`showing_the_original_leaves_the_edit_exactly_as_it_was` set row zero to its
maximum and then asserted the photograph was modified. It was not, and the
test failed on its own premise rather than on the thing it exists to check.
`EditGraph::capabilities` puts the lens corrections at the head of the list,
matching where they sit in the shader. Those carry profile coefficients rather
than parameters, so with no profile loaded a slider on one is a control with
nothing behind it: the graph stays neutral and the premise assertion fires.
The test was written against a panel whose first row happened to be an
adjustment, and it stopped being one.
So it now walks the rows until it finds a control that actually changes the
edit, which is what it meant by "row zero" all along. Still addressed by
index, so it still names no operation, and it no longer depends on where in
the chain the first *adjustment* happens to sit.
dtourolle
124b2d99c6