The grid fetches a preview only for cells that are actually browsed, which is
the right posture over a link that must not be saturated to show one screen
(FR-NC-3). The cost is that the thumbnail store ends up holding the fraction of
the library someone happened to scroll past — and that store is the one derived
thing worth syncing, since a second device that downloads the shards gets a
full grid without touching a single RAW. So the complete set is worth an hour
of range fetches paid once, deliberately, on a machine that can afford it.
That is what this adds: a pass over every visible image with an `oc:fileid`,
launched from the settings page and reported in the activity register like
every other background job. The work list is what the store lacks rather than a
flag in the catalog, so it is resumable by construction and safe to press
twice.
Lane-parallel like the metadata sweep, but it does what that sweep declined to.
The store is `&mut` and cannot cross lanes, which is why dating the library
skips thumbnails entirely; here the lanes fetch, decode and *encode*, and only
the ~20 KB result crosses back to the one thread that owns the store and writes
the chunk. The parallelism is real and the single-writer rule is not bent.
Grid class only. The large class is ~860 MB of shards against ~200 MB on the
reference library, paid by every device that syncs them; a photograph looked at
closely still gets its large thumbnail from the interactive path.
Dates come free — the header a preview needs is the header EXIF lives in — and
the pass ends by pushing the shards to the server. A filled store that never
leaves this device would be most of the cost for none of the point.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
d91f1ec277