test: tag the untagged suites; correct two stale headers

Four test files and one node header carried no TRACES tag, so the
requirements they verify read as implemented-but-unverified. Tagging a
test is what distinguishes the two.

test_calibration.cpp is AR-023; its three [report] cases verify GR-003
and are tagged separately, since the report is fitted from the same
distributions but is its own requirement. test_similarity.cpp is the CI
half of AR-026 — equivalence against hand-computed dot products, where
throughput at scale is AR-027 and cannot run on this host.
test_face_tracker.cpp is AR-007 and AR-008.

Two headers described code that no longer exists. face_aligner_node.hpp
still documented the RANSAC fit AR-005 replaced with an Umeyama
least-squares fit over all five points — not merely out of date but the
opposite of what the file does, and it reads as a rationale for
discarding the landmarks AR-030 measures. test_face_tracker.cpp still
described the park/revive branch AR-008 deleted, and the raw-cosine
cut_revive_sim that guarded it, which AR-024 retired.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

TRACES: AR-005, AR-007, AR-008, AR-023, AR-026, AR-030 | GR-003 | SR-001, SR-002

tests/test_calibration.cpp

@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
+// TRACES: AR-023 | SR-002
+//
 // Unit tests for gallery calibration: the sigmoid math, the pairwise fit on
 // separable data, and the in-memory hash-keyed cache (hit / stale / cold).
 // All pure, GPU-free, model-free.
+//
+// The three `[report]` cases at the bottom carry their own GR-003 tags: they
+// verify the build report, which is fitted from the same distributions but is a
+// separate requirement.
 #include <catch2/catch_test_macros.hpp>
 #include <catch2/matchers/catch_matchers_floating_point.hpp>
 
@@ -183,6 +189,7 @@ Embedding unit_axis(int slot) {
 }
 }  // namespace
 
+// TRACES: GR-003 | SR-001
 TEST_CASE("report surfaces actors that can never be recognised", "[report][GR-003]") {
     // An actor with no usable image is a silent recall ceiling: the pipeline
     // will never name them, and nothing in the gallery says why. This is the
@@ -212,6 +219,7 @@ TEST_CASE("report surfaces actors that can never be recognised", "[report][GR-00
     CHECK(r.actors[1].references == 0);
 }
 
+// TRACES: GR-003 | SR-001
 TEST_CASE("report surfaces actors too thin to calibrate on", "[report][GR-003]") {
     // Below the positive-pair threshold an actor contributes nothing to the
     // intra-class side of the fit. They are not broken, so nothing complains —
@@ -237,6 +245,7 @@ TEST_CASE("report surfaces actors too thin to calibrate on", "[report][GR-003]")
     CHECK(r.actors_below_positive_threshold >= 1);
 }
 
+// TRACES: GR-003 | SR-001
 TEST_CASE("report round-trips", "[report][GR-003]") {
     ActorGallery g;
     ActorGallery::Actor act;