Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 d44bffa4a8 Remember where the photographer was
Opening the application was always a fresh arrival at the beginning of
the library, whatever you had been doing when you closed it.

What is written down is the view, the scope, the rating filter and the
photograph on screen -- the open one in develop, the first visible one in
the grid. Not just a scroll position: a position without the filter that
produced it names a row of a list that no longer exists. Restoring them
has an order for the same reason -- scope, then filter, then position,
then the view -- because each step changes what an ordinal *means*.

Addressed by remote path and collection UUID, never by an ordinal or a
row id. `images.id` and `collections.id` are local to one catalog, and a
grid ordinal is local to one ordering; a record naming either would land
somewhere arbitrary on a second device and after any filter change on
this one. Where the ordinal is needed, `library::ordinal_of_path`
computes it through the grid's own `ORDER BY`, taken verbatim by a window
function rather than spelled a second time as an inequality -- which is
the mistake `grid_order_for` already warns about, and which a manually
ordered collection would make unreadable.

Every failure degrades rather than reports. A collection this device has
not merged leaves the scope at the whole library; a photograph that has
since been deleted falls back to when it was taken, which puts the grid
in the right week; a torn file yields no place and the library opens at
the top. Reopening develop is the one thing that requires an exact match,
because a canvas on a path that no longer resolves is a filename over an
empty frame.

The record lives in `dr-types` beside `Settings` and the store lives here
beside `SettingsStore`, for the reason `dr-types`' manifest gives: a JSON
serialiser in `core/` would be paid for by every crate there. Two files
and two lifetimes, though -- resetting preferences must not forget where
you were.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-30 20:39:50 +02:00
dtourolle 19b56ad85c Merge: collection ordering, and a range that says where it ends
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

# Conflicts:
#	docs/traceability.md
#	ui/dr-ui/src/collections_ui.rs
#	ui/dr-ui/src/library.rs
#	ui/dr-ui/ui/app.slint
#	ui/dr-ui/ui/library.slint
#	ui/dr-ui/ui/widgets.slint
2026-08-30 16:38:08 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 f5edd49b6b Let a manual collection be put in the order it is meant to be seen in
`collection_members.position` and `Sort::CollectionPosition` have been in the
catalog since collections were, and nothing above dr-catalog has ever written
or read either: `collections::set_order` had no callers, and the grid ordered
everything by capture time whatever it was scoped to — dr-ui does not construct
a `Query` at all, it has its own `GRID_ORDER` constant. So a manual collection
was a set with an order nobody could see or change.

Three pieces, because it could not be fewer:

`grid_order_for` decides the ordering from the scope, and both readers take it
from there. That is the load-bearing part. An ordinal only names a photograph
relative to an ordering, so the window read and the span read have to agree —
a shift-click resolved through a different ORDER BY than the cells were drawn
with selects a different run than the one on screen, and the user finds out
when the export runs. `read_ids_span` already stated that invariant about
`GRID_ORDER`; this widens it to an ordering that depends on the scope.

Only a single manual collection has one. A set draws its descendants' images
too, and two children's positions are unrelated integers that interleave
arbitrarily; a smart collection has no member rows to carry a position at all.
Both fall back to capture time and refuse the drop rather than pretending.

The drop is on the cell, on whichever half of it the finger landed — the
trailing edge is the only way to name the last place in a collection, since
there is no cell beyond the last one to drop in front of.

`reordered` is pure and the membership is rewritten whole. `set_order` sets the
positions it is given and leaves the rest, so a partial write would interleave
the moved run with rows nobody touched; and it is read unfiltered, so what the
filter is hiding keeps its place relative to what the user can see.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 23:18:06 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 7ad75dd905 Let a manual collection be put in the order the photographer wants
`collections::set_order` and `Sort::CollectionPosition` have been in the
catalog since collections were, and nothing above dr-catalog has ever
called either. A manual order existed, could not be seen, and could not be
set. This is the half that was missing.

Three pieces, because it needed all three to be visible at all.

The catalog gains `orders_manually` and `members_in_order`. The first is
the rule about *when* a manual order means anything, kept in one place with
one name: a collection must be manual, and it must have no children. A set
shows its descendants' images, and positions are only ever assigned within
one collection — so two children's positions are unrelated integers, and
ordering by them would sort the grid by a coincidence. The existing comment
on `read_cells_scoped` already argued this; now something enforces it.

`members_in_order` returns the *whole* membership rather than the filtered
view, because `set_order` renumbers exactly what it is handed. Reordering a
filtered list would renumber those and leave every hidden image on a stale
position — two images sharing one, and a grid that rearranges itself the
moment the filter comes off.

The grid reads position where the scope qualifies and capture time
everywhere else. Manual order joins the member row rather than testing
membership with `IN`, which is safe from fanning out rows *because* that
branch is a single collection.

The gesture is a DropArea over the viewport, drawn only where a reorder
means something, with a caret in the gap the photographs would go into —
a line between two images rather than a highlight on one, because lighting
up a cell would say the drop replaces it.

The trap worth naming: `DropEvent.position` is in **window** coordinates.
Slint maps it through `map_to_window` when the drag begins and hands every
target the same event untranslated, so a target inside a Flickable has to
subtract its own `absolute-position`. Getting that wrong is invisible until
the grid is scrolled, because at the top the two frames coincide.

`reordered` is pure and names its destination by the image it goes before
rather than by an index, because the grid can only name a gap in what it is
showing and the ids are what survive a window swap. A drop that changes
nothing returns the order untouched: that counter is what a cross-device
merge resolves by, and spending a revision on a no-op makes this device win
an argument it did not have.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 20:49:00 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 2147eaa6a5 Put a keyword on a photograph, not only search for one
The catalog has been able to *find* by keyword since v1 — query.rs joins the
keywords table, matches it exactly, and substring-matches it for free text — and
nothing anywhere could ever put a word there. A user could filter to a keyword
they had no way to apply.

This is the missing half: create, rename, delete, list, assign, unassign, and
the two reads a panel needs. Bulk-only for assignment, because keywording a
selection is the common case rather than the exception — the photographer picks
out the frames with the puffin in them and applies "puffin" once, in one
transaction.

Schema v6 adds `keyword_terms`, and deliberately does *not* touch the v1 join.
The assignment keeps the word as text because the catalog is a rebuildable index
and the durable copies of that fact — the sidecar, XMP dc:subject — both carry a
string; a foreign key would mean a catalog rebuilt from sidecars had to invent
identity rows before it could record anything, and would break the query path
that already works. So the text is the fact, and the new table is only the
identity a rename and a deletion can be keyed on.

`keyword_terms.name` carries no unique index, which looks like an oversight and
is not: two devices that each type "Iceland" are both right until they meet, and
a constraint would abort the merge at that moment. Uniqueness is converged upon
instead — create resolves an existing name, fuse_duplicates collapses a
cross-device pair onto the smaller uuid.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 15:50:49 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 03326242a1 Make the CI checks say what they mean, and format the workspace
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 1h23m26s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Failing after 2s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 50s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Failing after 1m9s
The Android job's "Verify minimum API level" step has never verified the
minimum API level. It took the first `*.so` anywhere under the target
directory, which is a host proc-macro from debug/deps — an x86-64 object
built by the runner's gcc, whose .comment section cannot mention Android
and so can never contradict the expected value. It now reads the artifact
under the target triple, compares against MIN_API parsed from the
Dockerfile rather than a second copy of the number, and fails on a
mismatch. Both sides are checked non-empty first: two failed parses would
otherwise compare equal and pass, which is the same silent success in a
new costume.

The Android image installs one SDK package per layer and keeps the
output. sdkmanager is a JVM program that aborts when it cannot get memory,
and the single `> /dev/null` step reported that as a bare "exit code 134"
while a retry re-downloaded everything that had already succeeded.

tools/ci-local.sh runs all four jobs — desktop, android, layering,
traceability — against the host toolchain, which is pinned to the same
1.92.0 CI installs. Its matrix check compares regeneration against the
working tree rather than against HEAD: CI starts from a clean checkout, so
git's answer is the right one there and reports every local run stale here.

The rest is rustfmt across the workspace, and the clippy findings that
surfaced once it did: manual_contains in dr-thumbs and collections_ui, a
map iterated as pairs for its keys, an index loop over a slice, and two
runtime assertions on a constant now made at compile time.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-16 12:02:51 +02:00
dtourolle d5b1f6bff5 Add collections, ratings, and soft delete to the catalog
Three features over a shared schema migration.

Collections: a tree of manual collections plus smart collections whose
membership *is* their stored selector. Dropping images onto a smart
collection is refused rather than silently discarded, so the UI can say why
the drop did nothing — member rows there would be a second source of truth
that nothing reads.

Ratings: the star and pick/reject axes, kept independent.

Trash: soft delete to a folder, then permanent delete.

Catalog::open now backfills after migrating. A migration adds a column but
cannot know what the value should be for rows that already existed;
backfilling on open is what stops those rows being silently partial.

Timeline queries exclude shadowed JPEGs, which would otherwise double every
paired shot in the histogram, and gain a range-bounded variant so zooming in
returns finer buckets rather than the same coarse ones with the ends cropped.

Assisted-by: LLM
2026-08-09 20:42:13 +02:00