to look at,
for the whole of the time between choosing a subject and deciding what to do
to it. So `MaskStack::rendered` is `active()` plus the layer being looked at,
and the rasteriser, the composer and the distance-field builder all index by
position in it. Which is also why the design's "two uniforms, no recompile" is
not available: a uniform can select a slot, it cannot conjure one.

The reveal is never on the graph. It reaches the pipeline as an argument to
`compose_revealing`, and `compose_for` — which the exporter, the thumbnail and
the neutral probe all call — has no way to ask for one. A flag on the graph
would have been shorter, would have type-checked, and would have been one
forgotten reset away from a red tint baked into an exported file.

And the tools that shape a mask now arm. `Masking.tool` is an `in` property
only Rust may write, and the handler wrote nothing back, so the strip reported
"Select" however many times Paint was pressed and the paint area was never
enabled — the brush, the parts and the whole of FR-DEV-19b reachable from no
control in the application.

The region overlay stands down while a mask is being shown, and its button now
says what it hides: two overlays that look alike and mean different things is
worse than either.
2026-09-10 20:28:06 +02:00
dtourolle df741a8a49 Let one mask be built from more than one selection, and paint into it
A mask the model draws arrives approximately right — stopping inside a
shoulder, leaking into the hair — and FR-DEV-3's edge controls move the
*whole* boundary, so no value of feather or dilation fixes two errors that
go opposite ways. What fixes them is a second selection joined to the first,
and a layer that held exactly one source had nowhere to put one. The brush
the core has had all along was reachable from no control in the application.

A layer is now an ordered list of parts. Each names a source and how it
joins the mask before it — added to it, or taken out of it — and carries its
own edge treatment, because a model's soft coverage and a stroke painted
where it stopped short do not want the same feather. Invert and opacity stay
on the layer, where the composed shader already reads them.

The sidecar grows `[part]` blocks and nothing else. A layer of one part
writes exactly the bytes it always did; a mask block with no part blocks
after it reads back as one part; and a stroke, a join or a source this build
cannot read costs that part rather than the layer. So every sidecar in every
library still parses to the edit it always was.

On the device the parts fold into the layer's one slice, so eight layers
still cost eight channels: union is a `max` blend and subtraction is the
erase blend the brush already used. A part is drawn into a scratch texture
before it is joined, and that is not incidental — an erase stroke means a
hole in *that part*, not a hole in the mask, and drawn straight onto the
accumulator it would punch through the subject underneath. A layer of one
part skips all of it and takes the path it always took.

In the interface: a part list under the selected layer with a chip saying
which way each joins, Add and Subtract beside it, a Select/Paint/Erase strip
with the brush's size, hardness and flow, and a drag on the photograph that
paints. Pressing Paint on a mask that cannot hold a stroke joins a part that
can, rather than explaining that a subject is not a brush. A whole stroke is
one step in the history.

The edge controls now shape the part that is selected rather than the layer,
which is the one behaviour change to an existing control: with a correction
selected, the feather slider softens the correction and leaves the model's
mask alone.
2026-09-07 20:00:40 +02:00
dtourolle af89433aee Offer the lens profile as a tick box, since applying it silently reads as absent
The develop panel's Optics group is three manual sliders: distortion, chromatic
aberration and lens vignetting. The automatic correction was already there — the
file's EXIF lens is matched against the bundled Lensfun database on open and the
coefficients are fanned out to all three — but nothing in the interface said so
except a line of grey text under the camera reading "· corrected", and there was
no way to decline it. From the outside that is indistinguishable from the
feature not existing, which is how it was read.

`dr-lens` states the rule this breaks: an automatic correction that silently
does nothing is worse than one the user can see is unavailable. The caption
satisfied the letter of it and not the point — a photographer looking for
"apply the lens profile" found three sliders and no switch.

So the profile is now a control. It is a capability rather than a flag on the
session, because everything a photographer sets travels one road: the capability
list feeds the generated panel, `Preset` captures it, the sidecar stores it and
the undo stack replays it. A bool on the side would have needed adding to each
of those four by hand and would have been forgotten in at least one — which is
exactly how the mask stack came to be missing from the history.

It is on by default, which is what `switch_on` is for: the coefficients are a
measurement of the lens that took the photograph, so accepting them is neutral
and declining them is the edit. The sidecar therefore stores nothing for the
ordinary case and the correction still happens.

The switch appears only where a profile was matched. A tick box on a photograph
whose lens the database has never heard of would be a control that looks
available and does nothing, which is the failure the rule above names rather
than an instance of following it — those photographs are told "· no profile" in
words instead, and one whose box is unticked now says "· profile off", which is
a third fact and not either of the other two.

Two things had to be built underneath. `ParamKind::Bool` was in the core's
closed enum and mapped to a row kind here, and had no control behind it in
`adjust.slint`: a parameter declaring itself a switch was flattened into a row
that drew nothing at all. Nothing shipped had one until now, so the gap cost
nothing and was invisible. And `Check` self-toggled, which is right for a
settings page that owns its value and wrong for a panel row that is a view of
the edit graph — the click would have answered by replacing the binding with a
literal, and the next undo or pasted preset would have moved the value with the
tick left where the finger put it. It now takes `controlled`, and the generated
row uses it.

The manual sliders are unchanged and still trim whatever the profile leaves, so
switching it off is "correct this by hand" rather than "stop correcting".
2026-09-07 00:27:47 +02:00
dtourolle 901f51e6c4 Point at something grey and let the pipeline work out the rest
FR-DEV-3 has asked for "white balance (temperature/tint, and picker)" since
it was written, and only the first half existed. `WidgetKind::WhitePoint` was
in the vocabulary and `develop::supported` answered false for it, so the node
degraded to two sliders — correct behaviour that had quietly become the only
behaviour. Sampling a neutral is the first move of the global tonal pass and
every colour judgement afterwards is measured against where the grey was put,
so guessing at two sliders until a wall stops looking green is the wrong way
round.

The awkward part is that a picker genuinely needs to know how far a hundred
units of temperature move red against blue, and that number is declared in
the node's own file. So the inversion lives in `dr_pipeline::neutral` rather
than in the interface: the canvas hands over a colour, the core finds the
operation that asked to be driven by a pixel and bisects its declared
response until the sample comes back grey. Nothing in `ui/` names white
balance, and nothing holds a second copy of a response that would be wrong
the first time somebody adjusted the range. A bisection rather than a
closed-form inverse because only monotonicity is part of the bargain — the
expression is free to become a table tomorrow.

The result is rounded to the precision the control is drawn at, which is not
cosmetic: unrounded, sampling something already neutral lands a
ten-thousandth off zero, and the photograph comes back modified with an undo
step for a correction of nothing.

On the panel side this needed one distinction the generated path was
missing. `is_on_canvas` was being read as "and so the panel draws nothing for
it", which is right for a crop — four edge fractions are not controls anyone
drags in a list — and wrong for an eyedropper, which *writes* temperature and
tint and leaves them exactly the controls a photographer reaches for next.
So a sampling widget keeps its sliders and puts the affordance that arms the
canvas in the group's heading, built like the reset beside it. One click, one
sample, one history step: `Edit::Action` never coalesces, and there is no
hover preview to fill the stack with temperatures nobody chose.

Declaring the presentation also groups temperature and tint under one undo
step, where they were two. That follows from what `Presentation` means and
reads correctly — white balance is one decision — but it is a change, and
worth saying so.
2026-09-06 19:01:52 +02:00
dtourolle 68ebf5d78b Let a mask start from a tone or a colour, not only a shape
Every local adjustment began from a shape: painted, drawn with a handle, or
found by a model. So the only way to hold back a sky was to draw a line near
where it ended, and the only way to warm skin was to paint round it — both of
which put the edit's edge where the photographer put a gesture rather than
where the picture changes. A gradient across a treeline halos, and an
adjustment traced round a face stops on the outline of a hand.

MaskSource grows two variants that select by what a pixel *is*. Luminance
carries two bounds on the perceptual tone scale plus a softness; Colour carries
an arc of hue, a range of chroma, and one softness for every edge of both. Five
floats and three, so they diff, sync and merge per field under FR-NC-9 exactly
as a gradient's geometry does — the property a stored raster has none of, and
the reason the model's coverage had to sit beside its source rather than inside
it.

The pixels are the shader's business and nowhere else's. `mask.wgsl` takes the
demosaiced source as a sixth binding and two new modes read it: decode, balance,
pull a clipped photosite back to neutral, apply the camera matrix, then weigh
the band. Nothing crosses to the CPU but the numbers and the matrix, and each
mask texel averages its own footprint in the source, so a band lands on the tone
an area is rather than on whichever texel a proxy grid happened to land on.

The photograph it measures is the one the camera recorded, before this edit. A
band over the edited result would slide out from under the edit as the edit was
made — raising the highlights would change which pixels counted as highlights,
and the slider would chase its own mask.

Feather, falloff and morphology stay off a range layer, which is what
`shapeable` already meant. All three are functions of the signed distance from
a boundary, and a range has no boundary to be at a distance from; its edge is
the softness of its own band, in the band's units. Offering them would be four
controls that move and change nothing.
2026-09-06 19:01:48 +02:00
dtourolle 81b1ae8c42 Measure the haze from the picture, and divide it back out
Four files named dehaze as a member of the compositional detail family —
`detail.rs` twice, `dr-gpu`'s detail module, `ops/README.md` and
`capture_sharpen.rs` — and no such node existed. Every one of them was
describing the family by listing clarity, texture and a control the
photographer could not reach.

Haze is the one degradation the controls already in the chain cannot
remove, and the reason is spatial rather than tonal. Scattering
composites an airlight over the scene in proportion to distance, so the
lift is per-pixel: a black point that clears the mountains crushes the
foreground, and a contrast curve that clears the mountains does the
same. So the node has to estimate the transmission at every pixel, which
is the dark-channel prior — the local minimum over the channels and over
a patch is the airlight that has been added there — and then invert the
scattering model with it.

The airlight is taken as neutral and as unit, which removes the one part
of the published method this stage cannot perform. Estimating it
properly is a whole-frame reduction, and the detail chain has none: it
hands each pass the pass before it. It is also unnecessary, because
white balance is the first node in the chain and has already driven the
illuminant to grey, so only the magnitude is unknown — and an unknown
magnitude on the veil is a scale factor on the amount slider, which the
photographer is setting by eye regardless.

The patch is a fraction of the frame's shorter edge, through
`RenderScale::frame_fraction`, and never a count of pixels. It has to be
wide enough to contain something dark and narrow enough that what it
measures is still local, and both of those are statements about how much
of the composition it covers — so it must cover the same proportion of
the picture on a proxy as in the export, or the file is sharpened for a
patch three times narrower than the one that was tuned on screen.

Affording it needs an identity a Gaussian does not have. Erosions
compose by adding their structuring elements, so the minimum over a run
of d followed by the minimum over k points spaced d apart is the exact
minimum over the whole kd window. At the square root that is 16 taps
rather than 61 at 4K, and it is the same filter rather than an
approximation of one — which is the difference from the strided kernel
`local_contrast` refuses, where sampling an image that is not
band-limited aliases into the base and comes back as mottling.

It runs first among the compositional detail nodes, at order 125: after
noise reduction, because dividing by a transmission below one amplifies
the noise in the veiled distance by exactly the factor it recovers the
contrast by, and before clarity and texture, coarse before fine, so that
their base is computed on the picture the veil has left rather than on a
modelling about to be divided out.

What it cannot honour is the placement dehaze most wants. It shifts
colour — it subtracts a grey term and rescales, so saturation changes
wherever the veil is thick — and the colour work would ideally be
correcting the picture that leaves here. The detail stage runs as a
group after every point operation, because a neighbourhood pass is a
separate dispatch over a texture the fused pass has finished writing, so
an order placing this node ahead of `vibrance` would be a lie the chain
cannot tell. Interleaving would mean splitting the fused pass in half
around it, at the cost of a second full-frame dispatch and intermediate
for every edit in the catalogue whether it dehazes or not. The
declaration records that rather than leaving it to be rediscovered.

FR-DEV-18 is added to the requirements register alongside it. The tag
had nowhere to point, and an orphan tag fails the traceability gate
rather than quietly counting for nothing.
2026-09-06 19:01:47 +02:00
dtourolle 7c3e1d2c54 Let the shadows and the highlights carry a colour the picture never had
The colour mixer is the only chromatic control in the chain, and it can only
turn a hue that is already in the frame. Ask it for cool shadows against warm
highlights and it has nothing to take hold of: the shadows of a correctly
balanced photograph are near enough neutral that there is no band there to
turn, and a monochrome conversion hands it a picture with no hue in it at all.
Split toning is the oldest look in the book and every developer worth comparing
against ships it; there was no way to reach it from here.

So colour_grading, declared like any other node — a hue and a strength for the
shadows, the midtones and the highlights, and a global cast over the frame. It
targets a tonal range rather than a hue, which is the whole difference between
the two controls: it puts colour where none was rather than turning what it
finds. It sits at 105, after the mixer has had the last word on the colours
that are in the picture and before the detail stage.

The mechanism is one helper. Three cosines 120 degrees apart are the hue wheel
written directly as an RGB direction, and their sum is zero at every angle, so
exp2 turns them into three gains whose product is exactly one — a cast tilts
the balance without moving the level. A grade that doubled as an exposure
change is the failure that has the photographer chasing brightness with a
colour slider, and it is corrected with a control that cannot reach it. The
three tonal weights partition the scale rather than overlapping, the midtones
being whatever the two ends leave, so setting all three to one hue is exactly
the global cast and a split tone does not colour its own midtones as a side
effect of its halves meeting. Full strength is half a stop on the leading
channel, the ceiling white balance already holds itself to.

Neutral is declared rather than inferred, which is what `active:` is for. A hue
with no strength behind it is a direction with no distance, so under the
default rule nudging one would have put the node into every fused shader for a
change nobody can see. Summing the strengths is zero exactly when all four are,
and they cannot go negative to cancel each other. The opposite reading —
neutral as "nothing has been touched" — fails the other way round: red is hue
zero, so a grade toward red never moves a hue off its default and would never
have been applied at all.

It asks for a colour wheel, the widget the descriptor vocabulary has been
carrying with no operation behind it. Nothing draws one yet, and that is fine
by construction: the panel takes the first widget it implements and falls
through to sliders otherwise, so this arrives as eight ordinary controls that
work. Each parameter is named for its own range for exactly that reason — in a
flat list, four sliders called "Hue" are four controls nobody can tell apart.

FR-DEV-12 is written into requirements.md beside it. A TRACES tag naming a
requirement that is not defined there is an orphan, and the traceability gate
fails on those rather than quietly counting them. The label catalogue gets one
line for the operation's display name; the eight parameters derive correctly
and are left to.
2026-09-06 18:51:40 +02:00
dtourolle efa9d84aad Correct the lens first and settle the grain last
`Attribute::ALL` has claimed since it was written to be roughly the order a
photographer works in, and 474dcf0 moved `Compose` to the front on exactly that
argument. Both ends went on contradicting it.

`Optics` sat fifth, so the column offered the lens corrections after the tones
they change. Removing a vignette brightens the frame; an exposure judged before
that correction has to be judged again after it, which is the definition of the
wrong order. `Detail` sat fourth, so sharpening and noise reduction — the only
work here that depends on everything above it, and the only work that cannot be
judged at fit view at all — were offered before the lens had even been put
right.

So `Optics, Compose, Tone, Colour, Effect, Detail`. `Optics` leads even
`Compose` because it is not a decision about the photograph at all: it is
undoing what the equipment did, a property of the capture rather than a choice.
`Effect` after `Colour` is a look laid over a settled picture, and is the one
slot that is genuinely arguable — a spectral film simulation declares `renders`
and replaces the base curve, which is a case for treating it as foundational
instead, and e235e99 filed film under `Effect` only days ago. The doc comment
records that tension rather than pretending to settle it; an array of six
cannot say "last, except when it is first".

`decl::Attr::ALL` moves with it. It is the second spelling of one vocabulary,
compiled by `build.rs` where `descriptor` is not visible, and the agreement
test in `declared/mod.rs` zips the two positionally — that test is what caught
the last reorder, and it would have caught this one.

Nothing persists a position in this list, which is what makes the reorder safe
rather than merely tidy. `Scope` packs one bit per attribute indexed by
`Attribute::ALL`, but `bits` is private, has no accessor and no `serde`; what
reaches a settings file is `develop.copy_attributes`, a list of names read back
through `Attribute::from_name`. A photographer's copy scope survives untouched
— only the order the names happen to be written in changes.

6a97fdf is why this is worth a commit now rather than a shrug: the
contradiction was harmless while the list only fed a row of chips nobody reads
in order, and stopped being harmless when the same list began driving a column
read top to bottom.

The matrix follows the two files' shifted line numbers.
2026-09-05 21:17:56 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 e235e99cce Move the film to Effect in the descriptor that is actually read
An earlier commit claimed to move `film_sim` from `[tone, colour]` to
`[effect]` and did not. It edited `ops/film_sim.yaml`, where `attributes:` is
read, validated against the vocabulary, and then dropped: a `rust:` node
publishes its own descriptor, and the type still said tone and colour. The
stock went on appearing in the Light group beside exposure and again in Colour
beside white balance, exactly as before, and every test passed.

Nothing caught it because nothing could. The declaration parsed, the parity
tests compare ids rather than attributes, and an operation filed under the
wrong groups renders perfectly. It surfaced only on screen, as a missing
Effects tab — which is indistinguishable from a category that genuinely has
nothing in it, and is precisely how `Optics` looked for as long as it was
empty.

So three changes rather than one:

`FilmSim`'s descriptor declares `Attribute::Effect`, which is the move the
earlier commit described.

`attributes:` joins the keys a `rust:` node may not carry, beside `params`,
`uniforms`, `wgsl`, `helpers`, `define` and `label`. The rule was already
written — "its descriptor comes from the type" — and attributes were the one
field that slipped past it. A key that is silently ignored is worse than one
that is rejected, because it reads as though it worked; the eight hand-written
declarations lose a line that never did anything.

And a test asserts that every attribute the chain carries reaches the tab
strip. That is the property that was actually broken, and its failure mode is
invisible from every direction: the controls exist, they are in the shader,
and there is no way to filter to them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 18:28:59 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 474dcf0bf6 Let Compose lead the attributes, as their own doc always said
`Attribute::ALL` claims to be "roughly the order a photographer works in" and
then listed framing fifth, behind tone, colour and detail. Framing is the
first decision made about a photograph and the one every later judgement is
made inside — there is no sense balancing tones across a frame about to lose a
third of its width.

The contradiction was harmless while the list only fed a row of chips nobody
reads in order. It stops being harmless now that the same list drives a column
read top to bottom.

`declared::Attr::ALL` moves with it. The two are separate spellings of one
vocabulary and a test asserts they agree, which is what caught this rather
than the order silently disagreeing between the YAML front end and the crate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 18:13:44 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 601c984894 Fold a photograph's rival default versions back into one
Picking the newer of two default versions stopped the wrong edit being shown,
but it did not close the split: the losing version stayed in the file, and a
device holding disjoint work — a crop made here, an exposure change made there
— still contributed only one of the two.

Worse, the next write made it larger. `amend` looks its version up by uuid,
neither of the two was ours, so the miss minted a *third* `default = 1` block
and the file grew one rival per device per photograph.

`Sidecar::fuse_default_versions` folds them down. The version with the highest
`(revision, modified)` is the accumulator and every other default is merged
into it as the remote, which is what makes the fold order-independent —
`Version::merge` raises its own revision to `max + 1` as it goes, so merging a
chain in ascending order stops being ascending after the first step and a third
device would be dropped. Contested values resolve to the winner, disjoint keys
survive from both sides because the merge is key-wise, and ratings come across
under `merge_judgement`, so a device that never judged the frame cannot erase
one that did.

The result is a function of the file's bytes alone, so two devices that fuse
independently reach the same document and converge instead of overwriting each
other.

Called wherever a sidecar is parsed:

- `amend`, with the write's own uuid, so the fold lands on the identity this
  device is about to use and the lookup below it hits instead of missing.
- `spawn_sidecar_fetch`, so opening a photograph shows everything done to it
  rather than whichever half won.
- `drain_one`, because `merge_into` reconciles by uuid and would otherwise
  publish the split rather than resolve it.
- `presets::load_local` and `save_local` — a local sidecar's folder may be
  synced by something else entirely, and gets the same split.

A file with one default under the expected uuid comes back byte-identical, so
this costs nothing on the ordinary write and no sidecar is uploaded merely for
having been read.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 16:13:53 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 98fcf8e98e Ask which edit is newer, not which uuid sorts first
A photograph edited on two devices ends up with two `[version]` blocks in one
sidecar, both marked `default = 1`. Five of the thirty-eight sidecars in the
local cache are in that state right now.

`default_version` answered with the first `is_default` it met in map order,
and the map is keyed on uuid — so which device's work the photographer saw was
decided by which randomly minted uuid happened to sort lower. On
`IMG_20130625_0033` that is `0545c20a` over `679fe872`: a four-star rating from
the twenty-first of August standing in front of the one-star made on the
thirtieth, with nothing anywhere saying the newer judgement existed.

Resolved by `(revision, modified)` instead, which is the discriminator
`Version::merge` already uses — revision first so that a device with a skewed
clock cannot win by claiming a later timestamp (FR-NC-8), and the timestamp
only to break an exact tie.

This makes the reader pick the right one. It does not make the two converge:
the edit that lost is still in the file, and a device that holds disjoint work
— a crop here, an exposure change there — still only contributes one of them.
That is the next commit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 16:13:49 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 a56baa9042 Let rustfmt have the assertion it reflowed
The closure taken down to `&dyn Operation` needed its call site re-wrapped,
and I wrapped it by hand rather than letting rustfmt decide: it fits on one
line at the workspace width. `cargo clippy` was run on the change and
`cargo fmt --check` was not, which is the whole of how it got through — the
two catch different things and CI runs both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 15:37:46 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 2841eaf9a1 Take the layer-chain test's closure down to &dyn Operation
`clippy::borrowed_box` is denied by the workspace lint set, and the closure
added with the optics exclusion took `&Box<dyn Operation>` — a borrow of the
box rather than of the thing in it, which says nothing the plain trait object
does not.

Caught by `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -D warnings`, which is
what CI runs and what the workspace tests do not: a lint on test code only
appears when the tests are compiled as a clippy target.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 15:14:15 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 c4ddcbe0f7 Look the lens up and say plainly whether one was found
`dr-lens` has held a complete Lensfun lookup — distortion, TCA and vignetting
coefficients from a lens name, a focal length and an aperture — with no
dependents anywhere in the workspace. The three corrections it feeds now
exist in the graph, so this connects the two and finishes the chain.

The coefficient structs stay duplicated. `dr-pipeline` is organised around
having no dependencies so its codegen is testable without a device or a
database (ARCH §6.5a), and `dr-lens` carries an XML parser and 5.5 MB of
profile data. Neither crate can convert to the other, so the conversion goes
above both, in `develop.rs`, which is the only place that sees them together.

Both traits grow the same defaulted door. The optical corrections do not sit
on the same side of the fetch — distortion and CA rewrite coordinates and are
`Warp`s, vignetting applies a gain to the pixel already there and is an
ordinary node — and fanning a profile out by which trait each happens to
implement would make the caller reason about that distinction. Each correction
takes its own share of the whole profile instead, and `set_lens_profile` walks
both lists identically.

The lookup happens in `set_source_metadata` rather than in its caller, because
that is the one place a session is told which file it came from. Doing it
there makes it unforgettable, in the shape `FilmRebake` already uses for the
other derived thing — and, more to the point, makes *clearing* unforgettable:
a session that opened a second photograph while still holding the first one's
profile would correct it for the wrong optics, invisibly, in a way that looks
exactly like the lens.

It needs the whole shot and not just a name. Distortion is interpolated across
a zoom's focal range and vignetting depends strongly on aperture — a fast
prime can be two stops down in the corners wide open and clean by f/8 — so a
lookup missing either returns coefficients measured for a shot nobody took.
Missing any of the three refuses rather than guesses.

A profile is derived, not persisted: it comes from the file's EXIF and a
database, so it is not a parameter, not in the sidecar and not undoable. What
is an edit is the manual trim beside it, which each correction composes with
the measurement — so a photographer can lean on it, override it, or work
without one.

`InfoPanel` gains a lens line, and it distinguishes three cases rather than
two. `dr-lens` states the rule it exists for: an automatic correction that
silently did nothing is worse than one the user can see is unavailable. A
session with no header draws nothing, a header naming no lens reads "Lens not
recorded", and a lens the database has never heard of reads "· no profile".
Collapsing the last two would send somebody hunting for a profile that was
never missing — which, for third-party and adapted glass, is the ordinary case.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 15:11:32 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 a1165ef182 Put the coordinate-domain lens corrections into the graph
`lens.rs` has held a `Warp` trait, a composer and two implementations —
distortion and lateral chromatic aberration — since they were written, and
`compose_warps` was called by nothing outside its own tests. The corrections
existed, were correct, and never touched a photograph.

`EditGraph` now holds them, and `compose_full` emits them between the framing
prologue and the fetch. Distortion first, then CA: each warp receives the
position the previous one produced, and lateral CA is a magnification about
the optical axis of the *undistorted* frame, so measured on a barrel-distorted
one it would be fitted to a radius no profile describes.

They reach the panel the way framing already does — through `capabilities`.
That was the one open question and existing practice answered it: framing is
also not an `Operation`, also has parameters a photographer sets, and also
arrives through that list. Because `Preset::capture` walks the same list, the
sidecar, the clipboard and the undo stack carry a warp's parameters with
nothing registered anywhere, and no file under `ui/` names one (FR-DEV-3a).

`state()` destructures `EditGraph` field by field precisely so that a new
field cannot be forgotten, and it was not.

Chromatic aberration is the only thing that samples per channel, and
`splits_channels` is what keeps everything else from paying for it. Red and
blue are fetched from positions green is not — green is the reference and
never moves, so a wrong correction still leaves one channel sharp rather than
softening all three. With no CA in the chain the single-fetch path is emitted
instead.

The interpolating sampler is now chosen by framing *or* an active warp. Asking
framing alone would have nearest-neighboured a distortion correction on an
unstraightened frame, and that aliasing reads as a bad profile rather than as
a missing filter.

The warps go in the geometry invalidation key rather than the colour one: they
decide which source pixel a colour is read from, so a tile cached across a
distortion change would keep drawing the previous correction. The pipeline
cache needs nothing new — `hash_source` already covers the generated body, and
uniform values never enter it, so arming a warp recompiles and dragging it
does not. Both are asserted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 15:03:16 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 e17b909d41 Connect the lens vignetting correction to the pipeline
`ops/vignetting.rs` has carried a complete descriptor, polynomial, helper
and test suite without an entry in `ops/`, so it was never in `chain()`.
It reached no photograph and no panel, and `Attribute::Optics` was an empty
category in consequence — filtered out of the tab strip for having no rows,
by a chain that had never been given its only member.

Declaring it needs the one thing the operation was written against and
which did not exist. `wgsl_body` reads `radius`, and the module claimed
"the composer publishes `radius` in the shader prologue for exactly this
reason". It did not. `sample_source` now does, in both sampling branches,
beside the `source_px` it already published for the same class of caller.

It is corner-normalised there, which is the part that is easy to leave out.
`p` spans ±0.5·aspect, so its length at the corner is 0.5·length(aspect) —
about 0.901 on a 3:2 frame, not 1. Lensfun's polynomials are fitted against
a corner radius of 1, so passing `length(p)` straight in evaluates every one
of them short of where it was measured, by a factor that changes with the
aspect ratio. It would have read as a correction that is simply too weak,
which is indistinguishable from a bad profile. Both `lens.rs` and
`framing.rs` asserted the normalisation `p` does not have; corrected.

`order: 5` puts the correction ahead of the tonal stages, and the ordering
is load-bearing rather than tidy. Recovering a corner means dividing by an
attenuation below one — about two stops for a fast prime wide open — so run
after the highlights have been rolled off and clipped, the lift has nowhere
to go and the corners posterise instead of brightening.

`layer_chain` now drops `Optics` as well as the neighbourhood operations.
A local vignetting slider would have worked, which is what makes it worth
excluding: `radius` measures from the centre of the whole photograph and a
mask cannot move the optical axis, so it would lay a frame-centred radial
ramp across the picture and multiply it by the mask. The existing exclusion
covers operations that move and do nothing; this one covers an operation
that moves and does something its name does not promise. The rule both
share is now written down.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 14:34:24 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 8e7b1350bf Name the frame's category for the decision, not the maths
`Attribute::Geometry` becomes `Attribute::Compose`, and `film_sim` moves
from `[tone, colour]` to `[effect]`.

Two categories were doing the wrong job. "Geometry" describes what crop,
straighten and the quarter turns do to coordinates — but it describes lens
distortion correction exactly as well, and that is not a compositional
choice at all. Naming the attribute for the photographer's decision is what
separates it from `Optics`: one is what the lens did, the other is what
they chose. The maths the two have in common is not the thing worth
filing them under.

A film stock declared both `tone` and `colour`, so "Kodachrome" appeared in
the Light group beside exposure and again in Colour beside white balance —
two places, neither of which is where anyone looks for it. It is neither:
`Effect` is defined in this same file as "applied rather than corrected — a
look, not a fix", which is what a stock is. That it moves tone and colour
is true of every look, and is not what the attribute is for.

`from_name` still accepts "geometry" on the way in. That string is
persisted in `develop.copy_attributes`, and an entry it fails to parse is
not an error — `presets::scope_for` logs it and drops it — so without the
alias an existing settings file would have quietly narrowed what a paste
carries. `name` writes the current spelling, so the file migrates itself
the first time it is saved.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 14:34:03 +02:00
dtourolle 89c4ff1820 Store what the model found, so a reopened photograph keeps its masks
A subject or category layer was written to the sidecar as identity alone —
which run, which instance, which category — on the reasoning that the pixels
are reproducible by running the same model over the same image. They are, but
only by *running the model*, and nothing runs one except a photographer
pressing "find subjects". So on every path that did not already have a run in
memory the layer resolved to no coverage, `MaskPass::render` logged "has no
distance field; skipping", and the adjustment was silently absent:

  - reopening an edited photograph rendered it without its local adjustments,
    and then saved that state back on the way out;
  - a batch export from the grid could not have them at any point, because
    `render_from_library` opens a session, applies a version and renders, and
    there is no model anywhere on that path. Three hundred files written
    without the edits their photographer made, over a log warning.

Neither failure announced itself. The generated shader still emits the layer's
block and the empty placeholder multiplies it by zero, so the result is a
well-formed frame that is simply missing an edit — `mask_is_stale` already
named the state and called it "not stale, just unrenderable".

The coverage now travels in the file, as one `coverage = w h levels payload`
line at the end of the layer's block.

Two levels, and that is not a compromise. The model hands out a byte per pixel
but `Shaped::build` measures its distance field from `coverage >= 128` and
throws the shoulder away on the first line; everything soft about the rendered
edge comes afterwards from the layer's feather and falloff, which are read off
the distance. So one bit per pixel is not an approximation of what the model
said — it is exactly the part of it that reaches a pixel, and the stored mask
renders the identical frame. Storing all 256 levels would have stored 1.7 MB
of bilinear interpolation to reconstruct a predicate, and would not even have
compressed: a model mask is a bilinear upsample of a coarse grid, so almost no
two adjacent bytes are alike. Measured on a simulated sky and a simulated
figure at 1600x1067, against 1.71 MB raw: 4.0 kB and 6.5 kB at two levels,
46 kB and 76 kB at sixteen, 835 kB and 1.43 MB at all 256. The level count is
still written into the line, so a later build that finds a use for the
shoulder can write sixteen and this one will read them rather than misreading
a stream of lengths as pairs.

The coder is hand-rolled — run-length pairs in a base-64 varint — because
`dr-pipeline` links nothing, which is the property that lets the descriptor
and codegen logic be tested without a device. `flate2` would have been fewer
lines and a dependency in the one crate that has none.

Where it lives matters more than how it is coded. The raster sits on
`MaskLayer` beside the source, not inside `MaskSource::Subject`: the source is
*identity*, which is what makes it diff as a handful of numbers and merge per
field under FR-NC-9, and a raster in there would have given the merge a binary
blob to arbitrate. It takes no part in `MaskLayer`'s equality for the same
reason — a device that has run the model and one that has not hold the same
edit, and counting the difference would raise a conflict over a cache and let
`remote_wins` answer it by discarding the only copy of the pixels.

Encoding happens in `masks_for_storage`, on the save path, rather than in
`ensure_subject_fields` where every coverage already funnels through.
`ensure_subject_fields` runs on a drag — dilating a mask with a compound
morphology rebuilds the field every frame — and encoding a megapixel raster
per frame is the kind of work NFR-P5 exists to keep off a gesture. Saving
happens once, when the photograph stops being the open one, and already costs
a network round trip.

Version skew holds both ways. A file with no `coverage` line reads exactly as
it did before, which is a layer that needs the model run; an unreadable one
costs the pixels and not the layer, because the layer is the edit and the
raster is a cache of it. An old build reading a new file drops the key it does
not understand, which costs a model run and no work. And a payload that will
not compress is refused rather than truncated: a checkerboard would encode to
twice the raster it came from, so past 64 kB nothing is stored and the
behaviour falls back to what it was — half a mask would render as a mask that
is confidently wrong, which is the failure that tells nobody.
2026-08-30 21:28:54 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 3d248cfb79 Export the photograph, not the canvas
Zooming the develop view changed the exported file. `Framing::view` is
kept out of the sidecar, out of `is_active` and out of `output_size`
precisely so that it cannot — but those exclusions keep it out of the
*edit*, and an export is a *render*. `visible_rect` deliberately folds
the view into the single rect the fused shader's prologue samples, so
`render_for_export` inherited it: at 4:1 it wrote the middle of the
frame, magnified to fill the file at the full output size, with the
detail kernels scaled four times over because `render_scale` folds the
view in as well. `render_thumbnail` did the same to the grid.

`render_uncropped` already suspends the view for this exact reason, so
the fix is its pattern: one `render_the_file` that both file-producing
paths go through, composing inside the suspension since the view
reaches the shader as a uniform baked at composition time. Restored
whatever happens — leaving the graph un-zoomed after a failed export
would throw away where the photographer was looking.

Nothing caught it because the guard checked the wrong things.
`zooming_does_not_change_the_exported_image` asserted the output size
and the crop; both held perfectly throughout. Renamed to
`zooming_does_not_change_the_size_or_the_crop`, which is what it
tests, and the pixels are now guarded where pixels exist. The new test
uses a ramp rather than quadrants deliberately: a four-quadrant frame
is self-similar under a centred zoom, and the first version of this
test passed against the bug because of it.

Traces FR-EXP-9, which asks for the full-quality pipeline "regardless
of what the display was showing".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-30 19:41:30 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 4efab496c2 Put the refinement on a slider, per layer
Benchmarks / CPU and I/O (per commit) (push) Successful in 3m27s
Benchmarks / Frame budget (on demand) (push) Skipped
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 1h14m30s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 43s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Failing after 46s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Successful in 1h8m56s
The evidence was being gathered and spent immediately at one strictness
nobody could see or change. This makes it a control.

`MaskLayer::refine` is shaping, like the feather, and it lives on the layer
for the layer's reason: two layers may sit on the same category and want
different amounts of it, and the model ran once for both.

## What the segmentation now stores

`CategorySummary` keeps the **coarse** mask and the `Refinement` beside it,
rather than a refined mask. That is what gives the control an off position
that is bit-for-bit the model's own weighting, and what stops a strictness
change from needing the model again.

`category_mask_at` borrows at zero and wherever no refinement could be
fitted, so a layer nobody has touched costs nothing over the old path.

The fit moved to the far side of the orientation permutation. The verdict is
a per-pixel field over the same grid as the mask it gates, so fitting it
upright would mean permuting a proxy-sized buffer afterwards to match — a
second rotation, and a second chance to get one wrong. One logit cell is the
same number of pixels either way: the letterbox scales by the longer edge and
a permutation does not change which edge that is.

The two frames became a `Frames` struct rather than six parameters. This
function reads the picture twice for opposite purposes — the model needs it
upright or it recognises far less, the refinement needs the sensor's grid —
and a transposed pair produces a plausible mask over slightly the wrong
pixels, which is the failure this module is most prone to.

## It rebuilds the field, and the signature says so

`refine` is mixed into `subject_signature`. Unlike a feather, which is read
off a field that is already correct, this changes which pixels are in the
mask at all — so it changes the coverage the field is measured from. Omitting
it is the bug where the slider moves and nothing happens until some unrelated
control invalidates the cache.

That puts it in the same cost class as a close or an open, which is why the
row takes `SliderRow::changed` — already once-per-gesture, since that row
takes `SliderTrack`'s `committed` internally — rather than a live stream.

The slider is offered only where there is something to move: a category
source, *and* a refinement the frame actually gave enough to fit. A control
that moves and does nothing is worse than an absent one.

## Two defaults that are deliberately different

A layer added from the panel starts at 4.0, because a category's edges are
twenty proxy pixels wide before anything is done to them and a photographer
adding a sky mask wants the sky rather than the sky plus every chimney in it.

A layer read from a sidecar with no `refine` key starts at **zero**. A file
written before this control existed has to render as it did then, and a
default of 4 on absence would quietly re-grade every stored category mask in
the catalogue. `a_categorys_refine_strictness_survives_and_defaults_off`
holds both halves, and `an_out_of_range_refine_is_clamped` holds the file to
the scale — past the top of it every colour fails and the mask deletes
itself, which reads as lost work rather than as a bad file.

`MAX_REFINE` is dr-pipeline's own constant mirroring
`dr_segment::STRICTNESS_MAX`, following `Falloff` and `Morphology`: this
crate holds the description of an edit and must not depend on the crate that
runs a model. dr-ui is where the two meet, and the only place that converts.

Verified: fmt clean, clippy --workspace -D warnings clean, 488 dr-pipeline
and 60 dr-segment tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-30 18:30:40 +02:00
dtourolle 328fda6f7c Merge: mask a whole category, not just one instance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

# Conflicts:
#	apps/darkroom-desktop/Cargo.toml
#	docs/traceability.md
2026-08-30 16:37:31 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 485297f0c6 Let a mask cover a whole category, not just one instance
`MaskSource` could say "instance 3 of that segmentation run" but had no way
to say "the sky". Adding `Category { signature, name }` beside `Subject` is
what lets a local adjustment attach to a semantic category at all.

Stored as identity like a subject, and for the same reason: the coverage is
megabytes and is reproducible by running the same model over the same image,
so the sidecar carries what finds it again and the session carries pixels.

## A name rather than an index

An index would be smaller and would match `Subject`. It would also be a bug.
The grouping lives in `models/scene/categories.txt`, which is editable by
design — adding one category to it renumbers every category after it, and
every stored layer would silently start grading something else. A name that
no longer exists is simply not found and the layer reads as stale, which is
the failure that announces itself.

Staleness is otherwise identical to a subject's: the coverage buffer is in
the session, never the sidecar, so a signature from another run points at
pixels that were never computed.

## Two tests, and the second one caught a real shape

Round-tripping the name matters more than usual here, because the whole
argument for storing a name instead of an index is worthless if the sidecar
is what drops it.

The multi-word case is the one worth having: `category = swimming pool` is
written on one line, and a reader splitting on whitespace would have
truncated it to a category no model has — a layer that silently masks
nothing. `category` is also its own key rather than a reuse of `class`,
because a file conflating them would round-trip a subject into a category.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-30 14:02:08 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 99563b33f7 Record the one clause of FR-PLG-8 that is built, and say what it is short of
FR-PLG-8 reads as unbuilt, and most of it is: no aggregated missing-plugin
notice, no catalog-wide view, no export gate, no mark on an image whose
operation is unavailable. But its opening sentence is a claim about existing
behaviour — "the sidecar already preserves lines it does not understand
verbatim and writes them back untouched" — and it goes on to say that property
"is now load-bearing and shall be treated as such".

Two tests treat it as such, and neither was tagged. `sidecar.rs` keeps an
unknown operation across a parse-and-write, and keeps it out of the edit graph
so that preserving it is safe rather than merely tidy. Both would fail if the
verbatim path were removed, which is what CONTRIBUTING.md asks a tag to mean.

The tag sits on the two tests rather than on the module, so the matrix points
at the clause that is closed rather than at the requirement as a whole.

It is still short of the requirement's own acceptance criterion, and the tag
comment says so: FR-PLG-8 asks that a sidecar written with a plugin, opened and
saved without it, be byte-identical to the original, and the test asserts
`contains`. Both halves exist separately — `writing_the_same_state_twice_is_byte_identical`
proves byte identity for content this build understands — and nothing joins
them into the single claim the requirement makes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-30 10:20:22 +02:00
dtourolle 91fe6cf300 Merge master into partial-preset-scope
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 8s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 8s
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 1h17m12s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 56s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 1m33s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Successful in 1h0m38s
# Conflicts:
#	docs/traceability.md
#	ui/dr-ui/ui/app.slint
2026-08-29 22:02:03 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 754ab91347 Bring a Lightroom library across, and start with something in the list
Two halves of the same complaint: a preset sheet that opens on "No
presets yet" is homework, and a photographer with ten years of presets
in Lightroom has no way to bring them.

`dr-preset-xmp` reads Camera Raw `.xmp`. The mapping turned out to be
mostly a rename rather than a conversion, because Adobe and this
pipeline already agree: exposure is in stops in both, and contrast, the
four recovery controls, clarity, texture, vibrance and saturation are
all ±100 in both. That is not imitation, it is the convention raw
developers converged on — `highlights_shadows.yaml` cites it in as many
words. Only sharpening needed arithmetic, Adobe's 0…150 against our
0…100.

The white balance does not come across, and says so rather than
guessing. Adobe writes absolute Kelvin for a raw file where ours is a
relative nudge from what the camera recorded, so converting needs the
*target image's* as-shot white balance — exactly what a preset cannot
carry, since the same preset lands on a frame shot at 3200K and one shot
at 7000K. A guess would be wrong on most images and invisibly so.

A folder is read as readily as a file, nested, because that is the shape
an exported preset folder is in and importing ninety files one at a time
is asking someone not to bother.

`dr_pipeline::starter` is six presets a first run begins with, written
against this pipeline in its units and deliberately mild — a starting
point, not a caricature. They are seeded when the library *file* does
not exist rather than when the library is empty, so deleting all six
does not hand them back on the next launch.

Both of these name operations, and `ui_names_no_operation` was right to
stop them living in `ui/`. That test exists because the failure is
silent and cumulative, and it caught exactly what it was written for: a
preset called "Punch" is a statement about contrast, clarity and
vibrance, and a table mapping Adobe's vocabulary to ours is a statement
about the pipeline. Neither is a fact about an interface. So the starter
set went into `dr-pipeline`, and the importer into its own crate —
between two walls, since `dr-pipeline` depends on nothing on purpose and
XMP is real XML not worth hand-rolling.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 22:00:53 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 bb35665bd2 Let a paste carry some kinds of edit and not others
FR-DEV-6 asks for presets "covering a subset of the edit graph". What
landed with the named presets covered two subsets: everything, and
everything but the crop. "Match the colour but not the sharpening" had
no way to be said.

`Scope` is now a set of `Attribute` — the same six kinds every operation
already declares and the develop panel already builds its tabs from. The
photographer ticking "tone and colour" is naming the groups they
navigate by, and neither this module nor the interface has to name an
operation to do it (FR-DEV-3c).

The pleasing part is what left. Framing used to be excluded by an
explicit test against one operation's id; it is now excluded because
Geometry is not in the default set. The special case dissolved into the
general rule, and the argument for it — a crop is a decision about *this*
photograph, and carrying it across forty destroys forty compositions —
is now a statement about a kind of edit rather than about a node. All
thirty-three existing preset tests pass unchanged, which is the evidence
that the generalisation kept its promises.

One decision that is a field rather than a rule, because the two cases
genuinely differ. An operation this build cannot classify — from a newer
version, arriving over sync — travels under "everything" and "everything
but the crop", because those are claims about the whole edit and an
unrecognised operation is part of it (FR-NC-8). It does not travel under
a hand-picked set, because that is a claim about kinds, and an unknown
kind is not one of the kinds that were ticked.

The settings page's "Copy crop and rotation" checkbox is gone, replaced
by the same chips the preset sheet draws. It asked the right first
question — geometry is the kind whose accidental travel destroys work —
but it was the only question a boolean could ask. The field stays in
`Settings`, read exactly once to seed the new set, so anyone who had
ticked it keeps their behaviour.

The chips are deliberately not in the develop column. Six of them there
would set the width of the whole sidebar, which is the bug `ChipGrid`'s
comment records at length.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 20:38:19 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 ab0ef6a26d Say which requirements the code was already satisfying
Thirteen requirements were surveyed as built but untagged. Eight of them
were: R3, R6, FR-DEV-1, FR-UI-6, FR-NC-6d, NFR-OPS-3, NFR-PORT-2 and
NFR-SEC-3. Each was read against its full text in requirements.md and
against the code before the tag was added, because a tag that is wrong is
worse than an absent one — it turns a visible gap into an invisible one.

The five that were refused, and why, because the reasoning is the part
worth keeping:

R2 carries "(figure TBD)" in its own acceptance criterion and asks for a
stated prefetch margin and cache-hit rate; neither figure exists anywhere
in the tree and neither quantity is measured, while TD-2 and TD-3 both
describe the thumbnail path falling short of it.

R5 asks for three things and the code does one. The display pipeline does
run at viewport resolution, but "only visible tiles are computed" and
"panning recomputes only newly exposed tiles" need a tile scheduler that
does not exist — and frame_budget.rs currently argues for striking tiled
computation from the interactive path rather than building it.

FR-RAW-2 asks for a trait taking a SourceRef, so that a second decoder can
be added without changing callers. What exists is free functions over
&[u8]. That meets the requirement's stated *purpose* — the same decoder
serves a local file, a SAF document and a byte range, which is exactly why
it takes bytes — but there is no trait and no second implementation seam,
so the requirement should probably be amended rather than tagged.

NFR-ARCH-1 asks for named executors with stated thread counts.
architecture.md §7.1 states the table; nothing implements it. Workers are
twenty-odd ad-hoc std::thread::spawn sites, each building its own
one-worker tokio runtime, with no decode pool, no GPU-submit executor and
no I/O pool. The requirement's own text says R4 and NFR-P9 "assert an
outcome with no stated means", and that is still true.

NFR-SEC-4 is satisfied by absence — there is no telemetry — and absence
has no module to tag. A tag would point at nothing.

NFR-OPS-3 was the closest call of the eight taken. The store is single,
separate from the catalog, survives a catalog rebuild and does not sync
between devices; it has no version *field*, deliberately, and
settings.rs argues why and names the condition that would need one. The
substance is met and the reasoning is recorded where it belongs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 20:23:16 +02:00