dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 7407a82aa7 Let an operation read the pixel next to it, and settle where sharpening belongs
The fused pass hands a fragment a colour and no coordinate. That is what buys
one dispatch for a whole edit, and it is also a wall: sharpening, noise
reduction, clarity, texture, dehaze and spot removal are each defined by what
the neighbours are doing, and FR-DEV-3 and FR-DEV-8 ask for all six. None of
them could be written at any price.

So there is now a detail stage. An operation implements `Operation` for its
parameters exactly as before — the panel, the sidecar, the history and the
presets all work unchanged — and additionally returns `Affects::Detail` and a
`DetailStage` yielding one pass per dispatch. `Affects` grows the third variant
`docs/requirements.md:250` designed and nothing had cut.

Where the stage sits is a colour-science decision, not an arrangement of
convenience. It runs after every point operation and every mask layer, so an
amount chosen against a tone curve survives the curve moving; in linear sRGB
after the camera matrix, because camera RGB has no luminance to sharpen
against; and before the output transform and the clip, because FR-DEV-2 allows
one quantisation and a highlight clipped before a convolution grows a dark
ring. The fused pass therefore ends one of two ways, and when a detail stage
follows it hands on unclipped f16 and the last detail pass encodes.

At render resolution rather than on the source, which is the whole of FR-DSP-1:
a pass before the framing prologue would cost 24 MP to draw a 2 MP preview.
`RenderScale` is what makes that survivable — a radius is stored as a fraction
of the frame's shorter edge, exactly as a mask feather already is, or as a
count of source pixels, and converted per render. It also reports when a radius
is smaller than a proxy pixel rather than drawing a plausible lie; zooming to
1:1 makes the preview exact with no second path.

`Invalidation` gives FR-DEV-3d something to mean. Moving a detail parameter
leaves the colour key alone, so `AdjustPass` keeps the linear intermediate and
skips the fused dispatch: dragging a sharpening slider costs a convolution.
Moving exposure does re-run the detail passes, because they read what the
colour pass wrote, and there is no arrangement of keys that avoids it while
keeping sharpening after tone.

Validated by a separable box blur that is not a develop operation, behind the
`detail-probe` feature and absent from a shipping build. An abstraction with no
consumer is a guess; a box blur's answer is known in closed form, so the tests
assert every byte of the ramp rather than that the edge got softer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 14:39:35 +02:00

DarkRoom

A cross-platform, non-destructive RAW photo editor for Linux and Android.

Status: early. v0.1 is a remote library viewer — see docs/milestone-v0.1.md.

Documentation

Document Contents
requirements.md What the software must do — 122 numbered requirements
architecture.md How it is built — crates, GPU pipeline, data model, sync
milestone-v0.1.md The first buildable milestone

Building

Desktop:

cargo run -p darkroom-desktop

Android (containerised toolchain, see docker/android):

./docker/android/build.sh cargo ndk -t arm64-v8a build --release

Current state

Working: workspace, GPU context and compute pass, adaptive Slint shell, Android cross-compilation of the core crates.

Not yet working: the zero-copy display path. The build currently uploads frames through the CPU, which is exactly what ARCH §6.1 forbids — measured at 96% of frame time at 4K. Replacing it is spike S1, the project's highest priority.

cargo run -p dr-gpu --example bench --features readback

reproduces that measurement.

Licence

GPL-3.0-or-later.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme GPL-3.0
1 GiB
2026-10-07 11:27:59 +00:00
Languages
Rust 86.1%
Slint 10.3%
Python 1.1%
Shell 1%
WGSL 0.9%
Other 0.6%