Files
WatchedTogether/Jellyfin.Plugin.WatchedTogether.Tests/ProvisioningTests.cs
T
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 bd08629fff Support Jellyfin 12 alongside 10.11
Jellyfin 12 moved to .NET 10 and changed the IUserManager surface the
plugin relies on: Users/UsersIds became GetUsers()/GetUsersIds(),
ChangePassword takes a user id, HasPassword left the provider contract,
and the user cache is gone, so every lookup is a detached copy.

The plugin now multi-targets net9.0 (against 10.11.5) and net10.0
(against 12.0.0). The differences sit behind a JELLYFIN_12 constant in
Compat/UserManagerCompat.cs, whose ChangePasswordAsync also carries the
stored hash back onto the caller's instance: on 12 the UpdateUserAsync
that claims the account would otherwise write the stale null password
back over the one provisioning just set.

Each release ships one package per generation, with the fourth version
segment naming the target (x.y.z.11 and x.y.z.12) so a 12 server picks
the 12 package over the 10.11 one. scripts/package.sh wraps jprm for a
single generation and the workflows call it twice. The builder image
moves to the .NET 10 SDK, which builds both targets; the net9.0 test run
rolls forward onto the .NET 10 runtime.

CA1873 is a .NET 10 analyzer that flags the same log calls CA1848 does;
it is set to Info, as in the upstream Jellyfin 12 tree.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-11 19:25:16 +02:00

216 lines
8.6 KiB
C#

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Jellyfin.Database.Implementations.Entities;
using Jellyfin.Plugin.WatchedTogether.Services;
using MediaBrowser.Controller.Library;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions;
using Moq;
using Xunit;
namespace Jellyfin.Plugin.WatchedTogether.Tests;
/// <summary>
/// Covers shared-account provisioning against a user manager that dispatches password changes the
/// way Jellyfin's real one does.
/// </summary>
[Collection(nameof(PluginTestContext))]
public class ProvisioningTests
{
private static readonly string AuthProviderId =
typeof(Auth.SharedAccountAuthenticationProvider).FullName!;
private static User MakeUser(string name) => new(name, "Prov", "ResetProv");
/// <summary>
/// Builds a user manager that mimics the one behaviour that matters here: ChangePassword is
/// routed to the provider named by the user's AuthenticationProviderId, so an account already
/// claimed by us lands in our provider and is refused.
/// </summary>
private static Mock<IUserManager> MakeUserManager(List<User> users, List<string> callLog)
{
var userManager = new Mock<IUserManager>();
userManager.Setup(m => m.GetUserById(It.IsAny<Guid>()))
.Returns((Guid id) => users.Find(u => u.Id == id));
userManager.Setup(m => m.CreateUserAsync(It.IsAny<string>()))
.ReturnsAsync((string name) =>
{
var created = MakeUser(name);
users.Add(created);
callLog.Add("CreateUser");
return created;
});
userManager.SetupChangePassword(users, (user, password) =>
{
callLog.Add($"ChangePassword(provider={user.AuthenticationProviderId})");
// This is the dispatch that made provisioning fail in 0.0.3: once the account is
// claimed, the call reaches our provider, which refuses it by design.
if (string.Equals(user.AuthenticationProviderId, AuthProviderId, StringComparison.Ordinal))
{
return new Auth.SharedAccountAuthenticationProvider(
Mock.Of<MediaBrowser.Model.Cryptography.ICryptoProvider>(),
new Lazy<IGroupService>(() => Mock.Of<IGroupService>()),
new Lazy<IDynamicGroupService>(() => Mock.Of<IDynamicGroupService>()),
NullLogger<Auth.SharedAccountAuthenticationProvider>.Instance)
.ChangePassword(user, password);
}
user.Password = password;
return Task.CompletedTask;
});
userManager.Setup(m => m.UpdateUserAsync(It.IsAny<User>()))
.Returns((User user) =>
{
callLog.Add($"UpdateUser(provider={user.AuthenticationProviderId})");
return Task.CompletedTask;
});
return userManager;
}
private static ProvisioningService MakeService(Mock<IUserManager> userManager)
=> new(
userManager.Object,
Mock.Of<ILibraryAccessService>(),
NullLogger<ProvisioningService>.Instance);
[Fact]
public async Task CreateGroupAsync_SetsPasswordBeforeClaimingTheAccount()
{
using var context = PluginTestContext.Create();
var alice = MakeUser("alice");
var bob = MakeUser("bob");
var users = new List<User> { alice, bob };
var callLog = new List<string>();
var service = MakeService(MakeUserManager(users, callLog));
// Before the fix this threw NotSupportedException from our own ChangePassword.
var group = await service.CreateGroupAsync([alice.Id, bob.Id], null);
Assert.NotEqual(Guid.Empty, group.SharedUserId);
// The password must be set while the account is still on Jellyfin's default provider.
var changeIndex = callLog.FindIndex(c => c.StartsWith("ChangePassword", StringComparison.Ordinal));
var claimIndex = callLog.FindIndex(c => c.Contains(AuthProviderId, StringComparison.Ordinal));
Assert.True(changeIndex >= 0, "provisioning should set a password on the shared account");
Assert.True(claimIndex >= 0, "provisioning should claim the account for our provider");
Assert.True(
changeIndex < claimIndex,
$"password must be set before the account is claimed, but call order was: {string.Join(" -> ", callLog)}");
}
[Fact]
public async Task CreateGroupAsync_LeavesTheAccountClaimedByOurProvider()
{
using var context = PluginTestContext.Create();
var alice = MakeUser("alice");
var bob = MakeUser("bob");
var users = new List<User> { alice, bob };
var callLog = new List<string>();
var service = MakeService(MakeUserManager(users, callLog));
var group = await service.CreateGroupAsync([alice.Id, bob.Id], null);
// Claiming the account is what routes its logins to us; provisioning is useless without it.
var sharedUser = users.Find(u => u.Id == group.SharedUserId);
Assert.NotNull(sharedUser);
Assert.Equal(AuthProviderId, sharedUser!.AuthenticationProviderId);
}
[Fact]
public async Task CreateGroupAsync_GivesTheSharedAccountANonEmptyPassword()
{
using var context = PluginTestContext.Create();
var alice = MakeUser("alice");
var bob = MakeUser("bob");
var users = new List<User> { alice, bob };
var callLog = new List<string>();
var service = MakeService(MakeUserManager(users, callLog));
var group = await service.CreateGroupAsync([alice.Id, bob.Id], null);
// A passwordless shared account would be directly loginable if the provider were ever
// unassigned, which is the reason provisioning sets one at all.
var sharedUser = users.Find(u => u.Id == group.SharedUserId);
Assert.NotNull(sharedUser);
Assert.False(string.IsNullOrEmpty(sharedUser!.Password));
}
[Fact]
public async Task CreateGroupAsync_StoredPasswordSurvivesClaimingTheAccount()
{
using var context = PluginTestContext.Create();
// Models Jellyfin 12, where the user manager keeps no cache: every lookup returns a
// detached copy of the stored row, and UpdateUserAsync writes back every column of the
// instance it is handed. The random password provisioning sets must survive the provider
// assignment that is saved afterwards through a different instance.
var stored = new List<User> { MakeUser("alice"), MakeUser("bob") };
var userManager = new Mock<IUserManager>();
userManager.Setup(m => m.GetUserById(It.IsAny<Guid>()))
.Returns((Guid id) => Copy(stored.Find(u => u.Id == id)));
userManager.Setup(m => m.CreateUserAsync(It.IsAny<string>()))
.ReturnsAsync((string name) =>
{
var row = MakeUser(name);
stored.Add(row);
return Copy(row)!;
});
// On 12 the helper resolves the stored row by id, so this writes the hash there and only
// there; on 10.11 it writes to the caller's instance, as the real server does.
userManager.SetupChangePassword(stored, (user, password) =>
{
user.Password = password;
return Task.CompletedTask;
});
userManager.Setup(m => m.UpdateUserAsync(It.IsAny<User>()))
.Returns((User user) =>
{
var row = stored.Find(u => u.Id == user.Id)!;
row.Password = user.Password;
row.AuthenticationProviderId = user.AuthenticationProviderId;
return Task.CompletedTask;
});
var service = MakeService(userManager);
var group = await service.CreateGroupAsync([stored[0].Id, stored[1].Id], null);
var row = stored.Find(u => u.Id == group.SharedUserId);
Assert.NotNull(row);
Assert.Equal(AuthProviderId, row!.AuthenticationProviderId);
Assert.False(
string.IsNullOrEmpty(row.Password),
"claiming the account must not overwrite the password provisioning stored");
}
/// <summary>
/// Copies the columns provisioning touches into a fresh instance with the same id, the way a
/// cache-less user manager hands out rows.
/// </summary>
private static User? Copy(User? row)
=> row is null
? null
: new User(row.Username, row.AuthenticationProviderId, row.PasswordResetProviderId)
{
Id = row.Id,
Password = row.Password,
};
}