The tree is closer to Windows than a Linux-only project usually is: every image library, the TLS stack and the inference engine are pure Rust, and dr-plat already keeps the Linux-only code behind cfgs with a loud fallback where none exists for another platform. What remains is a short list above dr-plat — five XDG path lookups, an xdg-open, the secret store's third implementation, the models' lookup beside the executable — and none of it touches core, which is the NFR-PORT-3 test this would be the first real run of. docs/windows.md decides the GNU target over MSVC-via-xwin, Vulkan only as on every other platform, a per-user NSIS installer that leaves the library alone on uninstall, and a CI leg in the shape of the Android one. It is explicit about what a runner with no Windows can verify — that it links, is PE32+, starts under Wine and installs under Wine — and what it cannot, which is everything involving a real GPU driver. Three FR-PLAT-WIN requirements and a channel row record the decisions; the ordering puts a first cross-compile on the developer machine before any container exists, because the list of cfg gaps is a reading of the source and the compiler's list will be longer.
23 KiB
DarkRoom — A Windows installer from the Linux CI
Satisfies: FR-PLAT-WIN-1 · FR-PLAT-WIN-2 · FR-PLAT-WIN-3 · NFR-COMPAT-2 (a stated channel) Companion to: distribution.md · requirements.md §3.8, §4.4 · android-signing.md
Spec for producing DarkRoom-<version>-x86_64-setup.exe from the same Gitea runner that builds the
Arch package and the APK, with no Windows machine in the loop. It names the toolchain, what the
tree has to change to compile for the target, what the installer does, how the CI job is shaped,
and — because there is no Windows hardware on the runner — exactly how much of the result can be
verified before a person double-clicks it.
It is a spec, not a report. Nothing below has been built. Where a claim rests on reading rather than running, it says so, in the same discipline faces.md §2.3 applies to licences: the cheap way to find out is to read first, and the expensive way is at packaging time.
1. Why this is nearly free, and where it is not
The reason to write this at all is that the tree is closer to Windows than a Linux-only project usually is. The three things that ordinarily make a cross-build to Windows a week of work are all absent:
| Usual obstacle | Here |
|---|---|
| A C image library (libraw, libjpeg-turbo, lcms) | rawler, zune-jpeg, jpeg-encoder, all pure Rust |
| OpenSSL, or a TLS stack with a system dependency | reqwest on rustls + webpki-roots; ring cross-compiles to the GNU target |
| A GUI toolkit with a platform-specific build | Slint on winit + wgpu, which already runs the same code on Linux and Android |
rusqlite is bundled, so SQLite compiles with whatever C compiler the target has; that is the one
place a cross C compiler is required, and it is a package install rather than a port. The inference
engine is tract, in Rust, which is what faces.md §3 chose it for — and this is the
second time that choice pays: the C++ ONNX Runtime would have needed a prebuilt Windows binary
fetched at build time.
Where it is not free is dr-plat and the handful of paths above it, which is exactly where
NFR-PORT-1 says platform code should be and where §3 finds it. That the list in §3 is short and
every item on it is already behind a cfg is the measure of whether NFR-PORT-3 ("a third platform
requires implementing the platform interfaces only") was met. It was, nearly: the gaps are in
things that grew above dr-plat — a settings file path, an xdg-open — rather than in the
interfaces themselves.
2. Toolchain: the GNU target, from a container
Two Rust targets can produce a Windows binary from Linux.
| Target | Linker | What it needs on the runner | What it costs |
|---|---|---|---|
x86_64-pc-windows-gnu |
MinGW-w64 gcc |
gcc-mingw-w64-x86-64 (Debian/Ubuntu), mingw-w64-gcc (Arch) — one apt/pacman install |
Binaries link libgcc_s and libwinpthread unless told not to; the SEH unwinder is MinGW's rather than MSVC's; DirectX bindings are less exercised (not used — §2.1) |
x86_64-pc-windows-msvc |
lld-link via cargo-xwin |
The MSVC CRT and Windows SDK headers, fetched from Microsoft's servers by xwin on first use (~1.5 GB, licence-accepted by flag) |
A download step in CI that depends on Microsoft keeping those URLs stable, and a licence the runner accepts on the project's behalf |
Decision: GNU. It is a package install, it is what rustup target add supports out of the
box, and every crate in the dependency graph that carries a C component (ring, libsqlite3-sys,
zstd-sys if present) builds against MinGW today. The MSVC route produces a marginally more
conventional binary — the same CRT every other Windows application links — and costs a
1.5 GB fetch of Microsoft-licensed headers on every cold CI run. That is the wrong trade for a
channel whose users are, for now, the author.
Static-link the MinGW runtime so the installer carries one file rather than three:
# .cargo/config.toml
[target.x86_64-pc-windows-gnu]
linker = "x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc"
ar = "x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc-ar"
rustflags = ["-C", "link-args=-static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -Wl,-Bstatic,--whole-archive -lwinpthread -Wl,--no-whole-archive"]
The winpthread incantation is the well-known one and is stated rather than derived; it is the
first thing to check if the resulting .exe complains about a missing libwinpthread-1.dll.
2.1 What the binary reaches at runtime
Nothing the installer has to carry. wgpu opens Vulkan (dr_gpu::new_shared, D1 — Vulkan on
both targets, and the shared-device path permits nothing else), and on Windows the Vulkan loader
vulkan-1.dll is installed by every GPU vendor's driver. Slint's femtovg renderer finds system
fonts through fontdb, so the fontconfig the Linux CI job installs has no Windows counterpart.
There is no libxkbcommon, no display-server library: winit speaks Win32 directly.
DirectX 12 is deliberately not enabled. wgpu supports it and on Windows would be the
conventional choice, but the develop pipeline's compute shaders are written once for Vulkan
(NFR-PORT-2) and validated on two Vulkan drivers already; a third backend is a third set of
driver behaviours to characterise (NFR-R1's tolerance argument), and no Windows machine that can
run this application lacks a Vulkan ICD. The same reasoning that keeps GL out of new_shared
keeps DX12 out here. It is one flag away if that turns out to be wrong.
2.2 Where it builds
The same shape as the Android leg: a job container built from a Dockerfile in the tree and pushed
to the Gitea registry, tagged by the tree id of its directory so an unrelated push reuses it
(android-image.yml already does this and the comment
there explains why).
docker/windows/
Dockerfile ubuntu + rustup (1.92.0, target x86_64-pc-windows-gnu) + gcc-mingw-w64-x86-64 + nsis + wine64 + osslsigncode
build.sh cargo build --release --target x86_64-pc-windows-gnu -p darkroom-desktop
package.sh the LFS guard, then makensis
makensis is a Linux binary; NSIS has always been buildable and runnable on POSIX hosts, and
Debian ships it as nsis. Wine is in the image for §6, not for the build.
3. What the tree has to change
Read from the source, not run. Everything here is dr-plat or the thin layer above it — nothing
in core/ is touched, which is NFR-PORT-1 holding.
3.1 Already handled
volumes.rs— card detection reads/proc/mountsand/sys/blockundercfg(target_os = "linux")and returns an empty list elsewhere. Windows gets no card detection in this pass; the import flow's path picker still works. (AGetDriveType/DRIVE_REMOVABLEimplementation is a screen of code and a follow-up.)display.rs— the X11 and Wayland colour-profile readers arecfg(all(unix, not(android))); the fallback is FR-DSP-8's stated one. Windows ICC profiles viaGetICMProfileare a follow-up for the same reason.desktop_client.rs— the Nextcloud desktop client's Unix socket iscfg(unix). On Windows the client listens on a named pipe (\\.\pipe\...); until that is implemented FR-NC-6c's integration is absent and the app behaves as it does on a Linux machine with no client running.secrets.rs— has aPlatformSecretStorefor "any platform without an implementation" that returnsSecretError::Unavailableon every call. It is loud on purpose, so a Windows build made with no further change compiles, starts, and fails at sign-in with a clear message. §3.2 is what turns that into a working store.keyring,x11rb,wayland-*are target-scoped dependencies already, so the Linux-only crates are not even compiled.
3.2 Required before the installer is worth shipping
Ordered by what blocks a first sign-in.
-
Secret store.
keyringhas a Windows Credential Manager backend; enable its feature under acfg(windows)target dependency and add the thirdimpl SecretStore for PlatformSecretStorebeside the two that exist. The feature's exact name has changed acrosskeyringmajors (windows-nativein 3.x) and is to be read from the 4.x changelog rather than assumed. FR-NC-2's rule carries over unchanged: Credential Manager is always present on Windows, so there is no degraded mode to state. -
Paths. FR-PLAT-LIN-1 says XDG, and the code says it in five places by reading
XDG_*_HOMEand falling back to$HOME/.local/.... On WindowsHOMEis normally unset, so every one of these degrades to a relative path from the working directory — which for a Start Menu launch isC:\Windows\System32. The fix is one function per kind of directory indr-plat, with the Windows branch reading%APPDATA%(config; roams) and%LOCALAPPDATA%(data, cache, state; does not), and the five call sites using it:Kind Linux today Windows config ( settings.json, accounts)$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/darkroom—dr_sync::config_dir,settings_store.rs%APPDATA%\darkroomdata (catalog, thumbnails, faces) $XDG_DATA_HOME/darkroom—library::data_root%LOCALAPPDATA%\darkroomstate (crash reports, diagnostics) $XDG_STATE_HOME/darkroom—state.rs,crash.rs%LOCALAPPDATA%\darkroom\stateFR-PLAT-WIN-1 states this as the requirement. The catalog and thumbnail formats do not change, so a library directory copied from a Linux machine opens.
-
Face models.
library::system_face_models_dirswalks$XDG_DATA_DIRS, which does not exist on Windows. The installer puts the models beside the executable (§5), so the Windows branch returnscurrent_exe().parent().join("models"). The user-directory lookups above it are unchanged, so a hand-placed pair still outranks the installed one, exactly as on Linux. -
Opening the sign-in URL.
launch_ui.rsshells out toxdg-open. Windows wantsShellExecuteWwith theopenverb, orcmd /C start "" <url>; theopencrate does thecfgfor every platform and is the conventional answer. Android has its own Intent path already, so this is the third branch of a function that already has two. -
std::os::unixuses outside acfg.diagnostics.rsandpresets.rsusePermissionsExtfor mode bits on written files. Most are inside#[cfg(unix)]blocks already; the first cross-compile will name any that are not, and the fix is acfgrather than a Windows ACL equivalent — the files in question are the user's own. -
The executable's identity. Windows takes the icon and the version block from a resource compiled into the
.exe, not from a.desktopfile. Abuild.rsindarkroom-desktopusingwinresource(which invokes MinGW'swindreswhen cross-compiling) embedsui/dr-ui/ui/app-icon.pngconverted to.ico, the version fromCARGO_PKG_VERSION, and the product name. This is the fourth place the identifier lives (distribution.md §1's "one identifier, four places" becomes five), andtools/set-version.shdoes not need to learn it: the resource reads the version cargo already knows.
Everything in this list is cfg(windows) code in dr-plat or a call-site switch in dr-ui, and
none of it touches the image core, the catalog schema, or the edit pipeline. That is the NFR-PORT-3
test, and it should be stated in the commit that closes the list whether it passed.
3.3 Explicitly not in this pass
- MIME/file-type registration — FR-PLAT-LIN-1's
.desktopMIME entries have a registry equivalent (HKCU\Software\Classes\.cr2etc.). Not until the application opens a file from the command line usefully, whichmain.rsaccepts but the launch flow does not yet act on. - High-DPI declaration — winit sets per-monitor-v2 awareness through its manifest by default. Verified in winit's source, not on a monitor; if text is blurry on a 150% display this is the first suspect.
- Card detection, ICC profiles, the desktop-client pipe — §3.1's three follow-ups.
- A GL or DX12 fallback — §2.1. A machine without Vulkan gets the library and no develop path, which is what it gets on Linux too.
4. The build script
docker/windows/build.sh, in the shape of the Android one and with the same rules:
cargo build --release --target x86_64-pc-windows-gnu -p darkroom-desktop
Release only, with CARGO_TARGET_DIR inside the workspace so the CI cache key
(windows-${{ hashFiles('**/Cargo.lock') }}) covers it. The whole workspace is not built for
the target: darkroom-android cannot be, and the examples that need a display or a catalog on
disk have nothing to run against. cargo clippy --target x86_64-pc-windows-gnu -p darkroom-desktop
is worth running in the same job, because the cfg(windows) branches from §3 are otherwise
never linted — the Linux job cannot see them.
Not cargo test --target x86_64-pc-windows-gnu: the test binaries would be Windows executables,
and running them means Wine. §6 does that for exactly one binary, deliberately.
5. The installer
packaging/windows/darkroom.nsi, compiled by makensis on
the runner into DarkRoom-<version>-x86_64-setup.exe. package.sh passes the version in
(/DVERSION=…, from tools/set-version.sh's single source, the workspace Cargo.toml) and refuses
to run if any models/face/*.onnx is smaller than 100 KB — the LFS-pointer guard every other
packager carries, for the reason distribution.md §1 gives.
5.1 Per-user, not per-machine
Install to $LOCALAPPDATA\Programs\DarkRoom, register the uninstaller under
HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\DarkRoom, RequestExecutionLevel user.
No UAC prompt, no Program Files, no writes outside the user's profile. This is the shape VS Code's
"User Installer" and most Electron applications use, and it is right for this project for two
reasons: an unsigned installer that also asks for administrator rights is the most alarming thing
Windows can show a user (§5.4), and a per-user install means the application's own data directories
(§3.2) and its binaries are governed by the same account, which is what NFR-SEC-5's
"the user's own hardware" means on a shared machine.
5.2 What it puts on disk
$LOCALAPPDATA\Programs\DarkRoom\
darkroom.exe
models\
scrfd_500m_640.onnx scrfd_2.5g_640.onnx scrfd_10g_640.onnx arcface_mbf_b1.onnx
yolo26s-sem-ade20k.onnx yolo26s-sem-ade20k.classes.json categories.txt
LICENSE
uninstall.exe
Plus a Start Menu shortcut, and nothing on the desktop unless the user ticks it. The models are
the same seven files the APK bundles and the PKGBUILD installs; models\ beside the executable is
where §3.2's lookup finds them. The face weights carry the research-only grant that
faces.md §2 records, and this channel changes nothing about that: the installer is
for the author's own machines until §2.2a's caveat is resolved, exactly as the APK is.
5.3 Uninstall
Removes the install directory, the shortcut and the registry key. Does not touch
%LOCALAPPDATA%\darkroom or %APPDATA%\darkroom — the catalog, the thumbnails, the face
index, the settings. An uninstaller that deletes a library index the user spent two hours building
is the kind of destructive default FR-CULL-12 and NFR-SEC-5's "disabling deletes nothing" both
argue against. The uninstaller says so on its one page, and names the two directories so a user who
does want them gone knows where they are.
5.4 Signing, and the warning that results from not doing it
An unsigned installer triggers SmartScreen's "Windows protected your PC" interstitial, dismissable
through "More info → Run anyway". Signing needs an Authenticode certificate, which is paid and
identity-verified; from Linux the signing itself is osslsigncode, which is why it is in the
container image, but there is no certificate to give it. This spec ships unsigned and the
release notes say what the interstitial looks like. An OV certificate is a cost decision to make
if this channel ever has a user who is not the author; an EV one buys instant reputation and costs
a hardware token. Neither is a build problem.
The APK went through the same sequence — android-signing.md records a debug-signed build becoming a release-signed one when it mattered — and this channel should be allowed to do the same.
5.5 What NSIS is chosen over
WiX produces an MSI, which is what enterprise deployment tooling wants and what nobody deploying
a photo editor to their own laptop cares about; its Linux story is wixl from msitools, which is
real but thinly used. Inno Setup runs only under Wine. NSIS is scriptable in plain text, builds
natively on Linux, produces a single self-contained .exe, and the script for §5.2 is under a
hundred lines. It is the conventional answer for exactly this situation.
6. Verifying without Windows
This is the part to be honest about. The runner has no Windows, no GPU it can hand to a Windows process, and no display. What can be checked, in increasing cost and decreasing certainty:
| Check | How | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| It links | the build succeeds | Every cfg(windows) branch compiles; no unix-only symbol leaked past a cfg |
| It is a Windows executable | file darkroom.exe reports PE32+; x86_64-w64-mingw32-objdump -p lists the DLLs it imports and none are MinGW's |
The static-runtime flags in §2 held |
| It starts | wine64 darkroom.exe --version exits 0 and prints the version |
The CRT, the resource block and main are sound; paths in §3.2 resolve (Wine sets LOCALAPPDATA) |
| The installer runs | wine64 DarkRoom-setup.exe /S then the install directory exists with the eight files, and wine64 uninstall.exe /S removes it |
The NSIS script's file list, sections and uninstaller are right |
| It draws a window | xvfb-run wine64 darkroom.exe with SLINT_WGPU_CPU and a lavapipe ICD exposed through winevulkan |
That Slint's winit backend initialises on Win32 — and this is where the chain gets long enough that a failure says more about Wine than about DarkRoom |
The first four are the CI gate. The fifth is worth trying once by hand and not putting in CI:
it needs winevulkan to find a host ICD, xvfb, and a Wine prefix warmed up in the container,
and every one of those is a moving part that has nothing to do with whether the application works
on Windows.
--version does not exist yet — main.rs takes paths and nothing else — and it is added for this,
because a smoke test needs an exit that does not open a window. It is two lines.
What none of this proves: that wgpu opens a Vulkan device on a real driver, that a 6000-px render completes, that fonts are found, that the secret store round-trips. Those are a person with a Windows machine, once per release, until there is a Windows runner — and a self-hosted Windows act_runner is how that would be done, not a cloud service. The release notes for the first build say which of these were checked and on what.
7. The CI job
A fourth leg of build-and-test.yml, beside desktop,
Android and traceability:
windows-image:
uses: ./.gitea/workflows/windows-image.yml # same shape as android-image.yml
windows:
runs-on: linux/amd64
name: Windows (x86_64, cross)
needs: windows-image
container:
image: gitea.tourolle.paris/dtourolle/darkroom-windows:latest
steps:
- checkout, LFS pull # copied from the desktop leg
- cache: ~/.cargo, target # key: windows-${{ hashFiles('**/Cargo.lock') }}
- docker/windows/build.sh # cargo build + clippy, --target x86_64-pc-windows-gnu
- smoke: file, objdump, wine64 --version # §6 rows 1–3
- docker/windows/package.sh # LFS guard, makensis
- smoke: wine64 setup.exe /S; ls; uninstall # §6 row 4
- upload artefact: DarkRoom-*-setup.exe # on tags only, like the APK
Same gotchas as the Android leg, which its comments already record: the host has no Node, so the
checkout is plain git; workflow inputs arrive as strings; the image build needs the host Docker
daemon and runs outside a container. None of that is new.
Cost. A cold build of the whole graph for a second target is roughly the desktop leg again —
tract, Slint's compiler, wgpu — so with the cargo cache warm it is minutes and cold it is the
better part of half an hour. Worth noting because the runner is one machine and the legs run in
parallel on it; if it starts starving the desktop leg, needs: desktop serialises them.
8. Requirements
Three, added to requirements.md §3.8 under a #### Windows heading beside the
Linux ones. Phrased to be testable, and each one is something §3 or §5 would otherwise leave as a
convention.
FR-PLAT-WIN-1 — Known folders. Configuration under %APPDATA%\darkroom; data, cache and
state under %LOCALAPPDATA%\darkroom. No file under the user's profile root and nothing relative
to the working directory. The directory layout beneath those roots is the same as under XDG, so
a library directory moves between platforms unchanged.
FR-PLAT-WIN-2 — Installer. A per-user installer that needs no elevation, registers an uninstaller, and whose uninstaller removes what the installer wrote and nothing the application wrote. Models are installed beside the executable and found there last, after the user's own directories.
FR-PLAT-WIN-3 — Built from Linux. The Windows binary and its installer are produced by the Linux CI from the same commit as every other channel, with no Windows machine in the build. Verification on Windows is a release step, recorded per release, not a build step.
NFR-COMPAT-2's channel table in distribution.md §1 gains a row. NFR-PORT-3 gets its first real test, and the commit that closes §3.2 records the answer.
9. Order
--versioninmain.rs, and the.cargo/config.tomltarget block. Trivial, and the smoke test in §6 needs both before anything else can be measured.rustup target add x86_64-pc-windows-gnu,pacman -S mingw-w64-gcc, and a firstcargo build --target …on the developer machine — before the container exists, because the list in §3.2 is a reading of the source and the compiler's list will be longer. Fix thecfgfallout as it appears. This is the afternoon that decides whether §1's optimism holds.- §3.2 items 1–4, each its own commit, each stating which NFR-PORT interface it implemented.
- §3.2 item 6 — the resource block — and the NSIS script;
makensisby hand;wine64 setup.exe /Sby hand. Now there is an artefact. - The container, the image workflow, the CI leg. Only after 4 works locally, for the same reason the Android image was reproduced from the tree after it had lived on one laptop.
- A build on a real Windows machine, and a note in the release saying what was checked.
Steps 1–2 are cheap and either confirm this document or replace §3.2 with the true list. Nothing past step 2 should be started on the strength of this document alone.