Files
DarkRoom/docker/android
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 03326242a1
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 1h23m26s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Failing after 2s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 50s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Failing after 1m9s
Make the CI checks say what they mean, and format the workspace
The Android job's "Verify minimum API level" step has never verified the
minimum API level. It took the first `*.so` anywhere under the target
directory, which is a host proc-macro from debug/deps — an x86-64 object
built by the runner's gcc, whose .comment section cannot mention Android
and so can never contradict the expected value. It now reads the artifact
under the target triple, compares against MIN_API parsed from the
Dockerfile rather than a second copy of the number, and fails on a
mismatch. Both sides are checked non-empty first: two failed parses would
otherwise compare equal and pass, which is the same silent success in a
new costume.

The Android image installs one SDK package per layer and keeps the
output. sdkmanager is a JVM program that aborts when it cannot get memory,
and the single `> /dev/null` step reported that as a bare "exit code 134"
while a retry re-downloaded everything that had already succeeded.

tools/ci-local.sh runs all four jobs — desktop, android, layering,
traceability — against the host toolchain, which is pinned to the same
1.92.0 CI installs. Its matrix check compares regeneration against the
working tree rather than against HEAD: CI starts from a clean checkout, so
git's answer is the right one there and reports every local run stale here.

The rest is rustfmt across the workspace, and the clippy findings that
surfaced once it did: manual_contains in dr-thumbs and collections_ui, a
map iterated as pairs for its keys, an index loop over a slice, and two
runtime assertions on a constant now made at compile time.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-16 12:02:51 +02:00
..

Android build environment

Reproducible container for cross-compiling DarkRoom to Android. CI and local builds use the same image, so a break appears in one place rather than two.

Use

# Cross-compile for a device ABI
./docker/android/build.sh cargo ndk -t arm64-v8a build --release

# All four ABIs
./docker/android/build.sh cargo ndk -t arm64-v8a -t armeabi-v7a -t x86_64 -t x86 build --release

# Type-check without linking
./docker/android/build.sh cargo check --target aarch64-linux-android

# Interactive shell
./docker/android/build.sh

# After editing the Dockerfile
./docker/android/build.sh --rebuild

Prefers podman, falls back to docker. First run builds the image, which takes several minutes; after that it is cached.

Pinned versions

Component Version Why this one
JDK 17 AGP's stable target. The host's JDK 25 breaks Gradle.
Compile SDK API 36 Required for Play distribution
Min API 28 (Android 9) Floor where Vulkan support is dependable (NFR-COMPAT-1)
Build tools 36.0.0 Matches compile SDK
NDK 27.2.12479018 (r27c) Current LTS
Rust 1.92.0 Slint 1.17 requires it; cargo-ndk 4.1.x needs ≥ 1.86
cargo-ndk 4.1.2

Bumping any of these is a reviewable change, not silent drift.

Compile SDK versus min API

These are different and both matter. ANDROID_API (36) is what the SDK compiles against — the newest APIs available. MIN_API (28) is what native code links against, and determines the oldest device that can run the result.

cargo-ndk defaults to API 21 if not told otherwise, which is far below what this app needs. CARGO_NDK_PLATFORM and the per-target linker paths both pin it to MIN_API. Verify with:

file target/aarch64-linux-android/release/*.so
# → "... for Android 28, built by NDK r27c"

Caching

The cargo registry and target directory persist in ~/.cache/darkroom-android, so rebuilds do not re-download the crate index. Clear with:

rm -rf ~/.cache/darkroom-android

The Android target dir is kept separate from the host's target/ — sharing one directory between host and container builds causes constant rebuilds as they invalidate each other's fingerprints.

What is not here

No emulator, no adb device access. This image cross-compiles; it does not run or deploy. Device testing (spikes S2 and S10, which need two GPU vendors) happens on real hardware — the emulator's GPU behaviour is not representative of Adreno or Mali, which is precisely what those spikes exist to test.