2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	ab0ef6a26d	Say which requirements the code was already satisfying ... Thirteen requirements were surveyed as built but untagged. Eight of them were: R3, R6, FR-DEV-1, FR-UI-6, FR-NC-6d, NFR-OPS-3, NFR-PORT-2 and NFR-SEC-3. Each was read against its full text in requirements.md and against the code before the tag was added, because a tag that is wrong is worse than an absent one — it turns a visible gap into an invisible one. The five that were refused, and why, because the reasoning is the part worth keeping: R2 carries "(figure TBD)" in its own acceptance criterion and asks for a stated prefetch margin and cache-hit rate; neither figure exists anywhere in the tree and neither quantity is measured, while TD-2 and TD-3 both describe the thumbnail path falling short of it. R5 asks for three things and the code does one. The display pipeline does run at viewport resolution, but "only visible tiles are computed" and "panning recomputes only newly exposed tiles" need a tile scheduler that does not exist — and frame_budget.rs currently argues for striking tiled computation from the interactive path rather than building it. FR-RAW-2 asks for a trait taking a SourceRef, so that a second decoder can be added without changing callers. What exists is free functions over &[u8]. That meets the requirement's stated *purpose* — the same decoder serves a local file, a SAF document and a byte range, which is exactly why it takes bytes — but there is no trait and no second implementation seam, so the requirement should probably be amended rather than tagged. NFR-ARCH-1 asks for named executors with stated thread counts. architecture.md §7.1 states the table; nothing implements it. Workers are twenty-odd ad-hoc std::thread::spawn sites, each building its own one-worker tokio runtime, with no decode pool, no GPU-submit executor and no I/O pool. The requirement's own text says R4 and NFR-P9 "assert an outcome with no stated means", and that is still true. NFR-SEC-4 is satisfied by absence — there is no telemetry — and absence has no module to tag. A tag would point at nothing. NFR-OPS-3 was the closest call of the eight taken. The store is single, separate from the catalog, survives a catalog rebuild and does not sync between devices; it has no version *field*, deliberately, and settings.rs argues why and names the condition that would need one. The substance is met and the reasoning is recorded where it belongs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:23:16 +02:00
dtourolle	f12aece07e	Make storage pluggable, and prove it with a folder backend ... `RemoteBackend` existed from the first release and bought nothing it was designed for. Seven files in `dr-ui` constructed a `NextcloudBackend` directly, an account *was* a server URL beside a DAV user id, the local cache directory was named after a hostname, and the launch screen knew that signing in meant a browser handshake. The trait was real; the seam was documentation. A trait over operations is only a quarter of it. Pluggable storage needs four things, and this adds the other three: - **Capabilities** — already there, and the reason the engine can drive two backends at the speed each actually runs at. - **Configuration** — `dr_sync::Account`: where a library lives, in whatever form its connector addresses, with no server in it. Loads every existing config unchanged (`backend` defaults to `nextcloud`, `endpoint` is stored under its historical `server` key), and `Account::namespace()` reproduces the old catalog directory byte for byte, because changing it would abandon a catalog, its thumbnail shards, and the sidecars holding unsynced offline work. - **Registration** — `BackendProvider` and `BackendRegistry`. `ui/dr-ui/src/remote.rs` is now the only file above `dr-sync` that names a connector. `Connection` (an account plus an optional `Secret`) replaces the credentials-and-user-id pair that was threaded through fifteen signatures in an order that could be swapped. `Secret`'s inner string is reachable only through `expose()` and its `Debug` prints `Secret(***)`, so the indirect leak — a `{:?}` on anything holding one — no longer compiles into a leak. Nextcloud is unchanged and keeps every peculiarity: propagating ETags, chunked upload v2, `oc:fileid`, the `oc:permissions` probe on a refused PUT, the 423 retry classification, Login Flow v2. Those are what the capability model exists to serve, not something to hide. `dr-sync-folder` is the second connector: a local disk, a network mount, an external drive, or a folder a Nextcloud client already syncs. No account, no credential — the route that works where no secrets daemon does. It declares `LocalEtags` rather than claiming propagation a POSIX directory cannot provide, which costs nothing because 50k `stat` calls are not 50k PROPFINDs. Identity is a path hash, not an inode: an inode survives a rename but differs between devices and is reused after a delete, so two machines would disagree about which photograph a thumbnail belonged to. Re-deriving a thumbnail is a cost; showing the wrong one is a bug. docs/storage.md is the contract — the traits, the four steps to add a backend, and what each connector declares. ARCH §8.0 and §8.4a, and FR-NC-13, say why.	2026-08-29 09:57:52 +02:00