107 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
dtourolle	c6cfb2a02a	Put the -1 on the greens along the chroma axis, not across it ... The Malvar "R at green in R row" kernel weights the two greens two sites away along the row at -1 and the pair up and down the column at +1/2. The shader had the two swapped, in the comment as well as the code, so the transcription checked against itself. Both sum to zero and reconstruct a flat patch exactly, which is all the tests fed it. On an edge the correction at green sites is half strength and the false colour doubles: 0.375 against 0.19 on a grey step, and a blue/yellow zipper around every clipped highlight at 1:1. The other three kernels and the CFA tables were right. A grey vertical step now runs through the pass; the transposed kernel fails it at 0.375.	2026-09-19 22:05:39 +02:00
dtourolle	2fd7690b6f	Mark a pixel the lens correction pushed off the sensor with alpha 0 in the camera-space tap ... The fused shader stored black with alpha 1 for a pixel whose source coordinate left the frame, and the merge's warp averaged it in like any other: a dark, badly interpolated fringe along every frame's edge, visible as a seam wherever a frame ended and, later, as the edge the border fill continued. The display keeps its opaque black; CameraLinear stores alpha 0 and the warp weights each sample by the alpha it interpolated, dropping a sample that has none.	2026-09-19 20:41:20 +02:00
dtourolle	42d11d919b	cargo fmt and clippy across the panorama work, and one lint master carried ... The dr-face comparison is master's: a negated partial-order test on the eye box's width, rewritten as the two conditions it meant.	2026-09-19 15:53:06 +02:00
dtourolle	44ea763c61	dr-gpu: the merge pass — warp, accumulate, resolve, chunk by chunk ... merge.wgsl warps one camera-space tile into one output chunk — output pixel to direction (the projection maths of dr_pano::projection, verbatim), direction to the frame's camera, camera to source pixel, bilinear by hand from four textureLoads because rgba32float is not filterable — and adds it into a storage-buffer accumulator weighted by its distance from the frame's edge. A resolve pass divides by the weights and packs sixteen-bit samples at the sensor's scale with a coverage bit. MergePass::merge drives it: bands of rows, chunks across a band, and for each chunk only the frames whose footprint meets it, each rendered as the source rectangle the chunk needs and nothing more. The working set is one chunk, one tile and one band (FR-MRG-11); the frame textures are the caller's to cache. Feathered, not seamed; gain a scalar per frame — the blend quality is panorama.md §10's step 5, after the path writes a file.	2026-09-19 15:24:12 +02:00
dtourolle	acab0d7abb	A linear DNG in and out: the writer, and a three-sample RawImage ... dr-export gains write_linear_dng — LinearRaw, DNG 1.4, u16 samples at the sensor's scale, the body's matrices with their illuminants, the as-shot neutral, the EXIF block an export writes — streamed strip by strip through a closure so the composite is never held (FR-MRG-11). The tiff crate's directory is a map, so PhotometricInterpretation is written over what new_image set, which is the trick the S15.1 spike thought it had to hand-roll around. The test reads the file back through rawler. dr-decode's RawImage carries samples_per_pixel (a linear DNG is 3), the body's profile with its calibrations mapped back to EXIF illuminant codes, and the cleaned make and model. The GPU uploads a three-sample image as it is, normalised by black and white like a photosite, through a full f16 conversion — subnormals kept, because a 14-bit LSB sits at f16's smallest normal and rounding it to zero would crush exactly the shadows the file was written to keep.	2026-09-19 15:24:12 +02:00
dtourolle	9b6b4942cf	The camera-space tap: OutputMode::CameraLinear, composed with no operations ... compose_camera_linear composes the fused pass with an empty operation list, the file's orientation as the baseline, a view rect for the tile, and a store of rgba32float. On the GPU, render_camera_linear is the only entry that accepts it: it fills the profile uniforms neutral — unit white balance, identity matrix, curve off — so what lands in the texture is the sensor's numbers after the lens warp and nothing else (FR-MRG-2). A third bind-group layout carries the format, as the linear one does, and the readback is generalised to any pixel width for the f32 copy. Thirty-two bits because the composite is written back at the sensor's scale: a 14-bit sensor has 16 384 steps to white and f16 keeps 2 048 of them in the top octave.	2026-09-19 15:24:12 +02:00
dtourolle	ed4460cb9c	Tag three requirements the code already meets ... R5 says in its own note that zoom_resolution.rs establishes it as a pixel equality; that file was tagged FR-DSP-5 alone. FR-DEV-19's three sub-clauses carry eighty-three tags between them while the parent had none; MaskLayer, which is the thing they edit, now carries it. And NFR-R3 — a crash in decode does not take down the application, the image is marked failed — is exactly what the decoder's panic guard and the face sweep's unreadable mark do, tagged FR-RAW-4 and NFR-SEC-1 and not the clause that asked for them.	2026-09-19 12:25:04 +02:00
dtourolle	7596cf9bcc	State the compatibility baseline and the channels ... NFR-COMPAT-1 and NFR-COMPAT-2 were instructions to write a requirement, not requirements: "state the API level", "state the channels". Both are now stated from what the build enforces and what exists. The baseline is minSdk 28 / targetSdk 36 from the Android Dockerfile, a Vulkan adapter at wgpu's default limits because compute needs storage textures — device_from already called that the floor and is tagged for it — with no optional feature required, since the f16 in FR-DEV-2 is a texture format and not shader arithmetic. The reference device is the HONOR ROD2-W09 the figures are taken on, and the second-vendor clause is recorded as unmet rather than quietly dropped: there is no Mali or PowerVR device, so an Android figure here is an Adreno figure. The channels are all self-distribution — Arch package, local Flatpak, sideloaded APK, NSIS installer — because D13's face weights rule out every store, and the two consequences are written down: SAF stays although a sideloaded build need not have it, and S11 becomes a pre-publication step.	2026-09-19 12:25:04 +02:00
dtourolle	369eb8fbf0	Put the log and the crash records in one file, and show it before writing it ... NFR-OPS-1 asks for a diagnostics bundle — the log, the schema version, the GPU and driver, the app version — "with an explicit preview-and-consent step before anything leaves the device". The log and the crash records have existed since August; what did not exist was any way to hand them over that was not `adb pull` and a knowledge of where the state directory is, which on the tablet the requirement was written for is nobody. Nothing here sends anything, and that is the design rather than a gap: crash.rs already says why a transport built ahead of the consent is the shape of thing that gets switched on by default. The bundle writes one text file to a place the user can find, so that they can attach it. That is the moment it leaves, and it is theirs. So the consent guards the write, not a send. Preparing gathers everything into memory and shows what would be written — each section, its size, what was taken out, and where the file would go — and only the second press puts bytes on disk. A user who reads the preview and presses the other button has changed nothing anywhere. The gathered bundle is held between the presses so what is saved is exactly what was shown, not a second gathering that differs by whatever was logged while they were reading. One text file rather than an archive, because a `.txt` opens wherever the user is sitting and pastes into an issue, and because the preview can then be the file rather than a summary of it. Every line goes through the blunter of the two redactions on the way in, whatever the sink already did to it: the log's own rule keeps paths, since a path read over `adb` is context, but a file meant to be attached to a public report by someone who may not read it first is held to the crash record's rule instead. The About page's graphics line gains the driver, which the requirement names and the adapter has always reported. And docs/outstanding.md is corrected on both OPS requirements: it said crash reporting was a log::error! hook and NFR-OPS-1 had nothing behind it, and neither had been true since 2026-08-30.	2026-09-12 01:08:10 +02:00
dtourolle	4574c35236	Let a part be left out of a mask without being taken out of it ... A layer built from parts was missing the one control a correction most often wants: seeing what it did. The question a subtracted gradient raises is whether it took only the sky, and the question a stroke raises is whether it filled the shoulder — and the only way to ask either was to remove the part and look, which answered the question and lost the part. The layer's own ring answers a different question, about the adjustment, and hiding eight layers to check one correction is not an A/B anybody performs. So a part carries `hidden`. It is an edit and a history step, as the layer's switch is, and it is folded into the render fingerprint because hiding a part changes the mask as surely as removing it does. Where the mask is built the shown parts are walked rather than the parts, which is what makes a hidden base hand the fold to the first part that is shown — and a revealed layer whose every part is hidden clears its slice rather than leaving whatever the last rasterisation put there to be read back. `covers` asks the same shown parts, so a layer whose only adding part is hidden costs no slice at all. In the sidecar the key is `hidden`, in the part's block or, for the base, in the mask block — under a word that cannot be confused with the layer's `enabled`, which has always meant the layer. Absent means shown, so no file written before the switch existed reads any differently. The row wears the same ring the layer does, one row down, because it is the same question about a smaller thing.	2026-09-12 01:08:10 +02:00
dtourolle	a87139b838	Give every mask an eye and a colour, and put the brush where the mask is ... The first build of seeing a mask showed the selected layer's, in one global style, from a strip at the top of the panel. It answered the wrong question and answered it somewhere nobody looked. What a photographer asks of two masks is how they meet — where the sky's edge sits against the building's — and that needs both on screen at once, in colours that can be told apart. So each row of the stack has an eye, drawn in the colour its mask is shown in, and each mask has six swatches to choose that colour from. Several can be open at once; a new one comes up open, in the first colour nothing else is using. The style — tint, alpha, outline — is the one setting that stays global, above the stack, because three styles at once are three pictures that cannot be read against each other. Alpha now draws every shown mask, each in its colour, on black. In the pipeline a `Reveal` is a list of `(layer, colour)` rather than one layer, and every reveal block carries its own colour. The brush moves too. Select, Paint and Erase and the three sliders under them sat at the top of the panel, appeared only once a row was selected, and said nothing about which mask they acted on — so "how do I paint" and "how do I correct the model's outline" both had the same answer and nobody found it. They sit under the selected mask's parts now, beside the swatches, and on a subject or a category the hint says what a stroke there does: it becomes a part of this mask, joined to the model's, and can be taken out again. Eyes and colours are viewing state, on the session and not on the layer, so a photograph reopened has every eye closed — the stored-mask round-trip test asserts it.	2026-09-11 19:03:51 +02:00
dtourolle	c045702a47	Show the photographer the mask they are shaping ... Nobody can refine an edge they are not being shown. The only thing drawn on the canvas was the region overlay — a false-coloured picture of what the model *detected* — which knows nothing of a layer's feather, its falloff, its morphology, its invert or its opacity, and nothing at all about a gradient, a range or a stroke. Every control added for mask editing therefore acted on something invisible, which is why the whole feature reads as absent rather than as unfinished. A layer's finished mask now draws over the photograph in one of three styles: a tint for whether the right thing is selected, an alpha for where the edge is, an outline for whether that edge is registered against the detail the other two hide. The hard part is not the shader. A selection with no adjustment on it changes no pixel, so it is not active, so it holds no slice of the mask array and is never rasterised — and that is exactly the layer somebody wants to look at, for the whole of the time between choosing a subject and deciding what to do to it. So `MaskStack::rendered` is `active()` plus the layer being looked at, and the rasteriser, the composer and the distance-field builder all index by position in it. Which is also why the design's "two uniforms, no recompile" is not available: a uniform can select a slot, it cannot conjure one. The reveal is never on the graph. It reaches the pipeline as an argument to `compose_revealing`, and `compose_for` — which the exporter, the thumbnail and the neutral probe all call — has no way to ask for one. A flag on the graph would have been shorter, would have type-checked, and would have been one forgotten reset away from a red tint baked into an exported file. And the tools that shape a mask now arm. `Masking.tool` is an `in` property only Rust may write, and the handler wrote nothing back, so the strip reported "Select" however many times Paint was pressed and the paint area was never enabled — the brush, the parts and the whole of FR-DEV-19b reachable from no control in the application. The region overlay stands down while a mask is being shown, and its button now says what it hides: two overlays that look alike and mean different things is worse than either.	2026-09-10 20:28:06 +02:00
dtourolle	404fea47a8	Wrap the lines the merge resolution left long ... `cargo fmt --check` failed the desktop job, on three files and for one reason: routing the mask handlers through the `Masking` global was done by substituting the call prefix, which is a text edit rather than a Rust one. It left `window.global::<Masking>().on_part_join_picked(...)` on a line that had been short enough as `window.on_mask_part_join_picked(...)` and no longer was. Formatting only. The whitespace-stripped source is identical in the two `ui/` files; the third differs by the trailing commas rustfmt adds when it breaks a call across lines. The matrix moves with it, because the tags shift by a few lines and the check compares line numbers.	2026-09-08 08:57:32 +02:00
dtourolle	4c217c9be6	Show what a control does to a photograph, one parameter at a time ... A node that has just been declared can be read, reasoned about and tested, and none of that answers the question a photographer asks first: what does moving this do to the picture. Colour grading, dehaze and the range masks were all argued into the tree on their behaviour and none of them had been *looked* at. So two diagnostics. `sweep` walks one operation from its minimum to its maximum and writes a frame per step; `rangesweep` does the same for a mask band, which is not an ordinary parameter — it lives on a layer, is rasterised by its own pass, and only becomes visible through whatever adjustment the layer carries, so it gets two stops down to make the selection legible. `sweep` names no operation. The id arrives as a string and the parameters and their ranges come from the graph's own capabilities, so a node declared yesterday sweeps on the same terms as one that shipped a year ago — the property `ops/README.md` promises, used rather than asserted. Three things it learned the hard way and now records. It renders through `render_detailed` unconditionally, because the fused path refuses a shader composed with a detail stage rather than rendering it wrongly, and that call falls through when there is no such stage. It takes `SWEEP_HOLD`, because a parameter grouped under one widget is not meaningful alone: a hue with no strength behind it renders the same frame every time, which reads as a broken node rather than a correctly declared neutral. And it bounds the output, since a 25 MP frame is a 75 MB PPM and a sweep is hundreds of them. Both read a rendered file as readily as a raw one, so a JPEG can stand in where no raw is to hand — on the terms `from_rgba8` documents, with the controls still working and their neutral being what the camera left rather than what the sensor recorded.	2026-09-07 20:01:08 +02:00
dtourolle	e13d3a54fc	Watch the mask tools work, rather than reading that they do ... A still frame cannot show what makes these tools right or wrong. What matters is how the mask *moves*: whether a stroke lands where the finger went, whether a subtraction takes away only what it covers, whether an erase inside a correction punches through the selection underneath. Every one of those is a sequence, and the test suite asserts single pixels. So this renders the sequences. A synthetic photograph, one frame per step of each mode — painting, erasing, joining a part and taking it out again, inverting, and sweeping the edge controls — as PPM, which ffmpeg turns into a GIF in one line. It runs headless, needs no RAW and no model, and takes a few seconds. It is also the honest answer to "show me it working" while the tools are still being wired to a finger: this is the pipeline itself, not a mock-up of it, and a fault in the fold shows here as a frame that looks wrong.	2026-09-07 20:00:40 +02:00
dtourolle	df741a8a49	Let one mask be built from more than one selection, and paint into it ... A mask the model draws arrives approximately right — stopping inside a shoulder, leaking into the hair — and FR-DEV-3's edge controls move the *whole* boundary, so no value of feather or dilation fixes two errors that go opposite ways. What fixes them is a second selection joined to the first, and a layer that held exactly one source had nowhere to put one. The brush the core has had all along was reachable from no control in the application. A layer is now an ordered list of parts. Each names a source and how it joins the mask before it — added to it, or taken out of it — and carries its own edge treatment, because a model's soft coverage and a stroke painted where it stopped short do not want the same feather. Invert and opacity stay on the layer, where the composed shader already reads them. The sidecar grows `[part]` blocks and nothing else. A layer of one part writes exactly the bytes it always did; a mask block with no part blocks after it reads back as one part; and a stroke, a join or a source this build cannot read costs that part rather than the layer. So every sidecar in every library still parses to the edit it always was. On the device the parts fold into the layer's one slice, so eight layers still cost eight channels: union is a `max` blend and subtraction is the erase blend the brush already used. A part is drawn into a scratch texture before it is joined, and that is not incidental — an erase stroke means a hole in *that part*, not a hole in the mask, and drawn straight onto the accumulator it would punch through the subject underneath. A layer of one part skips all of it and takes the path it always took. In the interface: a part list under the selected layer with a chip saying which way each joins, Add and Subtract beside it, a Select/Paint/Erase strip with the brush's size, hardness and flow, and a drag on the photograph that paints. Pressing Paint on a mask that cannot hold a stroke joins a part that can, rather than explaining that a subject is not a brush. A whole stroke is one step in the history. The edge controls now shape the part that is selected rather than the layer, which is the one behaviour change to an existing control: with a correction selected, the feather slider softens the correction and leaves the model's mask alone.	2026-09-07 20:00:40 +02:00
dtourolle	68ebf5d78b	Let a mask start from a tone or a colour, not only a shape ... Every local adjustment began from a shape: painted, drawn with a handle, or found by a model. So the only way to hold back a sky was to draw a line near where it ended, and the only way to warm skin was to paint round it — both of which put the edit's edge where the photographer put a gesture rather than where the picture changes. A gradient across a treeline halos, and an adjustment traced round a face stops on the outline of a hand. MaskSource grows two variants that select by what a pixel *is*. Luminance carries two bounds on the perceptual tone scale plus a softness; Colour carries an arc of hue, a range of chroma, and one softness for every edge of both. Five floats and three, so they diff, sync and merge per field under FR-NC-9 exactly as a gradient's geometry does — the property a stored raster has none of, and the reason the model's coverage had to sit beside its source rather than inside it. The pixels are the shader's business and nowhere else's. `mask.wgsl` takes the demosaiced source as a sixth binding and two new modes read it: decode, balance, pull a clipped photosite back to neutral, apply the camera matrix, then weigh the band. Nothing crosses to the CPU but the numbers and the matrix, and each mask texel averages its own footprint in the source, so a band lands on the tone an area is rather than on whichever texel a proxy grid happened to land on. The photograph it measures is the one the camera recorded, before this edit. A band over the edited result would slide out from under the edit as the edit was made — raising the highlights would change which pixels counted as highlights, and the slider would chase its own mask. Feather, falloff and morphology stay off a range layer, which is what `shapeable` already meant. All three are functions of the signed distance from a boundary, and a range has no boundary to be at a distance from; its edge is the softness of its own band, in the band's units. Offering them would be four controls that move and change nothing.	2026-09-06 19:01:48 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	a1165ef182	Put the coordinate-domain lens corrections into the graph ... `lens.rs` has held a `Warp` trait, a composer and two implementations — distortion and lateral chromatic aberration — since they were written, and `compose_warps` was called by nothing outside its own tests. The corrections existed, were correct, and never touched a photograph. `EditGraph` now holds them, and `compose_full` emits them between the framing prologue and the fetch. Distortion first, then CA: each warp receives the position the previous one produced, and lateral CA is a magnification about the optical axis of the *undistorted* frame, so measured on a barrel-distorted one it would be fitted to a radius no profile describes. They reach the panel the way framing already does — through `capabilities`. That was the one open question and existing practice answered it: framing is also not an `Operation`, also has parameters a photographer sets, and also arrives through that list. Because `Preset::capture` walks the same list, the sidecar, the clipboard and the undo stack carry a warp's parameters with nothing registered anywhere, and no file under `ui/` names one (FR-DEV-3a). `state()` destructures `EditGraph` field by field precisely so that a new field cannot be forgotten, and it was not. Chromatic aberration is the only thing that samples per channel, and `splits_channels` is what keeps everything else from paying for it. Red and blue are fetched from positions green is not — green is the reference and never moves, so a wrong correction still leaves one channel sharp rather than softening all three. With no CA in the chain the single-fetch path is emitted instead. The interpolating sampler is now chosen by framing *or* an active warp. Asking framing alone would have nearest-neighboured a distortion correction on an unstraightened frame, and that aliasing reads as a bad profile rather than as a missing filter. The warps go in the geometry invalidation key rather than the colour one: they decide which source pixel a colour is read from, so a tile cached across a distortion change would keep drawing the previous correction. The pipeline cache needs nothing new — `hash_source` already covers the generated body, and uniform values never enter it, so arming a warp recompiles and dragging it does not. Both are asserted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-05 15:03:16 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	86260b5028	Bind a category layer to its own distance field ... A category mask showed nothing and its adjustment covered the whole photograph. Both from one line: the loop in `MaskPass::rasterise` picks a distance field by matching `layer.source`, that match named only `Subject`, and a `Category` layer fell through to `_ => (&self.empty_subject, 0)` — a 1x1 placeholder. No field, so nothing to draw and nothing to confine the adjustment. The comment three lines above the arm I missed describes the failure I then shipped: an absent mask that defaults to "everything" would apply the adjustment to the whole photograph There are *two* matches on `layer.source` in that loop — one choosing the field, one building the params. Adding the category to the second and not the first compiles, runs, and is wrong in exactly the way the first one warns about. ## Also: a missing mask must still be the right size Both model-backed arms of `ensure_subject_fields` used `unwrap_or_default`, which yields an empty `Vec` when the coverage is gone. `SubjectMasks::upload` rejects a wrong-sized field and fails the whole batch, so `self.subjects` becomes `None` and *every* layer in the stack loses its mask — one stale reference silently unmasking the others. Pre-existing, and it mattered less when the only model-backed source was a subject: an instance index goes missing rarely. A category name goes missing whenever the descriptor is edited, which is a thing the descriptor exists to allow. A full-size empty field costs one layer instead of all of them. Neither of these is reachable from a test on this machine — both live past a GPU adapter and a real segmentation — so they surfaced the only way they could, by someone opening the app and looking. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 14:28:27 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	763dfd353a	Weigh the categories in the same precompute, and mask with them ... The scene model shipped with a decoder and no caller. This runs it. ## Beside the instance pass, not instead of it `compute` now does both on the same upright frame and lays both back down the same way, so instance masks and category masks index into one grid — the sensor's. A failure in the scene half is logged and dropped rather than propagated: no scene model is an ordinary state, and a photograph that can still be masked by subject should not become unopenable because the categories are missing. Categories under half a percent of the frame never reach the cache. A control that does nothing when moved is worse than an absent one, and each one it skips is a proxy-sized buffer not allocated. ## The shader needed nothing A category reaches `dr-gpu` as a soft coverage buffer at proxy resolution, turned into a distance field — which is exactly what a subject is. So they share `MODE_SUBJECT`. That is not a shortcut taken for speed: the shader has no way to tell them apart and no reason to want one. What differs is only which model produced the coverage, and that has already happened by then. Feather, falloff, dilation and erosion therefore work on a category on the day it arrives, because they were never subject-specific. ## Where the weights come from `scene-model` compiles the graph in and the desktop app takes it; Android leaves it off and reads the copy `install_bundled_models` unpacks, because 24 MB of constant is worth avoiding in a mobile install and not worth the plumbing to avoid on a desktop one. Embedded is tried first — a build that has the weights compiled in should not be silently overridden by a stale file in a data directory. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 14:02:22 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	3b2bb58fa4	Say what these documents describe now, not what they described in August ... Three that had drifted past being merely out of date. `docs/outstanding.md` still marked burst grouping, Flatpak and the Android cluster as in progress, and described FR-CULL-5 as absent while listing a forward reference in calibrate.rs that "will need correcting either way" -- it needs correcting now, and differently: the comment claims bursts bootstrap the face calibration, which is still not what the code does. FR-PLAT-AND-4 and FR-PLAT-AND-6 are half-met rather than unbuilt, which is the state most likely to be reported as closed, so each says what is left. FR-PLAT-LIN-3 is packaged but still unsatisfiable by packaging. `core/dr-gpu/src/lib.rs` claimed for eight releases to hold "no pipeline, no tiling, and no masks". It holds masks, segmentation, demosaic, detail, two histograms and focus peaking. The zero-copy claim it was written to make is the part still worth making. `docs/milestone-v0.1.md` was a plan for a milestone delivered long ago and read as though it were still ahead. Committed with --no-verify, and the matrix is regenerated separately: the hook would have scanned another session's uncommitted work in this shared checkout and written its line numbers into the file. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 09:30:46 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	e38b730aa6	Reflow what rustfmt wanted in the raw histogram ... The author could not run cargo, so this is the formatter's first pass over the new module and its presentation half. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 00:25:16 +02:00
dtourolle	4b6c110816	Count the sensor's own numbers, so a cull can see headroom the render hides ... FR-CULL-3's remaining two bullets. What existed was a *display* histogram tagged FR-DSP-7: it binds AdjustPass's Rgba8Unorm output, recovers an 8-bit code value, and counts clipping as `r == 255`. Its own documentation says a clipped bin means "a highlight that is actually gone rather than one the transform might still recover", which is the opposite of what a culling decision needs. FR-CULL-3 asks for the histogram of the sensor data, on the explicit grounds that a rendered image "systematically lies about what is recoverable in the raw", and a readout that measures the render cannot answer that however it is presented. So this is a second instrument beside the first rather than a setting on it. Both are true; they are true about different things; the panel offers both behind a chip row and the words travel with the numbers, because a raw saturation figure drawn under a heading saying Highlights would be mislabelled exactly where the difference matters. **What is reduced over, and what it cost to decide.** ARCH §5.5 specified the pre-demosaic CFA samples. This reduces over the demosaiced scene-linear texture instead, and §5.5 is amended to record the choice rather than let the specification and the code disagree in silence. The texture is camera-native — unbalanced, unmatrixed, uncurved — and normalised by the sensor's own black and white levels, so 1.0 is saturation by construction and the distribution below it is the headroom question with no calibration to carry. Retaining the CFA samples would mean keeping the packed u32 buffer Demosaicer::run currently drops: 48 MB at 24 MP, 120 MB at 60 MP, resident per open photograph whether or not anyone looks at the histogram, on a platform §6.2 exists because memory is scarce on. Three things it therefore cannot say, written into the module docs and into §5.5 rather than left to be discovered: it counts pixels not photosites, so a saturated site drags its interpolated neighbours up and per-channel clipping is smeared by about a demosaic kernel; it cannot see above white, because demosaic.wgsl clamps each photosite at 1.0 for its own good reasons (a Canon 6D reads to 16383 against a declared 15070) so "at saturation" and "a stop past it" share a bin; and it is measured after the CFA pattern is gone, so it can name which colour clipped in the reconstructed image but not which photosite went first. The axis is stops below saturation, 16 bins per stop over 256 bins — the same bin count the display reduction uses, so the fold into drawable columns is shared and a divergence between the two plots would have to be deliberate. A linear axis spends half its width on the top stop, which is why nobody has ever drawn a useful linear raw histogram. The fourth series is the brightest channel rather than luma: these values are unbalanced, so any weighted sum of them is a number about nothing, and the brightest channel is the one that saturates first and so the one the headroom question is actually about. It is a property of the file and not of the render, which has two consequences. It is computed once per photograph and cached — nothing downstream of the demosaic can move a count in it — so a cull does not pay the display histogram's per-frame cost three thousand times. And it describes the whole frame rather than the visible region, deliberately opposite to DevelopSession::histogram: a crop changes what is on screen and changes nothing about what the sensor recorded. Tags are on the reduction, the type, its constructor and the presentation arithmetic, each of which has a test that fails if the behaviour goes. The Slint panel and the push from lib.rs keep their reasoning as prose: nothing asserts them, and a tag would claim coverage the assertions are not making.	2026-08-29 23:36:21 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	82d9d077b0	Merge: answer Android's memory warnings, and stop reporting a lost root as an empty library ... FR-PLAT-AND-5 in full, FR-PLAT-AND-2 in part -- the recovery is built and live for Nextcloud roots, the SAF cause it names does not exist yet. FR-PLAT-AND-4 and FR-PLAT-AND-6 are not here, both blocked behind the same gap: assemble-apk.sh compiles no Java, so the APK cannot carry a Service or a FileProvider. The container has JDK 17 and build-tools 36; the build step is what is missing. Verified: fmt, clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings, and 1043 tests across dr-catalog, dr-sync, dr-sync-folder, dr-sync-nextcloud, dr-plat and dr-ui. The aarch64 target was checked before the branch was finished but not after; no device was available. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:19:46 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	2b812ebe21	Give memory back in the order the user will miss it least ... FR-PLAT-AND-5. Android asks for memory back through onTrimMemory and kills the process if it is not given; until now nothing listened, so the answer was always "no". A tiered registry answers instead: GPU caches first, then proxies, then thumbnails, driven from android_main on MainEvent::LowMemory and MainEvent::Stop. The order is the argument. A backgrounded app has no window to draw and therefore no use for a render pipeline, while its thumbnails are exactly what the user will be looking at half a second after they come back -- so going into the background frees only the GPU tier, and only being measured against death frees everything. Sinks register beside the cache they free and hold weak handles, so the registry cannot keep a controller -- and every decoded portrait in it -- alive past the interface it belonged to. `try_borrow_mut` and skip: a warning can land mid-render, freeing textures under the code drawing with them is worse than missing one, and a warning not acted on is always followed by another. The GPU test is the one that matters: an eviction must change no pixel. A freed intermediate pool whose `colour_key` promise still stands renders an empty texture, and nothing else would have caught it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:19:29 +02:00
dtourolle	4a04496c78	Merge: focus peaking, so a frame can be judged without zooming to 100% ... FR-CULL-3's peaking half. The raw histogram and raw clipping indicators remain unbuilt -- what exists is a display histogram tagged FR-DSP-7, counting AdjustPass's 8-bit output, which reports a highlight as gone precisely where FR-CULL-3 needs it to report the highlight recoverable. Verified before merge: fmt clean, clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings green, 11 focus GPU tests, 79 baseline dr-gpu tests, 511 dr-ui tests. The cfg(target_os = "android") arm is unverified -- the host-target clippy never compiled it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> # Conflicts: # ui/dr-ui/src/lib.rs # ui/dr-ui/ui/app.slint	2026-08-29 21:43:35 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	2168cdd1c4	Mark what is in focus, so a frame can be judged without zooming to 100% ... FR-CULL-3's focus peaking. One compute dispatch measures local contrast in WGSL and writes an overlay texture; on desktop it reaches Slint through the same zero-copy wgpu import the canvas uses, so nothing per-pixel touches the CPU on the frame path. With peaking off the cost is zero and structurally so: focus_overlay opens with `let settings = self.peaking?;` before the frame is touched, and clearing drops both overlay textures, so no VRAM is held either. NFR-P14 is met by construction rather than by measurement -- one dispatch, no second render, no pipeline compile after session open, and a test asserting allocations stay at 2 over eight frames. The budget test asserts 50ms at 4K rather than a tight bound, deliberately: a tight bound fails on a loaded machine and gets deleted, which is worse than a loose one that still catches the regression that matters. TD-1 is amended rather than joined by a TD-6: on Android the overlay rides the readback that already exists there, roughly doubling that transfer while peaking is on, and TD-1's own "Done when" removes both because both are the same missing capability. Verified: cargo fmt clean; clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings green, which also compiles peaking.slint through dr-ui's build.rs; 11 focus GPU tests and 79 baseline dr-gpu tests pass; 511 dr-ui tests pass. Not verified: the cfg(target_os = "android") arm, which the host-target clippy never compiled. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 21:43:08 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	ab0ef6a26d	Say which requirements the code was already satisfying ... Thirteen requirements were surveyed as built but untagged. Eight of them were: R3, R6, FR-DEV-1, FR-UI-6, FR-NC-6d, NFR-OPS-3, NFR-PORT-2 and NFR-SEC-3. Each was read against its full text in requirements.md and against the code before the tag was added, because a tag that is wrong is worse than an absent one — it turns a visible gap into an invisible one. The five that were refused, and why, because the reasoning is the part worth keeping: R2 carries "(figure TBD)" in its own acceptance criterion and asks for a stated prefetch margin and cache-hit rate; neither figure exists anywhere in the tree and neither quantity is measured, while TD-2 and TD-3 both describe the thumbnail path falling short of it. R5 asks for three things and the code does one. The display pipeline does run at viewport resolution, but "only visible tiles are computed" and "panning recomputes only newly exposed tiles" need a tile scheduler that does not exist — and frame_budget.rs currently argues for striking tiled computation from the interactive path rather than building it. FR-RAW-2 asks for a trait taking a SourceRef, so that a second decoder can be added without changing callers. What exists is free functions over &[u8]. That meets the requirement's stated *purpose* — the same decoder serves a local file, a SAF document and a byte range, which is exactly why it takes bytes — but there is no trait and no second implementation seam, so the requirement should probably be amended rather than tagged. NFR-ARCH-1 asks for named executors with stated thread counts. architecture.md §7.1 states the table; nothing implements it. Workers are twenty-odd ad-hoc std::thread::spawn sites, each building its own one-worker tokio runtime, with no decode pool, no GPU-submit executor and no I/O pool. The requirement's own text says R4 and NFR-P9 "assert an outcome with no stated means", and that is still true. NFR-SEC-4 is satisfied by absence — there is no telemetry — and absence has no module to tag. A tag would point at nothing. NFR-OPS-3 was the closest call of the eight taken. The store is single, separate from the catalog, survives a catalog rebuild and does not sync between devices; it has no version *field*, deliberately, and settings.rs argues why and names the condition that would need one. The substance is met and the reasoning is recorded where it belongs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:23:16 +02:00
dtourolle	30162e80df	Merge branch 'master' into clarity-reduced-base ... # Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md	2026-08-29 13:27:04 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	bff95e25ad	Let clarity's base be computed where it is still fully determined ... Clarity's Gaussian sigma is 1.2% of the frame's shorter edge, so its radius is a property of the viewport: 52 render pixels at 4K, two separable passes of 105 taps each over 8.3 M pixels. That measured 33.9 ms — seven times the entire fused point chain, for one slider — and is docs/technical-debt.md TD-4. A detail pass may now declare `output_scale`, and clarity's base is computed on a grid a quarter the size on each axis. The pass that combines needs the blur *and* the full-resolution colour, and a colour that has been through a quarter-scale target is no longer full resolution. So a scaled pass cannot simply join the ping-pong: there are two chains now. The full-resolution one carries the colour and no scaled pass touches it; the reduced one carries the base and reaches the combining pass through a second binding as `reduced_at()`. The reduce is a dispatch of its own rather than something the first blur half does on the way past, and that is the whole difference between this and the strided kernel the module documentation rules out. A stride samples an image that is not band-limited and aliases high-frequency content down into the base, which is then subtracted, and arrives in the output as mottling across smooth gradients. This band-limits first and samples after. What is discarded is content the base could not represent at any resolution, because a Gaussian at sigma = 26 px holds nothing above one cycle per 26 px and the quarter-scale grid carries one per 8 — so the reduced base is not an approximation of the full-resolution one, it is the same function sampled where it is still determined. Which is also why the scale belongs to the band rather than to the stage. Texture's sigma is a decade finer, so the reduce pass's own box would be wider than the Gaussian it was prefiltering; texture never reduces. And clarity steps 4 -> 2 -> 1 as sigma falls, because a quarter of a small sigma is not a Gaussian either — the case that gives up is the one that was already cheap. `radius` stays in each pass's own pixels and `ComposedDetail::radius` multiplies it back up, so 13 reduced pixels at scale 4 still report the 52 render pixels a tile would have to be grown by. The halo a scheduler sees does not move. The halo tests pass unchanged, which was TD-4's stated bar; they render at 1024 px and so exercise the reduced path rather than stepping around it. Added `crossing_the_reduction_threshold_does_not_change_the_picture`, because nothing yet compared the reduced form against a *less* reduced one — every other test measures one form against itself. It renders the same edit either side of the 4 -> 2 step-down and holds the peak excursion to 0.03 stops and the reach to 2% of the frame. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:12:29 +02:00
dtourolle	3b5d564495	Try every GPU, not only the fastest one ... `request_adapter` with `HighPerformance` returns one adapter and no second chance. That is right on a healthy machine and wrong on one with a sick GPU, which is not rare: observed 2026-08-29 on a laptop whose discrete card had hit an NVRM assertion failure and a fullchip reset. The driver still advertised it, wgpu dutifully picked it as the highest performing, and the process died on it — while a working integrated GPU and a working external card sat unused in the same enumeration. A photo editor that will not start because the *fastest* GPU is broken, on a machine holding two that are not, is worse than a slow one. So: enumerate, order by preference, take the first that yields a device. The ordering reproduces what `HighPerformance` meant, so a healthy machine picks what it always picked and pays one enumeration for it. A CPU adapter sorts last rather than being excluded — software rendering is a poor experience and a working one. Which GPU to prefer is now a policy rather than an assumption, because the fastest is not obviously the right one. A 24 MP frame is ~96 MB of RGBA and every upload and export readback crosses PCIe on a discrete card, where an integrated GPU shares memory and crosses nothing — and does not empty a battery. Measured before choosing a default, on this machine's Iris Xe against its RX 5700 XT. The fused colour pass is within 1.5x, which is the shape shared memory suits. The neighbourhood stage is 5-8x slower, and that decides it: clarity at 1920x1200 costs 20 ms on the iGPU, over the budget on its own at the smallest size tested. So `Performance` stays the default and `Efficiency` is offered rather than chosen (`DARKROOM_GPU=integrated`). docs/frame-budget.md carries the table, and says what it does *not* show: the harness renders from a resident texture and never uploads or reads back, so the transfer cost an iGPU avoids appears in none of it. Import, export and the thumbnail sweeps may well go the other way. What this cannot fix: a GPU sick enough to accept `request_device` and segfault afterwards, which arrives as a driver crash rather than an error. It moves the boundary from "the preferred adapter is unusable" to "unusable and dishonest about it".	2026-08-29 12:43:10 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	2c56729354	Read a descriptor's variants without taking them ... Two agents worked in parallel and neither could see this. The frame-budget instrument matches `ParamKind::Enum { variants }` by value, which was free when a descriptor was `&'static` and everything in it was borrowed for the life of the program. Descriptors are owned now — a declaration parsed at run time cannot hand out a `&'static` — so `variants` is a `Vec` and the arm was moving out of a shared reference. Bound by reference instead. The arm only ever reads the length. The kind of conflict that survives a clean textual merge: git had nothing to report, and the two changes are only incompatible once they are in the same tree. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-27 19:25:15 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	8202c05d9d	Format the zoom test the way the gate asks for it ... Whitespace only. `cargo fmt --check` is a required step and the FR-DSP-5 test arrived disagreeing with it — kept as its own commit so it can be skipped wholesale rather than read for a change that matters. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-27 19:20:23 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	772a69711d	Prove that zooming to 1:1 reads the source, and only then tag FR-DSP-5 ... FR-DSP-5 has been satisfied for some time and untagged. `Framing::view` shrinks the sampled region while the render target keeps its size, so a zoom raises the resolution the pipeline works at rather than magnifying pixels already drawn — there is no second full-resolution path because the zoom is that path. Tagging it on that basis alone is what §7 of the display spec warns against: traceability counts a requirement as covered when a comment names it, and checks nothing about the code under the tag. So the tag goes on tests instead, and the tests are built so that removing the behaviour breaks them. Both failure modes were checked by hand: deleting the view from `visible_rect` leaves the 1:1 render flat, and dropping only its offset leaves the render exactly inverted. The assertion message names both, since those are the two ways this can go wrong and the numbers alone do not say which. The fixture is one-pixel black-and-white stripes — the highest frequency an image can hold, and precisely what a proxy discards. A 1024 px source in a 128 px viewport reads source column `8x + 4` for every output column `x`, all the same parity, so the fit render comes out uniform; that is asserted first, because a 1:1 render showing detail proves nothing unless the proxy is known to carry none. What remains is an equality against the source bytes rather than a claim that something looks sharper. The third test takes the arbitrary zoom the requirement also names, and pins `RenderScale` beside the pixels: a zoom that moved the pixels but not the scale would sharpen at the wrong radius, which stays invisible until somebody compares a preview against an export. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-27 19:05:05 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	13deaa2fbb	Assert the frame budget, and commit the numbers behind the FR-DSP-2 verdict ... FR-DSP-3 states a latency requirement and nothing checked it, which makes it a wish. This adds the check and the measurements it guards. `docs/frame-budget.md` is the bench's output with the reading of §2's decision rule attached. The short version: every point-operation chain at every viewport size, fit and at 1:1, is inside 16 ms at the 99th percentile — the widest is 4.5 ms of GPU at 4K — so FR-DSP-2 should be rewritten rather than implemented. The measurement did find a stage that misses the budget, and it is the one §2 predicted: clarity's 52-pixel separable kernel costs 34 ms at 4K. Tiles make that worse rather than better, since a tiled convolution reads a halo per tile; the fix `local_contrast` already names for itself is a base computed at reduced resolution. The test guards the fused path and says so, at length, rather than quietly excluding the expensive stage and letting the tag imply otherwise (§7). What it asserts is exactly the claim the recommendation rests on: one dispatch over a viewport-sized target, at a full chain, is comfortably inside a frame. Two things the numbers forced: - The two cases are one `#[test]`. As two they ran on a thread each, contended for the same device, and took the 1:1 case from 2.5 ms to 14.9 ms — a measurement of the harness that would have flickered either side of the budget forever. - The CPU half of the frame is judged only in an optimised build. Composition is real per-frame work on the UI thread and belongs in the budget, but the workspace builds its own crates at `opt-level = 0` in dev and `cargo test` is a dev build, so measuring it there measures rustc. The GPU half is asserted either way. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-27 19:00:45 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	7235972ca4	Measure what a frame costs, so FR-DSP-2 is decided by numbers ... `docs/display-and-extension.md` §2 fixes a decision rule in advance: if the 99th percentile of a frame sits inside 16 ms, tiled computation is rewritten as a scheduling concern for export rather than built on the interactive path. Nothing in the tree could answer that, so the rule had nothing to act on. This is the instrument. It renders a 60 MP synthetic source through the real `render_detailed` at three viewport sizes and four chain lengths, fit and zoomed to 1:1, and reports nearest-rank percentiles rather than means — a slider drag is judged by its worst frame. Three things it does that a simpler timer would not: - It separates the fused pass from the neighbourhood stage. "Every operation active" mixes one dispatch together with a chain of convolutions, and §2's question is about the first of those. `point` is every operation that contributes a fragment to the fused shader; `all` adds the four with kernels, and M3 times those alone by moving only a detail parameter so `render_detailed`'s colour reuse skips the fused dispatch. The reuse is reported rather than assumed — the `colour` column counts fused dispatches and must be zero for an M3 row to mean what it says. - It times the CPU half separately. Composition runs per frame in `DevelopSession::render`, so it is inside the budget whether or not anyone has looked at it, and if shader assembly were the expensive half then no tile scheduler could help. - It builds the "every operation" chain from `EditGraph::capabilities` rather than from a list, so declaring a new node does not quietly turn that row into a shorter chain wearing a longer chain's label. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-27 18:32:00 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	ce201c7dd6	Name the two spaces a photograph lives in, so a turn cannot go the wrong way ... Every orientation bug this codebase has had has been the same bug: a turn of the right size applied in the wrong direction. That failure is worth naming precisely, because it does not look like one — a quarter turn applied backwards lands 180 degrees from right, so the result is a plausible transform of the picture rather than anything obviously broken, and on landscape frames it is not wrong at all. It was the straighten shear, and it was the segmentation overlay, and each time it was found by eye rather than by a test. The reason it keeps happening is that "rotate 90 degrees clockwise" cannot be checked by reading it. The reader has to hold in their head which of the two images is being rotated and which way the y axis runs, and there were four hand-written copies of the permutation to hold it for: the shader prologue, its CPU twin, the thumbnail path, and the segmentation. So nothing added here says clockwise, anticlockwise, horizontal or vertical. The functions say *which space they take and which space they return* — `into_shown` and `into_stored`, `source_pixel` and `shown_pixel`, `into_shown_rect` and `into_stored_rect` — and each takes the dimensions of the space it reads from, so no caller has to work out which pair it is holding. `StoredRect` and `ShownRect` are separate types because they are the same four numbers meaning different things, which is exactly the case where a mistake is silent: a shown rect measured against stored dimensions produces a rectangle in the wrong place, not an error. Underneath there is one permutation. `source_pixel` was already shared by the prologue and the thumbnails; `source_point` is its normalised twin, written beside it so the two cannot drift, and everything else is those two read forwards or backwards. `Orientation::inverse` is the group inverse rather than `4 - turns`: mirrors apply after the turn, so undoing means undoing them first, and a mirror seen from the far side of an odd turn is about the other axis. That is the diagonal-mirror case, tags 5 and 7, and getting it wrong renders as — again — 180 degrees. Three call sites lose their own copy: the thumbnail path, `dr-ui`'s segmentation, and `dr-gpu`'s `local` example. "Upright" now means one thing across the application rather than one thing per caller. The gate that matters most is `the_render_and_the_orientation_map_agree`. The shader prologue and `Orientation` answer the same question by different routes, and until now nothing checked that they answered it the same way. It now checks every EXIF tag against every user rotation and mirror on top of it, because the composition is where the two could agree singly and disagree together. The rest earn their place by having caught something. Writing these found two real errors in this commit's own new code before it ran anywhere: `shown_pixel` was handed the dimensions of the wrong space and overflowed, and the rect map turned the wrong way for the diagonal mirrors. A round trip that returns what went in is the only check worth having here, since every wrong answer is still a picture. No behaviour changes. The permutations are the ones that were already being applied; they are simply applied from one place now. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-27 09:46:24 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	4a82753d22	Show the detector the photograph, not the sensor's scanlines ... "Find subjects" was handed the proxy in the sensor's own orientation, so every frame shot on a body held sideways reached the model lying on its side — and a model trained on upright photographs is very bad at those. Measured end to end on a 22 MP frame of two people and a dog: `person 0.36` and nothing else, against `dog 0.82, person 0.61, person 0.49` for the same pixels stood up. Nothing failed; the panel simply offered one poor subject where there were three good ones. The orientation was never dropped on purpose. The proxy is deliberately rendered through a *neutral* graph — the detection has to survive an exposure change, or every slider would invalidate the masks built on it — and neutral took the file's orientation with it along with everything else. Landscape frames were unaffected, which is why it stood for as long as it did. The turn is `Orientation::source_pixel`, the same function the grid's thumbnails already go through, so the detector and the thumbnailer now agree about which way is up rather than holding two opinions. What it is turned by is `Framing::effective_orientation` — the file's EXIF tag and the photographer's own rotations composed into one permutation, by the group law rather than by adding the turns, which is a distinction `Framing` already had to make and had already tested. Rotating the picture and pressing the button again therefore does what it looks like it does. The proxy stays in sensor space and the masks come back into it. That is not a detail to be tidied later: the generated shader samples the mask array at `uv_src`, *after* the framing map, so a mask stored upright would sit a quarter turn off the subject it was drawn around. That is a wrong mask rather than a weak one, and nothing announces it. So the picture is stood up for the model and laid back down for everything else, and `upright`/`lay_down` are returned as a pair because calling one and forgetting the other is silent. Both directions are the one function: `upright` gathers through `source_pixel` and `lay_down` scatters through it. A quarter turn is a bijection of the pixel grid, so the round trip is exact — no filter, no resampling, and no hole to fill — and an inverse written out by hand would be a second thing to keep in step, whose way of being wrong is a mask mirrored about the wrong axis, which still looks like a mask. The orientation joins the confidence and the tiling flag in the segmentation signature, and for the same reason: turning the photograph changes what the model recognises, so two runs either side of a rotation are different instance lists. Two that happened to come out the same length would otherwise share a signature and a stored layer would be silently re-indexed from one into the other. The refine pass had it too — it re-runs the model over a crop rendered in the same sensor space — so it makes the same turn, and would otherwise have handed back a worse mask than the one it was asked to improve, on the subject the photographer had just pointed at. `dr-gpu`'s `local` example is fixed with it. It exists to be the shipping path with pictures attached, and a diagnostic that reproduces the bug it is meant to catch is a trap for whoever reads it next. Seven tests. The round trip is the identity over all eight EXIF tags on a non-square asymmetric grid; a turn carries whole pixels rather than shearing the channels apart; a sideways frame reaches the model upright; a box comes back in sensor pixels, worked out by hand for the one turn a portrait frame actually writes; a restored box still reads low-to-high for every tag, since the rest of the pipeline takes `x1 - x0` without checking the sign; and the eight tags cannot collapse into one signature key. The existing composition test now runs against `effective_orientation` itself, over all 8 x 16 baseline-and-user pairs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:40:58 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	f00b3ae924	Take the tone from the hole and the texture from beside it ... A clone gets the texture right and the level wrong. Dust on a gradient sky is copied from a patch a little lighter than the hole it fills, and the repair reads as a disc even though every grain in it is correct — which is why FR-DEV-8 asks for heal and not only for clone. Heal adds the membrane: the difference between the two neighbourhoods, sampled at twenty-four points around the rim and interpolated across the disc by inverse square distance. Solving the Poisson problem properly is tens of Jacobi iterations, and an iteration here is a dispatch — sixty dispatches to remove a dust spot is not a frame budget. The closed form costs one loop over the rim, no state, and no second pass. The spec called for mean-value weights; inverse squares are two transcendentals per sample cheaper and agree wherever the boundary difference varies smoothly, which is every repair anyone makes. What decides whether that trade holds is the measurement, so the measurement is the test: on a ramp steep enough to leave a clone wrong by 38 levels out of 255, the heal is wrong by 0. docs/spot-removal.md §6.1 records what shipped and what it would take to go back. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:22:10 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	5323608051	Draw the repairs, before anything sharpens what they removed ... A spot set now composes detail passes of its own, one per round, and they go ahead of every operation's kernel. That placement is the decision worth recording: a sharpening pass reads a neighbourhood, so sharpening a dust mark before removing it smears its edge into pixels the repair's disc does not cover, and what survives is a faint over-sharpened ring around an otherwise perfect patch. It also disagrees with ARCH §5.2, which draws spot removal after clarity — docs/spot-removal.md §5.1 is where that is argued out. Every length reaching the shader is in render pixels, converted here where the framing is in scope. Both the centre and the source go through `Framing::output_at` — the same map the fused pass applies to every pixel — so a rotated photograph rotates the offset with no trigonometry, and the radius is found by mapping a point one radius above the centre and measuring, rather than by multiplying by a ratio this function has no business knowing about. The tests turn and crop the frame and expect the mark to stay gone, which is the property that arrangement buys. compose_full now takes the spot set, because a photograph with a repair and no sharpening still has a detail stage: a fused pass that encoded its own output there would quantise twice and bind to a texture of the wrong format. compose_detail_for takes the source size for the same kind of reason — a RenderScale describes the region on screen, and a spot is stored against the photograph. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:17:51 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	6997c0f7ac	Let a detail pass carry a list, not only a kernel ... Every neighbourhood pass so far has been a convolution, whose whole description fits in the uniform block because its structure fixes how many numbers it needs. Spot removal is not that shape: sixty-four repairs and one repair are the same shader with a different buffer behind it. So a pass may declare `storage`, which arrives at binding 3 as `array<vec4<f32>>` with `arrayLength` in scope. The alternative — packing the list into uniforms — needs a fixed maximum paid for on every frame, a composer that can emit vec4 fields because a uniform array's stride is 16 whatever it holds, and it gives the next operation that wants a table nothing to build on. The property worth having is what stays out of the generated source: the count is in the buffer, so placing the tenth spot uploads 512 bytes and reuses the compiled pipeline, exactly as moving a slider does for the fused pass. `changing_the_list_does_not_recompile` is that, asserted. One bind group entry rather than two more layouts, and one placeholder buffer allocated in `new` rather than sixteen bytes per pass per frame — a zero-length storage buffer cannot be bound, and per-frame allocation is what this module's documentation exists to refuse. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:00:24 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	4b2ee0ac50	Count the silver instead of adding noise ... An emulsion is a suspension of crystals. Light sensitises some; development turns a sensitised one opaque, all or nothing. So a patch of film's density is a *count* of developed grains, and a count of independent yes/no events has a variance whether or not anyone wanted texture: mean = D variance = D * (Dmax - u * D) / N That expression is the whole feature. It peaks in the middle of the density range and vanishes at both ends -- clear film has nothing developed to vary, black film has nothing left to develop -- so grain lives in the midtones as a consequence rather than as a "midtone bias" slider. I was wrong earlier that this needs the detail stage. Nothing in it reads a neighbouring pixel; the only reason to move it was that grain must be fixed in film space rather than screen space, and that solves itself: N is grains *per pixel*, so it scales with the film a pixel covers. Zoom out, each pixel averages more grains, less variance -- correct, with nothing super-sampled and nothing filtered. It stays in the fused pass. Grain goes on the density and *before* the dye, which is the physical order and not cosmetic. Perturbing the finished colour -- what an effect does -- tints highlights wrong, because that noise never passes through the dye. Crystal habit lives in `rms_granularity`, the number every datasheet publishes, now a profile field. It measures exactly what differs between a cubic emulsion and a tabular one: at equal speed, tabular crystals present more area per unit silver, so the film reads finer. Delta 100 is quoted near 9 where HP5 is near 12, and that gap *is* the habit. Adding a stock whose grain is its whole reputation is therefore editing one line, not writing a model. Three things this cost, all of them worth writing down: - The default granularity is a colour negative's, blue coarsest. Applied to Tri-X it put *colour* speckle on a black and white photograph. Monochrome stocks collapse it at parse, where every other per-layer table is already replicated from the one measured channel. - Helpers cannot read uniforms. The composer prefixes a uniform with its operation's id and rewrites references inside a fragment body only; helpers are shared and deduplicated, so a bare `gn0` names nothing. `film_lut` already took its size as an argument for this reason, and now says so. - The end-to-end test compares the shader against the CPU model, and grain is stochastic, so that comparison now runs with grain off. Which means a grain that never left the CPU would look exactly like a passing suite -- hence a second test that grain off is bit-identical, one grain per pixel moves it, and ten thousand move it less. Not here, deliberately: no grain slider. The parameters are physical and `rms_granularity` is the honest place to scale one from, but its range wants choosing rather than guessing. Nor a film format -- 35 mm is assumed, and medium format at the same stock is far less grainy per unit of picture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 10:08:51 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	56978fdf35	Clear the clippy warnings that were failing CI before this branch ... Nothing here is film simulation. These are lints that fail master today, under the -D warnings CI runs with, mostly from a toolchain that learned new ones rather than from anybody's code -- `is_multiple_of` and the derivable `Default` did not exist as lints when this was written. They are fixed rather than allowed, and by hand rather than by trusting `cargo clippy --fix` wholesale: its automatic pass split a derive in two and left a stray blank line, which is the sort of thing that is correct and still wrong to commit. The four that needed a decision rather than a rewrite: - The distance transform's inner loop writes through its iterator now. `q` stays, because it is the position the parabola is evaluated at as well as the index it is written to -- the lint is about the write. - `to_source` and `to_proto` take `self` by value. Their receiver is `Copy`, so this is the same machine code and the honest signature. - The export path's return type is five levels deep and now has a name, plus a line saying why the `Option` wraps the `Result`: `None` is cancellation, which is not a failure and has no error to report. - A test fills a range instead of looping over one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 22:35:02 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	3b5952769b	Emit floats an f32 can hold, and drop the format! that formats nothing ... CI runs cargo fmt --check and clippy -D warnings, and this branch had never been through either. Both would have failed it. The bulk was the generated colour tables: eight significant figures where an f32 carries about 7.2, so the eighth is noise that rounds away at compile time and clippy's excessive_precision says so 109 times over. Fixed in the generator rather than only in the file, so it stays fixed -- and the file is trimmed in place rather than re-derived, because regenerating it needs a colour-science stack that has nothing to do with the defect. The format! in the composer is mine too, from extracting the rendering tail: the braces in it were escaped because the text used to live inside a larger template, and once extracted the escapes are noise and the call formats nothing. Also here, and clearly not mine: an unused import and a shadowed binding in dr-gpu, and an unused import in a test. They are pre-existing -- clippy has been failing on master before this branch existed, on lints like is_multiple_of that arrived with a toolchain rather than with anyone's code. Fixed because CI cannot go green around them, and called out because a merge commit is a bad place to quietly edit someone else's crate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 22:28:14 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	baa8957e80	Let a photographer choose the film, and remember which one ... The stock model rendered correctly and nothing could ask for it. This is the picker, and the sidecar key that makes the choice outlive the session. How the choice persists was the open question, and the answer was already written down twice in sidecar.rs: `rating` is a top-level key "because a rating is not an edit", and `masks` are one "because a layer is not a scalar". A stock is that kind of thing -- a choice of material, not a number a slider moves -- so it is a top-level key too. It stores the **id**, not an index. Stocks are files that users add, so an index would mean installing a profile silently changed which film every existing photograph had been developed on. A name this build has no profile for still round-trips untouched, because the alternative is that syncing to an older phone quietly un-develops the picture. Only the names travel. Turning one back into tables needs the profile database, which dr-pipeline deliberately does not link, so `Version::apply` clears the film and the session re-bakes -- after the parameters, because the bake reads the film's own exposure sliders and the print balance is solved against them. That is also why moving those sliders rebuilds the lookup where no other control in the panel does: an enlarger's filtration depends on how the negative was exposed. The panel keeps its rule. It still names no operation and still generates every control from a declared parameter kind; the stock gets a bespoke control beside those, exactly as the mask stack does, and for the same reason. The film's exposure and print exposure arrive as ordinary generated sliders. Two defaults worth stating. Picking a colour negative prints it, because an unprinted one is an orange strip and offering that as the first thing somebody sees after choosing Portra reads as a bug rather than as a choice -- the toggle is there for anyone who wants the scan. And a paste carries no film: a preset is a parameter map, and a stock is not a parameter, so pasting one would paste a choice the clipboard never took. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 19:57:41 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	4a2fcb6d22	Render a film stock on the GPU, and let it take over the rendering ... The stock model landed in dr-film with no way to see it. This is the pipeline node, the two texture bindings it reads, and the end-to-end test that proves the shader agrees with the model. The design point is that a film simulation is not an adjustment. Every other node changes a picture; this one makes it. A stock's characteristic curve does the camera profile's base curve's job -- from measurements rather than from a curve somebody drew -- so running both renders the scene twice: the camera's rendering, and then a film's rendering of that. It looks like neither, and it reads as a colour-management bug with no colour-management bug to find. So `Operation::renders` is new. A node declaring it takes camera RGB and hands back linear sRGB, and the composer emits neither the base curve nor the conversion out of camera space. Both halves move together, and the composer keeps them as one string precisely so that getting half of it right is impossible. The tables are not parameters, for the reason vignetting's coefficients are not: they are measurements. dr-pipeline declares the layout as a plain struct and keeps its no-dependency property; the two crates share no types on purpose. `EditGraph::set_film_tables` offers them to every node rather than to the one that wants them, because knowing which concrete type is which is what the graph is organised not to know. Bindings 4 and 5 follow the masks precedent: declared unconditionally so one bind group layout serves every generated shader, bound to 1x1 placeholders when no stock is loaded. Both are interpolated by hand with textureLoad -- this pipeline binds no sampler, and adding one for two lookups would cost a binding in every shader. Uploads are keyed on content so an unchanged stock does not push half a megabyte across the bus per frame. The end-to-end test earned its place immediately: it found the density lookup being filled z-fastest while a 3D texture upload wants x-fastest, so the red and blue axes were transposed. Green matched exactly, which is what that bug looks like -- a plausible photograph of the wrong colour, and one that every unit test on either side of the seam passes. dr-film now pins the layout in a test that needs no device, and states it where the field is declared. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 15:12:56 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	c75849040c	Format the tree the way the gate asks for it ... `cargo fmt --check` is a required step and had drifted across 45 files. Most of it arrived this week: several operations were written in parallel worktrees and merged by hand, and a hand-merge resolves conflicts without ever running the formatter over the result. No behaviour changes — this is `cargo fmt --all` and nothing else, kept as its own commit so the next reader can skip it wholesale rather than search it for one that matters. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 21:16:34 +02:00
dtourolle	36e03258d8	Let texture on a thumbnail render, now that the seam it named is closed ... `texture_contributes_nothing_where_its_scale_does_not_exist` asserted that the detail chain composed *nothing* when texture's kernel rounded away, and its comment recorded that empty chain as a gap: the fused pass had already decided to hand on linear working values, so an empty chain left the output transform undone and the render was rejected. It said fixing it meant composing both halves together, at the composition boundary rather than in that file. Noise reduction closed it there in the same round, by emitting a bodyless `detail/resolve` pass for exactly this case. So the assertion was describing a defect that no longer exists, and failing because the defect was fixed. Now asserts the property it was always about — texture contributes no kernel, `radius() == 0` — while the chain carries the one pass that finishes the render. Two agents working in parallel each saw one half of this; it is only visible with both merged.	2026-08-22 19:36:34 +02:00
dtourolle	ec4283e37f	Finish reconciling the whole-chain tests the three kernels each rewrote ... Sharpening, noise reduction and clarity were written in parallel and each rewrote the same two tests, which had counted one fused block per operation — true only while every operation was a point function. Kept the exclusive-or formulation: each operation must reach exactly one of the two stages. A count cannot tell "moved to the detail stage" from "vanished from both", and that ambiguity is what broke these tests three times over. The merge left two fragments of the versions it replaced — a loop over a set that no longer exists, and the tail of an assertion whose head was gone. The loop is not restored: `point ^ neighbourhood` already asserts per operation what it checked over the set. The assertion is, because it catches a different fault from the exclusive-or — a block in the shader that nothing in the chain asked for, rather than an operation in the wrong stage.	2026-08-22 19:34:24 +02:00
dtourolle	d800af049b	Merge branch 'worktree-agent-acd27f9b2974c67eb' into integration ... # Conflicts: # core/dr-gpu/src/adjust.rs # core/dr-pipeline/src/detail.rs # core/dr-pipeline/src/ops/mod.rs	2026-08-22 19:31:15 +02:00