jellytau/docs/TRACEABILITY_CI.md
Duncan Tourolle e3797f32ca
Some checks failed
Traceability Validation / Check Requirement Traces (push) Failing after 1m18s
🏗️ Build and Test JellyTau / Build APK and Run Tests (push) Has been cancelled
many changes
2026-02-14 00:09:47 +01:00

289 lines
7.3 KiB
Markdown

# Requirement Traceability CI/CD Pipeline
This document explains the automated requirement traceability validation system for JellyTau.
## Overview
The CI/CD pipeline automatically validates that code changes are properly traced to requirements. This ensures:
- ✅ Requirements are implemented with clear traceability
- ✅ No requirement coverage regressions
- ✅ Code changes are linked to specific requirements
- ✅ Quality metrics are tracked over time
## Gitea Actions Workflows
Two workflows are configured in `.gitea/workflows/`:
### 1. `traceability-check.yml` (Primary - Recommended)
Gitea-native workflow with:
- ✅ Automatic trace extraction
- ✅ Coverage validation against minimum threshold (50%)
- ✅ Modified file checking
- ✅ Artifact preservation
- ✅ Summary reports
**Runs on:** Every push and pull request
### 2. `traceability.yml` (Alternative)
GitHub-compatible workflow with additional features:
- Pull request comments with coverage stats
- GitHub-specific integrations
## What Gets Validated
### 1. Trace Extraction
```bash
bun run traces:json > traces-report.json
```
Extracts all TRACES comments from:
- TypeScript files (`src/**/*.ts`)
- Svelte components (`src/**/*.svelte`)
- Rust code (`src-tauri/src/**/*.rs`)
- Test files
### 2. Coverage Thresholds
The workflow checks:
- **Minimum overall coverage:** 50% (57+ requirements traced)
- **Requirements by type:**
- UR (User): 23+ of 39
- IR (Integration): 5+ of 24
- DR (Development): 28+ of 48
- JA (Jellyfin API): 0+ of 3
If coverage drops below threshold, the workflow **fails** and blocks merge.
### 3. Modified File Checking
On pull requests, the workflow:
1. Detects all changed TypeScript/Svelte/Rust files
2. Warns if new/modified files lack TRACES comments
3. Suggests the TRACES format for missing comments
## How to Add Traces to New Code
When you add new code or modify existing code, include TRACES comments:
### TypeScript/Svelte Example
```typescript
// TRACES: UR-005, UR-026 | DR-029
export function handlePlayback() {
// Implementation...
}
```
### Rust Example
```rust
/// TRACES: UR-005 | DR-001
pub fn player_state_changed(state: PlayerState) {
// Implementation...
}
```
### Test Example
```rust
// TRACES: UR-005 | DR-001 | UT-026, UT-027
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
// Tests...
}
```
## TRACES Format
```
TRACES: [UR-###, ...] | [IR-###, ...] | [DR-###, ...] | [JA-###, ...]
```
- `UR-###` - User Requirements (features users see)
- `IR-###` - Integration Requirements (API/platform integration)
- `DR-###` - Development Requirements (internal architecture)
- `JA-###` - Jellyfin API Requirements (Jellyfin API usage)
**Examples:**
- `// TRACES: UR-005` - Single requirement
- `// TRACES: UR-005, UR-026` - Multiple of same type
- `// TRACES: UR-005 | DR-029` - Multiple types
- `// TRACES: UR-005, UR-026 | DR-001, DR-029 | UT-001` - Complex
## Workflow Behavior
### On Push to Main Branch
1. ✅ Extracts all traces from code
2. ✅ Validates coverage is >= 50%
3. ✅ Generates full traceability report
4. ✅ Saves report as artifact
### On Pull Request
1. ✅ Extracts all traces
2. ✅ Validates coverage >= 50%
3. ✅ Checks modified files for TRACES
4. ✅ Warns if new code lacks TRACES
5. ✅ Suggests proper format
6. ✅ Generates report artifact
### Failure Scenarios
The workflow **fails** (blocks merge) if:
- Coverage drops below 50%
- JSON extraction fails
- Invalid trace format
The workflow **warns** (but doesn't block) if:
- New files lack TRACES comments
- Coverage drops (but still above threshold)
## Viewing Reports
### In Gitea Actions UI
1. Go to **Actions** tab
2. Click the **Traceability Validation** workflow run
3. Download **traceability-reports** artifact
4. View:
- `traces-report.json` - Raw trace data
- `docs/TRACEABILITY.md` - Formatted report
### Locally
```bash
# Extract current traces
bun run traces:json | jq '.byType'
# Generate full report
bun run traces:markdown
cat docs/TRACEABILITY.md
```
## Coverage Goals
### Current Status
- Overall: 51% (56/114)
- UR: 59% (23/39)
- IR: 21% (5/24)
- DR: 58% (28/48)
- JA: 0% (0/3)
### Targets
- **Short term** (Sprint): Maintain ≥50% overall
- **Medium term** (Month): Reach 70% overall coverage
- **Long term** (Release): Reach 90% coverage with focus on:
- IR requirements (API clients)
- JA requirements (Jellyfin API endpoints)
- Remaining UR/DR requirements
## Improving Coverage
### For Missing User Requirements (UR)
1. Review [README.md](../README.md) for unimplemented features
2. Add TRACES to code that implements them
3. Focus on high-priority features (High/Medium priority)
### For Missing Integration Requirements (IR)
1. Add TRACES to Jellyfin API client methods
2. Add TRACES to platform-specific backends (Android/Linux)
3. Link to corresponding Jellyfin API endpoints
### For Missing Development Requirements (DR)
1. Add TRACES to UI components in `src/lib/components/`
2. Add TRACES to composables in `src/lib/composables/`
3. Add TRACES to player backend in `src-tauri/src/player/`
### For Jellyfin API Requirements (JA)
1. Add TRACES to Jellyfin API wrapper methods
2. Document which endpoints map to which requirements
3. Link to Jellyfin API documentation
## Example PR Checklist
When submitting a pull request:
- [ ] All new code has TRACES comments linking to requirements
- [ ] TRACES format is correct: `// TRACES: UR-001 | DR-002`
- [ ] Workflow passes (coverage ≥ 50%)
- [ ] No coverage regressions
- [ ] Artifact traceability report was generated
## Troubleshooting
### "Coverage below minimum threshold"
**Problem:** Workflow fails with coverage < 50%
**Solution:**
1. Run `bun run traces:json` locally
2. Check which requirements are traced
3. Add TRACES to untraced code sections
4. Re-run extraction to verify
### "New files without TRACES"
**Problem:** Workflow warns about new files lacking TRACES
**Solution:**
1. Add TRACES comments to all new code
2. Format: `// TRACES: UR-001 | DR-002`
3. Map code to specific requirements from README.md
4. Re-push
### "Invalid JSON format"
**Problem:** Trace extraction produces invalid JSON
**Solution:**
1. Check for malformed TRACES comments
2. Run locally: `bun run traces:json`
3. Look for parsing errors
4. Fix and retry
## Integration with Development
### Before Committing
```bash
# Check your traces
bun run traces:json | jq '.byType'
# Regenerate report
bun run traces:markdown
# Verify traces syntax
grep "TRACES:" src/**/*.ts src/**/*.rs
```
### In Your IDE
Add a file watcher to regenerate traces on save:
```json
{
"fileWatcher.watchPatterns": [
"src/**/*.ts",
"src/**/*.svelte",
"src-tauri/src/**/*.rs"
],
"fileWatcher.command": "bun run traces:markdown"
}
```
### Git Hooks
Add a pre-push hook to validate traces:
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# .git/hooks/pre-push
bun run traces:json > /dev/null
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "❌ Invalid TRACES format"
exit 1
fi
```
## References
- [Extract Traces Script](../scripts/README.md#extract-tracests)
- [Requirements Specification](../README.md#requirements-specification)
- [Traceability Matrix](./TRACEABILITY.md)
- [Gitea Actions Documentation](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/actions/)
## Support
For issues or questions:
1. Check this document
2. Review example traces in `src/lib/stores/`
3. Check existing TRACES comments for format
4. Review workflow logs in Gitea Actions
---
**Last Updated:** 2026-02-13