Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
dtourolle 6b1aac477d Put the developer docs under docs/dev and index the folder for users first
docs/ had 26 developer documents flat beside the manual, and the two
audiences are very differently sized: most readers want the manual and
the gesture reference, a few want the register, the designs and the
measurements. The manual and gestures.md stay at the top; everything for
someone changing the code moves to docs/dev/, and the two documents that
name their own successors — the v0.1 milestone and the UI-refinement plan
— go to docs/dev/archive/ rather than being deleted, since both are still
cited. docs/README.md is the index, users first.

Every reference follows: code comments, Cargo manifests, the workflows,
the pre-commit hook, the bench and traceability tools (which locate the
repo root by docs/dev/requirements.md now), packaging, the Docker READMEs,
CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md and the README. The matrix links one level
deeper and is regenerated. Links out of the moved documents into the tree
gain a level; a link checker over every Markdown file finds none broken.
2026-09-20 16:20:15 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 091306f736 Gate the gesture vocabulary the way the matrix is gated
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 1h16m50s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 39s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 50s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Successful in 22m27s
Three holes, all found by the gate catching itself out.

**Prose that mentions the tag was read as a tag.** `dr-ui`'s module list
carries a comment saying where the generated table comes from, and it
names `GESTURE:` in passing; the scan extracted that sentence fragment as
a gesture with no place and no way to perform it. A tag must now *open*
its comment. A line that merely mentions it is describing the mechanism,
not declaring a member of it, and position is the only thing that tells
the two apart — which also makes the string-literal guard fall out for
free rather than being a special case.

**Neither artefact was regenerated on commit.** They cite line numbers,
so they go stale on anything that moves a line — the sheet commit made
the document wrong about every gesture in `library.slint` without
touching a single one. The pre-commit hook that already keeps the matrix
in step now keeps these too, and unlike the matrix it *fails* rather than
shrugging when the scan does: a matrix that will not build leaves a stale
one in place, where a malformed gesture block means a user about to be
told the wrong thing.

**CI did not check them at all.** It does now, blocking. The matrix is
read; the gesture table is *shown to somebody using the application*, and
a stale one tells them to perform a gesture that no longer exists — from
which they will conclude the application is broken rather than the page.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-30 00:51:13 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 d70f5c14e0 Name rust-analyzer everywhere the toolchain is installed
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 1h18m38s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 48s
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 9m41s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 9m41s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 48s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Successful in 21m54s
VS Code's rust-analyzer extension ships a server newer than 1.92.0
supports and prompts, on every window, to add one. Listing the component
in rust-toolchain.toml makes rustup supply the server matching the pin —
the same thing the pin buys everywhere else.

The cost lands outside the editor, which is why this is four files
rather than one. rustup reconciles that component list against the
installed toolchain on the first cargo call in the work tree and
downloads what is missing, inside whatever job happens to be running. An
unasked-for fetch in the middle of a build step is nobody's line item
and hard to find in a log. So every environment that builds this repo
names it too: baked into the Android image, and in the install step of
each CI job that rolls its own toolchain.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 23:21:44 +02:00
dtourolle 4d78041d1d Many imorovments
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 1m8s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Failing after 2s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Canceled after 23s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Failing after 59s
2026-08-12 22:16:15 +02:00
dtourolle 0f202fd3f9 Add requirements traceability gate and Gitea pipelines
Ports JellyTau's traceability tooling to Rust, carrying across the bug it
was repaired for. That gate divided a traced count by frozen literal
denominators; the requirements file outgrew them and it reported 158%
coverage, so it could never fail its own threshold.

Two rules, both enforced by the extractor's own tests:

  - denominators parsed from docs/requirements.md at run time
  - coverage is |traced ∩ defined| / |defined|, never a raw traced count

The gate additionally fails hard on a misconfigured run — zero
requirements parsed or zero files scanned — rather than reporting a
plausible 0%, and on any orphan tag naming a requirement that does not
exist.

Adapted for DarkRoom: IDs are FR-CAT-1 / NFR-P13 / FR-DEV-3a shapes
rather than JellyTau's fixed three digits, and decisions (D), spikes (S),
milestone items (M) and test ids remain taggable while being excluded
from the denominator — counting them inflated it by 25.

Also adds dr-sync: the RemoteBackend trait and capability model, so the
Nextcloud connector is one implementation rather than the only shape the
engine understands. No mature Nextcloud crate exists (reqwest_dav is too
thin), so the connector will be hand-rolled over reqwest per D7.

Gitea workflows follow the same style: containerised, commented with the
reasoning, desktop and Android on every push, plus a CI check that no
core/ crate depends on the UI toolkit (ARCH §6.5a).

Coverage today: 13.3% (19/143). 50 tests passing.
2026-08-09 08:01:32 +02:00