743fefe7f18e55d345d0f4f3ab1b02872118854b
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
743fefe7f1 |
Render each body through the profile its own files describe
Colour came from whichever matrix rawler happened to key `D65`, the second one was discarded, and the rendering was left linear. That is the dcraw default, and FR-DEV-3e names it as the reason people abandon a converter in the first hour: correct in the abstract, flat and poor on skin in practice. The decoder now builds a camera profile. - `ColorMatrix1/2` and `CalibrationIlluminant1/2`. rawler surfaces these as an illuminant-keyed map — for DNGs from the tags, and for native formats from its own camera database — so a Canon CR2 arrives with a tungsten matrix and a daylight matrix exactly as an Adobe DNG of the same frame would. Dual-illuminant support is therefore not a DNG feature here. - `ForwardMatrix1/2`, read straight from the root IFD, because rawler parses them and never surfaces them. Where a file carries both, they replace the inverted colour matrix: the same relationship measured in the direction rendering actually wants, rather than an inversion that amplifies the measurement error exactly where skin lives. - `AsShotNeutral`, used to estimate what the scene was lit by and to interpolate between the two calibrations in mireds. The estimate is circular — the temperature needs a matrix and the matrix needs the temperature — so it is a fixed point, three rounds, as Adobe's SDK does it. Bodies calibrated at neither D65 nor A stopped rendering uncalibrated as a side effect: a Phase One IQ3 carries D55 and D75 and used to get no matrix at all. And a base curve, applied per channel in camera RGB between the last adjustment and the conversion out of camera space — a toe, a steep midtone and a shoulder, which is the difference between a photograph and a scan of one. It is not an edit: no slider, nothing in the sidecar, because it belongs to the body rather than to anything anyone decided, and a sidecar is shared between bodies. It is not a develop node either, and `ops/README.md` now records why. It evaluates on the tone curve's own spline rather than a second copy, so a profile author placing a control point and a photographer dragging one mean the same thing by it. The curves are data. `core/dr-decode/profiles/base_curves.yaml` ships inside the binary as a floor and is superseded by any copy on disk carrying a higher `version:`, so a body can be added and distributed without a release — and, under the GPL, contributed. The comparison runs both ways: a stale pack cannot hold an upgraded binary back at last year's rendering. Canon EOS 6D and R6, Nikon Z 6 and D750, Sony A7 III and Fujifilm X-T3 ship with their own curves. Every other body gets a conservative default, which is much closer to right than the identity is for any of them. A JPEG gets none — it has already been rendered once, by the camera. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
7421837c8a |
Let an operation say what it is about, so the panel can group without naming
Tool tabs need a taxonomy, and the taxonomy was the problem: a table in `ui/` mapping operation to tab breaks FR-DEV-3a, and a `group:` field risks what `ui-refinement.md` condemned `starts-group` for — the core deciding where the panel draws things. `Attribute` threads the needle. It says what an operation *is* — tone, colour, detail, optics, geometry, effect — which is the same category as `ParamKind` and squarely on the core's side of ARCH §4.3a's line. What is drawn, where it sits and whether it is visible stay the frontend's. There is no attribute for "the third tab", the enum's order is declaration order rather than screen order, and a frontend may render these as tabs, as headings, or ignore them. The payoff is that a tab strip can be *derived*: the groups are the attributes present in the capability list, so the interface names no operation and needs no table to keep in step. An operation joins the right group by declaring what it is, which is the one thing its author is well placed to say. Plural, because the tone curve is genuinely both — an RGB curve is tonal and the per-channel curves are chromatic, and filing it under one would hide it from half the people looking for it. Required and non-empty, enforced in `build.rs`, and the failure was checked by removing the line rather than assumed. An operation with no attribute is invisible to a panel that groups by them; a build that stops costs ten seconds, a control nobody can find costs more. The vocabulary is closed for the same reason: a typo would otherwise invent a category holding exactly one operation, which looks like a deliberate one until somebody counts. Six tests over the real chain, including the hand-written operations that `build.rs` never sees and so cannot check. |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
23f0c4b76a |
Let a declared node ask for a widget, and write down how
Two gaps in the control vocabulary, both found by reading back what
|
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
7c57f490fe |
Declare a develop operation in YAML, and generate the rest
An operation was, in the overwhelming majority of cases, four facts: what its parameters are, what uniforms they compute, what WGSL those uniforms drive, and where it sits in the chain. Written in Rust those four facts arrived wrapped in ninety lines of trait implementation — a match on parameter id to a struct field, another match back, an is_active comparing each field to its default, a Vec<Uniform> built by hand. All mechanical, and each one a place to make a silent mistake: a param() arm returning the wrong field reads perfectly and breaks the sidecar round-trip. So the four facts are the file now. core/dr-pipeline/ops/<id>.yaml is a node, build.rs compiles it into the same Operation impl as before, and the result lands in OUT_DIR — the same reasoning as style.yaml -> theme.slint, including why it does not land beside the sources it would look exactly like. Nothing downstream can tell a declared node from a hand-written one: same &'static OpDescriptor, same fused-shader composition, same sidecar. Nine nodes moved: exposure, white_balance, contrast, highlights_shadows, blacks_whites, brilliance, vibrance, saturation, and the shared WGSL helper registry. Their prose came with them, and so did their tests — set/expect/expect_active/expect_wgsl in the declaration compile to real #[test]s, so a node file carries its own proof rather than leaving it behind in a file that no longer exists. Two stayed in Rust and say so with `rust:`. The tone curve's neutral is a relationship between five interpolated points rather than a set of values; the colour mixer generates thirty-six faceted parameters from twelve computed hue bands. A schema stretched to cover either would be a worse language than Rust aimed at one caller. They still declare their position here, because the chain's *order* is the one thing a reader comes to this directory to learn, and an order written half in YAML and half in Rust would be worse than either alone. default_chain() is generated from it. Uniforms are derived by a small expression language — exp2(exposure), blacks / 100 * 0.02 — compiled to Rust rather than interpreted, so an unknown name or a wrong arity is a build error naming the file and the key and the arithmetic costs nothing at runtime. The build script refuses a duplicate order, a filename disagreeing with its id, a default outside its own range, a test value the graph would clamp before the node saw it, a helper that does not define the function it names, and a declared node colliding with a file in src/ops. Verified by adding a scratch node and removing it again: one file, no other edit, and it joined the chain at its declared order with its test running. 237 tests pass in dr-pipeline, clippy and fmt clean. .yaml joins the traceability tool's scanned suffixes, because a node's Rust now lives in OUT_DIR where a tag could never be linked from the report. Coverage 47.7% -> 48.3%. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |