Three places, because the finding has three audiences.
The display spec's §1 table said FR-DSP-3 was unmeasured and FR-DSP-5 untagged.
Both are now false, and §2's decision rule has fired. The body of §2 is left as
written with the verdict quoted above it: a plan overtaken by its own evidence
reads better in order than quietly edited into agreement with the outcome.
TD-4 is the stage that misses the budget. Clarity's kernel is a fraction of the
frame, so it reaches a 52-pixel radius at 4K and costs 34 ms — seven times the
entire fused chain, for one slider. It is debt rather than a bug because the
detail stage cannot yet write a target smaller than it reads, which
`local_contrast`'s own documentation has said since it was written. The entry
says plainly that tiles are the wrong tool for it, since that is exactly the
conclusion a reader arriving from ARCH §5.3 would otherwise draw.
TD-5 is the one nobody was looking for: composing the fused shader costs
2.8–5.2 ms of CPU per frame on a full chain, on the UI thread, which at
1920x1200 is more than the dispatch it precedes. The source depends only on the
graph's structure — what `structure_hash` already identifies and what does not
move during a drag — so the fix is the cache `AdjustPass` already keeps for
compiled pipelines, one level up.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
2e6825ded0