dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
8e7b1350bf
`Attribute::Geometry` becomes `Attribute::Compose`, and `film_sim` moves from `[tone, colour]` to `[effect]`. Two categories were doing the wrong job. "Geometry" describes what crop, straighten and the quarter turns do to coordinates — but it describes lens distortion correction exactly as well, and that is not a compositional choice at all. Naming the attribute for the photographer's decision is what separates it from `Optics`: one is what the lens did, the other is what they chose. The maths the two have in common is not the thing worth filing them under. A film stock declared both `tone` and `colour`, so "Kodachrome" appeared in the Light group beside exposure and again in Colour beside white balance — two places, neither of which is where anyone looks for it. It is neither: `Effect` is defined in this same file as "applied rather than corrected — a look, not a fix", which is what a stock is. That it moves tone and colour is true of every look, and is not what the attribute is for. `from_name` still accepts "geometry" on the way in. That string is persisted in `develop.copy_attributes`, and an entry it fails to parse is not an error — `presets::scope_for` logs it and drops it — so without the alias an existing settings file would have quietly narrowed what a paste carries. `name` writes the current spelling, so the file migrates itself the first time it is saved. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>