Files
DarkRoom/core/dr-film
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 56978fdf35
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 1s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 1s
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 9m6s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 26s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Failing after 23s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Failing after 22m38s
Clear the clippy warnings that were failing CI before this branch
Nothing here is film simulation. These are lints that fail master today,
under the -D warnings CI runs with, mostly from a toolchain that learned
new ones rather than from anybody's code -- `is_multiple_of` and the
derivable `Default` did not exist as lints when this was written.

They are fixed rather than allowed, and by hand rather than by trusting
`cargo clippy --fix` wholesale: its automatic pass split a derive in two
and left a stray blank line, which is the sort of thing that is correct
and still wrong to commit.

The four that needed a decision rather than a rewrite:

  - The distance transform's inner loop writes through its iterator now.
    `q` stays, because it is the position the parabola is evaluated at as
    well as the index it is written to -- the lint is about the write.
  - `to_source` and `to_proto` take `self` by value. Their receiver is
    `Copy`, so this is the same machine code and the honest signature.
  - The export path's return type is five levels deep and now has a name,
    plus a line saying why the `Option` wraps the `Result`: `None` is
    cancellation, which is not a failure and has no error to report.
  - A test fills a range instead of looping over one.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 22:35:02 +02:00
..

Film stocks

One file per stock in profiles/. Adding a stock is adding a file — no code change, no shader, no new operation — for the same reason dr-decode's base curves work that way: under the GPLv3 a stock should be contributable without a release.

What a profile is

Three measured tables, all of them published in the manufacturer's datasheet:

Field What it decides
log_sensitivity what each emulsion layer sees, per wavelength
density_curves contrast, latitude, and where the stock clips
dye_density what the developed stock looks like, per wavelength
base_density the support: film base, and a colour negative's orange mask

Plus kind (negative or positive), support (film or paper), and the two illuminants the data is referenced to. A print paper is a stock like any other; support exists so an interface can offer papers separately, not because the renderer treats them differently.

Why it is not a LUT

Because the parameters stay physical. Opening up a stop moves the picture along the film's own characteristic curve — toe, shoulder and all — instead of scaling a number somebody baked at one exposure. A scanned negative comes out orange and inverted because that is what a negative is, and it becomes a photograph when a paper profile prints it, exactly as it would in a darkroom.

The data cost runs the other way from a LUT collection too: a stock is about 17 kB of measurements, where one HaldCLUT is roughly 800 kB of one person's grade.

How it runs

The spectral chain reduces to three tables, and the reduction is exact where it matters — see src/bake.rs for the argument:

  1. A 3×3 matrix, linear sRGB to the three layers' exposure. Exact, not an approximation: the reconstructed scene spectrum is linear in the sRGB triple, so the integral collapses into nine numbers.
  2. Three 1D curves, log exposure to density, sampled at 256 points.
  3. One 32³ lookup, density to linear sRGB — dye absorption, the print through the negative, the paper, the viewing illuminant and the chromatic adaptation, all of which take exactly three numbers in.

Per pixel that is a matrix multiply, three curve taps and one texture fetch. Splitting 2 from 3, rather than baking one LUT over exposure, is measured rather than assumed: the curve carries all the sharp shape and the dye mixing is smooth, so folding the curve into the 3D lookup would need it three times larger for the same error. At 32³ the worst interpolation error is about 0.003 in linear sRGB, below one 8-bit code value, and there is a test that says so.

Adding a stock

If spektrafilm has it, add its name to STOCKS in tools/film-profiles/convert.py and re-run it. Otherwise write the YAML by hand from the datasheet; the loader validates the table lengths and says which file and field is wrong.

Either way, list it in BUILT_IN in src/lib.rs to compile it in — or drop it in the profile directory at runtime, which is the path meant for stocks that ship separately from the binary.

Provenance

The shipped profiles are converted from spektrafilm by Andrea Volpato, licensed CC BY-SA 4.0. See profiles/LICENSE-PROFILES.txt for the licence and profiles/CHANGELOG.txt for what the conversion changed and what it deliberately did not.

The sRGB reflectance basis is Mallett & Yuksel (2019); the observer is the CIE 1931 2°.