DarkRoom

787 Commits 3 Branches 35 Tags

3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	ab0ef6a26d	Say which requirements the code was already satisfying Thirteen requirements were surveyed as built but untagged. Eight of them were: R3, R6, FR-DEV-1, FR-UI-6, FR-NC-6d, NFR-OPS-3, NFR-PORT-2 and NFR-SEC-3. Each was read against its full text in requirements.md and against the code before the tag was added, because a tag that is wrong is worse than an absent one — it turns a visible gap into an invisible one. The five that were refused, and why, because the reasoning is the part worth keeping: R2 carries "(figure TBD)" in its own acceptance criterion and asks for a stated prefetch margin and cache-hit rate; neither figure exists anywhere in the tree and neither quantity is measured, while TD-2 and TD-3 both describe the thumbnail path falling short of it. R5 asks for three things and the code does one. The display pipeline does run at viewport resolution, but "only visible tiles are computed" and "panning recomputes only newly exposed tiles" need a tile scheduler that does not exist — and frame_budget.rs currently argues for striking tiled computation from the interactive path rather than building it. FR-RAW-2 asks for a trait taking a SourceRef, so that a second decoder can be added without changing callers. What exists is free functions over &[u8]. That meets the requirement's stated purpose — the same decoder serves a local file, a SAF document and a byte range, which is exactly why it takes bytes — but there is no trait and no second implementation seam, so the requirement should probably be amended rather than tagged. NFR-ARCH-1 asks for named executors with stated thread counts. architecture.md §7.1 states the table; nothing implements it. Workers are twenty-odd ad-hoc std::thread::spawn sites, each building its own one-worker tokio runtime, with no decode pool, no GPU-submit executor and no I/O pool. The requirement's own text says R4 and NFR-P9 "assert an outcome with no stated means", and that is still true. NFR-SEC-4 is satisfied by absence — there is no telemetry — and absence has no module to tag. A tag would point at nothing. NFR-OPS-3 was the closest call of the eight taken. The store is single, separate from the catalog, survives a catalog rebuild and does not sync between devices; it has no version field, deliberately, and settings.rs argues why and names the condition that would need one. The substance is met and the reasoning is recorded where it belongs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:23:16 +02:00
dtourolle	5768100816	Borrow the library to index it, and give it back The passes that need every photograph's bytes — thumbnails, face indexing — now borrow each one and release it at the end. On a placeholder library that is the difference between peak disk being the working set and being the whole library. Including on cancellation, which was nearly missed: the face sweep returns mid-loop when the user presses Stop, and without releasing there the disk is spent and nothing is delivered for it. `materialise` now answers whether it fetched the content. The pool used to work that out by listing a file's parent directory — one listing per file across a library — when the backend already had to `stat` it to decide whether to ask. One syscall instead of a directory walk, and it removes the bug class the tests found earlier: a file at the library root has no `parent()`, so every one of them read as already-downloaded. Pinning is the retention control, and it drives the model the catalog already had rather than a second one. `tier_desired` is what the user asked to keep hydrated, `pending_pins` is the resumable work list, and a pinned collection is never dehydrated for the same reason it was never evicted. It was in fact broken here before: `get` on a stub failed, and the pin worker logged "one unreadable file must not abandon the whole pin" and silently did nothing. Pinned originals on such a library are recorded with `path = NULL` (`Cache::record_in_place`) rather than copied under `originals/`. Two reasons, and the second is the important one. A copy would hold every pinned photograph twice, with the budget able to evict the half that was not costing the disk. And `release` deletes the file a row names — so a row that names none cannot delete anything, which puts the one catastrophic operation out of reach by construction rather than by remembering not to call it. Deleting a materialised file inside a synced tree removes the photograph from the server and every other device. Handing disk back is `spawn_dehydrate`, which asks the client. Two gaps written down rather than papered over (docs/storage.md §7): a hydrating pass cannot yet quote its cost, because a stub reports no size; and the two sweeps hold separate pools, so a library indexed for both fetches twice.	2026-08-29 09:57:53 +02:00
dtourolle	c102ba9df2	Treat a placeholder as the photograph, not as a one-byte file The folder connector was pointed at a Nextcloud VFS tree and got three things wrong, the first of which loses work. A dehydrated sidecar read as absent. `a.drsc` does not exist when the client has dehydrated it — only `a.drsc.nextcloud` does — so `get` missed, `.ok()` swallowed the `NotFound`, and the sidecar writer took that for "there is no sidecar yet" and wrote a fresh document over the existing one. Every edit another device had put there went with it. That function's own doc comment calls this the exact loss the format's unknown-key preservation exists to prevent. A stub was catalogued as a 1-byte image, and ARCH §9.0 measured this machine at 121,785 placeholders against 10,267 real files — so a folder library on a synced tree was ~92% broken rows. Identity changed on hydration, so downloading a photograph looked like a delete and an add, orphaning its thumbnail and its face rows. Entries now carry the photograph's own name and a `materialised` flag; `get` on a stub returns the new `RemoteError::NotMaterialised`, which is distinct from `NotFound` precisely because the sidecar writer must treat them differently — it fetches the sidecar and merges, or leaves the entry queued. Hydration is a borrow. `BorrowPool` records what was on disk before it asked, so `release_all` dehydrates only what a pass brought and leaves what the user already had. Reference counted: the thumbnail pass and the face pass meet on the same RAW, and without counting the first to finish dehydrates the file the second is reading. A borrow against a plain folder or a server does nothing, so a pass written for VFS runs everywhere. Releasing means asking the client to dehydrate and never deleting: a deletion inside a synced tree propagates to the server and removes the photograph from every device. Not a second backend — the capability is per connection, not per type, since the same folder hydrates only while the client runs. The convention arrives through a detector the registry supplies, so `dr-sync-folder` still knows nothing about any client's protocol. ARCH §9.0a records this as an amendment: finding 3 rejected hydration because it costs 100× a range read, and that comparison assumed a connector was available. A folder library has none.	2026-08-29 09:57:52 +02:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

dtourolleandClaude Opus 5

ab0ef6a26d

Say which requirements the code was already satisfying

Thirteen requirements were surveyed as built but untagged. Eight of them
were: R3, R6, FR-DEV-1, FR-UI-6, FR-NC-6d, NFR-OPS-3, NFR-PORT-2 and
NFR-SEC-3. Each was read against its full text in requirements.md and
against the code before the tag was added, because a tag that is wrong is
worse than an absent one — it turns a visible gap into an invisible one.

The five that were refused, and why, because the reasoning is the part
worth keeping:

R2 carries "(figure TBD)" in its own acceptance criterion and asks for a
stated prefetch margin and cache-hit rate; neither figure exists anywhere
in the tree and neither quantity is measured, while TD-2 and TD-3 both
describe the thumbnail path falling short of it.

R5 asks for three things and the code does one. The display pipeline does
run at viewport resolution, but "only visible tiles are computed" and
"panning recomputes only newly exposed tiles" need a tile scheduler that
does not exist — and frame_budget.rs currently argues for striking tiled
computation from the interactive path rather than building it.

FR-RAW-2 asks for a trait taking a SourceRef, so that a second decoder can
be added without changing callers. What exists is free functions over
&[u8]. That meets the requirement's stated *purpose* — the same decoder
serves a local file, a SAF document and a byte range, which is exactly why
it takes bytes — but there is no trait and no second implementation seam,
so the requirement should probably be amended rather than tagged.

NFR-ARCH-1 asks for named executors with stated thread counts.
architecture.md §7.1 states the table; nothing implements it. Workers are
twenty-odd ad-hoc std::thread::spawn sites, each building its own
one-worker tokio runtime, with no decode pool, no GPU-submit executor and
no I/O pool. The requirement's own text says R4 and NFR-P9 "assert an
outcome with no stated means", and that is still true.

NFR-SEC-4 is satisfied by absence — there is no telemetry — and absence
has no module to tag. A tag would point at nothing.

NFR-OPS-3 was the closest call of the eight taken. The store is single,
separate from the catalog, survives a catalog rebuild and does not sync
between devices; it has no version *field*, deliberately, and
settings.rs argues why and names the condition that would need one. The
substance is met and the reasoning is recorded where it belongs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-08-29 20:23:16 +02:00

dtourolle

5768100816

Borrow the library to index it, and give it back

The passes that need every photograph's bytes — thumbnails, face
indexing — now borrow each one and release it at the end. On a
placeholder library that is the difference between peak disk being the
working set and being the whole library.

Including on cancellation, which was nearly missed: the face sweep
returns mid-loop when the user presses Stop, and without releasing there
the disk is spent and nothing is delivered for it.

`materialise` now answers whether *it* fetched the content. The pool used
to work that out by listing a file's parent directory — one listing per
file across a library — when the backend already had to `stat` it to
decide whether to ask. One syscall instead of a directory walk, and it
removes the bug class the tests found earlier: a file at the library root
has no `parent()`, so every one of them read as already-downloaded.

**Pinning is the retention control**, and it drives the model the catalog
already had rather than a second one. `tier_desired` is what the user
asked to keep hydrated, `pending_pins` is the resumable work list, and a
pinned collection is never dehydrated for the same reason it was never
evicted. It was in fact *broken* here before: `get` on a stub failed, and
the pin worker logged "one unreadable file must not abandon the whole
pin" and silently did nothing.

Pinned originals on such a library are recorded with `path = NULL`
(`Cache::record_in_place`) rather than copied under `originals/`. Two
reasons, and the second is the important one. A copy would hold every
pinned photograph twice, with the budget able to evict the half that was
not costing the disk. And `release` deletes the file a row names — so a
row that names none cannot delete anything, which puts the one
catastrophic operation out of reach by construction rather than by
remembering not to call it. Deleting a materialised file inside a synced
tree removes the photograph from the server and every other device.

Handing disk back is `spawn_dehydrate`, which asks the client.

Two gaps written down rather than papered over (docs/storage.md §7): a
hydrating pass cannot yet quote its cost, because a stub reports no size;
and the two sweeps hold separate pools, so a library indexed for both
fetches twice.

2026-08-29 09:57:53 +02:00

dtourolle

c102ba9df2

Treat a placeholder as the photograph, not as a one-byte file

The folder connector was pointed at a Nextcloud VFS tree and got three
things wrong, the first of which loses work.

**A dehydrated sidecar read as absent.** `a.drsc` does not exist when the
client has dehydrated it — only `a.drsc.nextcloud` does — so `get` missed,
`.ok()` swallowed the `NotFound`, and the sidecar writer took that for
"there is no sidecar yet" and wrote a fresh document over the existing
one. Every edit another device had put there went with it. That function's
own doc comment calls this the exact loss the format's unknown-key
preservation exists to prevent.

**A stub was catalogued as a 1-byte image**, and ARCH §9.0 measured this
machine at 121,785 placeholders against 10,267 real files — so a folder
library on a synced tree was ~92% broken rows.

**Identity changed on hydration**, so downloading a photograph looked like
a delete and an add, orphaning its thumbnail and its face rows.

Entries now carry the photograph's own name and a `materialised` flag;
`get` on a stub returns the new `RemoteError::NotMaterialised`, which is
distinct from `NotFound` precisely because the sidecar writer must treat
them differently — it fetches the sidecar and merges, or leaves the entry
queued.

Hydration is a **borrow**. `BorrowPool` records what was on disk before it
asked, so `release_all` dehydrates only what a pass brought and leaves
what the user already had. Reference counted: the thumbnail pass and the
face pass meet on the same RAW, and without counting the first to finish
dehydrates the file the second is reading. A borrow against a plain folder
or a server does nothing, so a pass written for VFS runs everywhere.

Releasing means asking the client to dehydrate and never deleting: a
deletion inside a synced tree propagates to the server and removes the
photograph from every device.

Not a second backend — the capability is per *connection*, not per type,
since the same folder hydrates only while the client runs. The convention
arrives through a detector the registry supplies, so `dr-sync-folder`
still knows nothing about any client's protocol.

ARCH §9.0a records this as an amendment: finding 3 rejected hydration
because it costs 100× a range read, and that comparison assumed a
connector was available. A folder library has none.

2026-08-29 09:57:52 +02:00