404fea47a80ce4266ddec3ffd77b66b2b0ea4092
300
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
091306f736 |
Gate the gesture vocabulary the way the matrix is gated
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 1h16m50s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 39s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 50s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Successful in 22m27s
Three holes, all found by the gate catching itself out. **Prose that mentions the tag was read as a tag.** `dr-ui`'s module list carries a comment saying where the generated table comes from, and it names `GESTURE:` in passing; the scan extracted that sentence fragment as a gesture with no place and no way to perform it. A tag must now *open* its comment. A line that merely mentions it is describing the mechanism, not declaring a member of it, and position is the only thing that tells the two apart — which also makes the string-literal guard fall out for free rather than being a special case. **Neither artefact was regenerated on commit.** They cite line numbers, so they go stale on anything that moves a line — the sheet commit made the document wrong about every gesture in `library.slint` without touching a single one. The pre-commit hook that already keeps the matrix in step now keeps these too, and unlike the matrix it *fails* rather than shrugging when the scan does: a matrix that will not build leaves a stale one in place, where a malformed gesture block means a user about to be told the wrong thing. **CI did not check them at all.** It does now, blocking. The matrix is read; the gesture table is *shown to somebody using the application*, and a stale one tells them to perform a gesture that no longer exists — from which they will conclude the application is broken rather than the page. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
1cd5ab6815 |
Put the gesture reference in the application
The document the previous commit generates is for somebody reading the repository. The person who needs it most is holding a tablet, has just discovered that a hold does something, and has nowhere to ask what else does. So the same scan writes a table the application draws: a "Gestures" button beside Settings, a sheet with the same scrim and dismissal as the ones that file and name, and every gesture grouped by where it applies with its touch, pointer and keyboard routes side by side. Not the `why` — that is the argument for the design and belongs in the document; on a phone-sized card it would bury the one line the sheet was opened to read. The sheet's file knows nothing about what a gesture is. It draws the rows it is handed, and the rows come from the generated table, because a help screen with its text typed into it is a second description of one behaviour — and the second description is always the one that goes stale. The commit before this deleted a gesture; a hand-kept sheet would still be describing it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
04203b4a82 |
Regenerate the matrix after taking master in
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
4b212089d2 |
Merge master into wave-2
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> # Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
12812452e8 |
Regenerate the matrix over the second wave
67.0% to 68.2% (122/179). FR-PLAT-AND-4 and FR-PLAT-AND-6 are the two that moved; FR-CULL-3 was already tagged by the peaking half and now has the reduction its other two bullets asked for behind the same tag. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
df90dd95a2 |
Merge: a histogram that reads the sensor, beside the one that reads the frame
FR-CULL-3's other two bullets. What existed was a display histogram tagged FR-DSP-7, counting AdjustPass's 8-bit output with r == 255 clipping counters -- it says a highlight is gone precisely where this requirement needs it to say the highlight is recoverable. The new reduction runs over the demosaiced scene-linear texture on a stops-below-saturation axis: camera-native, unbalanced, unmatrixed, uncurved, normalised by the sensor's own black and white levels, so 1.0 is saturation by construction. Four series, and the fourth is the brightest channel rather than luma, because a weighted sum of unbalanced values is a number about nothing. Cached per photograph, not per frame: nothing downstream of the demosaic can move a count. Both readings are legitimate and answer different questions, so the panel offers a choice rather than replacing one with the other. ARCH 5.5 is amended to match. It specified a pre-demosaic reduction; retaining the CFA samples costs 48 MB at 24 MP and 120 MB at 60 MP resident on every photograph opened, whether or not anyone looks at the histogram, on the platform ARCH 6.2 exists for. The spec now records two reductions, why the more complete one was not worth its cost, and what the cheaper one cannot answer: it counts pixels not photosites, it cannot see above white, and it is measured after the CFA pattern is gone. Verified: clippy -D warnings clean, 98 dr-gpu tests, 556 dr-ui tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
31a3580f9d |
Extract the gesture vocabulary from the code that implements it
Every gesture the application has was documented in the comment beside the `TouchArea` that implements it. Excellent comments, and unreachable by anyone not reading the source — which is the FR-UI-4 failure in a different costume: a gesture nobody can find is a feature only its author knows about. Writing them out again in a hand-kept help page is the failure this avoids. Two descriptions of one gesture drift, and it is always the prose that drifts: the code is exercised every time somebody uses the application and the page is exercised never. A help screen confidently describing a double tap the grid stopped honouring last week is worse than no help screen — and the grid did stop honouring one, in the commit before this. So the comment beside the implementation stays the only copy, and a `GESTURE:` block beside it is scanned into two artefacts: `docs/gestures.md` for a reader, and a Rust table for the application to draw a help sheet from. Both committed, both gated, so neither can quietly stop describing the code. It lives in the traceability crate because it is the same operation on the same input — walk the tree, pull structured tags out of comments, render, fail if the committed artefact has moved. Only the vocabulary is new. It scans `ui` and `apps` alone: a gesture needs an interface to be performed on, and excluding `tools` is also what stops the scanner extracting its own worked examples as broken gestures. Fifteen gestures so far, across the library grid and the People screen. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
20c368d3fc |
Give each touch gesture one meaning, and give tap-to-open back
I broke opening a photograph. The dwell added in "Tell a tap on a photograph from a hand going past" required a finger to stay down 120 ms, and a deliberate tap is routinely quicker than that — so the grid stopped opening anything. Duration was the wrong discriminator: a tap and a brush are the same length. **Travel is what separates them, and a graze is by definition a moving contact.** A press now records where it landed and the release compares: within 12px it is a tap, beyond that the hand was going somewhere else. No dwell, so no deliberate tap can be refused, and the rule is the same for a finger and a mouse — one rule instead of two, and the `touch` argument the dwell needed goes away with it. Two real conflicts went with it, because a gesture set that overlaps itself is unlearnable however each half is documented. **A drag was also a hold.** Grabbing a cell and moving inside 450 ms left the hold timer armed underneath the drag, so it fired mid-gesture and put the grid into selection mode nobody asked for — the drag finished into a mode that changed what every later tap meant. Starting a drag now cancels it, exactly as a pinch already did. **A double tap was also a range.** In selection mode two taps on one cell selected everything back to where selecting began: no visible state, no warning, from a thing a hand does by accident. "Select to…" does that job and announces itself first, so the double tap is gone and two taps are now two toggles that land where they started. `extend_to_row` went with it — a second range implementation that only the double tap reached, where every other range goes through `apply_press`. The resulting vocabulary, one meaning each: tap opens, tap-and-slide does nothing, hold starts selecting, drag files, two fingers resize, and while selecting a tap only ever toggles. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
4b6c110816 |
Count the sensor's own numbers, so a cull can see headroom the render hides
FR-CULL-3's remaining two bullets. What existed was a *display* histogram tagged FR-DSP-7: it binds AdjustPass's Rgba8Unorm output, recovers an 8-bit code value, and counts clipping as `r == 255`. Its own documentation says a clipped bin means "a highlight that is actually gone rather than one the transform might still recover", which is the opposite of what a culling decision needs. FR-CULL-3 asks for the histogram of the sensor data, on the explicit grounds that a rendered image "systematically lies about what is recoverable in the raw", and a readout that measures the render cannot answer that however it is presented. So this is a second instrument beside the first rather than a setting on it. Both are true; they are true about different things; the panel offers both behind a chip row and the words travel with the numbers, because a raw saturation figure drawn under a heading saying Highlights would be mislabelled exactly where the difference matters. **What is reduced over, and what it cost to decide.** ARCH §5.5 specified the pre-demosaic CFA samples. This reduces over the demosaiced scene-linear texture instead, and §5.5 is amended to record the choice rather than let the specification and the code disagree in silence. The texture is camera-native — unbalanced, unmatrixed, uncurved — and normalised by the sensor's own black and white levels, so 1.0 is saturation by construction and the distribution below it is the headroom question with no calibration to carry. Retaining the CFA samples would mean keeping the packed u32 buffer Demosaicer::run currently drops: 48 MB at 24 MP, 120 MB at 60 MP, resident per open photograph whether or not anyone looks at the histogram, on a platform §6.2 exists because memory is scarce on. Three things it therefore cannot say, written into the module docs and into §5.5 rather than left to be discovered: it counts pixels not photosites, so a saturated site drags its interpolated neighbours up and per-channel clipping is smeared by about a demosaic kernel; it cannot see above white, because demosaic.wgsl clamps each photosite at 1.0 for its own good reasons (a Canon 6D reads to 16383 against a declared 15070) so "at saturation" and "a stop past it" share a bin; and it is measured after the CFA pattern is gone, so it can name which colour clipped in the reconstructed image but not which photosite went first. The axis is stops below saturation, 16 bins per stop over 256 bins — the same bin count the display reduction uses, so the fold into drawable columns is shared and a divergence between the two plots would have to be deliberate. A linear axis spends half its width on the top stop, which is why nobody has ever drawn a useful linear raw histogram. The fourth series is the brightest channel rather than luma: these values are unbalanced, so any weighted sum of them is a number about nothing, and the brightest channel is the one that saturates first and so the one the headroom question is actually about. It is a property of the file and not of the render, which has two consequences. It is computed once per photograph and cached — nothing downstream of the demosaic can move a count in it — so a cull does not pay the display histogram's per-frame cost three thousand times. And it describes the whole frame rather than the visible region, deliberately opposite to DevelopSession::histogram: a crop changes what is on screen and changes nothing about what the sensor recorded. Tags are on the reduction, the type, its constructor and the presentation arithmetic, each of which has a test that fails if the behaviour goes. The Slint panel and the push from lib.rs keep their reasoning as prose: nothing asserts them, and a tag would claim coverage the assertions are not making. |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
2955cad654 |
Regenerate the matrix over a night's merges
Coverage 59.8% to 67.0% (120/179). Eight of those came from tagging what was already built; the rest are tonight's features -- FR-CULL-3's peaking half, FR-CULL-5, FR-PLAT-AND-5. FR-PLAT-LIN-3 and NFR-COMPAT-2 stay untagged deliberately. Both were satisfied by a manifest and a document, and there is no source file to hang a tag on that would fail if the behaviour went away. This is also the first commit tonight the pre-commit hook has checked. Every branch used --no-verify, because the hook runs the traceability build and the branches were under a no-build rule; the matrix each of them left untouched is regenerated here, once, over all of them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
5226f7223b |
Group the frames of one moment, by when they were taken and what they look like
A burst is the commonest thing in a cull and the least interesting: twelve frames of the same gull at 10 fps occupy twelve cells, are scrolled past twelve times, and end with the photographer keeping one. FR-CULL-5 asks for them to collapse to one representative and be judged as a unit. Two signals, because neither alone survives a real library. Time alone groups a whole wedding ceremony -- a photographer working steadily never leaves the gap that would end the run. Similarity alone groups a studio setup shot across two days, which is a project rather than a moment. Together they are specific: adjacent in time *and* looks like the frame before it. Two seconds is the time bound, and the reason is worth recording because the figure looks absurd next to a 10 fps camera. `images.captured_at` is whole seconds -- EXIF's DateTimeOriginal has no sub-second field and SubSecTimeOriginal is optional and widely omitted -- so a burst arrives in the catalog as ten frames sharing one timestamp. Any threshold finer than a second is a threshold on information that is not there. Where the pace really is faster, the similarity bound is what separates the frames. Similarity is a 64-bit difference hash over a 9x8 box-averaged reduction, compared between *adjacent* frames only. Chained rather than anchored on the first frame, because by frame twenty a camera following a bird has nothing in common with frame one while no two neighbours differ by much; the time bound is what stops the chain running away. There is no all-pairs step and there must never be one -- that is what turns a grouping pass into something nobody can afford to run over 50k images. Nothing here ranks a frame. FR-CULL-5 names the failure it is avoiding, which is rejecting the only frame of an important moment because somebody blinked, so there is no sharpness score and no best-of-burst. The representative is the earliest frame -- a fact about the clock, not a judgement about the photograph -- and the user's own choice lives in its own table so that rebuilding the grouping cannot erase it. Same argument `people.ignored` makes one subsystem over: nothing short of remembering a decision survives re-clustering. A newly found burst is recorded *open*. Collapsing on discovery would be tidier, and would also mean a background pass taking photographs off the screen part way through a cull. The pass marks; the user folds. It is a pass rather than a job kind for the reason catalog.md 10.2 gives for face clustering: a burst is a property of a run of frames and has no natural subject_id, so a per-image job would rebuild the world once per photograph. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
d0b671d4db |
Put the grouping dials where the regrouping is
The merge probability was `dr_face`'s constant and the smallest group was a bare `< 2` in the clustering pass. Both were tuned on one library — 1,813 faces of one photographer's family — and the quantity they optimise is a property of the population, not of the model. A household at close family resemblance and two thousand strangers at a wedding want different answers, and neither of them is the reference library. The doc comment already conceded the point and pointed at `face_index --tune`; a photographer does not have a terminal. So they are `FaceSettings` now, saved per device beside the cache budgets and edited from the People screen — beside the Regroup button that applies them and the rail that shows what they did, because a value changed three screens away from its effect is one nobody can tune. Moving them is safe by construction, which is why nothing asks for confirmation: a regroup writes only the suggested half, and confirmations, names and ignores enter as anchors and come back unchanged. The smallest-group rule is applied only to groups the system invented — a group the user named or set aside survives it whatever its size, because a display preference does not overrule a judgement. **Withdrawal, without which the setting does nothing visible.** Raising the smallest group stops the pass creating small groups; it does not remove the ones a previous pass made, because those still hold their suggestions, so they are not empty, so the prune leaves them. The pass now releases every unanchored face it did not place before pruning. And a dial you cannot see the effect of is not a dial. "What would this do?" runs the same population through the clusterer without opening a transaction and reports groups, faces grouped and largest group — one row of `--tune`'s table, on the user's own library, on a worker thread. The line leads with the group count because that is the number that says which side of the right setting you are on: it climbs as fragments are gathered into people and falls as separate people start being welded, while the grouped-face count rises straight through both. The preview parks its poll timer in a slot of its own. A preview and a regroup are allowed to be in flight together, and sharing the sweep's single slot would have the second to start drop the first's timer — visible as a Regroup that finished on its worker and never said so. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
f5edd49b6b |
Let a manual collection be put in the order it is meant to be seen in
`collection_members.position` and `Sort::CollectionPosition` have been in the catalog since collections were, and nothing above dr-catalog has ever written or read either: `collections::set_order` had no callers, and the grid ordered everything by capture time whatever it was scoped to — dr-ui does not construct a `Query` at all, it has its own `GRID_ORDER` constant. So a manual collection was a set with an order nobody could see or change. Three pieces, because it could not be fewer: `grid_order_for` decides the ordering from the scope, and both readers take it from there. That is the load-bearing part. An ordinal only names a photograph relative to an ordering, so the window read and the span read have to agree — a shift-click resolved through a different ORDER BY than the cells were drawn with selects a different run than the one on screen, and the user finds out when the export runs. `read_ids_span` already stated that invariant about `GRID_ORDER`; this widens it to an ordering that depends on the scope. Only a single manual collection has one. A set draws its descendants' images too, and two children's positions are unrelated integers that interleave arbitrarily; a smart collection has no member rows to carry a position at all. Both fall back to capture time and refuse the drop rather than pretending. The drop is on the cell, on whichever half of it the finger landed — the trailing edge is the only way to name the last place in a collection, since there is no cell beyond the last one to drop in front of. `reordered` is pure and the membership is rewritten whole. `set_order` sets the positions it is given and leaves the rest, so a partial write would interleave the moved run with rows nobody touched; and it is read unfiltered, so what the filter is hiding keeps its place relative to what the user can see. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
9d11554c71 |
Make the range gesture visible, and offer the whole grid at once
Touch has had a range gesture for as long as selection mode has: double-tap the far end. It is invisible, it is unreliable on a grid that scrolls under the second tap, and it extends from the anchor *before* the two taps moved it — a rule subtle enough that the code needs two paragraphs to explain it to itself. Nobody who was not told about it has ever used it. "Select to…" is the same operation with state you can see. Press it, the strip stops reporting and says "Tap the last photograph", and the next cell taken is the far end. It reaches Rust as shift on `cell-pressed`, so it lands in `apply_press` as the ctrl+shift it already is, and there is no third selection policy to keep in step with the other two. This is deliberately not the sweep gesture. A drag that paints cells can only reach what is on screen, and the ranges that hurt on a tablet are longer than a screenful — between the two taps here the user may scroll as far as they like, and the run is resolved by the catalog rather than by what happened to be loaded. A sweep is still worth having for short runs; it is not what this should have rested on. "Select all" beside it, asked of the catalog for the same reason: a select-all that quietly meant "the hundred cells that happen to be loaded" is a lie the user cannot see until the export runs. The double-tap stays. It is tested, and an accelerator that costs nothing is worth keeping for whoever has already learnt it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
d1f3b97245 |
Ask for the collection's name where the keyboard can reach it
"New collection from selection" created the collection under a placeholder name and then opened the rename field in the sidebar tree. On a tablet the sidebar is not on screen. It is instantiated all the same — app.slint collapses it to zero width and `visible: false` rather than using an `if`, because an `if` there is a layout loop Slint panics on — so the rename field was created, its `init` took focus, and Android raised the on-screen keyboard over a box nobody could see. Nothing else on the screen is focusable, so the keyboard had nowhere to go: it stayed, the name could not be typed, and the collection was already written under the name the user did not want. Asked in a sheet instead, on the same card as the filing and keywording sheets, before anything is written. That also fixes what was hiding behind it: an abandoned rename used to leave a "New collection" in the tree, because the collection existed before the name did. `Field` gains `take-focus()` so a sheet whose field is the only thing to do in it can answer the keyboard for the user — a function rather than a property, because focus is an event and a bound property would re-take it on every unrelated re-evaluation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
b9891e2c04 |
Merge master into tablet-selection
Two real conflicts, both from work that landed either side of the same lines rather than against them. `lib.rs`: the settings controller was hoisted above the People screen's wiring, and Android's thumbnail-tier eviction registered itself at the same point. Independent, so both stay. `library.rs`: manual collection ordering and burst folding each added a clause to the same two queries. The scoped range read now carries both — the folding matters there for one step further on than it does in the grid, because a collapsed burst is one cell, so an ordinal counted over a list still holding every frame names a photograph several places away from the one the user pointed at. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
23c74d7063 |
Put the grouping dials where the regrouping is
The merge probability was `dr_face`'s constant and the smallest group was a bare `< 2` in the clustering pass. Both were tuned on one library — 1,813 faces of one photographer's family — and the quantity they optimise is a property of the population, not of the model. A household at close family resemblance and two thousand strangers at a wedding want different answers, and neither of them is the reference library. The doc comment already conceded the point and pointed at `face_index --tune`; a photographer does not have a terminal. So they are `FaceSettings` now, saved per device beside the cache budgets and edited from the People screen — beside the Regroup button that applies them and the rail that shows what they did, because a value changed three screens away from its effect is one nobody can tune. Moving them is safe by construction, which is why nothing asks for confirmation: a regroup writes only the suggested half, and confirmations, names and ignores enter as anchors and come back unchanged. The smallest-group rule is applied only to groups the system invented — a group the user named or set aside survives it whatever its size, because a display preference does not overrule a judgement. **Withdrawal, without which the setting does nothing visible.** Raising the smallest group stops the pass creating small groups; it does not remove the ones a previous pass made, because those still hold their suggestions, so they are not empty, so the prune leaves them. The pass now releases every unanchored face it did not place before pruning. And a dial you cannot see the effect of is not a dial. "What would this do?" runs the same population through the clusterer without opening a transaction and reports groups, faces grouped and largest group — one row of `--tune`'s table, on the user's own library, on a worker thread. The line leads with the group count because that is the number that says which side of the right setting you are on: it climbs as fragments are gathered into people and falls as separate people start being welded, while the grouped-face count rises straight through both. The preview parks its poll timer in a slot of its own. A preview and a regroup are allowed to be in flight together, and sharing the sweep's single slot would have the second to start drop the first's timer — visible as a Regroup that finished on its worker and never said so. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
bbbc23f376 |
Let go of the keyboard when a name is finished
Pressing Enter on a person's name committed it and then kept the field focused, so on a tablet the on-screen keyboard stayed up over the faces the user had pressed Enter to get back to. The name looked accepted and the screen looked stuck. `Field` grows `release-focus()`, the other half of the `take-focus()` it already had, and the Identity screen calls it from `accepted`. A function rather than a property for the reason the existing one gives: focus is an event, and bound to a property it would fight anything else that took it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
e027d34b65 |
Regenerate the matrix over a night's merges
Coverage 59.8% to 67.0% (120/179). Eight of those came from tagging what was already built; the rest are tonight's features -- FR-CULL-3's peaking half, FR-CULL-5, FR-PLAT-AND-5. FR-PLAT-LIN-3 and NFR-COMPAT-2 stay untagged deliberately. Both were satisfied by a manifest and a document, and there is no source file to hang a tag on that would fail if the behaviour went away. This is also the first commit tonight the pre-commit hook has checked. Every branch used --no-verify, because the hook runs the traceability build and the branches were under a no-build rule; the matrix each of them left untouched is regenerated here, once, over all of them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
6246a2e346 |
Merge: group the frames of one moment, and let a burst fold away
FR-CULL-5. Frames join a burst when they are adjacent in time and look like the frame before them -- both, because time alone groups a whole ceremony and similarity alone groups a studio setup across two days. Adjacent pairs only, chained; there is no all-pairs step and there must never be one. No selection of any kind. The representative is the earliest frame, a fact about the clock rather than a judgement about the photograph, and a newly found burst arrives open, so the pass never takes a row off the screen. Verified: fmt, clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings, 346 dr-catalog tests, 511 dr-ui tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
91fe6cf300 |
Merge master into partial-preset-scope
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 8s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 8s
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 1h17m12s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 56s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 1m33s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Successful in 1h0m38s
# Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md # ui/dr-ui/ui/app.slint |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
754ab91347 |
Bring a Lightroom library across, and start with something in the list
Two halves of the same complaint: a preset sheet that opens on "No presets yet" is homework, and a photographer with ten years of presets in Lightroom has no way to bring them. `dr-preset-xmp` reads Camera Raw `.xmp`. The mapping turned out to be mostly a rename rather than a conversion, because Adobe and this pipeline already agree: exposure is in stops in both, and contrast, the four recovery controls, clarity, texture, vibrance and saturation are all ±100 in both. That is not imitation, it is the convention raw developers converged on — `highlights_shadows.yaml` cites it in as many words. Only sharpening needed arithmetic, Adobe's 0…150 against our 0…100. The white balance does not come across, and says so rather than guessing. Adobe writes absolute Kelvin for a raw file where ours is a relative nudge from what the camera recorded, so converting needs the *target image's* as-shot white balance — exactly what a preset cannot carry, since the same preset lands on a frame shot at 3200K and one shot at 7000K. A guess would be wrong on most images and invisibly so. A folder is read as readily as a file, nested, because that is the shape an exported preset folder is in and importing ninety files one at a time is asking someone not to bother. `dr_pipeline::starter` is six presets a first run begins with, written against this pipeline in its units and deliberately mild — a starting point, not a caricature. They are seeded when the library *file* does not exist rather than when the library is empty, so deleting all six does not hand them back on the next launch. Both of these name operations, and `ui_names_no_operation` was right to stop them living in `ui/`. That test exists because the failure is silent and cumulative, and it caught exactly what it was written for: a preset called "Punch" is a statement about contrast, clarity and vibrance, and a table mapping Adobe's vocabulary to ours is a statement about the pipeline. Neither is a fact about an interface. So the starter set went into `dr-pipeline`, and the importer into its own crate — between two walls, since `dr-pipeline` depends on nothing on purpose and XMP is real XML not worth hand-rolling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
4a04496c78 |
Merge: focus peaking, so a frame can be judged without zooming to 100%
FR-CULL-3's peaking half. The raw histogram and raw clipping indicators remain unbuilt -- what exists is a display histogram tagged FR-DSP-7, counting AdjustPass's 8-bit output, which reports a highlight as gone precisely where FR-CULL-3 needs it to report the highlight recoverable. Verified before merge: fmt clean, clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings green, 11 focus GPU tests, 79 baseline dr-gpu tests, 511 dr-ui tests. The cfg(target_os = "android") arm is unverified -- the host-target clippy never compiled it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> # Conflicts: # ui/dr-ui/src/lib.rs # ui/dr-ui/ui/app.slint |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
2168cdd1c4 |
Mark what is in focus, so a frame can be judged without zooming to 100%
FR-CULL-3's focus peaking. One compute dispatch measures local contrast in WGSL and writes an overlay texture; on desktop it reaches Slint through the same zero-copy wgpu import the canvas uses, so nothing per-pixel touches the CPU on the frame path. With peaking off the cost is zero and structurally so: focus_overlay opens with `let settings = self.peaking?;` before the frame is touched, and clearing drops both overlay textures, so no VRAM is held either. NFR-P14 is met by construction rather than by measurement -- one dispatch, no second render, no pipeline compile after session open, and a test asserting allocations stay at 2 over eight frames. The budget test asserts 50ms at 4K rather than a tight bound, deliberately: a tight bound fails on a loaded machine and gets deleted, which is worse than a loose one that still catches the regression that matters. TD-1 is amended rather than joined by a TD-6: on Android the overlay rides the readback that already exists there, roughly doubling that transfer while peaking is on, and TD-1's own "Done when" removes both because both are the same missing capability. Verified: cargo fmt clean; clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings green, which also compiles peaking.slint through dr-ui's build.rs; 11 focus GPU tests and 79 baseline dr-gpu tests pass; 511 dr-ui tests pass. Not verified: the cfg(target_os = "android") arm, which the host-target clippy never compiled. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
b52be080ff |
Merge: say which requirements the code already satisfied, and which it does not
Eight requirements were implemented and untagged; tagging them takes coverage from 59.8% to 64.2% without a line of feature code. Five more were refused rather than tagged -- R2's own acceptance criterion still reads '(figure TBD)', R5 has one of three clauses built, FR-RAW-2 meets the requirement's purpose but not its stated mechanism. docs/outstanding.md records what is genuinely unbuilt, so the gap reads as a decision rather than an oversight. It also names four requirements the matrix reports as covered that are not, including two covered only by string literals inside the traceability tool's own test fixtures. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
4d0ad0601c |
Merge: a Flatpak that asks for no filesystem, and the channels v1 ships through
FR-PLAT-LIN-3 and NFR-COMPAT-2. The manifest grants no filesystem permission of any kind, which is not an oversight: a folder library is chosen by typing an absolute path, nothing in the tree calls the FileChooser portal, and a static --filesystem= grant would have made that design appear to work by not testing it. docs/distribution.md records what a portal-based picker would take. No Flatpak has been built -- flatpak-builder is not installed here -- so the finish-args set is reasoned from what the binary links, not observed to be sufficient. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
bb35665bd2 |
Let a paste carry some kinds of edit and not others
FR-DEV-6 asks for presets "covering a subset of the edit graph". What landed with the named presets covered two subsets: everything, and everything but the crop. "Match the colour but not the sharpening" had no way to be said. `Scope` is now a set of `Attribute` — the same six kinds every operation already declares and the develop panel already builds its tabs from. The photographer ticking "tone and colour" is naming the groups they navigate by, and neither this module nor the interface has to name an operation to do it (FR-DEV-3c). The pleasing part is what left. Framing used to be excluded by an explicit test against one operation's id; it is now excluded because Geometry is not in the default set. The special case dissolved into the general rule, and the argument for it — a crop is a decision about *this* photograph, and carrying it across forty destroys forty compositions — is now a statement about a kind of edit rather than about a node. All thirty-three existing preset tests pass unchanged, which is the evidence that the generalisation kept its promises. One decision that is a field rather than a rule, because the two cases genuinely differ. An operation this build cannot classify — from a newer version, arriving over sync — travels under "everything" and "everything but the crop", because those are claims about the whole edit and an unrecognised operation is part of it (FR-NC-8). It does not travel under a hand-picked set, because that is a claim about kinds, and an unknown kind is not one of the kinds that were ticked. The settings page's "Copy crop and rotation" checkbox is gone, replaced by the same chips the preset sheet draws. It asked the right first question — geometry is the kind whose accidental travel destroys work — but it was the only question a boolean could ask. The field stays in `Settings`, read exactly once to seed the new set, so anyone who had ticked it keeps their behaviour. The chips are deliberately not in the develop column. Six of them there would set the width of the whole sidebar, which is the bug `ChipGrid`'s comment records at length. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
d3dadbd725 |
Group the frames of one moment, by when they were taken and what they look like
A burst is the commonest thing in a cull and the least interesting: twelve frames of the same gull at 10 fps occupy twelve cells, are scrolled past twelve times, and end with the photographer keeping one. FR-CULL-5 asks for them to collapse to one representative and be judged as a unit. Two signals, because neither alone survives a real library. Time alone groups a whole wedding ceremony -- a photographer working steadily never leaves the gap that would end the run. Similarity alone groups a studio setup shot across two days, which is a project rather than a moment. Together they are specific: adjacent in time *and* looks like the frame before it. Two seconds is the time bound, and the reason is worth recording because the figure looks absurd next to a 10 fps camera. `images.captured_at` is whole seconds -- EXIF's DateTimeOriginal has no sub-second field and SubSecTimeOriginal is optional and widely omitted -- so a burst arrives in the catalog as ten frames sharing one timestamp. Any threshold finer than a second is a threshold on information that is not there. Where the pace really is faster, the similarity bound is what separates the frames. Similarity is a 64-bit difference hash over a 9x8 box-averaged reduction, compared between *adjacent* frames only. Chained rather than anchored on the first frame, because by frame twenty a camera following a bird has nothing in common with frame one while no two neighbours differ by much; the time bound is what stops the chain running away. There is no all-pairs step and there must never be one -- that is what turns a grouping pass into something nobody can afford to run over 50k images. Nothing here ranks a frame. FR-CULL-5 names the failure it is avoiding, which is rejecting the only frame of an important moment because somebody blinked, so there is no sharpness score and no best-of-burst. The representative is the earliest frame -- a fact about the clock, not a judgement about the photograph -- and the user's own choice lives in its own table so that rebuilding the grouping cannot erase it. Same argument `people.ignored` makes one subsystem over: nothing short of remembering a decision survives re-clustering. A newly found burst is recorded *open*. Collapsing on discovery would be tidier, and would also mean a background pass taking photographs off the screen part way through a cull. The pass marks; the user folds. It is a pass rather than a job kind for the reason catalog.md 10.2 gives for face clustering: a burst is a property of a run of frames and has no natural subject_id, so a per-image job would rebuild the world once per photograph. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
8d5dc423ea |
Say that all three of FR-CULL-3's bullets are unbuilt, not one
The first draft got this half right and half wrong. It correctly said the existing histogram and clipping indicators are not FR-CULL-3's, but it described them as adjacent — as though the work left were mostly focus peaking and a relocation. They are not adjacent. The histogram reads AdjustPass's 8-bit output and counts clipping as r == 255, so it describes the frame the display is about to show, after the entire develop chain. FR-CULL-3 asks for the histogram of the sensor data, and gives its reason in the requirement itself: a rendered image "systematically lies about what is recoverable in the raw". A readout taken from the render cannot answer that question however it is presented, which means two of the three bullets need a new measurement rather than a new placement. Found by the agent building focus peaking, who had to go looking at the counters to find out. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
0d9f802f88 |
Regenerate the matrix that this branch is about
Eight requirements gained a tag in this branch's first commit, so the generated matrix is stale until it is rerun. Coverage moves from 59.8% (107/179) to 64.2% (115/179), and the untagged list drops from 72 entries to 64. Regenerating here rather than leaving it to the pre-commit hook, because this branch's subject *is* the matrix: a reader comparing the two commits should see the number move for a stated reason. The eight are R3, R6, FR-DEV-1, FR-UI-6, FR-NC-6d, NFR-OPS-3, NFR-PORT-2 and NFR-SEC-3, and none of them is new work — every one was already satisfied by code that had simply never said so. Six of the thirteen tag sites were new `TRACES:` lines rather than additions to existing ones, so the tag count moves 896 → 902 while the covered count moves by eight. Orphan tags remain at zero. Run from source with `cargo run -p traceability -- report`, never from a prebuilt binary, and note that the tool tracks line numbers — the six prepended module tags shift every subsequent line in their own files, which accounts for the churn in this diff that is not a coverage change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
88ef7148d6 |
Write down what is not built, so the gap reads as a decision
The traceability matrix reports one number and cannot say what it means. An untagged requirement is either one nobody built or one somebody built and did not label, and both look identical in the summary table. Eight of the second kind were tagged in the previous commit. This is the first kind, written out with the reasoning, so that the distance between the register and the binary is something a reader can see rather than reconstruct from a percentage. Eleven clusters, each verified against the tree rather than inherited from a survey. Several turned out to be more interesting than "not done": Plugins are 21 untagged requirements — nearly a third of the shortfall — and §7 already lists the Plugin API as out of scope for v1 while §3.10 spends 280 lines specifying it. The two that *are* built, FR-PLG-2 and FR-PLG-2d, are the declarative operation format, which is a plugin system that resolves at build time. The fix here is an edit to requirements.md, not code, and D16 has to be answered before any format is called stable. FR-DSP-2 is not merely unbuilt; it is under challenge. frame_budget.rs and TD-4 independently argue that tiling costs more than it saves on the interactive path, so the open question is whether the requirement should survive, not when it will be met — and the spike that would settle it, S6, has not run. NFR-A11Y-1's hard half is done and its easy half is not. LocalizedKey already keeps display strings out of core/ and labels::resolve is a single resolution point; what that point does is a hardcoded English match, so a translation needs a recompile, which is the one thing the requirement forbids. The §4.1 performance targets are unverified rather than unmet. §8 requires a per-commit benchmark suite whose regressions fail the build; there is no benches/ directory, no criterion, and no benchmark step in any of the three CI workflows. The one guard that does live in CI skips itself without a GPU adapter and asserts its CPU half only in release, while CI tests in dev. Nothing says the targets are missed. It says nobody would find out. And three requirements are reported as covered while not being met: R1 and NFR-OPS-1 are tagged only by string literals inside the traceability tool's own tests, which it scans along with everything else, and FR-CAT-13's single tag sits on keyword storage while no XMP is parsed or written anywhere. CONTRIBUTING already warns that a tag proves a tag exists; these are the specific ones. Focus peaking, burst grouping, Flatpak packaging and the Android platform integration are being built in parallel and are marked in progress rather than listed as absent, so those lines can be struck as they land. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
95847e3a31 |
Say which channels v1 ships through, and that the Flatpak cannot reach a library
NFR-COMPAT-2 asks for the v1 channels to be stated, and says why in its own second sentence: the channel decision and the storage design are coupled. There was nowhere that statement lived. packaging/ held a PKGBUILD and a desktop entry, which is a recipe rather than a decision, and the coupling the requirement points at was therefore invisible. docs/distribution.md states five channels and, more usefully, which two of them exist only as promises. It also records what every channel has to get right independently of format — the one identifier that appears in four places, the metainfo, Vulkan being a requirement rather than a preference while NFR-R8 is open, a secrets daemon being optional rather than required, and the LFS pointer check that stops a package shipping 130 bytes where an 11 MB model should be. §4 is the part worth reading. Preparing a Flatpak is what surfaced that FR-PLAT-LIN-3 is not satisfied and cannot be satisfied by packaging alone: a folder library is chosen by typing an absolute path into an EndpointOnly field that checks it with std::fs, and nothing in the tree calls the FileChooser portal. Inside a sandbox that path does not exist, so the launch screen refuses it. Import fails one step earlier, because a sandboxed process reads its own mount namespace and a card mounted on the host is not in it. That is written down rather than fixed with --filesystem=host, and the argument for not fixing it that way is §2: the Arch package and an AppImage both hand the application the same unrestricted process the developer runs it in, so Flatpak is the only Linux channel that tests whether a design assumed unrestricted access. Granting the permission removes the only reason to ship it. The reverse coupling on Android is recorded too. NFR-COMPAT-2 says Play distribution is what makes ARCH §6.9 binding; §6.9 is verified rather than assumed, so SAF is already unconditional and a sideloaded build would gain nothing by asking for more. Play is deferred over the GPLv3 question, which is a licence-reading exercise and blocks nothing in the storage design. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
5a8327824f |
Keep an edit under a name, not just on the clipboard
FR-DEV-6 asks for three things — named presets, copy/paste between images, and batch-apply to a selection. The last two have been here for a while; this is the first. The format is the sidecar's, deliberately. A preset *is* the non-default half of a version, so the lines are the same lines keyed the same way, which makes the two files diffable against each other and lets someone debugging an edit paste a block from one into the other. One file rather than one per preset: a preset per file makes the name a path, and every name then has to survive a filesystem — a `/` becomes a directory, a name differing only in case collides on one platform and not another, and renaming becomes two operations that can half-fail. As a key in a document it is none of those. Unknown *parameters* needed no machinery. `Preset` already holds whatever keys it is given and resolves them against the descriptors only at apply time, so one written by a newer build survives by being stored. Only lines that are not `op.param = float` at all are preserved verbatim, which is the sidecar's version-skew promise made here too. Applying is the paste path with a different source, so a preset reaches a selection through the sidecar read-modify-write that was already there: no graph, no decode, no GPU, forty files or one. Two smaller decisions worth the record. A library that fails to parse is held empty in memory and *not* written back over — settings regenerate themselves and this is work, so a parse failure must not be the moment it is destroyed. And every save persists immediately and rolls the in-memory copy back if the write fails, so the sheet never lists a preset the file does not have. The grid's "Presets" button is gated on the selection alone, unlike the "Paste to 40" beside it. That button needs a clipboard armed this session; the preset list is whatever was saved last month, and hiding it behind an unrelated action is what makes a feature only its author knows about. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
574107bc39 |
Let a manual collection be put in the order it is meant to be seen in
`collection_members.position` and `Sort::CollectionPosition` have been in the catalog since collections were, and nothing above dr-catalog has ever written or read either: `collections::set_order` had no callers, and the grid ordered everything by capture time whatever it was scoped to — dr-ui does not construct a `Query` at all, it has its own `GRID_ORDER` constant. So a manual collection was a set with an order nobody could see or change. Three pieces, because it could not be fewer: `grid_order_for` decides the ordering from the scope, and both readers take it from there. That is the load-bearing part. An ordinal only names a photograph relative to an ordering, so the window read and the span read have to agree — a shift-click resolved through a different ORDER BY than the cells were drawn with selects a different run than the one on screen, and the user finds out when the export runs. `read_ids_span` already stated that invariant about `GRID_ORDER`; this widens it to an ordering that depends on the scope. Only a single manual collection has one. A set draws its descendants' images too, and two children's positions are unrelated integers that interleave arbitrarily; a smart collection has no member rows to carry a position at all. Both fall back to capture time and refuse the drop rather than pretending. The drop is on the cell, on whichever half of it the finger landed — the trailing edge is the only way to name the last place in a collection, since there is no cell beyond the last one to drop in front of. `reordered` is pure and the membership is rewritten whole. `set_order` sets the positions it is given and leaves the rest, so a partial write would interleave the moved run with rows nobody touched; and it is read unfiltered, so what the filter is hiding keeps its place relative to what the user can see. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
6d25d85f18 |
Make the range gesture visible, and offer the whole grid at once
Touch has had a range gesture for as long as selection mode has: double-tap the far end. It is invisible, it is unreliable on a grid that scrolls under the second tap, and it extends from the anchor *before* the two taps moved it — a rule subtle enough that the code needs two paragraphs to explain it to itself. Nobody who was not told about it has ever used it. "Select to…" is the same operation with state you can see. Press it, the strip stops reporting and says "Tap the last photograph", and the next cell taken is the far end. It reaches Rust as shift on `cell-pressed`, so it lands in `apply_press` as the ctrl+shift it already is, and there is no third selection policy to keep in step with the other two. This is deliberately not the sweep gesture. A drag that paints cells can only reach what is on screen, and the ranges that hurt on a tablet are longer than a screenful — between the two taps here the user may scroll as far as they like, and the run is resolved by the catalog rather than by what happened to be loaded. A sweep is still worth having for short runs; it is not what this should have rested on. "Select all" beside it, asked of the catalog for the same reason: a select-all that quietly meant "the hundred cells that happen to be loaded" is a lie the user cannot see until the export runs. The double-tap stays. It is tested, and an accelerator that costs nothing is worth keeping for whoever has already learnt it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
9ac1447139 |
Ask for the collection's name where the keyboard can reach it
"New collection from selection" created the collection under a placeholder name and then opened the rename field in the sidebar tree. On a tablet the sidebar is not on screen. It is instantiated all the same — app.slint collapses it to zero width and `visible: false` rather than using an `if`, because an `if` there is a layout loop Slint panics on — so the rename field was created, its `init` took focus, and Android raised the on-screen keyboard over a box nobody could see. Nothing else on the screen is focusable, so the keyboard had nowhere to go: it stayed, the name could not be typed, and the collection was already written under the name the user did not want. Asked in a sheet instead, on the same card as the filing and keywording sheets, before anything is written. That also fixes what was hiding behind it: an abandoned rename used to leave a "New collection" in the tree, because the collection existed before the name did. `Field` gains `take-focus()` so a sheet whose field is the only thing to do in it can answer the keyboard for the user — a function rather than a property, because focus is an event and a bound property would re-take it on every unrelated re-evaluation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
5133e53bc8 |
Give back what a straighten took, when the angle comes back
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 2h16m6s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 52s
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 4s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 4s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 51s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Successful in 47m10s
The auto-crop only ever shrank. Straighten to 20 degrees and the corners are cropped away correctly; come back to 3, or all the way to zero, and the crop stays at the size 20 degrees demanded. Nothing on screen explains why the photograph is still small, and the only way back was undo. The cause was that each correction was computed from the previous correction's output, so it accumulated: every angle the slider rested at took its cut and none was ever returned. The fix is to stop accumulating and recompute. The applied crop is now always the user's own rectangle fitted into the current angle's safe area, so as the angle falls and that area opens up the crop grows back — and stops, exactly, at the rectangle they chose. At zero the safe area is the whole frame and the fit is the identity, which is what carries it the last of the way home. There is deliberately no early exit for the upright case now: that exit is precisely what would strand the crop small. **The intent is remembered as a pair, so it repairs itself.** The session keeps `(applied, intended)` — what the correction wrote, and what it was derived from — and trusts the remembered intent only while the graph still holds `applied`. Every other route to the crop leaves something else there: a handle dragged, a ratio chosen, a sidecar loaded, a paste, an undo. That mismatch is the signal the memory is stale, and the current rectangle becomes the new intent. The alternative was a write into this field from each of those paths, which is the kind of bookkeeping that is correct until someone adds a seventh path. Dragging a handle therefore *is* the user choosing, including at a non-zero angle: the correction will not later grow the crop past what they dragged it to. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
ff6c313bab |
Wrap the chip rows, so one six-choice parameter stops sizing the sidebar
The develop column asked for 482px. Every comment in it, a dozen of them, describes it as a 280px column — and on a tablet it was taking 40% of the screen from the photograph it exists to serve. Measured rather than guessed, because none of it is visible in the source: the column takes the widest width any panel declares, `AdjustPanel` wanted 482 of it, its rows wanted 458, and after the 44px scroll gutter the widest single row was 414. That row is `film_sim`'s `format` — six film formats from 35mm to 8x10, laid out by `Segmented` as six 64px chips in a `HorizontalLayout` that cannot wrap. 6 x 64 + 5 x 6 = 414, exactly. Nothing about that is the film simulation's fault. An operation declares its parameters and the panel decides how to draw them (FR-DEV-3a), so a node is entitled to offer six choices; it is the drawing that has to cope. Any future operation with a five-choice enum would have done the same thing, silently, to every screen in the application. `ChipGrid` is the general answer: chips placed by index arithmetic inside a plain `Rectangle`, wrapping at a column count, declaring a width that depends on the columns rather than on the number of choices. `Segmented` takes a `columns` property and uses it when asked — zero, one row however many chips, stays the settings page's behaviour, where the page is full-width and reading the alternatives side by side is the whole argument for chips over a dropdown. The generated enum rows and the curve-channel picker now wrap at three, and the crop ratio chips use the shared grid instead of the private copy of it they shipped with last week. The column measures 351 now, down from 482, and what sets it is the mode strip rather than a parameter — which is a control the user chose to have on screen rather than an accident of one node's variant list. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
bd33487054 |
Say which axis each export dimension is, in the one place that renders
The box modes put two numeric fields one above the other, and on screen they are two anonymous numbers: `TextRow` draws its label behind the field rather than above it, so "Width" and "Height" never appear. That fault is older than this feature — the storage panel's cache sizes have the same missing labels, and the single "Size value" row always did — and it belongs in its own change rather than being fixed under cover of this one. But one unlabelled number is survivable and two are not, so the axis goes where the page does render it: the unit. It reads "3840 px wide" above "2160 px high", which is the sentence the user is trying to write anyway. The `label` bindings stay correct and stay where they are, so this becomes redundant rather than wrong the day `TextRow` is fixed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
c38df01bf7 |
Hang the auto-crop off the slider's commit, not off the pointer passing over
The straighten auto-crop worked once and then stopped. It was keyed on `PlainSlider::drag-changed`, whose name is a lie inherited from what it forwards: `SliderTrack` defines `engaged` as `has-hover || claimed`, and it has to — a `Flickable` withholds the press for 100ms, so hover is the only signal that arrives in time to stand the scrolling ancestor down. That is the right definition for the job it was written for and the wrong one for this. Keyed on hover, the correction fires when the pointer first crosses the track — before anything has been dragged — and then does not fire again for as long as the pointer stays on it, however many times the angle is changed. Which is exactly what "it only works once" looks like. `SliderTrack` already publishes the signal this wants. `committed` fires on release, once per gesture, after the final `changed`, and its doc comment says so in as many words. It was simply not forwarded through `PlainSlider`, so it now is, and the geometry panel's callback is a `committed(float)` rather than a `drag-changed(bool)`. The angle needs no re-applying here: the track emits its last `changed` before it commits, so the value is already in the graph by the time this runs. What is left is the correction that has to happen exactly once. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
2c8768ac29 |
Lay the ratio chips out by hand, because Slint will not lay them out
The ratio chips shipped inside a `GridLayout` with `row` and `col`
computed from the repeater's index. It compiles. On screen every chip
piles into a single row that runs off the panel, and the terminal fills
with
Internal error in Slint: RepeatedItemTree::grid_layout_input_data()
not implemented
once per frame. A `for` inside a `GridLayout` is not supported, and
nothing says so until it is running.
A `HorizontalLayout` is not the answer either: six chips side by side
need over 400px, and this column's width is the largest width any panel
declares — so one row would widen every other panel in the application to
fit a control that is on screen only while cropping.
So the grid is arithmetic over the index inside a plain `Rectangle`. It
costs the layout engine nothing, it wraps a seventh ratio onto a third
row by itself, and — because a bare `Rectangle` declares no preferred
width — it takes the width the column already has instead of setting it.
The Portrait chip gets a container of its own for the same reason: a
`ChoiceChip` dropped straight into a `VerticalLayout` is stretched the
full width of the panel and reads as a button for the section rather than
as one more chip.
The three conditional pieces are also now individually-conditional
children of the one layout rather than a nested layout under a single
`if`, which is the convention `app.slint` and `masks.slint` already carry
notes about: a conditional nested layout under-reports its height here
and the panels below it draw on top of one another.
All of this was invisible in the source and obvious in a screenshot.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
52c655e6cf |
Turn the ratio lock with the photograph when it is turned
A quarter turn carries the crop with it — that is what makes turning a photograph keep its composition rather than sliding the selection onto a different part of the picture. So a rect locked to 16:9 comes out of the turn at 9:16, of a frame whose axes have also swapped, and the lock was left claiming landscape over a portrait rect. The next drag would then snap it back upright and undo what the turn had just done. The orientation switch now turns with it, on odd numbers of quarters. `Original` is deliberately excluded, and getting that wrong flips it twice: it is resolved against the framed size every time it is asked for, and the turn has already swapped that frame's axes — so it has turned by the time anything asks. `turns_with_the_frame` is the one predicate that separates the two cases, with a test that pins both. `CropAspect` arrived without tests of its own; it has them now, including the round trip this fixes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
3bb68cff69 |
Export at an exact resolution, and offer the panels worth naming
Export sizing could bound an image but not fix it. Long edge, short edge and percentage all preserve the aspect ratio by letting one dimension fall where it may, which is right for most work and useless against a display that accepts one resolution and rejects everything else — a television's art mode, a digital frame, a wallpaper slot. FR-EXP-3 has always listed both halves of the answer, and this adds them. **Fit box** scales to fit inside a width and height, so nothing is thrown away and the result is smaller than the box on one axis unless the crop already matches it. **Fill box** scales to cover the box and cuts the overhang off the middle, so the file is exactly the pixels asked for. Fill is the only mode in the file that discards image data, so two things about it are worth stating. The overhang comes off symmetrically: the crop tool is where a photographer decides which part of a frame survives, and this stage having an opinion of its own would fight it. And locking the crop to the same ratio leaves nothing here to cut, which is the workflow the two features are meant to be used in. With upscaling off and a source too small to cover, a fill box keeps its *shape* rather than falling back to the source's: exporting a 3:2 file where 16:9 was asked for is silently wrong in exactly the way the mode exists to prevent, so the box shrinks instead. The existing rule — clamp, never fail — is otherwise unchanged. Four panel sizes are offered as buttons beside the fields. Getting 3840 x 2160 by typing four digits twice is a step at which the mistake is discovered after the upload rather than before it. They fill in the numbers and nothing else, in particular not the fit/fill choice: both are legitimate against a screen, and guessing would discard the edges of a photograph for a user who wanted them. The list is panels rather than platforms, because a screen has one exact pixel count for ever where "what a photo site wants" would rot in the file. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
d9eb8faffd |
Crop away the corners a straighten exposed, once the slider is let go
Turning a rectangle inside its own bounds exposes its corners: there is no source pixel out there, and the shader renders it black. Nothing in the render prevents that, deliberately — a free angle does not change the output size, which is what leaves the frame where the user put it while the slider moves. Correct during the drag; four black wedges on the finished photograph. Letting go of the slider now pulls the crop inside the area the angle leaves defined. `Framing::max_inscribed_crop` already computed that bound and had no caller; this is the caller its doc comment described. **Once, at the end of the gesture.** Applied per frame it would shrink the crop on every step of the slider and never grow it back, so a user who overshot to 20° and came back to 3° would be left with a crop ratcheted down by the excursion rather than by the angle they settled on. Per gesture it is bounded by the angles actually rested at, and undo steps back through them. **The crop is fitted into the bound, not replaced by it.** A crop placed deliberately off-centre is a decision, and an automatic correction that recentred it would undo the user's work to fix a problem they did not have. `CropRect::fitted_into` scales only as far as the bound demands and then slides the rect the shortest distance needed to be inside — so a ratio locked in the crop panel survives the straighten too, since the shape is never touched. It returns the rect unchanged, bit for bit, when nothing needed to move. That matters more than it looks: this runs on every release of the slider, including releases at zero, and a rect that drifted by a rounding error each time would be an edit recorded for no reason. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
e6ad906bc1 |
Let the crop be held to a ratio while it is dragged
A photographer cropping for a print, a phone wallpaper or a 16:9 frame is not choosing four edges — they are choosing one edge and a known shape. Free-dragging every corner made them do that arithmetic by eye on every drag, and get it slightly wrong. The panel now offers Free, Original, 1:1, 3:2, 4:3 and 16:9, with a Portrait switch for the ones that have two orientations. Original follows the frame rather than naming a number, so it stays right on the next photograph from another body and after a quarter turn. **The ratio is of output pixels, and the rect is not.** `CropRect` is stored in fractions of a frame that is not itself square, so holding a shape needs the frame's size — `ratio * height / width` of the frame. Skipping that gives a "1:1" crop that is square only on a square photograph, which is the one case nobody would test on, so the conversion lives in `CropRect::with_aspect` where it is explained and pinned by a test that asserts the fractions are *not* equal. Two decisions worth recording: The reshaped rect **grows** onto the ratio rather than shrinking onto it, then scales down only as far as the frame's edge demands. Fitting inside instead makes a one-axis drag do nothing at all — the other axis clamps the first straight back, and the handle simply refuses to move. The overlay now reports **which corner the drag is holding**, because reshaping onto a ratio has to know which corner is nailed down and only the handle that took the press knows that. A move reports no corner and keeps its shape: reshaping about a centre would pull an over-moved rect smaller instead of sliding it along the edge. The lock lives with the window rather than the session. A `DevelopSession` is per image, and cropping a set of frames to one shape is exactly when the lock earns its place. It is not an edit and reaches no sidecar — what is saved is the rectangle it produced. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
480c46c41a |
Quote the percentile the measurement can actually support
The before/after published a p99 ratio of 6.0x at 4K. It is not supported and the correction is worth more than the number was. The baseline run's `fit` rows spread 2.3x between median and 99th percentile while every row of the after run spreads about 1.1x. A stage costing `radius x pixels` has no reason to be bimodal, and `fit` is the memory-bound configuration — it walks the whole 482 MB source on a stride where `1:1` reads a contiguous window. Something else had the machine. The merge brings in the cross-check that settles it: "Try every GPU, not only the fastest one" measured the same baseline code on the same card and reports 4.67 ms p99 for M3 clarity fit at 2560x1600, against 10.40 ms here. Two measurements of one thing differing by 2.2x mean the noisier one is wrong. So both percentiles are now published and the p50 column is the claim: 2.8x at 4K rather than 6.0x. The p99 improvement is real and larger; this run cannot say by how much, and says so. What the caveat does not touch: every after figure is inside the 16 ms budget with a p99 within 26% of its median at every size and both views, and clarity against all-four is a within-run comparison. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
30162e80df |
Merge branch 'master' into clarity-reduced-base
# Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
8b251b84a0 |
Record what the reduced base actually bought
TD-4 asked for the measurement as well as the change, and this is it: 25.05 ms to 4.17 ms at 3840 x 2160, six times faster, with clarity no longer dominating the neighbourhood stage it used to be 97% of. Measured before and after on the same machine and the same adapter minutes apart, baseline at the branch's merge-base, so the only variable is the change. That adapter is not the RTX 3050 the rest of this document was measured on, so the new table says to read it on its own rather than against the ones above — the before/after is comparable, the absolute figures are not, and quietly replacing the existing tables would have changed the instrument. Also recorded: the declared halo is now quantised to multiples of the output scale, because the 2-sigma truncation rounds on the reduced grid. 29 px becomes 28 at 1920x1200 and 38 becomes 40 at 2560x1600. It is inside what the cross-form test holds — 0.03 stops of peak, 2% of reach — but it is a change in reach and not only in cost, and a tile scheduler would be handed it. Better written down now than found later as a seam. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
bff95e25ad |
Let clarity's base be computed where it is still fully determined
Clarity's Gaussian sigma is 1.2% of the frame's shorter edge, so its radius is a property of the viewport: 52 render pixels at 4K, two separable passes of 105 taps each over 8.3 M pixels. That measured 33.9 ms — seven times the entire fused point chain, for one slider — and is docs/technical-debt.md TD-4. A detail pass may now declare `output_scale`, and clarity's base is computed on a grid a quarter the size on each axis. The pass that combines needs the blur *and* the full-resolution colour, and a colour that has been through a quarter-scale target is no longer full resolution. So a scaled pass cannot simply join the ping-pong: there are two chains now. The full-resolution one carries the colour and no scaled pass touches it; the reduced one carries the base and reaches the combining pass through a second binding as `reduced_at()`. The reduce is a dispatch of its own rather than something the first blur half does on the way past, and that is the whole difference between this and the strided kernel the module documentation rules out. A stride samples an image that is not band-limited and aliases high-frequency content down into the base, which is then subtracted, and arrives in the output as mottling across smooth gradients. This band-limits first and samples after. What is discarded is content the base could not represent at any resolution, because a Gaussian at sigma = 26 px holds nothing above one cycle per 26 px and the quarter-scale grid carries one per 8 — so the reduced base is not an approximation of the full-resolution one, it is the same function sampled where it is still determined. Which is also why the scale belongs to the band rather than to the stage. Texture's sigma is a decade finer, so the reduce pass's own box would be wider than the Gaussian it was prefiltering; texture never reduces. And clarity steps 4 -> 2 -> 1 as sigma falls, because a quarter of a small sigma is not a Gaussian either — the case that gives up is the one that was already cheap. `radius` stays in each pass's own pixels and `ComposedDetail::radius` multiplies it back up, so 13 reduced pixels at scale 4 still report the 52 render pixels a tile would have to be grown by. The halo a scheduler sees does not move. The halo tests pass unchanged, which was TD-4's stated bar; they render at 1024 px and so exercise the reduced path rather than stepping around it. Added `crossing_the_reduction_threshold_does_not_change_the_picture`, because nothing yet compared the reduced form against a *less* reduced one — every other test measures one form against itself. It renders the same edit either side of the 4 -> 2 step-down and holds the peak excursion to 0.03 stops and the reach to 2% of the frame. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
3b5d564495 |
Try every GPU, not only the fastest one
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 2h7m41s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 46s
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 3s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 3s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 41s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Successful in 21m1s
`request_adapter` with `HighPerformance` returns one adapter and no second chance. That is right on a healthy machine and wrong on one with a sick GPU, which is not rare: observed 2026-08-29 on a laptop whose discrete card had hit an NVRM assertion failure and a fullchip reset. The driver still advertised it, wgpu dutifully picked it as the highest performing, and the process died on it — while a working integrated GPU and a working external card sat unused in the same enumeration. A photo editor that will not start because the *fastest* GPU is broken, on a machine holding two that are not, is worse than a slow one. So: enumerate, order by preference, take the first that yields a device. The ordering reproduces what `HighPerformance` meant, so a healthy machine picks what it always picked and pays one enumeration for it. A CPU adapter sorts last rather than being excluded — software rendering is a poor experience and a working one. Which GPU to prefer is now a policy rather than an assumption, because the fastest is not obviously the right one. A 24 MP frame is ~96 MB of RGBA and every upload and export readback crosses PCIe on a discrete card, where an integrated GPU shares memory and crosses nothing — and does not empty a battery. Measured before choosing a default, on this machine's Iris Xe against its RX 5700 XT. The fused colour pass is within 1.5x, which is the shape shared memory suits. The neighbourhood stage is 5-8x slower, and that decides it: clarity at 1920x1200 costs 20 ms on the iGPU, over the budget on its own at the smallest size tested. So `Performance` stays the default and `Efficiency` is offered rather than chosen (`DARKROOM_GPU=integrated`). docs/frame-budget.md carries the table, and says what it does *not* show: the harness renders from a resident texture and never uploads or reads back, so the transfer cost an iGPU avoids appears in none of it. Import, export and the thumbnail sweeps may well go the other way. What this cannot fix: a GPU sick enough to accept `request_device` and segfault afterwards, which arrives as a driver crash rather than an error. It moves the boundary from "the preferred adapter is unusable" to "unusable and dishonest about it". |