D19 retired the per-body base curve, moved the matrix ahead of the
edits and the film into the view transform's place, but a dozen doc
comments still listed the curve among what a pixel passes through, or
said the film skipped it. The detail stage's module doc still drew the
matrix after the edits and the last detail pass encoding, which the
view pass took over. The film crate's README gave the base curves as
its reason for being data, and the ops README's list of hand-written
nodes had neither the view transform nor three of the five kernels.
FR-MRG-2 gave the base curve as why the merge cuts below the profile;
the view transform is why now. The decision table still said colour
defaults were a per-body curve, and FR-DEV-3j said only the default
view transform skips a JPEG, where the node skips one whatever its
sliders say. frame-budget.md records the view pass as unmeasured.
fc54523 (0.18.1) stopped running a layer as a second chain after every
global operation and made its settings offsets applied at each
operation's own place, and nothing outside the code said so. The
manual still read as though a mask's slider were a setting of its own,
frame-budget.md described the masks as "a separate chain per layer",
and no document said how a layer is blended at all.
architecture.md §5.2 now says it: the offset, the blend by the layer's
weighted difference from the global result, what a photograph with no
layers composes to, and the film as the one operation whose settings
are averaged instead (6b99f67). FR-DEV-3 records the change as resolved
beside its local-adjustments bullet, frame-budget.md's note on what it
does not measure describes the cost as it now is, and the manual gives
the arithmetic in one sentence: -20 in a mask over -30 is -50 there.
The bundled manual is regenerated to match.
The figures are bee5c58's, quoted as that commit measured them: five
passes to two, 22.9 ms to 9.1 ms at 2560 x 1600 fit and 54.1 ms to
28.1 ms at 4K, the output bit-identical. Under its own heading and
status line, like the 2026-09-25 section, since this file was not
re-run for them.
display-and-extension.md still called FR-DSP-4 absent, and
frame-budget.md ended its reading at "satisfied vacuously". 0.15.0 built
it (refine.rs, the provisional histogram, the fade), so the table row
says so, frame-budget.md gains a note under its FR-DSP-4 section, and the
register gains a status note like FR-RAW-2's and FR-UI-5's.
frame-budget.md also gains a short section with the figures 1dc7b45
(the fit view's gather cached per framing) and d430ec9 (an identity
detail pass dropped) measured, since its fit rows no longer describe the
fused path. They are quoted from those commits, on the machine they name,
and are marked as not re-run here.
docs/ had 26 developer documents flat beside the manual, and the two
audiences are very differently sized: most readers want the manual and
the gesture reference, a few want the register, the designs and the
measurements. The manual and gestures.md stay at the top; everything for
someone changing the code moves to docs/dev/, and the two documents that
name their own successors — the v0.1 milestone and the UI-refinement plan
— go to docs/dev/archive/ rather than being deleted, since both are still
cited. docs/README.md is the index, users first.
Every reference follows: code comments, Cargo manifests, the workflows,
the pre-commit hook, the bench and traceability tools (which locate the
repo root by docs/dev/requirements.md now), packaging, the Docker READMEs,
CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md and the README. The matrix links one level
deeper and is regenerated. Links out of the moved documents into the tree
gain a level; a link checker over every Markdown file finds none broken.
dtourolle