12 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	dce1e66746	Show which cell a shift-click is measuring from ... The gesture had a hidden operand. A range runs from the anchor — the last cell plainly clicked — to the cell shift-clicked, and nothing on screen said which one the anchor was. A user who could not tell where the range was being measured from had no way to predict what it would take and no clue why a wrong one came out wrong; often the anchor is not on screen at all, which is itself the answer to "why did that select so much". The anchor is marked with an inner ring, drawn inside the selection ring rather than in a colour of its own: it has to stay legible against a thumbnail of any brightness, and a hue would read as a second kind of selection. It is an ordinal, so it marks a row only while the photograph it names is in the loaded window — off screen it marks nothing, which is the honest answer, and `anchor` rides in the cell model beside `selected` so both are pushed by the one pass that already keeps the grid in step with the selection. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-24 19:50:46 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	54f9cb54fb	Take the whole run a shift-click names, not the part that happens to be loaded ... Shift-clicking two photographs selected only the cells between them that were in the loaded window. The grid is a window of a hundred or so over a library of twenty thousand, and `apply_press` resolved the range against that window — `ids[lo_row..=hi_row]`, clamped to what was there. Everything else in the run had no id anywhere in the UI, so it was silently dropped. The user cannot see that: the selection count is off screen along with the photographs, and the gesture only announces itself when the drop files a dozen images instead of two hundred. The two ends are *ordinals*, and only the catalog knows what lies between them. `read_ids_span` asks it, through the same predicates, the same rating filter and the same ordering the window itself is read with — an ordinal names a photograph only relative to an ordering, so a run taken through any other one is a run through a different library. That ordering is now a constant, `GRID_ORDER`, shared by the window, the trash's own order beside it, and the run: capture time first, with the file name breaking ties and nothing more. A card written by two cameras interleaves names that have nothing to do with each other, and what "everything between these two" means to a photographer is a stretch of an afternoon. The query is reached through a closure handed to `CollectionsController` at wiring time rather than a catalog handle, because the scope and the filter that bound the run belong to the grid's controller. `apply_press` stays a pure function of what it is given, which is what keeps the selection rules testable with no library open — and the tests pass a run that reads a plain slice. Where there is nothing to ask, the loaded window is still used: a poorer answer than the catalog's and a far better one than a gesture that appears to do nothing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-24 19:50:21 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	b0b6dd559a	Show what is selected, and let a collection be made of it ... Three things a selection needed and did not have. **Seeing it.** The count existed — "12 selected" — in the header row, which scrolls sideways. On a tablet it sat past the right-hand edge along with every button beside it, so a selection was something you could make and then not see. A selection you cannot see is one you act on by accident. **Putting it down.** The only way to clear one was "Done", which also leaves select mode — so after filing forty photographs the next forty began by re-entering a mode the user had not meant to leave. Clearing is now its own action and keeps the mode. **Filing it somewhere new.** Making a collection of a selection took four steps: create one, find it in the tree, select the photographs again because creating it changed the scope, then add them. It is one press, which is how a selection is usually meant — it is gathered *because* it is going somewhere. The new collection is created at the top level rather than inside the current scope, unlike the tree's "+". A selection can be gathered from anywhere, including across collections, so filing it under whichever one happens to be open would put it somewhere its contents did not come from. It opens straight into its name field, for the reason `collection_new` already does: the placeholder name is nobody's choice, and making the user find the rename afterwards is asking them to finish a job we started. All of it on its own strip beside the date range's, appearing only while there is a selection — the third control this session that was invisible for being put in a row that scrolls. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-23 17:57:35 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	c75849040c	Format the tree the way the gate asks for it ... `cargo fmt --check` is a required step and had drifted across 45 files. Most of it arrived this week: several operations were written in parallel worktrees and merged by hand, and a hand-merge resolves conflicts without ever running the formatter over the result. No behaviour changes — this is `cargo fmt --all` and nothing else, kept as its own commit so the next reader can skip it wholesale rather than search it for one that matters. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 21:16:34 +02:00
dtourolle	2fba685e16	Make a pinch zoom the grid and nothing else ... Two faults left over from making the gesture reach the grid at all. **It still opened photographs.** Checking the finger id stops the synthetic release Slint emits when the *second* finger lands, but not the other end of the gesture: lifting one finger of two leaves the other one down, and Slint replays that survivor as a fresh `Pressed` on whatever is under it — which is how it hands the pointer back to ordinary handling. Under it is a cell. So the cell was selected, and lifting that last finger was a complete, well-formed click on the same finger that pressed. No part of the event stream distinguishes it from a real tap, so the grid now remembers that a pinch just happened: a latch raised when the gesture starts and lowered a beat after it ends, during which cells take neither presses nor clicks. The press that *opens* a pinch is undone rather than suppressed — it has already happened by the time a second finger makes it a pinch. Undoing it has to be exact, or a cancel that restored the selection but left the anchor moved would make the next shift-click select a run from a cell nobody pointed at, so capture and restore are a tested pair. **And it was not smooth.** Two reasons. The pinch was thresholded into ±1 steps of 25%, so the grid lurched and then sat still; it now takes the ratio since the last update and tracks the fingers, with the drawn cell still landing on whole column counts because the columns divide the width. And `zoom-cells` was the one geometry change still reloading inline — a full catalog re-read, 360-row model rebuild and thumbnail batch per step, on the thread drawing the frame. It goes through the same settle timer as the rest now.	2026-08-21 22:03:46 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	f1cd6ed5b3	Make the drop decision a rule that can be tested ... The gesture is Slint's and cannot be driven from a test — synthetic drags do not reach a DragArea at all — but the decision it leads to is where this can actually go wrong, and it was buried in a callback. `decide_drop` names the three outcomes and the order that separates them: an image drag always fills the payload, so photographs pressed after a row was clicked are still filed rather than read as a rearrangement. A row dropped on itself is a no-op here rather than a cycle error from the catalog, and an empty drag with nothing remembered — a file from another application — leaves the tree alone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-17 23:12:11 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	6acc73a9fa	Drag a collection onto another to nest it ... The tree could be built nested but never rearranged: `set_parent` existed, with its cycle check and its tests, and nothing in the UI called it. A collection created in the wrong place stayed there. Each row is already a drop target, so it becomes a `DragArea` too — wrapped at the instantiation site the way the grid's cells are, which keeps the row's own TouchArea nested underneath and a click still selecting. `allow-move`, not copy: a collection has one parent, unlike a photograph, which is filed in as many collections as you like. The drop is handed only the target's id, so the source is remembered from the press that precedes the drag — Slint builds the payload through a `pure` binding, which must not have side effects. An image drag always fills `dragging`, so an empty payload with a remembered row is unambiguously a rearrangement; the row is taken rather than read, or a later empty drop would move a collection nobody touched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-17 22:54:50 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	d913e50948	Select photographs with a finger, and take a collection with you ... Two things a tablet could not do. Both existed for a pointer and had no touch form at all, which on Android meant the collection sidebar was somewhere to look at rather than somewhere to file into. **Selecting more than one.** Ctrl-click and shift-click are the only ways into a multi-selection, and touch has neither. Holding a cell now enters selection mode, where a tap toggles — reported to Rust as a ctrl-press, so it goes through the same `apply_press` as everything else rather than growing a second copy of the selection rules. A double tap takes the run between where selecting began and there: the touch form of shift-click, and the reason the anchor from *before* the double tap has to be remembered, since both of its taps move the anchor onto the cell being tapped. A "Select" button does the same thing where a gesture would go undiscovered (FR-UI-4). **Filing without a drag.** A one-finger drag beginning in the grid belongs to the Flickable that scrolls it — that is the arbitration working, not a bug to route around — so the selection can now be filed from a sheet listing the sidebar's own rows. Copy by default, as the drag has always been; moving out of the collection being shown is a switch, because it is the one that takes something away. **Taking a collection offline.** The machinery was there and reachable only by scoping the grid to a collection and finding a button behind a disclosure. Holding a collection's name now asks the question directly, and the tray on a row and the header button ask the same one — three affordances doing two different things is how a user comes to avoid all three. The question is asked rather than a toggle flipped because both answers are expensive: one downloads gigabytes, the other deletes them, and the counts and sizes go in the buttons where they are read before the tap. `Cache::release` is new and is the destructive half `unpin` deliberately is not. "Remove the local copies" is asked by someone whose device is full, and withdrawing a promise while leaving the bytes for a future eviction to notice is not an answer to it. It unpins before forgetting, or the next pin fetch would dutifully download everything it just deleted. The sidebar's trays read `tier_actual`, never `tier_desired`: the question is whether these will open on the aeroplane, and a pin whose download has not run yet answers no. TRACES: FR-CAT-7 | FR-NC-6a | FR-NC-6b | FR-NC-6c | FR-UI-2 | FR-UI-3 | FR-UI-4 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-17 12:27:29 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	65e6a96a65	Say what the application is doing, in one bar and one list ... Every background job reported into a window property of its own — library-thumbs-done, library-pin-total, library-syncing — which only the grid ever read. A pin download that outlived the view it was started from drew nothing at all once the user opened an image, and there was no answer anywhere to "what is this busy with", because the answer was spread across eight properties nothing collected. They report to one register now (ui/dr-ui/src/activity.rs). It publishes an aggregate, which draws a three-pixel bar across the top of the shell in every view, and a row per job, which the settings page lists: scans, thumbnail batches, pin and open downloads, sidecar uploads, the sync and the trash. Failures stay on the list until they are cleared; routine successes do not, or a scroll would bury them. The handle removes a still-running job when it drops, so a worker that dies mid-transfer takes its row with it rather than leaving the bar sweeping for the rest of the session. Also carries in-flight work from a parallel session — the drawn icon set and the dr-pipeline ops split. dr-pipeline's build script does not compile at this commit; ui/dr-ui does, with clippy clean and its tests passing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-16 18:32:09 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	70435b712e	Walk the grid with the arrow keys, and open with Return ... A cull is thousands of decisions. The grid already bound 0-5, P, X and U so the judgement itself needs no mouse, and then made the photographer reach for one to move to the next frame — which is most of the gesture, most of the time. Arrows now move a cursor, shift+arrow extends the selection, Home/End and PageUp/PageDown cover ground, and Return opens what the cursor is on. The cursor is a library ordinal, not a row of the loaded window. The window is a few screenfuls around wherever the user is looking, so a cursor held as a row would stop at its edge or keep counting into cells belonging to other photographs; walking out of the window reloads it around the new position, exactly as scrolling does. This is the argument the selection already made by keying on ids rather than rows. The anchor had that fault for real: it was a window row, so a shift-click after a scroll extended from whatever image had since drifted into it. It is an ordinal now, and apply_press takes the window's offset to map between the two. A range longer than the loaded window truncates to what is loaded, since selection is by id and an image the catalog has not been asked for has none. The pointer and the keyboard share select_row so the two cannot drift apart. The one deliberate difference: a plain arrow collapses the selection onto the cursor, where a plain click on an already-selected cell leaves it alone — that exception exists so a multi-image drag can start from one of its members, and there is no drag behind a keystroke. The grid scrolls to the cursor only when the cursor leaves the viewport, and then by as little as will do it. Reusing the scrub's seek() would put the cursor's row at the top on every press, which makes a row unreadable as you walk along it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-16 16:25:13 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	03326242a1	Make the CI checks say what they mean, and format the workspace ... The Android job's "Verify minimum API level" step has never verified the minimum API level. It took the first `*.so` anywhere under the target directory, which is a host proc-macro from debug/deps — an x86-64 object built by the runner's gcc, whose .comment section cannot mention Android and so can never contradict the expected value. It now reads the artifact under the target triple, compares against MIN_API parsed from the Dockerfile rather than a second copy of the number, and fails on a mismatch. Both sides are checked non-empty first: two failed parses would otherwise compare equal and pass, which is the same silent success in a new costume. The Android image installs one SDK package per layer and keeps the output. sdkmanager is a JVM program that aborts when it cannot get memory, and the single `> /dev/null` step reported that as a bare "exit code 134" while a retry re-downloaded everything that had already succeeded. tools/ci-local.sh runs all four jobs — desktop, android, layering, traceability — against the host toolchain, which is pinned to the same 1.92.0 CI installs. Its matrix check compares regeneration against the working tree rather than against HEAD: CI starts from a clean checkout, so git's answer is the right one there and reports every local run stale here. The rest is rustfmt across the workspace, and the clippy findings that surfaced once it did: manual_contains in dr-thumbs and collections_ui, a map iterated as pairs for its keys, an index loop over a slice, and two runtime assertions on a constant now made at compile time. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-16 12:02:51 +02:00
dtourolle	8ad5c86ff9	Add the library, collections, and trash views; theme from style.yaml ... The UI gains the views the catalog work was building toward: a windowed library grid with ratings and flags, the collection tree with drag-to-add, and trash with restore. derived_sync pushes thumbnail shards and the catalog snapshot to the server's derived folder. Tokens now have one source of truth. build.rs reads style.yaml and generates theme.slint into OUT_DIR, which answers every existing `import { Theme } from "theme.slint"` unchanged, because Slint resolves imports against the importing file's directory first and the include paths after. Generating into OUT_DIR rather than beside the hand-written Slint is the point: a generated file sitting in ui/ looks exactly like the files around it that are meant to be edited, and an edit to it would survive until the next touch of style.yaml — a bug that hides for weeks. build.rs fails loudly if a stale ui/theme.slint exists, which would otherwise shadow the generated one silently and make every palette change vanish with no error. The palette moves to near-neutral dark with achromatic signalling, so the accent means "modified" or "active" rather than "heading". Shared components land in widgets.slint: a token that binds several values into one concept is a component, not a row in a YAML file. Adds an optional live-style feature that makes the tokens in-out so they can be written at startup — a feature rather than the default because it stops the properties being constant-folded. serde_norway is the YAML crate: serde_yaml and serde_yml are both deprecated, and its mappings preserve insertion order, which is what lets the generated Slint keep the token ordering the author chose. Assisted-by: LLM	2026-08-09 21:11:38 +02:00