🏗️ Build and Test JellyTau / Run Tests (push) Successful in 22m57s
Publish Documentation / Build & publish docs to gitea-pages (push) Successful in 5m50s
Traceability Validation / Check Requirement Traces (push) Successful in 24s
Build & Release / Run Tests (push) Successful in 7m21s
🏗️ Build and Test JellyTau / Android Compile Check (push) Successful in 10m3s
Build & Release / Build Linux (push) Successful in 20m32s
Build & Release / Build Windows (push) Successful in 14m29s
Build & Release / Build Android (push) Successful in 31m5s
Build & Release / Create Release (push) Successful in 12s
VideoPlayer.tapSurface.test.ts deliberately does not mock $lib/api/bindings — it renders the real component against the real bindings, which bottom out in the globally mocked `invoke`. That mock resolves `undefined` for every command, so any command whose result is *rendered* blows up: the quality picker assigns the result straight to state and the template then reads `streamingQualities.length`, which throws on undefined. It threw asynchronously, outside any test, so the suite reported 4 unhandled errors while every test still passed — the state vitest warns "might cause false positive tests". Answering the two rendered commands removes them. Authored in the main checkout; brought in here and verified: 83 files, 1009 tests, and the unhandled-error count drops from 4 to 0.
231 lines
8.0 KiB
TypeScript
231 lines
8.0 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Behavioural regression tests for the video tap surface — rendered against the
|
|
* REAL component, not a hand-modelled DOM.
|
|
*
|
|
* TRACES: UR-005, UR-061 | DR-098 | UT-092
|
|
*
|
|
* Why this file exists:
|
|
*
|
|
* `tapGestures.test.ts` tests `registerTap` / `isControlSurfaceTouch` /
|
|
* `isSynthesizedTouchClick` as isolated pure functions. Every one of those tests
|
|
* passed while, on the device, in sequence: the player pause-looped, then
|
|
* pausing became impossible, then the bottom controls went dead, then
|
|
* double-tap-to-seek stopped working. The helpers were each behaving exactly as
|
|
* specified — the bugs were all in the *composition*: which element actually
|
|
* receives a tap once Svelte has re-rendered.
|
|
*
|
|
* Testing my own helpers could not catch that, and modelling the DOM by hand in
|
|
* a test just re-encodes the same wrong assumption. So these tests render
|
|
* VideoPlayer and dispatch real touch/click events at whatever element is
|
|
* genuinely on top, asserting user-visible outcomes ("a double tap seeks")
|
|
* rather than internals.
|
|
*
|
|
* The specific traps encoded here, each a bug that shipped:
|
|
* - pausing renders a full-screen <button> play overlay OVER the video, so the
|
|
* second tap of a double tap lands on a button, not the video;
|
|
* - the browser synthesizes a `click` after a touch tap, which must not toggle
|
|
* a second time, on ANY layered target;
|
|
* - the bottom controls bar must drive its own buttons and NOT the container's
|
|
* tap gestures.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from "vitest";
|
|
import { render } from "@testing-library/svelte";
|
|
import { tick } from "svelte";
|
|
import { invoke } from "@tauri-apps/api/core";
|
|
import VideoPlayer from "./VideoPlayer.svelte";
|
|
import { SEEK_FORWARD_SECONDS } from "./tapGestures";
|
|
|
|
// --- Mocks: everything VideoPlayer reaches for that is not the tap surface. ---
|
|
|
|
const toggleSpy = vi.fn();
|
|
const seekVideoSpy = vi.fn();
|
|
const seekSpy = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("$app/navigation", () => ({ goto: vi.fn() }));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("$lib/player", () => ({
|
|
playerController: {
|
|
toggle: (...a: unknown[]) => {
|
|
toggleSpy(...a);
|
|
return Promise.resolve();
|
|
},
|
|
seekVideo: (...a: unknown[]) => {
|
|
seekVideoSpy(...a);
|
|
return Promise.resolve();
|
|
},
|
|
seek: (...a: unknown[]) => {
|
|
seekSpy(...a);
|
|
return Promise.resolve();
|
|
},
|
|
setActiveAdapter: vi.fn(),
|
|
clearActiveAdapter: vi.fn(),
|
|
getActiveAdapter: vi.fn(() => null),
|
|
},
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("$lib/player/adapters/rustReportHost", () => ({
|
|
createRustReportHost: () => ({
|
|
onState: vi.fn(),
|
|
onPosition: vi.fn(),
|
|
onMediaLoaded: vi.fn(),
|
|
onEnded: vi.fn(),
|
|
onError: vi.fn(),
|
|
onStreamUrlChanged: vi.fn(),
|
|
onBuffering: vi.fn(),
|
|
onReady: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("$lib/player/html5Adapter", () => ({
|
|
reportState: vi.fn(),
|
|
reportPosition: vi.fn(),
|
|
reportMediaLoaded: vi.fn(),
|
|
resetReporting: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("$lib/utils/pictureInPicture", () => ({
|
|
isPipSupported: () => false,
|
|
enterPip: vi.fn(),
|
|
setAutoEnterEnabled: vi.fn(),
|
|
setHtml5VideoState: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("$lib/stores/auth", () => ({
|
|
auth: {
|
|
getRepository: () => ({ getHandle: () => "h", jrayActorsAt: async () => [] }),
|
|
subscribe: (fn: (v: unknown) => void) => {
|
|
fn({ isAuthenticated: true });
|
|
return () => {};
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const MEDIA = {
|
|
id: "item-1",
|
|
name: "Test Episode",
|
|
type: "Episode",
|
|
runTimeTicks: 6_000_000_000, // 600s
|
|
} as any;
|
|
|
|
/** Dispatch a touch at (x, y) on whatever element is topmost there. */
|
|
function touchAt(el: Element, x: number) {
|
|
const touch = { clientX: x, clientY: 300 } as Touch;
|
|
el.dispatchEvent(
|
|
new TouchEvent("touchstart", {
|
|
bubbles: true,
|
|
cancelable: true,
|
|
touches: [touch] as unknown as Touch[],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function renderPlayer() {
|
|
return render(VideoPlayer, {
|
|
props: { media: MEDIA, streamUrl: "http://x/master.m3u8", onClose: vi.fn() },
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("VideoPlayer tap surface (real component)", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
// This file deliberately does NOT mock `$lib/api/bindings` — it renders the
|
|
// real component against the real bindings, which bottom out in the globally
|
|
// mocked `invoke`. That mock resolves `undefined` for every command, so the
|
|
// commands whose results are *rendered* have to be answered here: the
|
|
// quality picker assigns the result straight to state and then does
|
|
// `streamingQualities.length` in the template, which throws (asynchronously,
|
|
// outside any test) on undefined and fails the run with an unhandled error.
|
|
vi.mocked(invoke).mockImplementation(async (cmd: string) => {
|
|
switch (cmd) {
|
|
case "player_get_streaming_qualities":
|
|
return [];
|
|
case "player_get_video_settings":
|
|
return { streamingQuality: "original" };
|
|
default:
|
|
return undefined;
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("a single tap on the video toggles play/pause exactly once", async () => {
|
|
const { container } = renderPlayer();
|
|
const video = container.querySelector("video");
|
|
expect(video).toBeTruthy();
|
|
|
|
touchAt(video!, 900);
|
|
|
|
expect(toggleSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("the synthesized click after a tap does not toggle a second time", async () => {
|
|
const { container } = renderPlayer();
|
|
const video = container.querySelector("video")!;
|
|
|
|
touchAt(video, 900);
|
|
// The compatibility click the browser fires after a touch tap. detail=0 is
|
|
// how engines mark it; a late real-detail click is covered by the recency
|
|
// guard, which this exercises too since it lands immediately.
|
|
video.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent("click", { bubbles: true, detail: 0 }));
|
|
|
|
expect(toggleSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("a double tap seeks even though the first tap raised the play overlay", async () => {
|
|
// THE regression this file exists for. On device the first tap pauses, which
|
|
// makes Svelte render a full-screen <button> play overlay over the video —
|
|
// so the SECOND tap lands on a button, not the video. A control-surface
|
|
// guard that does not know about that overlay discards it and seeking dies.
|
|
//
|
|
// Reproducing it requires the overlay to actually render, which means
|
|
// driving `isPlaying` the way the real element does: via its `pause` event.
|
|
vi.useFakeTimers();
|
|
try {
|
|
const { container } = renderPlayer();
|
|
const video = container.querySelector("video")!;
|
|
|
|
// Tap 1 on the video.
|
|
touchAt(video, 900);
|
|
|
|
// The element reports it paused → isPlaying=false → overlay renders.
|
|
video.dispatchEvent(new Event("pause"));
|
|
await Promise.resolve();
|
|
await tick();
|
|
|
|
const overlay = container.querySelector("[data-player-surface]");
|
|
expect(overlay, "the play overlay should be covering the video").toBeTruthy();
|
|
|
|
vi.advanceTimersByTime(120); // inside DOUBLE_TAP_WINDOW_MS
|
|
// Tap 2 lands on the OVERLAY, exactly as on device.
|
|
touchAt(overlay!, 900);
|
|
|
|
// Either seek route is acceptable — which one runs depends on whether a
|
|
// video adapter is registered. What must hold is that a seek happened, to
|
|
// roughly the forward-skip target.
|
|
const calls = [...seekVideoSpy.mock.calls, ...seekSpy.mock.calls];
|
|
expect(calls.length).toBe(1);
|
|
const [position] = calls[0];
|
|
expect(position).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(position).toBeLessThanOrEqual(SEEK_FORWARD_SECONDS);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
vi.useRealTimers();
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("tapping the bottom play/pause button toggles once, not twice", async () => {
|
|
const { container } = renderPlayer();
|
|
const controls = container.querySelector("[data-player-controls]");
|
|
expect(controls).toBeTruthy();
|
|
|
|
const playBtn = controls!.querySelector("button");
|
|
expect(playBtn).toBeTruthy();
|
|
|
|
// A real press: touchstart bubbles to the container's gesture handler, then
|
|
// the button's own click fires. Only ONE toggle may result.
|
|
touchAt(playBtn!, 40);
|
|
playBtn!.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent("click", { bubbles: true, detail: 1 }));
|
|
|
|
expect(toggleSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|