dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 0b20436445 Prove the plateau pass does nothing, and stop paying for it
Picks up the lower-completion work a crashed session left mid-debug, with one
failing test and no diagnosis.

The diagnosis is that the pass is a no-op. Not "does not reduce basin count" —
it changes *no pixel's basin at all*, zero of 9216, comparing one plateau
iteration against sixty-four. That assertion is the substance of this commit:
the original test asserted a consequence (fewer basins) which a working pass
need not produce, so it could have been satisfied by weakening it. A no-op
check cannot pass vacuously, and it is what turned an opinion into a fact.

Three candidate causes were tried and none was it. Exact float equality is
genuinely wrong and is fixed regardless — a gradient computed from 8-bit
samples is never exactly equal across a region the eye calls flat, so `==`
never fires and `<` fires everywhere; `LEVEL_EPS` now sits behind all three
comparisons. The test image is not it either: a flat disc, a terraced disc and
a constant-slope ramp all behave the same.

The finding worth keeping is about the domain rather than the code. On a
gradient-magnitude watershed every flat region of the picture is at gradient
zero, the global minimum, and a plateau with no descending exit is a minimum —
one basin already, nothing to resolve. The plateaux lower-completion is defined
for are regions of constant non-zero gradient, which are rarer in a photograph
than F1's phrasing implies. That may be the whole answer, or it may be hiding
a fourth cause; I could not close it.

So `plateau_iterations` defaults to 0. The implementation stays, correct as
far as it goes and costing nothing until someone finishes it; the test stays,
ignored with its reason; docs/segmentation.md §12 records what was ruled out so
the next attempt starts further along than this one did.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 12:25:28 +02:00
2026-08-12 22:16:15 +02:00
2026-08-16 22:26:37 +02:00

DarkRoom

A cross-platform, non-destructive RAW photo editor for Linux and Android.

Status: early. v0.1 is a remote library viewer — see docs/milestone-v0.1.md.

Documentation

Document Contents
requirements.md What the software must do — 122 numbered requirements
architecture.md How it is built — crates, GPU pipeline, data model, sync
milestone-v0.1.md The first buildable milestone

Building

Desktop:

cargo run -p darkroom-desktop

Android (containerised toolchain, see docker/android):

./docker/android/build.sh cargo ndk -t arm64-v8a build --release

Current state

Working: workspace, GPU context and compute pass, adaptive Slint shell, Android cross-compilation of the core crates.

Not yet working: the zero-copy display path. The build currently uploads frames through the CPU, which is exactly what ARCH §6.1 forbids — measured at 96% of frame time at 4K. Replacing it is spike S1, the project's highest priority.

cargo run -p dr-gpu --example bench --features readback

reproduces that measurement.

Licence

GPL-3.0-or-later.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme GPL-3.0
1 GiB
2026-10-07 11:27:59 +00:00
Languages
Rust 86.1%
Slint 10.3%
Python 1.1%
Shell 1%
WGSL 0.9%
Other 0.6%