dtourolleandClaude Opus 5 f5edd49b6b Let a manual collection be put in the order it is meant to be seen in
`collection_members.position` and `Sort::CollectionPosition` have been in the
catalog since collections were, and nothing above dr-catalog has ever written
or read either: `collections::set_order` had no callers, and the grid ordered
everything by capture time whatever it was scoped to — dr-ui does not construct
a `Query` at all, it has its own `GRID_ORDER` constant. So a manual collection
was a set with an order nobody could see or change.

Three pieces, because it could not be fewer:

`grid_order_for` decides the ordering from the scope, and both readers take it
from there. That is the load-bearing part. An ordinal only names a photograph
relative to an ordering, so the window read and the span read have to agree —
a shift-click resolved through a different ORDER BY than the cells were drawn
with selects a different run than the one on screen, and the user finds out
when the export runs. `read_ids_span` already stated that invariant about
`GRID_ORDER`; this widens it to an ordering that depends on the scope.

Only a single manual collection has one. A set draws its descendants' images
too, and two children's positions are unrelated integers that interleave
arbitrarily; a smart collection has no member rows to carry a position at all.
Both fall back to capture time and refuse the drop rather than pretending.

The drop is on the cell, on whichever half of it the finger landed — the
trailing edge is the only way to name the last place in a collection, since
there is no cell beyond the last one to drop in front of.

`reordered` is pure and the membership is rewritten whole. `set_order` sets the
positions it is given and leaves the rest, so a partial write would interleave
the moved run with rows nobody touched; and it is read unfiltered, so what the
filter is hiding keeps its place relative to what the user can see.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 23:18:06 +02:00
2026-08-26 10:08:51 +02:00

DarkRoom

A cross-platform, non-destructive RAW photo editor for Linux and Android.

Status: 0.9.0, and no longer a spike. A library opens, culls, develops and exports on both platforms, across eight tagged releases. What is not built is written down rather than merely absent — see docs/outstanding.md for the requirements that have no implementation and why, and docs/technical-debt.md for the compromises that were chosen.

Documentation

Document Contents
CONTRIBUTING.md How to land a first change without reading the rest
requirements.md What the software must do — 179 numbered requirements
architecture.md How it is built — crates, GPU pipeline, data model, sync
technical-debt.md Compromises taken deliberately, each with the condition that retires it
outstanding.md What is not built, and whether that is a decision or a gap
code-health.md What a contribution costs, per seam, measured
traceability.md Generated: which requirement is claimed by which file
faces.md Face detection and identity — the models, the licence problem, and what S14 measured

Building

Desktop:

cargo run -p darkroom-desktop

Android (containerised toolchain, see docker/android):

./docker/android/build.sh cargo ndk -t arm64-v8a build --release

Git LFS is required for the model weights, and the toolchain pins itself. CONTRIBUTING.md has the details and the four commands CI will run against what you send.

Current state

Working. A catalog over a local folder, a Nextcloud account, or a folder a sync client keeps in virtual-files mode — where a placeholder is treated as the photograph rather than as a one-byte file. A virtualised library grid with a capture-time timeline, ratings, labels, keywords, collections and a trash that survives a crash mid-operation. Card ingest. Face detection and identity, with the index syncing between devices. A develop pipeline of fifteen declared operations fused into a single compute dispatch, plus the neighbourhood operations that cannot be — clarity, texture, capture sharpening, noise reduction, lens correction, spectral film simulation. Crop, straighten, spot removal, gradient and subject-segmentation masks, named presets, and a generated panel that no operation in ui/ is allowed to name. Export to JPEG, PNG and 8- or 16-bit TIFF with resize and output sharpening.

The zero-copy display path works on desktop. The compute pass writes a texture that Slint composites directly, which is what ARCH §6.1 requires; the readback it forbids costs 96% of frame time at 4K, and

cargo run -p dr-gpu --example bench --features readback

still reproduces that measurement. The one exception is the Android develop view, which reads the frame back through the CPU because zero-copy there needs wgpu's Vulkan swapchain, and that tears a portrait window on a tablet whose panel is mounted landscape. It is debt, not a revision of the rule: the reasoning, the on-device measurements that forced it, and the three separate things any one of which would remove it are in technical-debt.md TD-1.

Not built. Plugins, compare and survey culling, focus peaking, burst grouping, AI denoise, tiled and progressive rendering, and most of the Android platform integration beyond running. The performance targets in §4.1 are unverified rather than unmet — the per-commit benchmark suite §8 requires does not exist, so nothing fails a build on a regression. docs/outstanding.md is the list, with the reasoning.

Licence

GPL-3.0-or-later.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme GPL-3.0
1 GiB
2026-10-07 11:27:59 +00:00
Languages
Rust 86.1%
Slint 10.3%
Python 1.1%
Shell 1%
WGSL 0.9%
Other 0.6%