Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
dtourolle c3b10ed372 Format the download description test 2026-09-26 11:23:09 -04:00
dtourolle 4bec01eaf1 Say a photograph is downloading, and how far, instead of failing
The develop view reported a remote original on its way through the
error message, so it read "Could not load image" over "Downloading…".
It did so on every step along the roll, including a cached frame that
was ready within a tick, so each step flashed the error.

Waiting is now its own state. On the step, the grid's thumbnail of the
photograph stands in at once. Only when a transfer is really on the
wire does it dim under "Not on this device yet", with a line like
"Downloading — 12.4 of 38.0 MB" and a progress bar.

The bytes come from a new RemoteBackend::get_reporting. The Nextcloud
backend overrides it to read the body chunk by chunk; the default
reports once at the end. Progress is kept in the in-flight registry by
path, because a step usually lands on a frame the prefetcher is already
fetching. The catalog's file length stands in when the server sends no
Content-Length.
2026-09-26 11:02:11 -04:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 7d3c8c521f Export a whole selection, on a thread that is not the interface's
The export button rendered, resampled and encoded a 24 MP frame on the UI
thread and the window was dead for all of it. That was written down as a known
compromise, on the grounds that a batch is what makes the wait intolerable
rather than merely noticeable. This is the batch, so the compromise comes due.

The grid's selection now exports (FR-EXP-7). A worker thread takes a clone of
the `GpuContext` — an `Arc` pair over a device and a queue — and opens each
photograph for itself: fetch, sidecar, decode, demosaic, render at full size,
resample, sharpen, encode, write. Nothing of that touches the interface, which
keeps drawing throughout, and the progress goes where every other background
job's does: one row in the activity register, with a count and a bar.

Why the worker does not borrow the session it could have had. A
`DevelopSession` owns the `AdjustPass` the canvas renders from, so handing it
to a worker would stop the develop view drawing for the length of the batch —
the same freeze, moved. Opening a session per image instead costs a
`Demosaicer` and an `AdjustPass` each time round, and the pipeline cache is
per-pass so the composed shader is recompiled per image rather than once for
the run. Against a full-resolution decode, render and encode that is a few
percent, and it keeps this file out of the pipeline `develop` owns. A reusable
export pass is the obvious next economy if a profile ever says so.

The open image is the exception, and it is why the develop button is not simply
a one-image batch. Its edit lives in the interface's session and may not have
reached a sidecar yet, so a worker that re-opened the file would export the
saved version rather than the one on screen. That frame is therefore rendered
by the caller and handed over as `Source::Rendered`; everything after the
render — the Lanczos reduction, the encode, the write, which is the larger half
of the wait and all of its variance — still leaves the UI thread. So the
develop export is no longer synchronous, but it is not fully off-thread either,
and the doc comment says so rather than claiming otherwise.

Cancellation (NFR-ARCH-3) is an `AtomicBool` read between stages, and the
export button becomes the cancel button while a run is live — a batch that
could only be stopped by not touching the selection would be a trap. Waits on
another worker use `recv_timeout` rather than `recv`, so a cancelled batch
sitting on a forty-megabyte download gives up within 100 ms instead of when the
transfer finishes. The honest bound is worse than that: a frame already in
render has no interior stopping point, so the worst case is one image. Closing
that needs the render itself to become interruptible, which is NFR-ARCH-2's
scheduler and not a finer poll here.

Failures are per image and typed (NFR-ARCH-4). One unreadable body, one folder
that cannot be written, one server that went away — each is a message on the
channel, a line in the log, and a count in the summary, and the batch carries
on. A run with any failure keeps its row until it is cleared, because that is
the row somebody came to the list to find; a cancelled run does not, because
they asked for it.

Two collisions that look alike and are not. `CollisionPolicy` is the user's
answer to "a file of this name was already there", and Overwrite is a fine
answer to that. It is not an answer to "the frame I exported four seconds ago
was also called this" — two folders in a library each holding an IMG_0001 is
ordinary — so a name the run has already issued is always stepped past whatever
the policy says about the folder. Both halves are held by tests.

Supporting changes, each smaller than it sounds. `open_session` comes out of
`load_bytes` so the worker shares the JPEG-versus-RAW routing rather than
carrying a copy that would drift; the half that builds a `slint::Image` stays
behind, where it belongs. `LibraryController::selected_image_paths` answers
from the catalog rather than from the loaded window, because selection is by id
and survives a scrub — a selection made before scrolling routinely names
photographs no row holds. `cache_context_for` takes an id for the same reason,
so a batch reads the originals cache instead of re-downloading three hundred
files. `format_date` is shared so `{date}` and the timeline agree about what
day a photograph was taken.

Left undone, deliberately: the batch is sequential, where FR-EXP-7 asks for all
available cores. Four full-resolution frames in flight is tens of megabytes
each and a straightforward way to exhaust a tablet, and the GPU is shared with
the interface in any case. Also undone: exporting with a chosen preset rather
than the current export settings — that is FR-EXP-5's machinery, which does not
exist yet.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 09:59:57 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 65e6a96a65 Say what the application is doing, in one bar and one list
Every background job reported into a window property of its own —
library-thumbs-done, library-pin-total, library-syncing — which only the
grid ever read. A pin download that outlived the view it was started from
drew nothing at all once the user opened an image, and there was no answer
anywhere to "what is this busy with", because the answer was spread across
eight properties nothing collected.

They report to one register now (ui/dr-ui/src/activity.rs). It publishes an
aggregate, which draws a three-pixel bar across the top of the shell in
every view, and a row per job, which the settings page lists: scans,
thumbnail batches, pin and open downloads, sidecar uploads, the sync and
the trash. Failures stay on the list until they are cleared; routine
successes do not, or a scroll would bury them.

The handle removes a still-running job when it drops, so a worker that dies
mid-transfer takes its row with it rather than leaving the bar sweeping for
the rest of the session.

Also carries in-flight work from a parallel session — the drawn icon set
and the dr-pipeline ops split. dr-pipeline's build script does not compile
at this commit; ui/dr-ui does, with clippy clean and its tests passing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-16 18:32:09 +02:00