The folder connector was pointed at a Nextcloud VFS tree and got three things wrong, the first of which loses work. **A dehydrated sidecar read as absent.** `a.drsc` does not exist when the client has dehydrated it — only `a.drsc.nextcloud` does — so `get` missed, `.ok()` swallowed the `NotFound`, and the sidecar writer took that for "there is no sidecar yet" and wrote a fresh document over the existing one. Every edit another device had put there went with it. That function's own doc comment calls this the exact loss the format's unknown-key preservation exists to prevent. **A stub was catalogued as a 1-byte image**, and ARCH §9.0 measured this machine at 121,785 placeholders against 10,267 real files — so a folder library on a synced tree was ~92% broken rows. **Identity changed on hydration**, so downloading a photograph looked like a delete and an add, orphaning its thumbnail and its face rows. Entries now carry the photograph's own name and a `materialised` flag; `get` on a stub returns the new `RemoteError::NotMaterialised`, which is distinct from `NotFound` precisely because the sidecar writer must treat them differently — it fetches the sidecar and merges, or leaves the entry queued. Hydration is a **borrow**. `BorrowPool` records what was on disk before it asked, so `release_all` dehydrates only what a pass brought and leaves what the user already had. Reference counted: the thumbnail pass and the face pass meet on the same RAW, and without counting the first to finish dehydrates the file the second is reading. A borrow against a plain folder or a server does nothing, so a pass written for VFS runs everywhere. Releasing means asking the client to dehydrate and never deleting: a deletion inside a synced tree propagates to the server and removes the photograph from every device. Not a second backend — the capability is per *connection*, not per type, since the same folder hydrates only while the client runs. The convention arrives through a detector the registry supplies, so `dr-sync-folder` still knows nothing about any client's protocol. ARCH §9.0a records this as an amendment: finding 3 rejected hydration because it costs 100× a range read, and that comparison assumed a connector was available. A folder library has none.
260 lines
11 KiB
Rust
260 lines
11 KiB
Rust
/// Failures from a remote backend.
|
|
#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
|
|
pub enum RemoteError {
|
|
#[error("not authenticated")]
|
|
Unauthenticated,
|
|
|
|
#[error("authentication rejected")]
|
|
AuthFailed,
|
|
|
|
/// Authenticated, but not permitted to do this.
|
|
///
|
|
/// **Distinct from [`AuthFailed`](Self::AuthFailed) on purpose.** Folding
|
|
/// 403 into 401 sends the user to re-check a credential that is working
|
|
/// perfectly: reads succeed, only the write is refused. On Nextcloud the
|
|
/// usual cause is an app password created without "Allow filesystem
|
|
/// access", or a read-only share — neither of which signing in again will
|
|
/// fix.
|
|
/// Authenticated, and refused anyway.
|
|
///
|
|
/// The message names the cause that has actually been observed, because
|
|
/// "permission denied" alone sends people to re-check a login that is
|
|
/// working. On a Nextcloud mount the folder's `oc:permissions` can carry
|
|
/// `C` (create) without `W` (update): a file may be written once and never
|
|
/// amended. A sidecar is rewritten on every rating and every edit, so the
|
|
/// first judgement on a photograph succeeds and every one after it is
|
|
/// refused — which reads as sync being broken rather than as a share
|
|
/// needing one more permission.
|
|
#[error(
|
|
"permission denied — authenticated, but this folder does not allow \
|
|
changing an existing file. A Nextcloud share or external mount set to \
|
|
create-only will accept a sidecar once and refuse every later edit; \
|
|
granting update (and delete) on it is the fix."
|
|
)]
|
|
PermissionDenied,
|
|
|
|
#[error("not found: {0}")]
|
|
NotFound(String),
|
|
|
|
/// TRACES: FR-NC-6c
|
|
/// The object exists, but its content is not on this device.
|
|
///
|
|
/// A virtual-filesystem placeholder: the sync client holds the name and a
|
|
/// stub, and the bytes are still on the server (ARCH §9.0).
|
|
///
|
|
/// **Emphatically not [`NotFound`](Self::NotFound), and the distinction is
|
|
/// what stops a silent data loss.** The sidecar writer reads before it
|
|
/// writes, and treats a miss as "there is no sidecar yet, create one" — so
|
|
/// a dehydrated sidecar reported as absent makes it write a fresh document
|
|
/// over an existing one, discarding every edit another device had put
|
|
/// there. It is also the difference between an error a user can act on
|
|
/// (fetch it) and one they cannot (it is gone).
|
|
#[error("not on this device: {0}")]
|
|
NotMaterialised(String),
|
|
|
|
/// The backend does not support this operation. Expected, not a bug —
|
|
/// callers check capabilities and adapt.
|
|
#[error("operation unsupported by this backend: {0}")]
|
|
Unsupported(&'static str),
|
|
|
|
/// The account is configured wrongly, or for a backend this build has no
|
|
/// connector for.
|
|
///
|
|
/// **Not a network failure and not an auth failure**, which is why it is
|
|
/// its own variant. A folder library whose directory has been unmounted,
|
|
/// or an account naming a backend a cut-down build was not compiled with,
|
|
/// produces a request that never leaves the process — reporting either as
|
|
/// `Network` would put the app into offline mode and tell the user their
|
|
/// connection is down, and reporting them as `AuthFailed` would send them
|
|
/// to re-enter a credential that is fine. The message names what is wrong
|
|
/// with the configuration, because that is the only thing that will fix
|
|
/// it.
|
|
#[error("account misconfigured: {0}")]
|
|
Configuration(String),
|
|
|
|
/// A conditional write failed: the remote changed underneath us. Triggers
|
|
/// the sidecar merge path (ARCH §8.5).
|
|
#[error("precondition failed — remote was modified")]
|
|
PreconditionFailed,
|
|
|
|
#[error("quota exceeded")]
|
|
QuotaExceeded,
|
|
|
|
#[error("network error: {0}")]
|
|
Network(String),
|
|
|
|
/// The TLS handshake was refused: an untrusted issuer, an expired
|
|
/// certificate, a hostname mismatch.
|
|
///
|
|
/// **Distinct from [`Network`](Self::Network) on purpose.** The server is
|
|
/// there and answering — the connection is refused on trust grounds, which
|
|
/// no amount of waiting repairs. Folding it into `Network` puts the app
|
|
/// into offline mode and tells the user their connection is down, sending
|
|
/// them to inspect a network that is working perfectly (observed
|
|
/// 2026-08-12: a Let's Encrypt chain anchored at ISRG Root YE, absent from
|
|
/// the compiled-in root store, reported as "you are offline" on a server
|
|
/// answering in 19 ms).
|
|
#[error("TLS error: {0}")]
|
|
Tls(String),
|
|
|
|
#[error("unexpected server response: {status} {detail}")]
|
|
Server { status: u16, detail: String },
|
|
|
|
#[error("malformed response: {0}")]
|
|
Protocol(String),
|
|
|
|
#[error("operation cancelled")]
|
|
Cancelled,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl RemoteError {
|
|
/// Whether retrying might succeed.
|
|
pub fn is_transient(&self) -> bool {
|
|
match self {
|
|
RemoteError::Network(_) => true,
|
|
// Not transient: a rejected certificate is rejected identically on
|
|
// every retry. Retrying one buys nothing and hides the cause.
|
|
RemoteError::Tls(_) => false,
|
|
RemoteError::Server { status, .. } => {
|
|
// 5xx and 429 are worth retrying; other 4xx are not.
|
|
//
|
|
// 423 Locked is the exception, and it is not hypothetical:
|
|
// Nextcloud's file locking returns it on a plain *read* under
|
|
// concurrency, and the same range re-read seconds later
|
|
// succeeds. Treating it as permanent marks an image
|
|
// permanently undated over a lock that lasted moments.
|
|
*status >= 500 || *status == 429 || *status == 423
|
|
}
|
|
_ => false,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Whether this failure means *the server could not be reached*, as
|
|
/// opposed to the server answering and refusing.
|
|
///
|
|
/// The distinction is the whole basis of offline mode (FR-CAT-9). A 403
|
|
/// and a dead connection are both "the operation failed", but only one of
|
|
/// them is fixed by waiting, and only one of them should put the whole app
|
|
/// into a degraded mode. Signing the user out — or showing "you are
|
|
/// offline" — because a single file was forbidden would be a much worse
|
|
/// error than the one it reported.
|
|
///
|
|
/// A 5xx is deliberately **not** offline: the server is up and talking, it
|
|
/// is just failing, and a retry is the right response rather than a
|
|
/// mode change. 429 and 423 likewise — those are the server working
|
|
/// correctly under load.
|
|
///
|
|
/// [`Tls`](Self::Tls) is likewise not offline. The host resolved, the
|
|
/// socket connected, and the peer answered; only trust failed. Reporting
|
|
/// that as offline is what made a root-store gap look like a dead network.
|
|
pub fn indicates_offline(&self) -> bool {
|
|
matches!(self, RemoteError::Network(_))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
|
mod tests {
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn a_tls_failure_is_not_offline() {
|
|
// The regression this guards: a rejected certificate was reported as
|
|
// `Network`, which put the whole app into offline mode and told the
|
|
// user their connection was down — while the server answered in 19 ms.
|
|
let e = RemoteError::Tls("invalid peer certificate: UnknownIssuer".into());
|
|
assert!(
|
|
!e.indicates_offline(),
|
|
"trust failure is not unreachability"
|
|
);
|
|
assert!(
|
|
!e.is_transient(),
|
|
"a rejected certificate is rejected identically on every retry"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn a_dead_connection_is_still_offline() {
|
|
// The other side of the split: separating TLS out must not stop a
|
|
// genuine transport failure from reaching offline mode.
|
|
assert!(RemoteError::Network("dns error".into()).indicates_offline());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn transient_errors_are_retryable() {
|
|
assert!(RemoteError::Network("timeout".into()).is_transient());
|
|
assert!(RemoteError::Server {
|
|
status: 503,
|
|
detail: String::new()
|
|
}
|
|
.is_transient());
|
|
assert!(RemoteError::Server {
|
|
status: 429,
|
|
detail: String::new()
|
|
}
|
|
.is_transient());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn client_errors_are_not_retryable() {
|
|
assert!(!RemoteError::Server {
|
|
status: 404,
|
|
detail: String::new()
|
|
}
|
|
.is_transient());
|
|
assert!(!RemoteError::PreconditionFailed.is_transient());
|
|
assert!(!RemoteError::AuthFailed.is_transient());
|
|
// Neither is worth retrying, but they mean different things and a
|
|
// caller may want to say so.
|
|
assert!(!RemoteError::PermissionDenied.is_transient());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn permission_denied_is_not_an_auth_failure() {
|
|
// 403 folded into 401 sent a user to re-check a credential that was
|
|
// working: reads succeeded and only the write was refused (observed
|
|
// against a real server, 2026-08-09). The two must read differently.
|
|
let denied = RemoteError::PermissionDenied.to_string();
|
|
let rejected = RemoteError::AuthFailed.to_string();
|
|
assert_ne!(denied, rejected);
|
|
// Asserted on the intent rather than on a phrase: the message must
|
|
// send the reader to the folder's permissions and not to their
|
|
// credential. It gained the create-only detail after a real mount was
|
|
// observed accepting a sidecar once and refusing every later edit
|
|
// (2026-08-17), and pinning the old wording would have made that
|
|
// improvement look like a regression.
|
|
assert!(
|
|
denied.contains("folder") && denied.contains("permission"),
|
|
"the message must point at permissions, not the login: {denied}"
|
|
);
|
|
assert!(
|
|
!denied.contains("sign in") && !denied.contains("password"),
|
|
"it must not send the reader back to a working login: {denied}"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn a_lock_is_transient() {
|
|
// Observed against a real server: 12 concurrent range reads produced
|
|
// 423 on some files, and the identical request succeeded moments
|
|
// later. Classing it with the permanent 4xx left those images
|
|
// undated for good.
|
|
assert!(RemoteError::Server {
|
|
status: 423,
|
|
detail: String::new()
|
|
}
|
|
.is_transient());
|
|
|
|
// Still permanent, so the exception stays narrow.
|
|
assert!(!RemoteError::Server {
|
|
status: 404,
|
|
detail: String::new()
|
|
}
|
|
.is_transient());
|
|
assert!(!RemoteError::Server {
|
|
status: 400,
|
|
detail: String::new()
|
|
}
|
|
.is_transient());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|