Files
DarkRoom/CONTRIBUTING.md
dtourolle f9154ad12e Name the verdict check among the invariants the build defends
2cde2874 made `cargo test -p traceability` fail on any write of a
rating, flag, colour label or trash membership that is not on a
reviewed list, and CONTRIBUTING.md, which lists what CI will stop a
change for, did not mention it. It is now the third invariant beside
the ui-names-no-operation test and the operation schema: what it finds,
the kinds of reason a write can be listed with, that the workspace test
run is what runs it, and `traceability -- verdicts` to print the list.
2026-09-27 07:59:38 -04:00

209 lines
9.3 KiB
Markdown

# Contributing to DarkRoom
There is a lot of documentation here — twenty-odd documents and 192 numbered
requirements — and almost all of it is written for someone who has already
decided to work on this. This file is the other thing: how to get a first
change landed without reading any of it.
## The shortest useful contribution
**A develop operation is one file.** Not one file plus a registration, plus a
shader edit, plus a control in the UI — one file:
```
core/dr-pipeline/ops/split_toning.yaml
```
`build.rs` finds it with `read_dir`, compiles it into Rust implementing
`Operation`, and from there it is indistinguishable from a hand-written node.
It arrives with controls built from its declared parameter kinds, a place in
the chain from `order:`, a place in the panel from `attributes:`, sidecar
persistence, and its own tests — which are declared in the same file and run
under `cargo test`.
Read [`core/dr-pipeline/ops/README.md`](core/dr-pipeline/ops/README.md) and
copy [`exposure.yaml`](core/dr-pipeline/ops/exposure.yaml). Split toning,
colour zones, selective colour and channel-mixer variants are all pure point
operations, which means all of them are declarations rather than code.
If you want to understand one thing about the architecture before starting,
make it this: **the core describes its capabilities and the interface composes
them.** No code in `ui/` names an operation, and a test enforces that
(`ui/dr-ui/tests/ui_names_no_operation.rs`). It is why your node needs no UI
change.
## Getting it to build
**Git LFS is required.** Model weights are stored in LFS, and a clone made
without it leaves a ~130-byte text pointer where an 11 MB model should be:
```bash
git lfs install && git lfs pull
```
Forget this and `dr-segment`'s build script stops with an instruction rather
than embedding the pointer and failing at inference time — but it is easier to
run the two commands now.
**The toolchain pins itself.** `rust-toolchain.toml` selects 1.92.0 and rustup
fetches it on first use. Do not override it; `cargo fmt` and `clippy` are both
version-sensitive and CI runs exactly this version.
**System packages.** Slint and winit need these at build time. On Debian or
Ubuntu:
```bash
sudo apt-get install pkg-config libfontconfig1-dev libxkbcommon-dev
```
**Then:**
```bash
cargo run -p darkroom-desktop
```
The first build resolves some 850 crates and takes a while — on a laptop, long
enough to look like a hang. It is not one.
Android is a containerised toolchain and is not needed for most work; see
[`docker/android/README.md`](docker/android/README.md) if you get there.
## What CI will check
All four of these run on every push, so run them before you send anything:
```bash
cargo fmt --all -- --check
cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -D warnings
cargo test --workspace
cargo build --workspace --release
```
GPU tests skip themselves where there is no adapter rather than failing — a
test that cannot run is not evidence either way — so a green run on a machine
without a GPU is expected, and does not mean the GPU paths were exercised.
There is a fifth check, and it is not in that list because you are unlikely to
break it by accident:
```bash
cargo run --release -p dr-bench -- check
```
That is the benchmark suite (`docs/dev/requirements.md` §8), which builds a
synthetic 50,000-image catalog and fails the build if a performance target is
missed or a measurement has drifted past its tolerance. It runs on every push in
its own workflow. [`docs/dev/benchmarks.md`](docs/dev/benchmarks.md) says what it
measures, what it deliberately does not, and how to read a failure. If you have
touched the catalog, the decoder, the thumbnail store or the exporter, run it
before you send.
## Requirements and traceability
[`requirements.md`](docs/dev/requirements.md) is the register of record.
[`traceability.md`](docs/dev/traceability.md) is generated from `TRACES:` tags in
the source and must never be hand-edited:
```rust
// TRACES: FR-DEV-3a | FR-DEV-3c
```
Tags are read from `.rs`, `.slint`, `.wgsl` and `.yaml` — the last so a
declared operation can record the requirement it satisfies, since the Rust it
generates lands in `OUT_DIR` and is not scanned.
A pre-commit hook regenerates the matrix and stages it whenever you touch
something that can carry a tag, so you should not have to think about it. If
you do need to run it by hand:
```bash
cargo run -p traceability -- report
```
Note that it tracks line numbers, so a change that only moves code still moves
the matrix. Never regenerate it with a stale prebuilt binary.
**One convention that the tooling cannot enforce.** A tag proves that a tag
exists, not that the code under it does the thing — `docs/dev/code-health.md`
CH-4 has the details, and two requirements currently read as covered on the
strength of plumbing a future feature would use. So: **close a requirement
with a test that would fail if the behaviour were removed.** Coverage that
moves slowly and means something beats coverage that moves quickly.
**Keys and gestures are held the same way.** A key handler in Slint compares
one canonical chord, `Keys.chord(event) == "Ctrl+Z"`, under a `// KEYMAP:`
comment naming its section of the gesture book, and every key it binds must be
named by a `GESTURE:` block beside it. `cargo run -p traceability -- gestures`
regenerates [`docs/gestures.md`](docs/gestures.md) and the in-app help sheet
from those blocks; `-- gestures-check` fails when a handler binds a key no tag
names, or a tag names a key no handler binds. A `manual:` field in a block
links the gesture to a section of the manual, and a heading that is not there
fails the scan.
**The manual is checked too.** `docs/manual/index.html` is rendered from
`docs/manual/README.md` by `-- manual` and `-- manual-check` fails when they
differ; `tools/manual/record.sh --check` fails when the manual shows a picture
no scene in `tools/manual/scenes.py` makes. If you change what a pictured
screen looks like, [`tools/manual`](tools/manual/README.md) says how to record
it again. The pre-commit hook regenerates the matrix, the gesture book and the
page; CI runs all three checks.
## Three invariants the build defends
Worth knowing before you trip one, because each failure names a requirement
rather than a line:
- **No operation may be named in `ui/`** (FR-DEV-3a). Special-casing one
operation in the panel to fix a layout problem is how a generated interface
stops being generated. If a node needs presentation the panel cannot give it,
the answer is a `presentation:` hint in the declaration and a `WidgetKind`,
not a branch in `develop.rs`.
- **The operation schema rejects ambiguity at build time**: a duplicate
`order:`, a filename disagreeing with its `id:`, a default outside its own
range, an expression naming something that is not a parameter. Each error
names the key you got wrong and exits rather than panicking.
- **No verdict is written without a user action** (FR-CULL-13). A rating,
flag, colour label or trash membership is the photographer's to set, never a
signal's. `tools/traceability/src/verdicts.rs` finds every write of one in
the shipped code — the catalog setters, SQL that assigns those columns, the
sidecar's judgement amendment — and holds each to a reviewed list with its
reason: inside a Slint `on_*` callback, writing for callers that are checked
in turn, or carrying a verdict made elsewhere, such as a sidecar pull or the
sync merge. A new write fails `cargo test` (the `traceability` crate's tests,
part of the workspace run) until it is listed, and so does a listed one that
has gone; `cargo run -p traceability -- verdicts` prints the list.
## Commit messages
Imperative subject describing the change from the reader's side — "Offer the
merge when two people turn out to share a name", not "fix: merge dialog". No
conventional-commits prefixes.
The body is where the reasoning goes, and it is expected to be substantial when
the change is. This codebase records *why* far more than most, in commits and
in comments alike, and that is the single habit most worth adopting: the
constraint you worked around is invisible to whoever reads the diff next.
One commit per change. If you fixed two things, that is two commits.
## Where to read next, in order
| Document | Read it when |
|---|---|
| [`core/dr-pipeline/ops/README.md`](core/dr-pipeline/ops/README.md) | Adding or changing a develop operation — start here regardless |
| [`docs/dev/architecture.md`](docs/dev/architecture.md) | Anything touching the render path, catalog or sync |
| [`docs/dev/code-health.md`](docs/dev/code-health.md) | Deciding what to work on; grades each seam by what it costs |
| [`docs/dev/benchmarks.md`](docs/dev/benchmarks.md) | A change that could plausibly cost time or memory |
| [`docs/dev/technical-debt.md`](docs/dev/technical-debt.md) | Something looks wrong — check it was not chosen |
| [`docs/dev/distribution.md`](docs/dev/distribution.md) | Packaging a build, or adding a permission to one |
| [`docs/dev/requirements.md`](docs/dev/requirements.md) | Reference, not reading |
`technical-debt.md` is the one to check before "fixing" anything surprising.
It records compromises that were deliberate, each with the reasoning and a
falsifiable condition for when it stops being one — the point being that you
can tell a constraint from an accident without asking.
## Licence
GPL-3.0-or-later. By contributing you agree your work is licensed the same way.