547 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	f00b92a0e6	Turn face boxes back into sensor space before matching regions ... Faces are found on the thumbnail, which is cached the right way up -- the grid would lie on its side otherwise. Segmentation runs on a proxy rendered through a neutral edit graph, which carries no orientation and is therefore in sensor order. For anything shot in portrait the two differ by a quarter turn, so a face and the person containing it were being compared in spaces 90 degrees apart: no match, or worse, a match against somebody else's region. The transform goes on the face rather than on the proxy. Instance masks are defined in the proxy's space and sampled long afterwards, so turning that space would be a far larger change than naming a region warrants. Also two things the first screenshot of the running app showed that no test would have: 110 of 23,528 displayed as "0%", which reads as the feature having done nothing. One decimal below ten percent, and a floor so real progress never shows as none. The rail picked some near-black covers, because the largest face in a group is often the nearest one in a badly lit frame and a black square beside a name identifies nobody. It now cuts the best few and takes the first legible one, falling back to the largest when a person's every photograph is dark -- which happens, and showing it beats showing nothing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 23:28:52 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	61c4547b9c	Make the Identity Manager a peer of the library and develop ... It was reachable only from the library header, which made it a side trip rather than a mode. It is now reachable from develop's header too, beside the way back, because that is the same kind of move -- leaving this photograph for somewhere else in the library -- and a screen you can only reach from one of the other two is not a peer of them. Leaving returns to whichever screen opened it, and the button says which. A back button that read "Library" while returning to develop would be lying about the one thing a back button has to be right about. The develop session is only hidden, never torn down, so returning to it costs nothing and keeps the photographer's place. The header now matches the other two screens rather than using a close cross: three screens whose headers disagree read as three applications. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 23:14:17 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	b55812812a	Name segmented people from the faces already recognised in them ... The segmenter knows it found a person; the face index knows which person. Joining them turns "person" in the mask list into "Anna", which is the difference between a vocabulary of eighty COCO classes and one that includes the user's family. Selecting a subject in a group photograph stops being a guessing game between three identical rows. Containment, not IoU. A face is a small part of the person it belongs to, so a correct pairing has an IoU near zero and anything IoU-based would reject every true match. Confirmed names only. A suggestion is the system's guess, and printing a guessed name onto a mask region would launder it into a fact. Writing the tests corrected the design once: a tight head-and-shoulders portrait, where the face fills most of the person box, is the case where naming is most certain, not least. An earlier guard rejected exactly that and has been removed, with the reasoning left as a test because it is easy to get backwards a second time. The names hang on the develop session, set when the image opens because that is the one moment the catalog and the image id are both in reach. Every segmentation run afterwards picks them up for free, and a library with no face indexing behaves exactly as it did before. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 23:10:46 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	d7a81375ee	List the steps, and let a photographer step straight to one ... Undo answers "take back the last thing", which is the question asked about a mistake just noticed. It is the wrong instrument for one noticed six adjustments later: eight presses, each changing the picture, with no way to see how far back the mistake is without passing through it. A step is a whole state, so arriving from six away costs what arriving from one does — which is what makes a row worth making clickable rather than decorative. `Edit::Discrete` had to go for the list to be worth drawing. Seventeen call sites recorded the same anonymous step, which is fine for deciding whether two changes are one gesture and useless for a panel: seventeen rows reading "Discrete" is not a history. Every variant now carries enough to name itself, and the compiler enumerated the sites that had to start saying so. A step that moved a parameter is still named out of the descriptor, so an operation added as a YAML declaration appears in the history correctly named with nothing written for it (FR-DEV-3c). Choosing a film stock was not undoable at all. The pick went straight to `choose_film`, which nothing on the history's path ever sees. `pick_film` records it, and is separate because the same call is also how a *restored* edit gets its tables back — recording that would push a step for the undo the photographer had just asked for. The list is rebuilt off a revision rather than off every redraw. A drag ends in a redraw per frame while folding into one step, so the unconditional version would tear down and recreate every row sixty times a second to arrive back at the list already on screen. The counter is process-wide: a per-instance one starts every photograph at the same number, so a frontend holding "the revision I last drew" would keep the previous image's steps on screen — invisible while every image opens with one identical row, and a wrong-photograph bug the moment persisted history means it does not. The step names that no descriptor can supply are constants with a roll, and a test walks the roll rather than a second copy of it. `resolve` splits so that "is this catalogued?" can be asked: `derive` turns `history.mask_toggled` into "Mask Toggled", which names a field rather than an act and, being perfectly readable, is a mistake nobody would look at twice. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 23:04:35 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	b89f1cfece	Snapshot the whole edit in the history, so a drawn mask can be taken back ... The undo stack snapshotted a `Preset` — the parameter map — and a mask layer is deliberately not a parameter. So drawing one changed nothing the history could see: `record` returned `false`, no step opened, and the layer the photographer had just painted had no way back. The interface went on calling `record` in good faith, including from the mask controls, and nothing failed. A film stock went missing the same way. The snapshot is an `EditState` now, so the history is complete by construction rather than by anyone keeping a list in their head. `undo` and `redo` return a `Step` rather than a `bool`. Stepping is not the only outcome a caller has to act on — a step across a change of film leaves the graph without its tables, and only the caller can bake them — and a `bool` would let that be dropped by writing nothing at all, which is the shape of mistake this module had already made once. `DevelopSession` settles the debt either way; a step that found nowhere to go is left alone, since clearing the film because undo hit the floor would take the stock off the picture. Five tests, all of which fail against the old snapshot: a drawn layer is undoable and redoable, a layer's own settings are a step of their own, a change of stock is a step and names what it needs baked back, clearing the film is undoable, and an exposure move does not deep-copy the mask stack. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:54:55 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	93efdf27a6	Keep the film stock when an edit is saved ... `Version::update` is the write path an automatic save goes through. It copied the parameters and the masks and said nothing about the film, so a photograph developed on a stock was written back without it and opened the next time without its emulsion. Nothing reported a failure — the line was simply not there. It is the third of the three routines that captured "the edit" and the only one that got it wrong, which is the argument for not having three. All of them now destructure one `EditState`, so `from_graph`, `update` and `apply` cannot disagree about what an edit consists of, and the next part of one cannot be lost by anybody writing a line too few. Two tests, both of which fail without the fix: the field survives `update`, and the stock survives the round trip through the file. `apply` returns the `FilmRebake` it always implicitly owed, so `apply_version` now reads the debt off the call rather than off `version.film` — and pays it in both directions, since a version with no film has to clear the adjust pass too or it keeps textures bound that nothing will sample. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:53:00 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	5622a58ce3	Give an edit one complete state, and make omitting part of it a compile error ... An edit used to be a bag of scalars. That stopped being true when the mask stack and the film stock arrived, both deliberately held apart from `ops` because a layer is not a scalar and a stock is not a scalar — and nothing announced the change. What happened instead is that three routines each captured "the edit" and each captured a different subset of it. `EditState` is all of it: the parameter map, the masks, the stock. What keeps it complete is not a comment. `EditGraph::state` destructures the graph exhaustively, `EditGraph::set_state` destructures the state exhaustively, and the fields are public so every construction site is a struct literal naming all of them. Adding a fifth kind of graph state — FR-DEV-8's spot removal is the one already asked for — fails to compile until somebody has decided whether an undo has to put it back. Verified both ways round by adding a field to each type and watching five call sites refuse to build. A compiler error rather than a runtime check, because the failure being prevented is silence: the missing halves produced no panic, no warning and no failing test. The stack is now shared rather than owned, and that is about the drag path rather than memory: `state` runs on every parameter change, which during a drag is once a frame, and deep-copying a painted brush sixty times a second to record an exposure move would be a cost paid for nothing. `masks_mut` is the one door a stack is modified through, so it clones on write. `FilmRebake` is the one thing a caller is still owed. Restoring a stock always needed the profile database this crate does not link (ARCH §6.5a); it was a comment before, and it is a `#[must_use]` return value now. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:50:11 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	2944c1b704	Document the run marker and cross-device face sync ... Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:42:28 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	96d07da15f	Sync face data as sealed shards, so a second device does not re-index ... Indexing 23,500 images is about two hours of CPU, and the result is byte-identical on every device: the same model over the same proxy produces the same embedding. Paying for it once per account rather than once per device is the point. Shards rather than the catalog snapshot, because the snapshot goes up whole on every sync and a fully indexed library carries roughly 30 MB of embeddings. That is exactly the cost the thumbnail store's 25 MB cap exists to bound, so face shards use the same cap -- imported from dr_thumbs rather than restated, since the number is a statement about sync cost and the two must not drift apart. The split follows the one already there: bulk immutable data in sealed shards, small mutable data in the catalog snapshot. Faces, landmarks, embeddings and run markers shard; people, names and assignments ride the catalog and merge by uuid. Keyed on oc:fileid throughout, never on image_id, because a row id means nothing on another device. The run marker travels with the faces it describes. Without it a receiving device cannot tell an image with no faces from one never examined, and would re-detect every landscape it had just adopted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:41:50 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	4a82753d22	Show the detector the photograph, not the sensor's scanlines ... "Find subjects" was handed the proxy in the sensor's own orientation, so every frame shot on a body held sideways reached the model lying on its side — and a model trained on upright photographs is very bad at those. Measured end to end on a 22 MP frame of two people and a dog: `person 0.36` and nothing else, against `dog 0.82, person 0.61, person 0.49` for the same pixels stood up. Nothing failed; the panel simply offered one poor subject where there were three good ones. The orientation was never dropped on purpose. The proxy is deliberately rendered through a *neutral* graph — the detection has to survive an exposure change, or every slider would invalidate the masks built on it — and neutral took the file's orientation with it along with everything else. Landscape frames were unaffected, which is why it stood for as long as it did. The turn is `Orientation::source_pixel`, the same function the grid's thumbnails already go through, so the detector and the thumbnailer now agree about which way is up rather than holding two opinions. What it is turned by is `Framing::effective_orientation` — the file's EXIF tag and the photographer's own rotations composed into one permutation, by the group law rather than by adding the turns, which is a distinction `Framing` already had to make and had already tested. Rotating the picture and pressing the button again therefore does what it looks like it does. The proxy stays in sensor space and the masks come back into it. That is not a detail to be tidied later: the generated shader samples the mask array at `uv_src`, *after* the framing map, so a mask stored upright would sit a quarter turn off the subject it was drawn around. That is a wrong mask rather than a weak one, and nothing announces it. So the picture is stood up for the model and laid back down for everything else, and `upright`/`lay_down` are returned as a pair because calling one and forgetting the other is silent. Both directions are the one function: `upright` gathers through `source_pixel` and `lay_down` scatters through it. A quarter turn is a bijection of the pixel grid, so the round trip is exact — no filter, no resampling, and no hole to fill — and an inverse written out by hand would be a second thing to keep in step, whose way of being wrong is a mask mirrored about the wrong axis, which still looks like a mask. The orientation joins the confidence and the tiling flag in the segmentation signature, and for the same reason: turning the photograph changes what the model recognises, so two runs either side of a rotation are different instance lists. Two that happened to come out the same length would otherwise share a signature and a stored layer would be silently re-indexed from one into the other. The refine pass had it too — it re-runs the model over a crop rendered in the same sensor space — so it makes the same turn, and would otherwise have handed back a worse mask than the one it was asked to improve, on the subject the photographer had just pointed at. `dr-gpu`'s `local` example is fixed with it. It exists to be the shipping path with pictures attached, and a diagnostic that reproduces the bug it is meant to catch is a trap for whoever reads it next. Seven tests. The round trip is the identity over all eight EXIF tags on a non-square asymmetric grid; a turn carries whole pixels rather than shearing the channels apart; a sideways frame reaches the model upright; a box comes back in sensor pixels, worked out by hand for the one turn a portrait frame actually writes; a restored box still reads low-to-high for every tag, since the rest of the pipeline takes `x1 - x0` without checking the sign; and the eight tags cannot collapse into one signature key. The existing composition test now runs against `effective_orientation` itself, over all 8 x 16 baseline-and-user pairs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:40:58 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	336a1fd296	Write down what the Android renderer change cost, and what else is owed ... Three compromises were taken deliberately over the last few days and none of them was written anywhere a future reader would look. So `docs/technical-debt.md`, and two corrections to the architecture document that the Android change made untrue the moment it landed. **TD-1, the Android readback.** §12/6.1 says GPU results never round-trip through the CPU, and the develop view on Android now does exactly that. That is worth recording as a breach with reasons rather than quietly leaving a constraint the code no longer honours — the next person to read §6.1 and then `DevelopSession::render` would otherwise conclude one of them is a mistake. The entry carries the device measurements that forced it, why setting `preTransform` is not a fix available to us, and the three separate things any one of which would remove it. **TD-2 and TD-3**, the serial thumbnail fetch and the unbounded drain, were found while chasing the tearing and are still outstanding. Both have a known shape for the fix; neither is a bug, and neither should be discovered again from scratch. The architecture document said the app renders "through wgpu to Vulkan on both Linux and Android", which stopped being true at 6267802, and §12/6.1 claimed a constraint with no exceptions. Both now say what the code does and point at the debt entry for why. The numbers are labelled with what they are. TD-1's readback cost has *not* been measured on the device and says so, and TD-3's figures are from a debug build and say so — a documented measurement that quietly turns out to be the wrong build is worse than no measurement. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:36:37 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	26a1eb7e28	Record that face detection has run, not just what it found ... An image with no faces in it was indistinguishable from one that had never been looked at, so every landscape, still life and document scan in the library was re-detected on every pass, for ever. In a real library that is most of it: on the 23,527-image test library, 64 of the first 110 images indexed contain no face at all. Schema v9 adds face_index, a run marker per (image, model) carrying the face count and the proxy edge it read. Keyed on the model, so a model change puts every image back in the queue by itself. That makes a coverage figure possible, which is the thing a user actually wants to see. The audit also splits the outstanding set by whether a proxy exists, because 23,417 awaiting a proxy and 110 ready to index are different problems, and telling the user to run indexing again would not fix the first. The Identity screen gains Index faces, Stop, and the coverage line. examples/face_index.rs is the same check and sweep without a window, which is the right shape for an overnight pass. Measured on the real library in release: 3.5 images/second, 110 images and 125 faces in 30 seconds, and a second run correctly finds nothing left to do. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 22:13:41 +02:00
dtourolle	e0cb968e04	Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree-spot-removal ... # Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md	2026-08-26 21:56:32 +02:00
dtourolle	bc07c32611	Merge branch 'master' into worktree-spot-removal ... # Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md	2026-08-26 21:51:47 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	626780276d	Draw with OpenGL on Android, where the driver owns the display rotation ... The grid tore while scrolling on the tablet, in portrait only, and was flawless in landscape. It was not vsync and it was not the grid. Measured on the device, same build, only the tablet rotated: landscape bufferTransform=ROT_180 composition=DEVICE (2) clean portrait bufferTransform=ROT_270 composition=CLIENT (1) torn The panel is mounted landscape — 1920x3000 at installOrientation 3 — so a portrait window needs a 90 degree rotation before scanout. wgpu-hal hardcodes the swapchain's `preTransform` to `IDENTITY` and says so in a comment beside the line: // On Android 10+, libvulkan's `vkQueuePresentKHR` returns // `VK_SUBOPTIMAL_KHR` if not doing pre-rotation ... This is always the // case when the device orientation is anything other than the identity // one, as we unconditionally use `VK_SURFACE_TRANSFORM_IDENTITY_BIT_KHR`. That is gfx-rs/wgpu#3345, and it cannot be fixed by setting the field: `preTransform` is a *promise* that the content is already rotated, so keeping it needs the renderer to rotate what it draws, which wgpu cannot do on Skia's behalf. We do not have to be on that swapchain. `AndroidWindowAdapter` chooses `SkiaRenderer::default_wgpu_29` only because this crate enables `unstable-wgpu-29`; without it `SkiaRenderer::default` resolves — through i-slint-renderer-skia's build script, which selects OpenGL on anything that is not Apple, Windows or wasm — to Skia over OpenGL, where the driver owns the rotation and there is no transform to get wrong. So both renderer features move to the desktop-only dependency, and desktop is untouched. # The cost, stated rather than hidden Skia over OpenGL cannot sample a `wgpu::Texture`, so the develop view's frame comes back through memory: `AdjustPass::export_pixels`, already ungated and already used by the export path, into a `SharedPixelBuffer`. That is the round-trip ARCH §6.1 and AC-8 exist to forbid, and it is the right trade only because of what the alternative actually is — not a faster develop view, but a grid that tears in the orientation a tablet is mostly held in. Two things keep it small. The device is still opened on Android, so demosaic and the adjust pass are untouched on the GPU; only the last hop changes. And `render` fits the pass to the canvas before it runs, so the readback is at viewport resolution, a fraction of the ~7 ms at 4K the original measurement was taken against. Four other explanations died on the way here, each by measurement rather than argument: the present mode (a patch confirmed in the installed binary reached `AutoVsync`, and the rows still duplicated), our shared wgpu device (Slint opened its own, unchanged), Skia's partial rendering (off for GPU surfaces), and client composition itself (unavoidable in portrait on this panel, so it cannot be what distinguishes a torn frame from a clean one). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 21:47:02 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	3e607222c6	Record the Identity screen in the face spec ... Also notes what building it taught the design: a split has to reject before it confirms, or the next clustering pass undoes it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 21:16:04 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	10b10569e2	Add the Identity screen ... A third top-level screen beside the library and develop, because naming a cluster and pulling a stranger out of it are tasks with their own rhythm and need the whole window. The screen is designed around the clustering being wrong, which is FR-CULL-10 rather than pessimism: grouping over-merges on siblings, on parents and children, and on the same person a decade apart. So Split off sits next to Confirm all rather than behind a menu, the confirm/reject pair is on the face itself, and a group the system found is drawn differently from a person the user has vouched for. Splitting rejects before it confirms. Without that the next clustering pass suggests the face straight back and the user's correction becomes an argument they keep having. Face crops come from the proxies the grid already built, one decode per image rather than per face -- a group photograph holding six faces of one family is one JPEG. Where the calibration is not fitted the screen says confidence is unavailable instead of printing a percentage that looks measured, which is FR-CULL-9's rule at the point it becomes visible. The verdict controls use drawn icons, not tick and cross characters: ui/icons.slint exists because those render as tofu on Android. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 21:05:41 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	8ab9440190	Put the repair tool on the photograph ... A third chip beside Crop and Local, and the mode strip's own comment predicted the shape: a mode that arms a gesture on the canvas and scopes the column. Click a mark to cover it, drag the disc to move the repair, drag the source circle to say where the patch comes from, Delete to remove it. The source starts two and a half radii towards the middle of the frame, which is FR-DEV-8's automatic placement in its cheap form — dust sits on skies and skies are smooth, so it is usually right and always one drag from fixed. Two things are drawn deliberately. The circles are the size the repairs actually are, because whether a disc covers a speck is the whole judgement being made and a fixed-size dot would say nothing about it; the reach around them is padded to a touch target so a spot on a dust mark can still be picked up on a phone. And only the selected repair shows its source: a dusty sky carries a dozen, and two dozen circles with nothing saying which belongs to which is less information rather than more. The panel edits what is stored while the canvas draws what is mapped, and the two are pushed separately for that reason — a slider deriving its value from the drawn radius would move differently at different zoom levels. It is also the one panel built from SliderRow rather than a live track: a repair has no OpId to coalesce a drag under, so a row that fires once per gesture is what keeps undo one step per decision. Verified as far as this environment allows: the strip renders and the column re-scopes, photographed under XWayland. Synthetic clicks do not reach this application, so the gestures are as-written rather than as-felt, and docs/spot-removal.md says so. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:58:13 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	2ac069a6b3	Index the library's faces, and group them into people ... Wires dr-face to dr-catalog: a background sweep that reads the proxy the grid already built, detects, aligns, embeds and stores, then a clustering pass that turns those embeddings into suggested people. Detection runs on the Large thumbnail tier and nowhere else. That is what makes the feature affordable -- a browsed library has already paid for its proxies, so face indexing adds no RAW decode that was not already happening -- and it is why an image whose proxy is missing is skipped rather than fetched: requesting one here would put face indexing on the network path FR-CULL-8 keeps it off. The sweep keeps no cursor. It asks the catalog what is missing, so it resumes after process death with no repeated work beyond the in-flight image, and cancelling is dropping the receiver. recluster writes only the suggested half. Confirmed faces go in as anchors and come back untouched, and a cluster of one stays nameless -- naming every stray face would fill the People view with noise the user then has to dismiss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:49:30 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	d06b24c485	Regenerate the traceability matrix after the 0.7.0 work ... Seven more tags -- 621 against 614 -- from the print path, the film table rebuild and the projector lamp. Coverage is unchanged at 51.4% (91/177): the new tags land on requirements that already had one. Nine rows move. As before, the matrix links to line numbers, so a commit that inserts anything above a tag rewrites its row without changing what the row says. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:28:27 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	2958444835	Let undo reach the repairs before the tool can make one ... A history state was a Preset — a map of scalars — which was right while every edit in the graph was a parameter. A spot is not one, and undo is the first thing anyone does with a repair: place it, dislike it, take it back. Left as it was, that press would have stepped some unrelated slider and left the spot on the photograph, which reads as undo being broken rather than as undo being absent. So a state is now the pair, params and spot set. The same door is the one the mask stack will come through: mask edits are outside undo today for exactly this reason, and FR-DEV-5 is not finished until they are not. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:27:34 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	f00b3ae924	Take the tone from the hole and the texture from beside it ... A clone gets the texture right and the level wrong. Dust on a gradient sky is copied from a patch a little lighter than the hole it fills, and the repair reads as a disc even though every grain in it is correct — which is why FR-DEV-8 asks for heal and not only for clone. Heal adds the membrane: the difference between the two neighbourhoods, sampled at twenty-four points around the rim and interpolated across the disc by inverse square distance. Solving the Poisson problem properly is tens of Jacobi iterations, and an iteration here is a dispatch — sixty dispatches to remove a dust spot is not a frame budget. The closed form costs one loop over the rim, no state, and no second pass. The spec called for mean-value weights; inverse squares are two transcendentals per sample cheaper and agree wherever the boundary difference varies smoothly, which is every repair anyone makes. What decides whether that trade holds is the measurement, so the measurement is the test: on a ramp steep enough to leave a clone wrong by 38 levels out of 255, the heal is wrong by 0. docs/spot-removal.md §6.1 records what shipped and what it would take to go back. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:22:10 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	5323608051	Draw the repairs, before anything sharpens what they removed ... A spot set now composes detail passes of its own, one per round, and they go ahead of every operation's kernel. That placement is the decision worth recording: a sharpening pass reads a neighbourhood, so sharpening a dust mark before removing it smears its edge into pixels the repair's disc does not cover, and what survives is a faint over-sharpened ring around an otherwise perfect patch. It also disagrees with ARCH §5.2, which draws spot removal after clarity — docs/spot-removal.md §5.1 is where that is argued out. Every length reaching the shader is in render pixels, converted here where the framing is in scope. Both the centre and the source go through `Framing::output_at` — the same map the fused pass applies to every pixel — so a rotated photograph rotates the offset with no trigonometry, and the radius is found by mapping a point one radius above the centre and measuring, rather than by multiplying by a ratio this function has no business knowing about. The tests turn and crop the frame and expect the mark to stay gone, which is the property that arrangement buys. compose_full now takes the spot set, because a photograph with a repair and no sharpening still has a detail stage: a fused pass that encoded its own output there would quantise twice and bind to a texture of the wrong format. compose_detail_for takes the source size for the same kind of reason — a RenderScale describes the region on screen, and a spot is stored against the photograph. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:17:51 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	00e78dc2ac	Cluster faces into people, and calibrate what a similarity means ... FR-CULL-9 forbids thresholding a bare cosine anywhere in the subsystem, so calibrate fits P(same person) per library and reports whether the fit is trustworthy. Two details carry most of the weight. The fit runs against a 200-bin histogram rather than a pair list: a 25,000-face library has ~3e8 pairs and no gradient descent is running over that. And a fresh library has no valid calibration, because the positives have to come from user confirmations or burst siblings -- bootstrapping them from high cosine would fit the calibration to the belief it was supposed to test. Clustering defends against the over-merging FR-CULL-10 warns about with constraints rather than a better threshold: two faces in one photograph never merge, and two groups confirmed as different people never merge. Average link rather than single link, so one strong edge cannot weld two families together. Calibration is defined once, in dr-face, and dr-catalog re-exports it. Two implementations of one probability model is exactly how a number comes to mean the wrong thing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:10:33 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	aac3136407	Store faces and the people they belong to ... Schema v8: people, faces, face_person, face_person_rejected, and the per-library calibration. Follows catalog.md 10.1 with two additions the spec work turned up. crop_px, because at the 1024px proxy tier a group shot reaches the embedder at ~50 source pixels upsampled to 112 and a portrait at 340. FR-CULL-9 names face size as an axis along which an uncalibrated similarity misbehaves, so it is a stored feature rather than a UI hint. face_person_rejected, because rejection is not the absence of an assignment. Without it the next clustering pass re-suggests exactly the face the user just pushed away, and the tool feels broken. record_detections replaces rather than appends, since DetectFaces is coalesced per image -- and carries confirmations across the replacement by box overlap, so re-indexing with a better model cannot discard the user's own labelling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:02:52 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	6997c0f7ac	Let a detail pass carry a list, not only a kernel ... Every neighbourhood pass so far has been a convolution, whose whole description fits in the uniform block because its structure fixes how many numbers it needs. Spot removal is not that shape: sixty-four repairs and one repair are the same shader with a different buffer behind it. So a pass may declare `storage`, which arrives at binding 3 as `array<vec4<f32>>` with `arrayLength` in scope. The alternative — packing the list into uniforms — needs a fixed maximum paid for on every frame, a composer that can emit vec4 fields because a uniform array's stride is 16 whatever it holds, and it gives the next operation that wants a table nothing to build on. The property worth having is what stays out of the generated source: the count is in the buffer, so placing the tenth spot uploads 512 bytes and reuses the compiled pipeline, exactly as moving a slider does for the fused pass. `changing_the_list_does_not_recompile` is that, asserted. One bind group entry rather than two more layouts, and one placeholder buffer allocated in `new` rather than sixteen bytes per pass per frame — a zero-length storage buffer cannot be bound, and per-frame allocation is what this module's documentation exists to refuse. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 20:00:24 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	19981c1033	Detect, align and embed faces with SCRFD and MobileFaceNet ... Ports the pipeline from the C++ reference in ../scene-actor-extraction (MIT, same author). End to end on real portraits it separates identities the way the reference's fitted calibration says it should: 0.596 between distinct photographs of one person, 0.05 between different people, either side of MBF's 0.267 boundary. Three things are structural rather than incidental: Aligned112 can only be built by align::warp, so Embedder::embed cannot be handed an unaligned bounding-box crop. That mistake yields 512 plausible unit-norm numbers and no error, so the type system refuses it instead. Embedding carries its ModelId and cosine() returns None across models, because a cross-model similarity is the one mistake that produces plausible garbage rather than a failure. The model-free half -- alignment, embedding arithmetic, f16 storage -- sits outside the inference feature and is covered by 11 tests that need no weights on the machine. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 19:57:56 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	44444f7768	Write the repairs down, one line each, and merge them by id ... A spot is eight numbers, so it goes in the version block as a line rather than in a block of its own the way a mask does — sixty-four blocks would bury the rest of the file. A line per spot rather than one line for the set, because the line is what a diff shows and what a merge resolves. The parse arm sits ahead of the op.param arm deliberately: without it, `spot.abc123 = 0.4 0.6 …` reads as an operation called `spot` whose value will not parse, and the repair is dropped with a warning about a corrupt number. The prefix is safe precisely because a spot is not an operation, so no ops/ declaration can claim the name. Merging is merge_masks by id, one level down, and it is where the derived ids earn their keep: two devices that removed different marks hold different ids and both survive, while two that removed the same piece of dust hold the same id and the merge sees the one repair it is. A spot both sides dragged resolves whole to the higher revision — eight numbers describe one disc, and half of each is a repair neither photographer made. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 19:52:54 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	72410f39c6	Answer M1: tract loads both face graphs once their dims are pinned ... Neither InsightFace export parses as shipped -- SCRFD fails at its input node, ArcFace at the first Conv -- which is the same wall dr-segment hit on YOLO's dynamic export. Both load cleanly with the input dims frozen, so the pure-Rust runtime holds for the face pipeline too. tools/fix-face-model-shapes.sh does the freezing, and exists so the artefact is reproducible rather than a binary someone once produced. It takes two forms because the two graphs need different ones: ArcFace's batch is a named dim_param, SCRFD's H and W are dynamic but unnamed. Also notes YuNet loading with no intervention, which matters for the licence question in faces.md 2.3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 19:51:02 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	97479a0512	Hold the repairs a photographer makes, and say which may share a pass ... A spot is a disc, a source offset and four numbers, and it lives beside `ops` for the reason `masks` and `film` do: the operation trait is ParamId -> f32, and a list of repairs is neither scalar nor fixed. Two decisions here are not obvious. The id is derived from the position rather than counted, because two devices editing offline would each mint `spot3` for different marks and the sidecar merge would then treat two repairs as one — from the position, two devices that removed the same piece of dust agree, and two that removed different ones do not. And every length is in the frame's isotropic units, not a mixture of those and shorter-edge fractions: one unit for the radius, the feather and the offset agrees on a landscape frame and on a portrait one, where a mixture only agrees on the first. `rounds` is the arithmetic that keeps a source from reading a destination. Every spot in one pass reads the photograph as it stood before that pass, so a spot sourcing from an earlier spot's destination would copy the mark that spot was removing. Grouping is not a pass per spot — that is sixty-four dispatches for a case that almost never arises — it is a new round only when the sources actually collide. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 19:50:00 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	ec740115b6	Spec the face pipeline on SCRFD and MobileFaceNet ... FR-CULL-8..12 specify the subsystem in terms of "a 512-dimension embedding from a stated model" and stop there, because D13 was open. This names the models, and grounds them in the measurements and the working C++ pipeline in ../scene-actor-extraction rather than in a literature reading. The licensing half of D13 stays open, but with a route through it: the InsightFace weights are non-commercial and cannot be committed, so the app ships the code and the user fetches the model. faces.model_id already makes that a survivable choice. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 19:44:39 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	8d8d6491ad	Say how spot removal is going to work before writing it ... FR-DEV-8 is the last develop requirement with nothing behind it. The pipeline it lands on already has most of the parts — the neighbourhood stage, the mask crate's normalised coordinates, the gradient handles' canvas drags, the merge-by-id rule — so the spec is mostly about the four things that are genuinely new, and about the two places where the obvious implementation is the wrong one: a Poisson solve is sixty dispatches per spot, and a per-frame readback to find out what colour a sky is would undo ARCH §6.1. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 19:43:30 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	b9ee29f3c7	Regenerate the traceability matrix for the Ilford stocks ... Same drift as before and for the same reason: the matrix links to line numbers, and the grain work moved lines in files that carry tags. The stocks bring six new files and ten new tags -- 227 scanned against 221, 614 found against 604 -- all on requirements that were already covered, so coverage is 51.4% (91/177) either side. Twelve rows move and nothing else changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 10:14:29 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	40e6334bb1	Sign the APK with a real key when one is configured ... The APK has been debug-signed with a key generated on the spot, which is right for putting a build on a test device and useless for anything else: a different signature every run, so nothing can ever update in place. Four secrets now select a real signature -- ANDROID_KEYSTORE_BASE64 and its password, alias and key password. The names are JellyTau's, because that repo already signs its Android build this way against this same runner and one convention across both is one thing to remember. Absence of the secrets is not an error. A fork or a branch build has no access to them and should still produce an installable APK, so the debug path stays exactly as it was. The reverse is an error: if a keystore is supplied and cannot be read, the build fails rather than quietly falling back to a debug key, because a release that is silently debug-signed is worse than no release. Passwords reach apksigner and keytool as `env:`, never `pass:`. `pass:` puts the password in the process table for anything on the box to read. The keystore is written to a 0700 mktemp directory and never into the workspace, which is both what actions/cache saves and what the upload step globs. Also: upload-artifact drops from v4 to v3. v4 was a guess about what this Gitea supports. v3 is what JellyTau uploads its APK with on this runner today, which makes it the version known to work rather than the one that ought to. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-26 10:13:50 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	8b07a90e71	Regenerate the traceability matrix the clippy pass moved ... `traceability-check` fails on master: the committed matrix does not match what the generator produces, so the gate that exists to keep the two in step is the thing reporting they are not. Nothing was traced or untraced. Coverage is 51.4% (91/177) before and after, the same 604 tags against the same 177 requirements; every one of the 32 changed rows is a line number that moved when the clippy warnings were cleared -- `adjust.rs:2150` is now 2164, 632 is 651, 751 is 770. The matrix links to lines, so touching a file above a tag rewrites its row without changing what it says. Regenerated with `cargo run -p traceability -- report`, which is what the failing step tells you to run. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 23:21:13 +02:00
dtourolle	6925aa2a86	Merge master into film-simulation ... Master gained the library's index paging while this branch was building the film simulation, and the two met in library_ui.rs. Only the generated traceability matrix conflicted; it is regenerated here rather than hand-resolved, which is what it is for.	2026-08-25 20:34:28 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	6d18517d28	Ship every stock that exists, black and white included ... Three profiles was what the first cut needed to prove the model. This is the rest of the open data: 23 camera stocks and 9 papers, which is all of spektrafilm. Black and white was the gap, and it turned out not to be a gap in the data -- it was a gap in where I looked. Upstream's `main` has 28 colour profiles and nothing monochrome; `dev` has three more, and they are Tri-X, Double-X and the 2302 print film they go onto. So the answer to "do we have B&W" was yes all along, and it needed the dev branch rather than a fortnight digitising Ilford's datasheet graphs by eye. Those three are pinned to `dev` per stock; the colour stocks stay on the released branch. A monochrome profile is single-channel -- one emulsion, not three -- and spreading that one layer across all three is exact rather than an approximation: three layers with identical sensitivity and identical curves respond identically, which is what one layer does. The dye is the trap. The renderer *sums* the three layers' contributions, so replicating it unchanged renders every frame three times too dense -- neutrally, and therefore plausibly. A third each reconstructs the single emulsion, and two tests hold both halves: that the densities stay equal, and that they sum to one emulsion and not three. Double-X and 2302 ship five curves apiece, measured at five development times -- 4 to 12 minutes for Double-X. That is push and pull processing as measured data. The standard 6.5 minutes is what ships; the rest is in the upstream file waiting for a control to ask for it. Two stocks are `support: film` and are nevertheless what a negative is printed *onto*: the cine projection films 2383 and 2393, which the Vision3 stocks print to. Filtering the picker on support alone offered a projection stock as something to load in a camera, so it filters on stage, with a test saying so. The picker had to change shape twice over. Chips were right for three stocks and off the edge of a 280px column at twenty-four, and the column that replaced them was a thousand pixels standing between the photographer and every slider below. It is a disclosure now: one row carrying the answer, opened to change it, closed again on choosing. That is the opposite of the argument this panel used to take the lids off its sliders, and deliberately so -- an instrument you compare wants to be visible, and a list you consult once wants to be out of the way. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 20:30:11 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	3330f350a4	Move the timeline marker from the window the grid already read ... The last of the per-scroll queries, and the strangest of them: this one got slower the further down the library you had scrolled. The marker has to follow every scroll event or it advances in jerks while the photographs beside it move smoothly — that part is right and stays. What was wrong is that each event asked the catalog `LIMIT 1 OFFSET n`, and that is not a seek: SQLite reaches row `n` by producing and discarding the `n` rows before it. 0.02 ms near the top of the library, 0.7 ms at twenty thousand, per row crossed, on the thread drawing the frame. A flick therefore got choppier the longer it went on. The window the grid has already read holds the answer, and since the loaded window now covers the whole view, the row is nearly always in it. So this is a vector index at the position the ordinal has in the window, and the query survives only as the fallback for a row outside it — briefly, after a scrub or a keyboard jump, before the load lands. The fallback is also the less correct of the two, which is worth recording rather than quietly keeping: it counts in a dated-only ordering while the argument is a grid row, so the two disagree wherever undated frames sit in between. It is kept because a marker about to be corrected is not worth a second index, and because being wrong there is what it always did. The window path has no such disagreement — it reads the very cell the row belongs to. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 20:01:51 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	0f231afe85	Stop re-answering questions about the library every time the window moves ... The timeline's bars, the filter chips' counts, the "on this device" count and whether the scoped collection is pinned all describe the *library*. None of them can change because the view scrolled. `load_window` recomputed all four every time the window moved, which is several times per screenful. Together that is a `MIN`/`MAX`, a `GROUP BY`, two counts, and under a collection three more queries — about 8 ms of SQLite on the thread that is trying to draw the frame, for four answers that were already on screen and already right. They are now keyed on what they actually depend on: the scope, the filter, whether this is the trash, and the total. The total earns its place as the change detector as much as for the scrollbar — a scan landing, a delete or a restore all move it, and it was already read on every load. What a total cannot see is a rating edited under an unchanged count. That is covered, and deliberately not by widening the key: `apply_judgement` already refreshes the chips itself, because it has to report what actually landed rather than what was asked for. Same for the axis — a zoom, a pan, a scrub and dates arriving from the thumbnail worker each call `refresh_timeline` directly. Skipping the recompute here cannot leave anything stale on screen. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 20:01:39 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	6d6ef8d34b	Page the grid along an index instead of sorting the library each time ... Scrolling jittered, and this was the largest single reason. Every window the grid loads is `ORDER BY ... LIMIT n OFFSET k`, and neither half of that was being answered the cheap way. **The sort.** `GRID_ORDER` leads with `captured_at IS NULL`, so undated frames fall to the end. No ordinary index answers that — the leading term is an expression, not a column — so SQLite sorted the whole library into a temp b-tree on every window read, then threw away the first `k` rows of it. Schema V7 indexes the expression exactly as the query writes it, partial on the same `shadowed_by IS NULL AND trashed_at IS NULL` the grid filters by, so the read becomes a walk along the index. **The join.** `LEFT JOIN remote` was paged *after* it was joined, so reading 280 cells at offset 20,000 first seeked into `remote` for all 24,000 rows and then discarded 23,720 of them. The file ids are now fetched for the 280 rows that survived — the shape the badge and rating reads already use, one query for the window rather than one per cell. Measured together on 24,000 images at offset 20,000: **15.2 ms → 0.36 ms**, inside a scroll handler that has 16.7 ms to draw a frame. The test asserts on the query plan rather than on a duration, because there is no other symptom. A `GRID_ORDER` edited out of step with the index, or a column added back that drags `remote` in again, both still return exactly the right cells — just after sorting the library — and the jitter would come back with nothing to point at. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 20:01:04 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	baa8957e80	Let a photographer choose the film, and remember which one ... The stock model rendered correctly and nothing could ask for it. This is the picker, and the sidecar key that makes the choice outlive the session. How the choice persists was the open question, and the answer was already written down twice in sidecar.rs: `rating` is a top-level key "because a rating is not an edit", and `masks` are one "because a layer is not a scalar". A stock is that kind of thing -- a choice of material, not a number a slider moves -- so it is a top-level key too. It stores the **id**, not an index. Stocks are files that users add, so an index would mean installing a profile silently changed which film every existing photograph had been developed on. A name this build has no profile for still round-trips untouched, because the alternative is that syncing to an older phone quietly un-develops the picture. Only the names travel. Turning one back into tables needs the profile database, which dr-pipeline deliberately does not link, so `Version::apply` clears the film and the session re-bakes -- after the parameters, because the bake reads the film's own exposure sliders and the print balance is solved against them. That is also why moving those sliders rebuilds the lookup where no other control in the panel does: an enlarger's filtration depends on how the negative was exposed. The panel keeps its rule. It still names no operation and still generates every control from a declared parameter kind; the stock gets a bespoke control beside those, exactly as the mask stack does, and for the same reason. The film's exposure and print exposure arrive as ordinary generated sliders. Two defaults worth stating. Picking a colour negative prints it, because an unprinted one is an orange strip and offering that as the first thing somebody sees after choosing Portra reads as a bug rather than as a choice -- the toggle is there for anyone who wants the scan. And a paste carries no film: a preset is a parameter map, and a stock is not a parameter, so pasting one would paste a choice the clipboard never took. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 19:57:41 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	4a2fcb6d22	Render a film stock on the GPU, and let it take over the rendering ... The stock model landed in dr-film with no way to see it. This is the pipeline node, the two texture bindings it reads, and the end-to-end test that proves the shader agrees with the model. The design point is that a film simulation is not an adjustment. Every other node changes a picture; this one makes it. A stock's characteristic curve does the camera profile's base curve's job -- from measurements rather than from a curve somebody drew -- so running both renders the scene twice: the camera's rendering, and then a film's rendering of that. It looks like neither, and it reads as a colour-management bug with no colour-management bug to find. So `Operation::renders` is new. A node declaring it takes camera RGB and hands back linear sRGB, and the composer emits neither the base curve nor the conversion out of camera space. Both halves move together, and the composer keeps them as one string precisely so that getting half of it right is impossible. The tables are not parameters, for the reason vignetting's coefficients are not: they are measurements. dr-pipeline declares the layout as a plain struct and keeps its no-dependency property; the two crates share no types on purpose. `EditGraph::set_film_tables` offers them to every node rather than to the one that wants them, because knowing which concrete type is which is what the graph is organised not to know. Bindings 4 and 5 follow the masks precedent: declared unconditionally so one bind group layout serves every generated shader, bound to 1x1 placeholders when no stock is loaded. Both are interpolated by hand with textureLoad -- this pipeline binds no sampler, and adding one for two lookups would cost a binding in every shader. Uploads are keyed on content so an unchanged stock does not push half a megabyte across the bus per frame. The end-to-end test earned its place immediately: it found the density lookup being filled z-fastest while a 3D texture upload wants x-fastest, so the red and blue axes were transposed. Green matched exactly, which is what that bug looks like -- a plausible photograph of the wrong colour, and one that every unit test on either side of the seam passes. dr-film now pins the layout in a test that needs no device, and states it where the field is declared. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 15:12:56 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	b6a95e1965	Simulate a film stock from its measurements, not from someone's grade ... FR-DEV-3f asks for look emulation and proposes HaldCLUT import to inherit the free film-simulation ecosystem. This takes the other road for the stocks where the measurements exist: run the physics. A stock here is its manufacturer's own datasheet -- spectral sensitivity, characteristic curves, dye densities. Light exposes three emulsion layers, the layers develop to densities, the densities are dyes that absorb, and what is left is what reaches the eye. A colour negative comes out orange and upside down because that is what a colour negative is; it becomes a photograph when a paper profile prints it, with the enlarger's filtration solved rather than dialled. What that buys over a LUT is that the parameters stay physical. Opening up a stop moves the picture along the film's real characteristic curve, shoulder and all, instead of scaling a number baked at one exposure. The data cost runs the other way too: a stock is 17 kB of published measurements where one HaldCLUT is 800 kB of one person's grade. It looks like it needs a spectral integration per pixel. It does not, and that is the whole design: - Exposure is a 3x3 matrix. The reconstructed scene spectrum is linear in the sRGB triple, so the integral collapses into nine numbers, exactly -- no approximation. - The characteristic curve is three 1D functions, sampled exactly. - Everything after that -- dye absorption, the print through the negative, the paper, the viewing illuminant, the adaptation -- takes exactly three numbers in, so it bakes into one 32^3 lookup. Per pixel: a matrix multiply, three curve taps, one fetch. Splitting the curve out of the 3D lookup rather than baking one LUT over exposure is measured, not assumed: the curve carries the sharp shape and the dye mixing is smooth, so folding them together would need three times the resolution for the same error. At 32^3 the worst error is 0.003 in linear sRGB, under one 8-bit code value, and a test says so. No wgpu dependency, deliberately, and the same isolation argument dr-lens makes: the model is plain f32 with a documented layout, so every property worth asserting is asserted on the CPU. Binding it to a texture is dr-gpu's job and is not done here yet. The expected values in tests/ came from a Python prototype running against a different colour-science stack. Agreement to three decimals is evidence about the model rather than about one implementation of it -- a transposed matrix or a mispasted observer row would pass every unit test and fail that one. Profiles are converted from spektrafilm by Andrea Volpato, CC BY-SA 4.0. The converter is in the tree and runnable, so what was changed from upstream is auditable rather than taken on trust; profiles/CHANGELOG.txt records it, including the one deliberate deviation -- Mallett & Yuksel's 1 kB basis instead of Hanatos's 4 MB table, which costs accuracy at the gamut edge and saves four megabytes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-25 14:44:54 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	7c8e433911	Load the window around the whole view, not around its first cell ... The bottom row of the grid was often blank, at a scroll position the user could sit at indefinitely. Two numbers decided when the loaded window follows the view, they lived in different languages, and they disagreed. The grid loaded three screenfuls and Rust held the window still until the first visible cell was three quarters of the way through them. Three quarters of three screenfuls is 2.25, and the view itself is one screenful tall — so the bottom of the screen had already travelled a quarter of a screenful past the last loaded cell before anything moved. Those rows are not in the model, so nothing is drawn for them. The same margin was wrong upward, and exactly so. The window is placed a quarter of itself behind the view, and the margin then declared the view too close to the top at precisely that distance: every single row scrolled upward re-read the catalog, rebuilt all 360 cells and re-queried their badges and ratings, and so did the row after it. So the grid now reports what it shows — a screenful, counting the row the scroll position has cut in half, which `visible-rows` alone undercounts and which is exactly the row reported missing — and Rust owns the rest: four screenfuls loaded, placed a quarter back, and moved once the view comes within half a screenful of an edge of them. One decision in one place, and the test now walks the view the length of the library and asserts the window covers it at every step. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-24 19:48:58 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	33847a0bbc	Open one GPU device for the tests, and stop the checkout dying over LFS ... Two CI failures, unrelated except that both were mine. **The test binary faulted under parallel threads.** Every GPU test opened its own `GpuContext`, and `cargo test` runs on as many threads as there are cores — so a full run asked the driver to bring up a dozen Vulkan devices at once and died with SIGSEGV. Serially it passed, which made it look like flakiness rather than a fault in the harness. One device now, behind a `OnceLock`: a `GpuContext` is an `Arc<Device>` and an `Arc<Queue>`, so sharing it is a refcount, and the losers of the race block until the winner is done. 416 tests now pass in parallel, in half the time twenty-six devices took. **`lfs: true` on the checkout made the checkout fail.** The intent was right — the model is in LFS, a plain checkout writes a 133-byte pointer, and the build script panics on it — but on this server `git lfs fetch` is rejected at `/info/lfs/objects/<oid>` with a client error: the credential `actions/checkout` installs for git is not one the LFS endpoint accepts. So a fetch problem presented as a checkout problem and took the whole job with it. The object is on the server; a clean clone over SSH with `git lfs install --local` pulls all 11 MB of it. It is now its own step with an explicit token, and `continue-on-error` so a credential problem cannot masquerade as a broken checkout — if it fails, the build still runs and fails with the build script's own message, which names the real problem. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-24 19:36:34 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	6b5ffc6a93	Anchor the delete on what the view was showing, not on the window's start ... The grid still jumped. Anchoring on `offset` was wrong for a reason this file already states, a few hundred lines away: "the first *visible* ordinal, not the window's start: the loaded window deliberately begins a quarter of a screen above the view, so its first cell is one the user cannot see." Two things made `offset` the wrong number. It is a screen-quarter above what is being looked at, and by the point this runs it has already been re-clamped against the new, smaller total — so seeking to it moved the view somewhere the photographer had not been. A smaller jump than the original, and the same fault. `resume_at` is what the grid last reported as its first visible image, which is the photograph the person is actually looking at. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-23 19:38:27 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	cd64166b15	Keep the view on the photographs after some of them are deleted ... Deleting made the grid go blank and jump somewhere arbitrary. Two causes, both of them the viewport being left behind by everything else that moved. The Flickable is sized to the *whole* library so its scrollbar is a real address into twenty thousand images. Delete some and that content gets shorter, which leaves a view near the end scrolled past what now exists — cells sitting above a viewport looking at empty space. Slint does not pull a Flickable back on its own. (The clamp for that went in with the previous commit.) The jump is the other half. Cells are drawn at their absolute place in the library, `(i + offset) / columns`, and a delete re-clamps `offset` downward so the loaded window still fills. Nothing touches `viewport-y`, so the same scroll position now addresses different photographs and the grid appears to leap somewhere unrelated. `restore_position` re-anchors on the ordinal the view was showing, clamped into what is left. Not on the deleted image's own position, which no longer exists, and not on the top of the library, which would throw the scroll position away on every delete — after removing one frame from a wall of twenty thousand, the one you want next is the one that just moved into its place. Only on a shrink, and the shrink is detected by reading `library-total` before overwriting it. Re-anchoring on every load would fight a scrub, which sets exactly this property to go where the user asked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-23 19:03:15 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	fa4ad6e2d6	Drag the date range on the axis it is chosen from ... The range could be turned on with a finger and not aimed with one. Its two ends were typed as `YYYY-MM-DD` into 108px fields behind a soft keyboard, to name days already drawn on the axis a thumb away; and the chip that seeds them takes its span from the timeline's zoom and pan, which are a wheel and a middle button. A touch screen has neither, so on Android the filter was a switch with no aim. The band is now on the timeline. Two ends with grips, dragged along the bars, released to filter — the histogram was already how a period is found, and this makes it how a period is stated. Both ends snap to whole days, which is what the typed fields mean, what `show_range` reads back out, and a floor under a range dragged shut. The fields stay for what dragging cannot do: name an exact day, and say in words what the range is. For that to work the axis had to stop following the range. Redrawn to the band, it moved the ground under the very handles doing the narrowing, and there was nothing outside the range left to widen back into. While there: a fixed number of equal bins instead of calendar buckets. Between one calendar unit and the next the bar count is free to wander by a factor of twelve, so zooming in halved it two steps out of three — the same picture drawn wider until it jumped back to fine. Equal bins also include the empty ones, so a bar's position on the track and the date under it are finally the same quantity; before, a library with gaps drew a February six months wide and the marker, the band and a click all pointed somewhere else. The count is a setting, 32 or 64, because the right answer is a question about the screen. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-23 18:42:42 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	b0b6dd559a	Show what is selected, and let a collection be made of it ... Three things a selection needed and did not have. **Seeing it.** The count existed — "12 selected" — in the header row, which scrolls sideways. On a tablet it sat past the right-hand edge along with every button beside it, so a selection was something you could make and then not see. A selection you cannot see is one you act on by accident. **Putting it down.** The only way to clear one was "Done", which also leaves select mode — so after filing forty photographs the next forty began by re-entering a mode the user had not meant to leave. Clearing is now its own action and keeps the mode. **Filing it somewhere new.** Making a collection of a selection took four steps: create one, find it in the tree, select the photographs again because creating it changed the scope, then add them. It is one press, which is how a selection is usually meant — it is gathered *because* it is going somewhere. The new collection is created at the top level rather than inside the current scope, unlike the tree's "+". A selection can be gathered from anywhere, including across collections, so filing it under whichever one happens to be open would put it somewhere its contents did not come from. It opens straight into its name field, for the reason `collection_new` already does: the placeholder name is nobody's choice, and making the user find the rename afterwards is asking them to finish a job we started. All of it on its own strip beside the date range's, appearing only while there is a selection — the third control this session that was invisible for being put in a row that scrolls. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-23 17:57:35 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	f9c7aba8b6	Regenerate the traceability matrix ... Six commits added nineteen TRACES tags between them and none regenerated the matrix, so the gate failed on every one of them — including the commit the release tag points at. The gate is doing its job: a matrix that disagrees with the tree is worse than none, because it is read as current. Coverage is unchanged at 50.3%; what moved is where each requirement is tagged, which is the half of the file that is actually consulted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-23 15:00:45 +02:00