677b047235e586ab1330ed144e4c53c33edc611e
6
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
09dddde594 |
Take the photograph another app hands over, and hand an export back
FR-PLAT-AND-6 asks for two things this app did neither of: be a receiver for image view and share intents, and share exported results out through a FileProvider. The manifest declared one activity with one MAIN/LAUNCHER filter, so nothing on the device ever offered DarkRoom for a photograph, and there was no route out at all — Android has refused file:// URIs between apps since API 24, and a content:// URI needs a provider to be behind it. Inbound. Three filters now: VIEW for a gallery or a file manager, SEND and SEND_MULTIPLE for the share sheet, all on image/*. `android_main` reads the launch Intent before it gives `app` away to Slint, and what comes back is passed to `dr_ui::run` exactly as argv is on the desktop — `startup_action` already treats a non-empty list as "the user asked for these specifically", which is what a share is. The URIs are copied into the cache before the viewer opens, and that cost is real: a shared raw file is written once, in full, on the startup path. A content:// URI is a handle into another app's provider, not a path, and the decoders take paths; the alternative is teaching the whole read path about URIs, which is FR-PLAT-AND-1's SAF connector and is not built. Outbound. ExportProvider serves one directory — getFilesDir(), which is the same path `internal_data_path` gives the Rust side — and refuses everything else by canonicalising the request and checking it is inside that root, so `../` and a planted symlink fail the same test. Not AndroidX's FileProvider, because AndroidX is a Maven artefact and this build has no resolver; what it does is a hundred lines and they are here. The share half has no caller. The provider, the URI grant and the chooser are all in place, but the control that would invoke them belongs in `ui/dr-ui`, and wiring it needs an `AndroidApp` the interface can reach. It is documented as unwired and deliberately not tagged as covering the requirement. `launchMode="singleTask"` comes with the filters and is not decoration: another app can now launch this activity while it is running, and the default mode answers that by creating a second NativeActivity in the same process — a second android_main, a second Slint backend, a second wgpu device. The cost of the fix is stated in the manifest: a share arriving while DarkRoom is already open brings it forward without opening the image, because onNewIntent has no route through android-activity's event stream. The Java is Java because Android constructs it: a ContentProvider is instantiated by the system from its manifest entry, and getIntent() exists only on an activity object. Both directions live there rather than in JNI so that what crosses the boundary is two method signatures instead of forty, each of which is a string checked at run time and nowhere else. What a test can hold: the declarations. Nothing about an Intent or a ContentProvider is reachable from `cargo test`, but an intent filter that is deleted takes the app out of every "open with" menu silently, and an authority that stops matching its class raises a SecurityException inside somebody else's app. The tests in lib.rs read the manifest and ExportProvider.java through `include_str!` and hold both to that, on the host, which is the only place in the workspace that looks at either file from Rust. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
f12aece07e |
Make storage pluggable, and prove it with a folder backend
`RemoteBackend` existed from the first release and bought nothing it was
designed for. Seven files in `dr-ui` constructed a `NextcloudBackend`
directly, an account *was* a server URL beside a DAV user id, the local
cache directory was named after a hostname, and the launch screen knew
that signing in meant a browser handshake. The trait was real; the seam
was documentation.
A trait over operations is only a quarter of it. Pluggable storage needs
four things, and this adds the other three:
- **Capabilities** — already there, and the reason the engine can drive
two backends at the speed each actually runs at.
- **Configuration** — `dr_sync::Account`: where a library lives, in
whatever form its connector addresses, with no server in it. Loads
every existing config unchanged (`backend` defaults to `nextcloud`,
`endpoint` is stored under its historical `server` key), and
`Account::namespace()` reproduces the old catalog directory byte for
byte, because changing it would abandon a catalog, its thumbnail
shards, and the sidecars holding unsynced offline work.
- **Registration** — `BackendProvider` and `BackendRegistry`.
`ui/dr-ui/src/remote.rs` is now the only file above `dr-sync` that
names a connector.
`Connection` (an account plus an optional `Secret`) replaces the
credentials-and-user-id pair that was threaded through fifteen
signatures in an order that could be swapped. `Secret`'s inner string is
reachable only through `expose()` and its `Debug` prints `Secret(***)`,
so the indirect leak — a `{:?}` on anything holding one — no longer
compiles into a leak.
Nextcloud is unchanged and keeps every peculiarity: propagating ETags,
chunked upload v2, `oc:fileid`, the `oc:permissions` probe on a refused
PUT, the 423 retry classification, Login Flow v2. Those are what the
capability model exists to serve, not something to hide.
`dr-sync-folder` is the second connector: a local disk, a network mount,
an external drive, or a folder a Nextcloud client already syncs. No
account, no credential — the route that works where no secrets daemon
does. It declares `LocalEtags` rather than claiming propagation a POSIX
directory cannot provide, which costs nothing because 50k `stat` calls
are not 50k PROPFINDs. Identity is a path hash, not an inode: an inode
survives a rename but differs between devices and is reused after a
delete, so two machines would disagree about which photograph a
thumbnail belonged to. Re-deriving a thumbnail is a cost; showing the
wrong one is a bug.
docs/storage.md is the contract — the traits, the four steps to add a
backend, and what each connector declares. ARCH §8.0 and §8.4a, and
FR-NC-13, say why.
|
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
cf8f5b632f |
Show the develop frame itself, instead of a photocopy of it
The oldest open item in the project (ARCH §6.1, spike S1, AC-8). Every frame
in develop was read off the GPU into a `SharedPixelBuffer` and handed back to
Slint to upload again: ~7 ms at 4K against a 0.28 ms compute pass, 96% of the
frame spent carrying pixels to the CPU and back so they could be drawn where
they already were.
Slint 1.17 will adopt a `wgpu::Texture` directly, and the whole of what that
needs is arrangement rather than code.
**One device, made before the window.** A texture belongs to the device that
allocated it, so the compute passes and the compositor cannot each open their
own. `GpuContext::new_shared` opens one and hands back the instance and
adapter alongside it; `dr_ui::shared_gpu` gives all four to
`BackendSelector::require_wgpu_29(WGPUConfiguration::Manual { .. })`. That
call has to come before the first window, because creating one selects a
backend for you — which is why the GPU is now opened at the top of `run`
rather than two hundred lines down beside the other controllers.
dr-gpu still names no UI type. It hands out raw wgpu and does not ask who is
compositing (ARCH §6.5a).
**Vulkan only on the shared path**, where headless keeps its GL fallback.
wgpu's GL backend reaches its display through EGL at instance creation, and
before a window exists there is no display handle to give it — so a GL
instance cannot later produce the window surface Slint needs from it. A
machine with no Vulkan gets no shared device and browses without develop,
which is the same degradation as no adapter at all.
**`renderer-femtovg` becomes `renderer-femtovg-wgpu`.** The old one is FemtoVG
over OpenGL and cannot be handed a wgpu texture at all. It is not kept
alongside as a fallback: FemtoVG-over-GL has no branch for an imported
texture, falls through to "render this image into a buffer", gets nothing, and
draws nothing — a blank canvas with no error, which is worse than the failure
it would be papering over. The consequence is stated plainly in the manifest:
the desktop app now needs a working wgpu adapter to open a window.
**Two output textures, not one, and this is the part that is not obvious.**
Slint repaints when the image property *changes*, and it decides that with
`PartialEq` — which for two images over the same `wgpu::Texture` says
"unchanged". A pass that reused a single target would have rendered every
slider move correctly on the GPU and shown none of them: right, and invisible.
`AdjustPass` alternates between two targets, so consecutive frames are
genuinely different values. It also settles the read-while-write question that
one queue was already answering.
`RENDER_ATTACHMENT` is added to both render targets. Neither pass uses it;
Slint rejects an imported texture without it, on the reasoning that a
compositor handed a texture may need to draw into it.
**`AdjustPass::read_output` is deleted rather than gated.** It and
`export_pixels` were the same transfer under two names, and the comments
explaining why they were separate are the point of the whole criterion:
reading pixels back to *display* them is the defect, reading them back to
*encode a file* is the only way a file is made. The display twin is now gone
outright, which is stronger than a feature flag — it cannot be turned back on.
`export_pixels` is untouched and still ungated. The `readback` feature comes
off dr-ui, darkroom-desktop and darkroom-android; it stays in dr-gpu, where it
still gates `RenderTarget::read_pixels` and the segmentation field readback.
`examples/develop` moves to `export_pixels`, which is honest — it writes a
PPM — and so no longer needs the feature.
Four tests, each named for what it protects and each of which fails without a
screen if the property it guards breaks:
- the adjust target satisfies every condition Slint's import checks, asserted
in the crate that owns the descriptor, because a descriptor that drifts
fails at runtime on a real display and nothing else would notice;
- consecutive renders are different textures, and the third is the first
again, so the alternation is a rotation and not an allocation per frame;
- the develop canvas has no CPU pixel buffer and does have a wgpu texture —
AC-8 itself, in the terms Slint uses;
- consecutive frames compare unequal as `slint::Image`, which is the property
the repaint actually depends on.
The zoom test's readback moves into the test module. It has to: there is no
library function that copies a displayed frame to the CPU any more, and that
is the point — the round-trip now exists in the test binary and nowhere a
shipping build can reach.
**What is not proven.** No GUI was run. What is verified is that the texture
satisfies the import contract, that the import succeeds, that the canvas is a
texture rather than a buffer, and that consecutive frames are distinguishable.
What is unverified is everything that needs a display: that Slint's FemtoVG
wgpu renderer adopts the Manual configuration on a real surface, that the
picture appears the right way up and the right colour, and the frame timing
that motivated the whole exercise. Android is untouched by testing — the
android backend routes a WGPU29 request to Skia, whose wgpu surface does
handle imported textures, but that is read from the source, not observed.
56 dr-gpu tests and 255 dr-ui tests pass, clippy clean under `-D warnings`,
fmt clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
dtourolle
|
4d78041d1d | Many imorovments | ||
|
dtourolle
|
2a7a319d6c |
Depend on slint directly in the Android app
android_main takes an AndroidApp and calls slint::android::init, both of which come from slint itself rather than from dr-ui. The backend feature still arrives through dr-ui's target-specific dependency. anyhow was unused. Assisted-by: LLM |
||
|
dtourolle
|
5dc1279429 |
Add the Android app shell; cap cross-build parallelism
Cap both halves of the container build: CARGO_BUILD_JOBS limits how many rustc processes cargo starts, while --cpus limits what the container gets regardless of what nested build scripts spawn — cc, cmake, and ring's asm build all parallelise on their own account and do not consult cargo. Without both, a full cross-compile takes every thread on the host and makes the machine unusable for the length of a background build. Assisted-by: LLM |