7407a82aa758203dba06b8858e1fa41230088247
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
7407a82aa7 |
Let an operation read the pixel next to it, and settle where sharpening belongs
The fused pass hands a fragment a colour and no coordinate. That is what buys one dispatch for a whole edit, and it is also a wall: sharpening, noise reduction, clarity, texture, dehaze and spot removal are each defined by what the neighbours are doing, and FR-DEV-3 and FR-DEV-8 ask for all six. None of them could be written at any price. So there is now a detail stage. An operation implements `Operation` for its parameters exactly as before — the panel, the sidecar, the history and the presets all work unchanged — and additionally returns `Affects::Detail` and a `DetailStage` yielding one pass per dispatch. `Affects` grows the third variant `docs/requirements.md:250` designed and nothing had cut. Where the stage sits is a colour-science decision, not an arrangement of convenience. It runs after every point operation and every mask layer, so an amount chosen against a tone curve survives the curve moving; in linear sRGB after the camera matrix, because camera RGB has no luminance to sharpen against; and before the output transform and the clip, because FR-DEV-2 allows one quantisation and a highlight clipped before a convolution grows a dark ring. The fused pass therefore ends one of two ways, and when a detail stage follows it hands on unclipped f16 and the last detail pass encodes. At render resolution rather than on the source, which is the whole of FR-DSP-1: a pass before the framing prologue would cost 24 MP to draw a 2 MP preview. `RenderScale` is what makes that survivable — a radius is stored as a fraction of the frame's shorter edge, exactly as a mask feather already is, or as a count of source pixels, and converted per render. It also reports when a radius is smaller than a proxy pixel rather than drawing a plausible lie; zooming to 1:1 makes the preview exact with no second path. `Invalidation` gives FR-DEV-3d something to mean. Moving a detail parameter leaves the colour key alone, so `AdjustPass` keeps the linear intermediate and skips the fused dispatch: dragging a sharpening slider costs a convolution. Moving exposure does re-run the detail passes, because they read what the colour pass wrote, and there is no arrangement of keys that avoids it while keeping sharpening after tone. Validated by a separable box blur that is not a develop operation, behind the `detail-probe` feature and absent from a shipping build. An abstraction with no consumer is a guess; a box blur's answer is known in closed form, so the tests assert every byte of the ramp rather than that the edge got softer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
1d7106c94d |
Apply the masks to the thumbnail and the export, not only the screen
Reported as a thumbnail bug; the export had it too, which is the serious half. You would have exported a photograph missing every local adjustment. Both called the unmasked `render`, and the failure is silent by construction: the generated shader always declares the mask binding and always emits a block per active layer, so binding the empty placeholder multiplies each of them by zero. No error, no warning, no missing texture — the adjustments are simply not there. From inside either path there is nothing to see. Every path that produces pixels now goes through one helper that binds the array, and that is the point of it being one helper rather than three correct call sites. The array is rasterised in source space at proxy size and sampled through the framing map, so one array serves every output size: a 256px thumbnail and a 24 MP export bind the same texture. Three tests, and the first is the fault stated directly — render the same edit with and without the array and assert they *differ*. If binding it ever stops mattering, the masks have stopped reaching the shader. The third checks the masked share of the frame is the same at 32px and 128px, because "both non-empty" would pass while a mask that scaled wrongly still ruined every thumbnail. |
||
|
dtourolle
|
ee10097435 |
Mask the subject the model found, not the regions underneath it
The watershed hierarchy does not survive a photograph, so local masking stops depending on it. A layer can now be one recognised object, and the object's own coverage is the mask. `Options::watershed` defaults off. It costs ~80 ms plus a full-resolution readback to produce a ladder that collapses, and paying that on every photograph buys a control that misleads. Kept switchable rather than deleted: the passes and the hierarchy are correct in themselves and it is the merge criterion that fails, which is a change to one function. Masks now rasterise in **source** space at proxy resolution and are sampled by the composed shader after the framing map. That fixes a real bug: they were rasterised in output space, so zooming slid the photograph underneath a mask that stayed pinned to the viewport, and cropping moved every adjustment to a different part of the picture. Doing it this way also leaves the framing map in exactly one place — a second copy in the mask shader would have been a second thing to keep in step, failing only when straightened. A subject is stored as identity, not pixels: the mask is megabytes and is reproducible by running the same model over the same image, so the sidecar carries the index, the class and the score, and the session carries the pixels. The class is there to be checked — if instance 3 comes back a "car" where it was a "dog", something changed and the layer is stale rather than silently masking the wrong thing. The overlay now draws instances and is transparent everywhere else. The region version covered every pixel and so hid the photograph it was drawn over; the question it exists to answer is whether an outline follows the subject, which you can only answer by seeing both. `examples/local.rs` is the worked example: subject in colour with the rest monochrome, and the subject lifted out of its background. Run on a 5472x3648 CR2 it finds two people and two cars, and the colour-pop keeps her hat and hair while the wall and grass behind go grey. |
||
|
dtourolle
|
c6a846a1f9 |
Brighten her face without touching the sky behind her
A mask layer is an ordinary develop chain plus a rule about where it applies. Nothing in the chain knows it is being masked, so every operation that works globally now works locally and a newly declared op in `ops/` arrives with local support already done. The composer emits each layer after the global chain and before the conversion out of camera space, which is what a photographer means by "and *then* lift the shadows on her face". Op fragments write to a `c` they expect to own, so a layer block shadows it and copies the result back out through a carrier — assigning the outer one from inside is impossible precisely because it is shadowed. The fused dispatch survives: three global adjustments and two masked ones remain one shader, one read, one write. Masks rasterise on the GPU and never exist in CPU memory (ARCH §5.4). That is the whole reason darktable's brush masks lag, and it is architectural rather than tuning, so it is not a thing to inherit and fix later. The rasteriser is a render pass rather than the compute shader it obviously wants to be, and the format is why: R8Unorm is not a core storage format, so a compute path has to widen masks to four bytes per pixel — 768 MB across eight layers of a 24 MP export, against 192 MB at one byte. A colour attachment takes R8Unorm happily. The array slice comes from the attached view, so no slot uniform exists to disagree with where the pass writes. Region masks index a compacted label field rather than the watershed's raw basin roots, because a root is a sparse index into pixel space and indexing a per-region array by one would need a table the size of the image. Changing a selection then costs a few kilobytes, not a re-upload. Stored as region ids, not as pixels: diffable, mergeable per-field under FR-NC-9, and cheap in a sidecar. The ids only mean anything alongside the segmentation that produced them, so each layer carries that signature and is treated as stale rather than applied when it does not match — a confidently wrong mask being much worse than an absent one. Seven device tests render actual frames and read them back. The unit tests either side check halves that would both pass if the two agreed with each other and were both wrong; a mask sampled with x and y swapped satisfies them and fails these. |