`persist` runs after every scan, for every photograph the scan listed. On
a settled library that is the folders whose ETag changed -- a sidecar
written there by a rating is enough -- so one relisted folder of 1,600
images is an ordinary pass, and a first scan is all 24,000.
Per photograph it prepared four statements from their SQL (a folder
lookup, the image upsert, the id read-back, the remote upsert) and then,
after the commit, found the image again by path and enqueued its
thumbnail job as an autocommitting statement of its own -- a commit per
photograph, for rows that were almost all already queued.
Now the statements are prepared once per pass, a folder's id is looked up
once per folder rather than once per photograph in it, and the job is
enqueued inside the transaction with the id already in hand. That also
makes the job atomic with the row it points at, which is what the old
ordering after the commit was trying to guarantee. `jobs::enqueue` uses a
cached statement for the same reason.
persist_bench on a copy of the reference catalog, CPU, best of runs:
largest folder (1,589 images) 102-118 ms -> 10-13 ms
whole library (23,582 images) 1.55-2.19 s -> 188-192 ms
The fingerprint of images, remote, jobs and folders after the run is the
same for both builds.
dtourolle
32b2a5e317