The July report (4-model ArcFace/LVFace bake-off, pre-opencv5 framework, 3-film training + held-out validation) is superseded by the opencv5 build: single-model LVFace-B, a 6-knob DE sweep over all 9 films, flood-fill presence, and the registry/decode fixes. Rather than overwrite it, archive it date-suffixed and start the current report fresh. - Rename the six July result pages to *-2026-07.md, rewrite their intra-archive cross-links, and add an "Archived (July 2026)" banner to each. - mkdocs nav: current report at top, the July set under an Archive section. - New docs/methodology.md for the opencv5 run: corrects the withdrawn anneal_sec/extinction_sec presence bridging (windows are now [first_seen, last_seen], AR-012/013), documents the two presence modes (track_extent / flood), and records that every eval scores all 9 films. The current experiment log (model-bakeoff.md) and Home rewrite land once the DE sweep converges and the final optimum is known.
5.7 KiB
How we score against X-Ray
Every number in this report comes from one comparison, and that comparison has a mismatch at its core: the ground truth is scene-level, the pipeline's output is per-second, and the two do not mean the same thing. This page documents the comparison once so the findings can rely on it.
What Amazon X-Ray records
X-Ray ships three tables per film: scenes.csv (a list of [start, end]
timespans), people_in_scenes.csv (which actors are credited in each
scene), and people.csv (actor identities). There is no per-frame or
per-second annotation anywhere in X-Ray. A scene might run 45 seconds, and
X-Ray records one cast list for the entire span, not "on screen from second
12 to second 30."
To compare against per-second predictions, second_score.py expands every
scene into per-second ground truth by copying the whole scene's cast list
onto every second inside it:
for sn, (t0, t1) in spans.items():
cast = scene_cast.get(sn, [])
for t in range(int(t0), int(t1)):
timeline[t] = cast
If X-Ray credits five actors to a 30-second scene, all five count as ground truth present for all 30 seconds, including seconds where only one is on screen. This is not a simplification the pipeline introduces; it is the only reading X-Ray's data supports, because X-Ray records nothing finer.
How the pipeline reports presence
A presence claim is one actor owning one time window. How that window is derived is a tunable choice — a knob the optimizer weighs — with two modes:
track_extent(default). A claim is exactly[first_seen, last_seen]of a track the actor owned (AR-012), ending at the last sighting and never after (AR-013). There is no keep-alive: the withdrawnanneal_secand the scene-trackerextinction_sec— which the July report's windows were held open by — are gone. A track that survives its own gaps needs no bridge; a gap after the final sighting is never claimed.flood. Each claim is snapped to the shot it sits in, so an actor seen once anywhere in a shot is reported for the whole shot[prev_boundary, next_boundary]. Boundaries come from TransNetV2 shot detection when available, otherwise from the always-on histogram cut detector (is_cut). This trades precision for recall against X-Ray's scene-level granularity, and the optimizer decides per run whether it pays.
Do not confuse the surviving track_extinction_sec with the withdrawn
scene extinction_sec: the former bounds how long a lost track stays
available for re-association (a tracking question), and never extends a
presence claim.
The two limits this does not resolve
The face-vs-presence ceiling. X-Ray credits scene membership regardless of whether a face is ever visible: background crew, characters shot from behind, voice-only presence. No face pipeline can recover a face that never appears, so recall against X-Ray is a structural ceiling, not a defect.
Flood-fill can overshoot. Snapping to a shot correctly answers "still in this scene" through an intra-scene cut, but a shot boundary is not a scene boundary: on a film with sparse cuts, flood-fill can carry an actor across a long "shot" they only briefly appeared in. This is why flood-fill is a knob, not a default — its value depends on the film's cut density.
Precision, recall, and the misID weighting
Per sampled second t:
TPI (true positive instances): actors both X-Ray and the pipeline agree are present.
FPI (false positive instances): actors the pipeline reports that are not in X-Ray's cast for this second, split into:
- FPI_incast: the actor is in the film's cast, just not credited to this scene. A timing or boundary slip.
- FPI_misid: the actor is not in the film's cast at all. A genuine wrong-identity error, weighted 10× in the precision objective, because naming someone not even in the film is categorically worse than a few seconds of scene-boundary slop.
!!! note "Every headline P and F1 is misID-weighted"
Precision puts each `FPI_misid` into the denominator 10 times
(`precision = TPI / (TPI + FPI_incast + 10·FPI_misid)`,
[`second_score.py`](https://REPOLINK/scripts/optimizer/second_score.py)).
This deliberately punishes naming an out-of-film actor far harder than a
boundary slip, so the `P` column is not raw precision and a misID-heavy
film's `P` is depressed super-linearly.
FN (false negatives): actors X-Ray lists that the pipeline never reports, counted only for actors who have a gallery reference embedding. An actor with no reference photo can never be recognized, and counting them as a miss would measure gallery coverage, not recognition accuracy.
Two further numbers accompany F1:
agreement_rate: mean per-second Jaccard overlap
(|Pred ∩ GT| / |Pred ∪ GT|) — partial credit, so naming 2 of 3 present
actors scores 2/3, not 0.
exact_match_rate: the fraction of seconds where the pipeline's named set exactly equals X-Ray's — no partial credit, dominated by recall.
The benchmark set
Unlike the July report — which trained on a 3-film subset and validated on held-out films to keep evaluations fast — this run scores all 9 films on every evaluation. The registry one-clock fix and uncapped dumps made full-set replay affordable, so the reported optimum is tuned against the complete set rather than a training subset.
Reproduce
python3 scripts/optimizer/second_score.py \
--pred pred.json --xray experiments/xray/.../<xray_dir> \
--gallery experiments/galleries/gallery_LVFace-B_Glint360K.h5
See the full experiment log for how pred.json is
produced and where the shipped src/config.hpp defaults come from.