dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
b0b6dd559a
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 2m37s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 26s
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 4s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 5s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 40s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Failing after 6s
Three things a selection needed and did not have. **Seeing it.** The count existed — "12 selected" — in the header row, which scrolls sideways. On a tablet it sat past the right-hand edge along with every button beside it, so a selection was something you could make and then not see. A selection you cannot see is one you act on by accident. **Putting it down.** The only way to clear one was "Done", which also leaves select mode — so after filing forty photographs the next forty began by re-entering a mode the user had not meant to leave. Clearing is now its own action and keeps the mode. **Filing it somewhere new.** Making a collection of a selection took four steps: create one, find it in the tree, select the photographs again because creating it changed the scope, then add them. It is one press, which is how a selection is usually meant — it is gathered *because* it is going somewhere. The new collection is created at the top level rather than inside the current scope, unlike the tree's "+". A selection can be gathered from anywhere, including across collections, so filing it under whichever one happens to be open would put it somewhere its contents did not come from. It opens straight into its name field, for the reason `collection_new` already does: the placeholder name is nobody's choice, and making the user find the rename afterwards is asking them to finish a job we started. All of it on its own strip beside the date range's, appearing only while there is a selection — the third control this session that was invisible for being put in a row that scrolls. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>