8a90d888d587fabf45f8959c66266be1e5d1927c
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
754ab91347 |
Bring a Lightroom library across, and start with something in the list
Two halves of the same complaint: a preset sheet that opens on "No presets yet" is homework, and a photographer with ten years of presets in Lightroom has no way to bring them. `dr-preset-xmp` reads Camera Raw `.xmp`. The mapping turned out to be mostly a rename rather than a conversion, because Adobe and this pipeline already agree: exposure is in stops in both, and contrast, the four recovery controls, clarity, texture, vibrance and saturation are all ±100 in both. That is not imitation, it is the convention raw developers converged on — `highlights_shadows.yaml` cites it in as many words. Only sharpening needed arithmetic, Adobe's 0…150 against our 0…100. The white balance does not come across, and says so rather than guessing. Adobe writes absolute Kelvin for a raw file where ours is a relative nudge from what the camera recorded, so converting needs the *target image's* as-shot white balance — exactly what a preset cannot carry, since the same preset lands on a frame shot at 3200K and one shot at 7000K. A guess would be wrong on most images and invisibly so. A folder is read as readily as a file, nested, because that is the shape an exported preset folder is in and importing ninety files one at a time is asking someone not to bother. `dr_pipeline::starter` is six presets a first run begins with, written against this pipeline in its units and deliberately mild — a starting point, not a caricature. They are seeded when the library *file* does not exist rather than when the library is empty, so deleting all six does not hand them back on the next launch. Both of these name operations, and `ui_names_no_operation` was right to stop them living in `ui/`. That test exists because the failure is silent and cumulative, and it caught exactly what it was written for: a preset called "Punch" is a statement about contrast, clarity and vibrance, and a table mapping Adobe's vocabulary to ours is a statement about the pipeline. Neither is a fact about an interface. So the starter set went into `dr-pipeline`, and the importer into its own crate — between two walls, since `dr-pipeline` depends on nothing on purpose and XMP is real XML not worth hand-rolling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
bb35665bd2 |
Let a paste carry some kinds of edit and not others
FR-DEV-6 asks for presets "covering a subset of the edit graph". What landed with the named presets covered two subsets: everything, and everything but the crop. "Match the colour but not the sharpening" had no way to be said. `Scope` is now a set of `Attribute` — the same six kinds every operation already declares and the develop panel already builds its tabs from. The photographer ticking "tone and colour" is naming the groups they navigate by, and neither this module nor the interface has to name an operation to do it (FR-DEV-3c). The pleasing part is what left. Framing used to be excluded by an explicit test against one operation's id; it is now excluded because Geometry is not in the default set. The special case dissolved into the general rule, and the argument for it — a crop is a decision about *this* photograph, and carrying it across forty destroys forty compositions — is now a statement about a kind of edit rather than about a node. All thirty-three existing preset tests pass unchanged, which is the evidence that the generalisation kept its promises. One decision that is a field rather than a rule, because the two cases genuinely differ. An operation this build cannot classify — from a newer version, arriving over sync — travels under "everything" and "everything but the crop", because those are claims about the whole edit and an unrecognised operation is part of it (FR-NC-8). It does not travel under a hand-picked set, because that is a claim about kinds, and an unknown kind is not one of the kinds that were ticked. The settings page's "Copy crop and rotation" checkbox is gone, replaced by the same chips the preset sheet draws. It asked the right first question — geometry is the kind whose accidental travel destroys work — but it was the only question a boolean could ask. The field stays in `Settings`, read exactly once to seed the new set, so anyone who had ticked it keeps their behaviour. The chips are deliberately not in the develop column. Six of them there would set the width of the whole sidebar, which is the bug `ChipGrid`'s comment records at length. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
5a8327824f |
Keep an edit under a name, not just on the clipboard
FR-DEV-6 asks for three things — named presets, copy/paste between images, and batch-apply to a selection. The last two have been here for a while; this is the first. The format is the sidecar's, deliberately. A preset *is* the non-default half of a version, so the lines are the same lines keyed the same way, which makes the two files diffable against each other and lets someone debugging an edit paste a block from one into the other. One file rather than one per preset: a preset per file makes the name a path, and every name then has to survive a filesystem — a `/` becomes a directory, a name differing only in case collides on one platform and not another, and renaming becomes two operations that can half-fail. As a key in a document it is none of those. Unknown *parameters* needed no machinery. `Preset` already holds whatever keys it is given and resolves them against the descriptors only at apply time, so one written by a newer build survives by being stored. Only lines that are not `op.param = float` at all are preserved verbatim, which is the sidecar's version-skew promise made here too. Applying is the paste path with a different source, so a preset reaches a selection through the sidecar read-modify-write that was already there: no graph, no decode, no GPU, forty files or one. Two smaller decisions worth the record. A library that fails to parse is held empty in memory and *not* written back over — settings regenerate themselves and this is work, so a parse failure must not be the moment it is destroyed. And every save persists immediately and rolls the in-memory copy back if the write fails, so the sheet never lists a preset the file does not have. The grid's "Presets" button is gated on the selection alone, unlike the "Paste to 40" beside it. That button needs a clipboard armed this session; the preset list is whatever was saved last month, and hiding it behind an unrelated action is what makes a feature only its author knows about. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |