diff --git a/docs/defect-windows.md b/docs/defect-windows.md index e5c1c9c5..43c418c0 100644 --- a/docs/defect-windows.md +++ b/docs/defect-windows.md @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ silently correct an out-of-range index — which is exactly why it was reported | Stop-report path never fed the sync queue that existed for it (DR-154) | v0.4.6 | **v0.5.1** | feature (queue + drain landed with no producer) | | Background-audio base applied in two display-only places (DR-159) | v0.2.9 | **v0.5.3** | pickaxe | | Positions reported as 0 before the first tick, and always 0 for webview media (DR-178/179/180) | v0.5.3 | **v0.5.5** | feature (DR-159's tick boundary) | +| Length-less handoff transcode left to the player's own load-error retry, which can only restart it (DR-203) | v0.0.16 | **v0.8.2** | feature (the handoff's progressive-mp3 choice) | Three of these are worth separating out, because the defect is not a mistake in the code so much as **plumbing that was built and never connected**: diff --git a/docs/requirements.md b/docs/requirements.md index 5faeee00..9cee1835 100644 --- a/docs/requirements.md +++ b/docs/requirements.md @@ -376,6 +376,7 @@ Internal architecture, components, and application logic. | DR-200 | The lockscreen notification is exempt from `POST_NOTIFICATIONS`, because of the **session token**, not because it belongs to a foreground service — and the difference is what the code now records. `POST_NOTIFICATIONS` was declared in the manifest and requested nowhere, so on Android 13+ it sat permanently denied; an audit read that as a threat to UR-006, since the media notification is what carries the lockscreen transport controls. It is not. Android's own wording is that the permission covers "non-exempt (including Foreground Services (FGS)) notifications", with denied users seeing FGS notices "in the Task Manager but [not] in the notification drawer" — so an FGS notification is explicitly *not* exempt — while separately "Notifications related to media sessions are exempt from this behavior change". The platform predicate is `Notification.isMediaNotification()`, which requires `MediaStyle` **and** a non-null `EXTRA_MEDIA_SESSION`, and it is byte-identical across API 33–36. `NotificationManagerService` uses it to decide whether to drop the post, and SystemUI's media carousel (`MediaDataProcessor.onNotificationAdded`) is gated on the *same* predicate — so a token-less notification is not merely absent from the shade, it never reaches the notification listener and the lockscreen/Quick-Settings controls do not exist at all. Confirmed on device (HONOR ROD2-W09, Android 16 / SDK 36): appops `POST_NOTIFICATION: ignore`, `granted=false`, and the service simultaneously `isForeground=true` with `foregroundNoti=Notification(category=transport actions=3 vis=PUBLIC)`. So **no runtime permission request is added** — a prompt the app does not need is a prompt that can be permanently denied for nothing — and no `checkSelfPermission` gate is placed on `startForeground`, which would trade a cosmetic problem for the "did not then call Service.startForeground()" kill. What is added is the guard that matches the real precondition: `mediaSessionCompat?.sessionToken` is a null-safe call, and the exemption hangs entirely on it, so both builders now bind the token once and log an error if it is ever null while the permission is denied — converting a failure that is invisible unless the tester happened to deny the permission (most grant it reflexively) into a logcat line. The manifest declaration is *kept*, unrequested, and documented: media3 does not need it (media3-session declares no permissions and the `MediaSessionService` guide asks only for the two `FOREGROUND_SERVICE` ones), but the exemption covers media and self-managed-call notifications only, so a download-completion notice (UR-011) would be an ordinary notification and silently dropped — keeping the declaration is what makes adding one a one-file change | Android | UR-006 | Done | | DR-201 | A lockscreen skip means different things depending on what is playing, and the backend decides which. `onSkipToNext`/`onSkipToPrevious` forwarded a bare `"next"`/`"previous"` to Rust, which always advanced the queue — correct for music, wrong for a video whose audio is running through a background-audio handoff (UR-040), where the buttons should scrub. Pressing skip to re-hear a line jumped to the next *episode* instead. `resolve_skip_action` in `player/seek.rs` maps the command to either `Advance` or `SeekTo`, and `is_background_audio_active()` is the whole test: the handoff exists only for video, and an episode played through it reports `MediaType::Audio`, so media type cannot distinguish the case. Forward jumps 30s, back 10s — asymmetric because the back button replays dialogue just missed rather than travels — and both clamp to `[0, duration]`, since a negative offset is rejected by backends and a seek past the end reads as EOF and would advance, the very outcome being prevented. Routed through the same spawn-then-`seek_absolute` path as the scrubber, because a handoff seek re-opens the stream and must not run under the blocking lock (DR-159). The Kotlin keeps sending the same opaque command; only the `PlaybackStateCompat` gains `ACTION_FAST_FORWARD`/`ACTION_REWIND` so the system draws seek affordances rather than skip arrows that lie about what they do | Playback | UR-040, UR-006 | Done | | DR-202 | Video keeps the display awake. Android counts its display timeout from the last *user input*, and watching something is exactly the case where there is none, so the screen dimmed and slept mid-film unless the user kept tapping it. Nothing held it: `FLAG_KEEP_SCREEN_ON` appeared nowhere in the app, and neither renderer supplies a hold for free — ExoPlayer's `setWakeMode` is a CPU/wifi wake lock that says nothing about the display, and it draws into the `TextureView` this app owns (DR-192) rather than media3's `PlayerView`, which is the widget that would otherwise set `keepScreenOn` itself; the WebView `