dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
5e4c7424ed
FR-DEV-3a is the property the declarative pipeline rests on: a node in `ops/` is one file because nothing in `ui/` has to learn about it. It was true — all fifteen ids grepped across `ui/` yield one hit, a localisation test — and it was held by discipline alone. That is the wrong mechanism for it. The failure is silent and cumulative: special-casing one operation to fix a layout problem is defensible on its own, and by the fifth the panel names half the chain and "a new operation is one file" has stopped being true without any single commit having broken it. Nothing would have told us. The ids are read from `ops/*.yaml` rather than listed, so a node added tomorrow is covered without anyone remembering this file — the same reason `traceability` parses its denominators from `requirements.md` at run time. Two decisions worth recording, because both are the difference between a test that holds and one that gets deleted: **Only string literals count.** `texture`, `contrast` and `clarity` are also ordinary graphics and English terms, and `texture` appears throughout `dr-ui` meaning a GPU texture. Matching bare words would fail constantly for reasons unrelated to the invariant. **`#[cfg(test)]` items are exempt, and finding them needs more care than it looks.** The first version cut each file at the first textual match of `#[cfg(test)]`, which in `develop.rs` is a *doc comment discussing the attribute* at line 969 — it read 18% of the most important file in the scan and passed. It now matches the attribute only as a whole line and skips the item by brace depth, and `MIN_SHIPPING_FRACTION` fails the test outright if the scan ever swallows the file again. The dangerous failure here is not a false alarm, which someone investigates; it is examining nothing and reporting success. Verified both ways: it passes on the tree, and an `"exposure"` planted at develop.rs:3635 — past two `#[cfg(test)]` attributes, exactly where the first version was blind — fails with the file, the line and the reason. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
DarkRoom
A cross-platform, non-destructive RAW photo editor for Linux and Android.
Status: early. v0.1 is a remote library viewer — see docs/milestone-v0.1.md.
Documentation
| Document | Contents |
|---|---|
| requirements.md | What the software must do — 122 numbered requirements |
| architecture.md | How it is built — crates, GPU pipeline, data model, sync |
| milestone-v0.1.md | The first buildable milestone |
| faces.md | Face detection and identity — the models, the licence problem, and what S14 measures |
Building
Desktop:
cargo run -p darkroom-desktop
Android (containerised toolchain, see docker/android):
./docker/android/build.sh cargo ndk -t arm64-v8a build --release
Current state
Working: workspace, GPU context and compute pass, adaptive Slint shell, Android cross-compilation of the core crates.
Not yet working: the zero-copy display path. The build currently uploads frames through the CPU, which is exactly what ARCH §6.1 forbids — measured at 96% of frame time at 4K. Replacing it is spike S1, the project's highest priority.
cargo run -p dr-gpu --example bench --features readback
reproduces that measurement.
Licence
GPL-3.0-or-later.