dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
cafa63ca6f
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 21m53s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 28s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 32s
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Failing after 53m45s
The column was 280px, a number chosen for a tablet, with 380px bolted on later for a desktop. Both were guesses at how much room the widest row inside needs, and a guess is what cannot work here: the mode strip is one chip per attribute the *operation set declares*, so the row is generated and no constant in app.slint can track it. When the guess came up short the failure was not a tidy clip. The Flickable inside the column never had its `viewport-width` set, so the viewport took its content's preferred width, and a viewport wider than its Flickable is *centred* in it — the same rule the note on the seam's `x: 0` already records a few lines below. So the column lost half of each edge rather than one of them: "HISTOGRAM" read "ISTOGRAM", "Straighten" read "aighten", Copy sat centred while Paste ran off the far side. It looked like a rendering fault and it was an alignment one. So the column asks instead of guessing. Every panel that can appear in it — image, histogram, geometry, settings transfer, masks, repairs, adjust, history — now publishes a `content-width`: how wide it has to be before it starts clipping itself, read off its own layout rather than asserted. Each declares that as its `min-width` too, and that is what makes the aggregation automatic: `column` is a layout, so it already reports the largest minimum among its children, and it does so for the panels that come and go with the mode as well, which live inside `if`s and cannot be named from outside. Grep `content-width` in ui/dr-ui/ui to see every panel with a say in the answer. The mode strip is named explicitly only because it is pinned outside that layout, so nothing else measures it. There is no floor left. A floor is one more guess and the panels state their own minimums now. The only thing still above the measurement is `panel-max-width`, which is not a size but a policy — a column may not take the window from the photograph it exists to serve — and it comes from Rust beside `layout-class` because a width read from `root.width` inside the layout that `root.width` depends on is a binding loop. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
DarkRoom
A cross-platform, non-destructive RAW photo editor for Linux and Android.
Status: early. v0.1 is a remote library viewer — see docs/milestone-v0.1.md.
Documentation
| Document | Contents |
|---|---|
| requirements.md | What the software must do — 122 numbered requirements |
| architecture.md | How it is built — crates, GPU pipeline, data model, sync |
| milestone-v0.1.md | The first buildable milestone |
| faces.md | Face detection and identity — the models, the licence problem, and what S14 measures |
Building
Desktop:
cargo run -p darkroom-desktop
Android (containerised toolchain, see docker/android):
./docker/android/build.sh cargo ndk -t arm64-v8a build --release
Current state
Working: workspace, GPU context and compute pass, adaptive Slint shell, Android cross-compilation of the core crates.
Not yet working: the zero-copy display path. The build currently uploads frames through the CPU, which is exactly what ARCH §6.1 forbids — measured at 96% of frame time at 4K. Replacing it is spike S1, the project's highest priority.
cargo run -p dr-gpu --example bench --features readback
reproduces that measurement.
Licence
GPL-3.0-or-later.