0a6509de93868b3ad00a26f9fd46d559d29b9bce
582
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 dtourolle
|
4b6c110816 |
Count the sensor's own numbers, so a cull can see headroom the render hides
FR-CULL-3's remaining two bullets. What existed was a *display* histogram tagged FR-DSP-7: it binds AdjustPass's Rgba8Unorm output, recovers an 8-bit code value, and counts clipping as `r == 255`. Its own documentation says a clipped bin means "a highlight that is actually gone rather than one the transform might still recover", which is the opposite of what a culling decision needs. FR-CULL-3 asks for the histogram of the sensor data, on the explicit grounds that a rendered image "systematically lies about what is recoverable in the raw", and a readout that measures the render cannot answer that however it is presented. So this is a second instrument beside the first rather than a setting on it. Both are true; they are true about different things; the panel offers both behind a chip row and the words travel with the numbers, because a raw saturation figure drawn under a heading saying Highlights would be mislabelled exactly where the difference matters. **What is reduced over, and what it cost to decide.** ARCH §5.5 specified the pre-demosaic CFA samples. This reduces over the demosaiced scene-linear texture instead, and §5.5 is amended to record the choice rather than let the specification and the code disagree in silence. The texture is camera-native — unbalanced, unmatrixed, uncurved — and normalised by the sensor's own black and white levels, so 1.0 is saturation by construction and the distribution below it is the headroom question with no calibration to carry. Retaining the CFA samples would mean keeping the packed u32 buffer Demosaicer::run currently drops: 48 MB at 24 MP, 120 MB at 60 MP, resident per open photograph whether or not anyone looks at the histogram, on a platform §6.2 exists because memory is scarce on. Three things it therefore cannot say, written into the module docs and into §5.5 rather than left to be discovered: it counts pixels not photosites, so a saturated site drags its interpolated neighbours up and per-channel clipping is smeared by about a demosaic kernel; it cannot see above white, because demosaic.wgsl clamps each photosite at 1.0 for its own good reasons (a Canon 6D reads to 16383 against a declared 15070) so "at saturation" and "a stop past it" share a bin; and it is measured after the CFA pattern is gone, so it can name which colour clipped in the reconstructed image but not which photosite went first. The axis is stops below saturation, 16 bins per stop over 256 bins — the same bin count the display reduction uses, so the fold into drawable columns is shared and a divergence between the two plots would have to be deliberate. A linear axis spends half its width on the top stop, which is why nobody has ever drawn a useful linear raw histogram. The fourth series is the brightest channel rather than luma: these values are unbalanced, so any weighted sum of them is a number about nothing, and the brightest channel is the one that saturates first and so the one the headroom question is actually about. It is a property of the file and not of the render, which has two consequences. It is computed once per photograph and cached — nothing downstream of the demosaic can move a count in it — so a cull does not pay the display histogram's per-frame cost three thousand times. And it describes the whole frame rather than the visible region, deliberately opposite to DevelopSession::histogram: a crop changes what is on screen and changes nothing about what the sensor recorded. Tags are on the reduction, the type, its constructor and the presentation arithmetic, each of which has a test that fails if the behaviour goes. The Slint panel and the push from lib.rs keep their reasoning as prose: nothing asserts them, and a tag would claim coverage the assertions are not making. |
||
 dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
09dddde594 |
Take the photograph another app hands over, and hand an export back
FR-PLAT-AND-6 asks for two things this app did neither of: be a receiver for image view and share intents, and share exported results out through a FileProvider. The manifest declared one activity with one MAIN/LAUNCHER filter, so nothing on the device ever offered DarkRoom for a photograph, and there was no route out at all — Android has refused file:// URIs between apps since API 24, and a content:// URI needs a provider to be behind it. Inbound. Three filters now: VIEW for a gallery or a file manager, SEND and SEND_MULTIPLE for the share sheet, all on image/*. `android_main` reads the launch Intent before it gives `app` away to Slint, and what comes back is passed to `dr_ui::run` exactly as argv is on the desktop — `startup_action` already treats a non-empty list as "the user asked for these specifically", which is what a share is. The URIs are copied into the cache before the viewer opens, and that cost is real: a shared raw file is written once, in full, on the startup path. A content:// URI is a handle into another app's provider, not a path, and the decoders take paths; the alternative is teaching the whole read path about URIs, which is FR-PLAT-AND-1's SAF connector and is not built. Outbound. ExportProvider serves one directory — getFilesDir(), which is the same path `internal_data_path` gives the Rust side — and refuses everything else by canonicalising the request and checking it is inside that root, so `../` and a planted symlink fail the same test. Not AndroidX's FileProvider, because AndroidX is a Maven artefact and this build has no resolver; what it does is a hundred lines and they are here. The share half has no caller. The provider, the URI grant and the chooser are all in place, but the control that would invoke them belongs in `ui/dr-ui`, and wiring it needs an `AndroidApp` the interface can reach. It is documented as unwired and deliberately not tagged as covering the requirement. `launchMode="singleTask"` comes with the filters and is not decoration: another app can now launch this activity while it is running, and the default mode answers that by creating a second NativeActivity in the same process — a second android_main, a second Slint backend, a second wgpu device. The cost of the fix is stated in the manifest: a share arriving while DarkRoom is already open brings it forward without opening the image, because onNewIntent has no route through android-activity's event stream. The Java is Java because Android constructs it: a ContentProvider is instantiated by the system from its manifest entry, and getIntent() exists only on an activity object. Both directions live there rather than in JNI so that what crosses the boundary is two method signatures instead of forty, each of which is a string checked at run time and nowhere else. What a test can hold: the declarations. Nothing about an Intent or a ContentProvider is reachable from `cargo test`, but an intent filter that is deleted takes the app out of every "open with" menu silently, and an authority that stops matching its class raises a SecurityException inside somebody else's app. The tests in lib.rs read the manifest and ExportProvider.java through `include_str!` and hold both to that, on the host, which is the only place in the workspace that looks at either file from Rust. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
846a249156 |
Drain the queue that nothing has ever drained
`jobs` has been a complete durable work queue since the catalog was written, and nothing has ever taken a job out of it. `claim_next`, `complete`, `fail` and `recover_orphaned` had no callers outside their own tests; `enqueue` had three. So the table grew one row per photograph and kept it forever, and FR-PLAT-AND-3's resumability was a property of code that never ran. `runner` is the missing half. It owns no thread, no clock and no policy, and that is the whole design: on Android the process does not decide when background work may run. WorkManager does, subject to Doze, battery saver and FR-NC-6's network constraints, and it revokes permission mid-job by calling onStopped(). So the runner exposes `run_one` — claim, run, record — and `drain`, which repeats it against a budget, a deadline and a cancellation flag the host owns. A `Worker.doWork()` with ten minutes calls drain with a deadline; a desktop idle pass calls it with none. That is the seam the Android service plugs into, and it needs no Android to test. Handlers are supplied from above, because the catalog knows what needs doing and nothing about how: a thumbnail needs a decoder and a fetch needs a network stack, neither of which belongs under core/dr-catalog. A runner claims only kinds some handler declares, so a queue holding work this device cannot do is left alone rather than failed five times. Four outcomes, and only two of them are the job's fault. Done deletes the row; Retry backs off; Abandon gives up now, for a failure no retry can fix; Interrupted releases the claim with its attempt refunded and ends the drain, because the host stopped rather than the job — five backgroundings in a row must not mark good work as failed. Process death is the fifth and cannot report itself, which is what `recover` is for. Recovery is called from `show_catalog_now`, which is the one place a catalog is opened for a session and already returns early if one is open. It has to be exactly once and before any worker starts: there is no owner column, so a second pass while a worker held a claim would take it away. The attempt a dead claim consumed is deliberately kept — a job that takes the process down with it is indistinguishable from one that fails, and the attempt counter is the only evidence that survives a death. The tests cover claiming under contention twice over: sequentially across two connections, and with four threads on four connections against one catalog on disk, asserting every job ran exactly once. Plus completion, backoff, giving up, abandoning, interruption, budget, deadline, cancellation, and a job orphaned by a simulated crash being reclaimed and run once rather than lost or repeated. Not wired to a handler yet, and deliberately not: the only enqueue site the app actually reaches is the remote scan's, whose thumbnails are already served by the async grid worker, and `walk`'s two sites are reachable only from the scan_local example. Inventing a handler to make the plumbing look used is how a requirement comes to read as covered by code that does not implement it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
d63872e5a9 |
Make a claim one statement, and give the queue what a runner needs
The claim was a deferred transaction around a SELECT and an UPDATE, and under a single connection that is fine. Under two it is not what it looks like: the SELECT takes only a read lock, the UPDATE tries to upgrade, and in WAL a worker that read the same snapshot as another gets SQLITE_BUSY_SNAPSHOT on its write. That is not an error a busy handler can retry away — the fix is to roll back and start over — so the queue was "safe" only in the sense that the loser failed loudly instead of taking a job someone else was holding. `UPDATE jobs SET state = 1, attempts = attempts + 1 WHERE id = (SELECT ...) RETURNING ...` is one statement and so one implicit transaction that takes the write lock immediately. Two workers serialise, the loser waits out its busy timeout, and neither can see a row the other already holds. The existing tests are unchanged by it, because from one connection the two forms are indistinguishable — which is exactly why it was never noticed. The rest is the surface a runner has to have and did not: - `claim_next_matching` takes only kinds a worker can actually do. Without it a device with no connector claims `FetchOriginal`, fails it, and pays five wakeups and five backoffs per photograph to reach a conclusion known before it started. Filtering after a claim cannot work: the claim has already marked the row running. - `abandon` gives up now, for failures no retry can fix. `fail` uses it for its own MAX_ATTEMPTS branch, so there is one statement that ends a job. - `release` hands a claim back with its attempt refunded, for a worker that is being stopped rather than a job that is going wrong. `attempts` stands in for the owner column the table does not have: it is bumped by every claim, so a stale worker's release matches nothing and changes nothing. - `reap_orphan_subjects` deletes jobs whose photograph is gone. Coalescing keeps the table one row per unit of work and nothing ever shrank it when the work stopped existing. `ScanFolder` is excluded because its subject is a folder id, and joining that against `images` deletes by coincidence of numbering — hence `JobKind::subject_is_image`, and `JobKind::ALL` so the next kind added cannot quietly fall out of the filter. - `counts` is the number a foreground service's notification is built from. One behaviour change worth stating: a kind this build does not recognise is now parked with an error rather than read as `ExtractMetadata`. The old `unwrap_or` would have run a job of an unknown kind as some arbitrary known one, which is worse than not running it at all. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
d70f5c14e0 |
Name rust-analyzer everywhere the toolchain is installed
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 1h18m38s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 48s
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 9m41s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 9m41s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 48s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Successful in 21m54s
VS Code's rust-analyzer extension ships a server newer than 1.92.0 supports and prompts, on every window, to add one. Listing the component in rust-toolchain.toml makes rustup supply the server matching the pin — the same thing the pin buys everywhere else. The cost lands outside the editor, which is why this is four files rather than one. rustup reconciles that component list against the installed toolchain on the first cargo call in the work tree and downloads what is missing, inside whatever job happens to be running. An unasked-for fetch in the middle of a build step is nobody's line item and hard to find in a log. So every environment that builds this repo names it too: baked into the Android image, and in the install step of each CI job that rolls its own toolchain. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
2955cad654 |
Regenerate the matrix over a night's merges
Coverage 59.8% to 67.0% (120/179). Eight of those came from tagging what was already built; the rest are tonight's features -- FR-CULL-3's peaking half, FR-CULL-5, FR-PLAT-AND-5. FR-PLAT-LIN-3 and NFR-COMPAT-2 stay untagged deliberately. Both were satisfied by a manifest and a document, and there is no source file to hang a tag on that would fail if the behaviour went away. This is also the first commit tonight the pre-commit hook has checked. Every branch used --no-verify, because the hook runs the traceability build and the branches were under a no-build rule; the matrix each of them left untouched is regenerated here, once, over all of them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
7418b040da |
Refuse a scan whose root has gone, instead of reporting it empty
FR-PLAT-AND-2, and a silent failure on both platforms. `dr_sync::scan` stepped over a NotFound or PermissionDenied the way it does for a child that vanished mid-walk -- correct for a child, wrong for the root, where it ended the walk, returned Ok with nothing in it, and reported a successful scan of a library that was no longer there. A lost root is now its own error. The images under it are marked Availability::Offline per FR-CAT-9 and no catalog row is deleted; `library::persist` clears the mark per file as each one is listed again, so a root that comes back needs no repair step. Partly satisfied rather than closed, and the gap is worth stating. The recovery half is real and reachable on Android today, because `map_status` turns Nextcloud's 403 and 404 into it and Nextcloud is how a phone actually gets a library in this build. The causes the requirement names -- revocation, reinstall, a removed card -- are properties of a persisted tree permission, and there is none: SAF does not exist here, `SourceRef::Document` is constructed only in test modules, and `LocalStorage` rejects the variant outright. When SAF lands it becomes a third producer of this error and nothing above it changes, which is why the discovery belongs in the connector. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
085ab766b3 |
Give memory back in the order the user will miss it least
FR-PLAT-AND-5. Android asks for memory back through onTrimMemory and kills the process if it is not given; until now nothing listened, so the answer was always "no". A tiered registry answers instead: GPU caches first, then proxies, then thumbnails, driven from android_main on MainEvent::LowMemory and MainEvent::Stop. The order is the argument. A backgrounded app has no window to draw and therefore no use for a render pipeline, while its thumbnails are exactly what the user will be looking at half a second after they come back -- so going into the background frees only the GPU tier, and only being measured against death frees everything. Sinks register beside the cache they free and hold weak handles, so the registry cannot keep a controller -- and every decoded portrait in it -- alive past the interface it belonged to. `try_borrow_mut` and skip: a warning can land mid-render, freeing textures under the code drawing with them is worse than missing one, and a warning not acted on is always followed by another. The GPU test is the one that matters: an eviction must change no pixel. A freed intermediate pool whose `colour_key` promise still stands renders an empty texture, and nothing else would have caught it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
55cb9b5b30 |
Keep the test scene's own arithmetic from overflowing a u64
The first compile this branch ever had. `cargo fmt` reflowed four files and clippy passed at -D warnings untouched, but one test panicked: `the_signature_does_not_change_with_scale`, on "attempt to multiply with overflow". It is the fixture, not the feature. `scene()`'s little LCG multiplied the block's y by the golden-ratio constant with a plain `*` while the term beside it already used `wrapping_mul`, so any scene taller than about 104 pixels overflowed in debug. Only the scale test builds one that large, which is why 345 of 346 passed around it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
e5db849f04 |
Mark a burst in the grid, and let it be folded away
The counterpart to the grouping: where the signatures come from, and how a group reaches a cell. Signatures are computed from the 256px thumbnails dr-thumbs already holds -- vastly more resolution than a 9x8 reduction can use -- so a library that has been browsed, or that has synced somebody else's shards, has already paid for them and no RAW is decoded for this. The consequence is stated rather than hidden: an image with no thumbnail gets no signature and never joins a burst. That is self-correcting, and it is why the pass runs when the thumbnail sweep finishes rather than on a timer. Nothing happens at import and nothing happens at query time. The mark is drawn as a child of the cell's TouchArea, for the same reason the star strip is: a click on it must not also reach `cell-clicked` and throw the user into develop, and children are hit-tested before the element they sit in. It is never hidden on hover the way the stars are -- a collapsed burst stands in for frames that are not on screen, and something has to say so whether or not a pointer is nearby. Folding changes what the grid's *query* returns rather than what its cells draw, because the grid is a window over an ordered query and the frames a fold hides are mostly not loaded. So the predicate joins VISIBLE in every query that lists or counts cells -- the window, the header's count, the run a shift-click resolves, and the ordinal a scrub lands on -- under the discipline VISIBLE's own comment sets out: present in four places of five is worse than absent, because the counts disagree with the cells and neither looks wrong on its own. There is a test for exactly that. `the_window_read_walks_the_ordering_index` now includes the burst clause. It asserts on the query plan while holding its own copy of the query, so left alone it would have gone on reporting green against a query the grid no longer runs. If the clause costs `images_grid_order` and puts the sort back, that fails here rather than becoming jitter someone measures in six months. The pass keeps its own drain timer in a thread-local instead of taking fields on the library controller, so everything the feature needs to run lives in one file and the screen that starts it holds nothing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
5226f7223b |
Group the frames of one moment, by when they were taken and what they look like
A burst is the commonest thing in a cull and the least interesting: twelve frames of the same gull at 10 fps occupy twelve cells, are scrolled past twelve times, and end with the photographer keeping one. FR-CULL-5 asks for them to collapse to one representative and be judged as a unit. Two signals, because neither alone survives a real library. Time alone groups a whole wedding ceremony -- a photographer working steadily never leaves the gap that would end the run. Similarity alone groups a studio setup shot across two days, which is a project rather than a moment. Together they are specific: adjacent in time *and* looks like the frame before it. Two seconds is the time bound, and the reason is worth recording because the figure looks absurd next to a 10 fps camera. `images.captured_at` is whole seconds -- EXIF's DateTimeOriginal has no sub-second field and SubSecTimeOriginal is optional and widely omitted -- so a burst arrives in the catalog as ten frames sharing one timestamp. Any threshold finer than a second is a threshold on information that is not there. Where the pace really is faster, the similarity bound is what separates the frames. Similarity is a 64-bit difference hash over a 9x8 box-averaged reduction, compared between *adjacent* frames only. Chained rather than anchored on the first frame, because by frame twenty a camera following a bird has nothing in common with frame one while no two neighbours differ by much; the time bound is what stops the chain running away. There is no all-pairs step and there must never be one -- that is what turns a grouping pass into something nobody can afford to run over 50k images. Nothing here ranks a frame. FR-CULL-5 names the failure it is avoiding, which is rejecting the only frame of an important moment because somebody blinked, so there is no sharpness score and no best-of-burst. The representative is the earliest frame -- a fact about the clock, not a judgement about the photograph -- and the user's own choice lives in its own table so that rebuilding the grouping cannot erase it. Same argument `people.ignored` makes one subsystem over: nothing short of remembering a decision survives re-clustering. A newly found burst is recorded *open*. Collapsing on discovery would be tidier, and would also mean a background pass taking photographs off the screen part way through a cull. The pass marks; the user folds. It is a pass rather than a job kind for the reason catalog.md 10.2 gives for face clustering: a burst is a property of a run of frames and has no natural subject_id, so a per-image job would rebuild the world once per photograph. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
d0b671d4db |
Put the grouping dials where the regrouping is
The merge probability was `dr_face`'s constant and the smallest group was a bare `< 2` in the clustering pass. Both were tuned on one library — 1,813 faces of one photographer's family — and the quantity they optimise is a property of the population, not of the model. A household at close family resemblance and two thousand strangers at a wedding want different answers, and neither of them is the reference library. The doc comment already conceded the point and pointed at `face_index --tune`; a photographer does not have a terminal. So they are `FaceSettings` now, saved per device beside the cache budgets and edited from the People screen — beside the Regroup button that applies them and the rail that shows what they did, because a value changed three screens away from its effect is one nobody can tune. Moving them is safe by construction, which is why nothing asks for confirmation: a regroup writes only the suggested half, and confirmations, names and ignores enter as anchors and come back unchanged. The smallest-group rule is applied only to groups the system invented — a group the user named or set aside survives it whatever its size, because a display preference does not overrule a judgement. **Withdrawal, without which the setting does nothing visible.** Raising the smallest group stops the pass creating small groups; it does not remove the ones a previous pass made, because those still hold their suggestions, so they are not empty, so the prune leaves them. The pass now releases every unanchored face it did not place before pruning. And a dial you cannot see the effect of is not a dial. "What would this do?" runs the same population through the clusterer without opening a transaction and reports groups, faces grouped and largest group — one row of `--tune`'s table, on the user's own library, on a worker thread. The line leads with the group count because that is the number that says which side of the right setting you are on: it climbs as fragments are gathered into people and falls as separate people start being welded, while the grouped-face count rises straight through both. The preview parks its poll timer in a slot of its own. A preview and a regroup are allowed to be in flight together, and sharing the sweep's single slot would have the second to start drop the first's timer — visible as a Regroup that finished on its worker and never said so. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
24bf5be574 |
Compile our own Java into the APK, so the classes Android constructs can exist
The APK's only dex was Slint's. `assemble-apk.sh` found `classes.dex` under the android-activity backend's build directory and copied it in, and there was no `javac` step and no `d8` of anything of ours — package.sh's header said so outright, on the reasoning that the app has no Java because android-activity calls `android_main` directly. That reasoning holds for everything the app *calls* and fails for everything Android *constructs*. A `ContentProvider` is instantiated by the system from its manifest entry; nothing in the process ever reaches its constructor, so there is no JNI route to writing one in Rust. The launch `Intent` is the same shape of problem from the other end: it arrives through `Activity.getIntent()`, and the activity android-activity hands out is a stock `NativeActivity` rather than a subclass with room for code. FR-PLAT-AND-6 needs both, and FR-PLAT-AND-4 needs a foreground `Service`, which is a third. So: everything under `apps/darkroom-android/android/java/` goes through javac against `android.jar`, and d8 merges the classes with Slint's finished dex into one `classes.dex`. Merging rather than emitting a second dex keeps the staging and zip steps as they are — multidex is native at API 28, but two files to keep in step buys nothing at this size. The step is skipped when the tree holds no Java, which is the state this commit leaves it in. Nothing about the APK changes until a `.java` file appears. `-source 8 -target 8 -bootclasspath android.jar` is not caution about language features. It is the last combination in which javac allows the boot class path to be replaced: from `-target 9` the flag is rejected, the platform classes come from the JDK instead of from android.jar, and the build stays green while the device raises `NoClassDefFoundError` for a class Android never shipped. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
e465ff0c80 |
Put the people filter where the filters are
Narrowing the grid to two people at once has worked since people became a selector term, and it was effectively unreachable. The only control that could add a second person lived on the People screen, behind selecting them there, and it appeared only once the grid was already narrowed to somebody — so "photographs with both of them" needed a two-screen round trip the user had to guess at. A filter belongs on the filter bar. A "People" chip there opens a tray of everyone the library knows; tapping a name adds or removes them, and the any/all chip beside it — already there, and already the thing nobody found — now has something to sit next to that explains it. The caption leads the row so a pair of chips means something before either is pressed. The tray is a strip under the bar rather than a popup, the way the develop column's film picker is: the view scrolls as one, so an inline strip is taller content and not a second overlay to dismiss. It scrolls horizontally for the same hard reason the bar above it does — a layout cannot be narrower than its children's minimums, and forty people would otherwise set the minimum width of the whole view. The roster is built on open, not kept in step: indexing and regrouping change who exists, and a list cached at startup would be stale for exactly the user who has just been naming people. Named first, then by how much of them the library holds — the catalog orders by face count alone, which puts a dozen unnamed strangers ahead of the two people the user actually cares about. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
6d5de21fb7 |
Tell a tap on a photograph from a hand going past
A brush across the grid opened whichever photograph was under it. Travel was already answered — the Flickable claims the pointer and the press is cancelled — but a contact that neither travels nor lasts reaches a TouchArea as an ordinary press and release, and it was landing the user in develop. So a finger now has to stay down for `TAP_MIN_MS` before letting go counts as opening anything. That is the floor under a tap where the 450 ms `HOLD_DELAY_MS` is the ceiling: below is a graze, between is a tap, above is a hold that starts a selection. One scale, three gestures. Only a finger is held to it. A mouse click is a discrete decision made by a button and is routinely over in thirty milliseconds, so `cell-pressed` now reports whether a finger did it — the same finger-id convention the pinch arbitration beside it already uses — and the dwell applies to touch alone. A graze still *selects* the cell it landed on, because the press already did that. That is the right failure mode: something visible and reversible rather than a silent nothing, and rather than develop. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
e40f2bfee9 |
Let go of the keyboard when a name is finished
Pressing Enter on a person's name committed it and then kept the field focused, so on a tablet the on-screen keyboard stayed up over the faces the user had pressed Enter to get back to. The name looked accepted and the screen looked stuck. `Field` grows `release-focus()`, the other half of the `take-focus()` it already had, and the Identity screen calls it from `accepted`. A function rather than a property for the reason the existing one gives: focus is an event, and bound to a property it would fight anything else that took it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
f5edd49b6b |
Let a manual collection be put in the order it is meant to be seen in
`collection_members.position` and `Sort::CollectionPosition` have been in the catalog since collections were, and nothing above dr-catalog has ever written or read either: `collections::set_order` had no callers, and the grid ordered everything by capture time whatever it was scoped to — dr-ui does not construct a `Query` at all, it has its own `GRID_ORDER` constant. So a manual collection was a set with an order nobody could see or change. Three pieces, because it could not be fewer: `grid_order_for` decides the ordering from the scope, and both readers take it from there. That is the load-bearing part. An ordinal only names a photograph relative to an ordering, so the window read and the span read have to agree — a shift-click resolved through a different ORDER BY than the cells were drawn with selects a different run than the one on screen, and the user finds out when the export runs. `read_ids_span` already stated that invariant about `GRID_ORDER`; this widens it to an ordering that depends on the scope. Only a single manual collection has one. A set draws its descendants' images too, and two children's positions are unrelated integers that interleave arbitrarily; a smart collection has no member rows to carry a position at all. Both fall back to capture time and refuse the drop rather than pretending. The drop is on the cell, on whichever half of it the finger landed — the trailing edge is the only way to name the last place in a collection, since there is no cell beyond the last one to drop in front of. `reordered` is pure and the membership is rewritten whole. `set_order` sets the positions it is given and leaves the rest, so a partial write would interleave the moved run with rows nobody touched; and it is read unfiltered, so what the filter is hiding keeps its place relative to what the user can see. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
9d11554c71 |
Make the range gesture visible, and offer the whole grid at once
Touch has had a range gesture for as long as selection mode has: double-tap the far end. It is invisible, it is unreliable on a grid that scrolls under the second tap, and it extends from the anchor *before* the two taps moved it — a rule subtle enough that the code needs two paragraphs to explain it to itself. Nobody who was not told about it has ever used it. "Select to…" is the same operation with state you can see. Press it, the strip stops reporting and says "Tap the last photograph", and the next cell taken is the far end. It reaches Rust as shift on `cell-pressed`, so it lands in `apply_press` as the ctrl+shift it already is, and there is no third selection policy to keep in step with the other two. This is deliberately not the sweep gesture. A drag that paints cells can only reach what is on screen, and the ranges that hurt on a tablet are longer than a screenful — between the two taps here the user may scroll as far as they like, and the run is resolved by the catalog rather than by what happened to be loaded. A sweep is still worth having for short runs; it is not what this should have rested on. "Select all" beside it, asked of the catalog for the same reason: a select-all that quietly meant "the hundred cells that happen to be loaded" is a lie the user cannot see until the export runs. The double-tap stays. It is tested, and an accelerator that costs nothing is worth keeping for whoever has already learnt it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
d1f3b97245 |
Ask for the collection's name where the keyboard can reach it
"New collection from selection" created the collection under a placeholder name and then opened the rename field in the sidebar tree. On a tablet the sidebar is not on screen. It is instantiated all the same — app.slint collapses it to zero width and `visible: false` rather than using an `if`, because an `if` there is a layout loop Slint panics on — so the rename field was created, its `init` took focus, and Android raised the on-screen keyboard over a box nobody could see. Nothing else on the screen is focusable, so the keyboard had nowhere to go: it stayed, the name could not be typed, and the collection was already written under the name the user did not want. Asked in a sheet instead, on the same card as the filing and keywording sheets, before anything is written. That also fixes what was hiding behind it: an abandoned rename used to leave a "New collection" in the tree, because the collection existed before the name did. `Field` gains `take-focus()` so a sheet whose field is the only thing to do in it can answer the keyboard for the user — a function rather than a property, because focus is an event and a bound property would re-take it on every unrelated re-evaluation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
a2a0131693 |
Merge: face grouping the photographer can tune, people on the filter bar, and a tap that means it
Four fixes to the identity work, and one to the grid. The name field lets the keyboard go when a name is finished, instead of leaving it up over the faces the user pressed Enter to get back to. Filtering to two people at once has worked since people became a selector term and was unreachable behind a two-screen round trip. It is a tray on the filter bar now, where filters are. The merge probability and the smallest group the clusterer will call a person were constants tuned on one library. They are settings, edited beside the Regroup button that applies them, with a read-only preview that answers what they would do to *this* library. And a hand brushing past a photograph no longer opens it: a finger has to stay down long enough to have meant it, on a scale between the graze and the hold that starts a selection. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
b9891e2c04 |
Merge master into tablet-selection
Two real conflicts, both from work that landed either side of the same lines rather than against them. `lib.rs`: the settings controller was hoisted above the People screen's wiring, and Android's thumbnail-tier eviction registered itself at the same point. Independent, so both stay. `library.rs`: manual collection ordering and burst folding each added a clause to the same two queries. The scoped range read now carries both — the folding matters there for one step further on than it does in the grid, because a collapsed burst is one cell, so an ordinal counted over a list still holding every frame names a photograph several places away from the one the user pointed at. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
23c74d7063 |
Put the grouping dials where the regrouping is
The merge probability was `dr_face`'s constant and the smallest group was a bare `< 2` in the clustering pass. Both were tuned on one library — 1,813 faces of one photographer's family — and the quantity they optimise is a property of the population, not of the model. A household at close family resemblance and two thousand strangers at a wedding want different answers, and neither of them is the reference library. The doc comment already conceded the point and pointed at `face_index --tune`; a photographer does not have a terminal. So they are `FaceSettings` now, saved per device beside the cache budgets and edited from the People screen — beside the Regroup button that applies them and the rail that shows what they did, because a value changed three screens away from its effect is one nobody can tune. Moving them is safe by construction, which is why nothing asks for confirmation: a regroup writes only the suggested half, and confirmations, names and ignores enter as anchors and come back unchanged. The smallest-group rule is applied only to groups the system invented — a group the user named or set aside survives it whatever its size, because a display preference does not overrule a judgement. **Withdrawal, without which the setting does nothing visible.** Raising the smallest group stops the pass creating small groups; it does not remove the ones a previous pass made, because those still hold their suggestions, so they are not empty, so the prune leaves them. The pass now releases every unanchored face it did not place before pruning. And a dial you cannot see the effect of is not a dial. "What would this do?" runs the same population through the clusterer without opening a transaction and reports groups, faces grouped and largest group — one row of `--tune`'s table, on the user's own library, on a worker thread. The line leads with the group count because that is the number that says which side of the right setting you are on: it climbs as fragments are gathered into people and falls as separate people start being welded, while the grouped-face count rises straight through both. The preview parks its poll timer in a slot of its own. A preview and a regroup are allowed to be in flight together, and sharing the sweep's single slot would have the second to start drop the first's timer — visible as a Regroup that finished on its worker and never said so. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
a4b9deaf96 |
Put the people filter where the filters are
Narrowing the grid to two people at once has worked since people became a selector term, and it was effectively unreachable. The only control that could add a second person lived on the People screen, behind selecting them there, and it appeared only once the grid was already narrowed to somebody — so "photographs with both of them" needed a two-screen round trip the user had to guess at. A filter belongs on the filter bar. A "People" chip there opens a tray of everyone the library knows; tapping a name adds or removes them, and the any/all chip beside it — already there, and already the thing nobody found — now has something to sit next to that explains it. The caption leads the row so a pair of chips means something before either is pressed. The tray is a strip under the bar rather than a popup, the way the develop column's film picker is: the view scrolls as one, so an inline strip is taller content and not a second overlay to dismiss. It scrolls horizontally for the same hard reason the bar above it does — a layout cannot be narrower than its children's minimums, and forty people would otherwise set the minimum width of the whole view. The roster is built on open, not kept in step: indexing and regrouping change who exists, and a list cached at startup would be stale for exactly the user who has just been naming people. Named first, then by how much of them the library holds — the catalog orders by face count alone, which puts a dozen unnamed strangers ahead of the two people the user actually cares about. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
2403f355d6 |
Tell a tap on a photograph from a hand going past
A brush across the grid opened whichever photograph was under it. Travel was already answered — the Flickable claims the pointer and the press is cancelled — but a contact that neither travels nor lasts reaches a TouchArea as an ordinary press and release, and it was landing the user in develop. So a finger now has to stay down for `TAP_MIN_MS` before letting go counts as opening anything. That is the floor under a tap where the 450 ms `HOLD_DELAY_MS` is the ceiling: below is a graze, between is a tap, above is a hold that starts a selection. One scale, three gestures. Only a finger is held to it. A mouse click is a discrete decision made by a button and is routinely over in thirty milliseconds, so `cell-pressed` now reports whether a finger did it — the same finger-id convention the pinch arbitration beside it already uses — and the dwell applies to touch alone. A graze still *selects* the cell it landed on, because the press already did that. That is the right failure mode: something visible and reversible rather than a silent nothing, and rather than develop. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
bbbc23f376 |
Let go of the keyboard when a name is finished
Pressing Enter on a person's name committed it and then kept the field focused, so on a tablet the on-screen keyboard stayed up over the faces the user had pressed Enter to get back to. The name looked accepted and the screen looked stuck. `Field` grows `release-focus()`, the other half of the `take-focus()` it already had, and the Identity screen calls it from `accepted`. A function rather than a property for the reason the existing one gives: focus is an event, and bound to a property it would fight anything else that took it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
e027d34b65 |
Regenerate the matrix over a night's merges
Coverage 59.8% to 67.0% (120/179). Eight of those came from tagging what was already built; the rest are tonight's features -- FR-CULL-3's peaking half, FR-CULL-5, FR-PLAT-AND-5. FR-PLAT-LIN-3 and NFR-COMPAT-2 stay untagged deliberately. Both were satisfied by a manifest and a document, and there is no source file to hang a tag on that would fail if the behaviour went away. This is also the first commit tonight the pre-commit hook has checked. Every branch used --no-verify, because the hook runs the traceability build and the branches were under a no-build rule; the matrix each of them left untouched is regenerated here, once, over all of them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
82d9d077b0 |
Merge: answer Android's memory warnings, and stop reporting a lost root as an empty library
FR-PLAT-AND-5 in full, FR-PLAT-AND-2 in part -- the recovery is built and live for Nextcloud roots, the SAF cause it names does not exist yet. FR-PLAT-AND-4 and FR-PLAT-AND-6 are not here, both blocked behind the same gap: assemble-apk.sh compiles no Java, so the APK cannot carry a Service or a FileProvider. The container has JDK 17 and build-tools 36; the build step is what is missing. Verified: fmt, clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings, and 1043 tests across dr-catalog, dr-sync, dr-sync-folder, dr-sync-nextcloud, dr-plat and dr-ui. The aarch64 target was checked before the branch was finished but not after; no device was available. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
75fd5619ca |
Refuse a scan whose root has gone, instead of reporting it empty
FR-PLAT-AND-2, and a silent failure on both platforms. `dr_sync::scan` stepped over a NotFound or PermissionDenied the way it does for a child that vanished mid-walk -- correct for a child, wrong for the root, where it ended the walk, returned Ok with nothing in it, and reported a successful scan of a library that was no longer there. A lost root is now its own error. The images under it are marked Availability::Offline per FR-CAT-9 and no catalog row is deleted; `library::persist` clears the mark per file as each one is listed again, so a root that comes back needs no repair step. Partly satisfied rather than closed, and the gap is worth stating. The recovery half is real and reachable on Android today, because `map_status` turns Nextcloud's 403 and 404 into it and Nextcloud is how a phone actually gets a library in this build. The causes the requirement names -- revocation, reinstall, a removed card -- are properties of a persisted tree permission, and there is none: SAF does not exist here, `SourceRef::Document` is constructed only in test modules, and `LocalStorage` rejects the variant outright. When SAF lands it becomes a third producer of this error and nothing above it changes, which is why the discovery belongs in the connector. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
2b812ebe21 |
Give memory back in the order the user will miss it least
FR-PLAT-AND-5. Android asks for memory back through onTrimMemory and kills the process if it is not given; until now nothing listened, so the answer was always "no". A tiered registry answers instead: GPU caches first, then proxies, then thumbnails, driven from android_main on MainEvent::LowMemory and MainEvent::Stop. The order is the argument. A backgrounded app has no window to draw and therefore no use for a render pipeline, while its thumbnails are exactly what the user will be looking at half a second after they come back -- so going into the background frees only the GPU tier, and only being measured against death frees everything. Sinks register beside the cache they free and hold weak handles, so the registry cannot keep a controller -- and every decoded portrait in it -- alive past the interface it belonged to. `try_borrow_mut` and skip: a warning can land mid-render, freeing textures under the code drawing with them is worse than missing one, and a warning not acted on is always followed by another. The GPU test is the one that matters: an eviction must change no pixel. A freed intermediate pool whose `colour_key` promise still stands renders an empty texture, and nothing else would have caught it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
6246a2e346 |
Merge: group the frames of one moment, and let a burst fold away
FR-CULL-5. Frames join a burst when they are adjacent in time and look like the frame before them -- both, because time alone groups a whole ceremony and similarity alone groups a studio setup across two days. Adjacent pairs only, chained; there is no all-pairs step and there must never be one. No selection of any kind. The representative is the earliest frame, a fact about the clock rather than a judgement about the photograph, and a newly found burst arrives open, so the pass never takes a row off the screen. Verified: fmt, clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings, 346 dr-catalog tests, 511 dr-ui tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
fc4157a1e0 |
Keep the test scene's own arithmetic from overflowing a u64
The first compile this branch ever had. `cargo fmt` reflowed four files and clippy passed at -D warnings untouched, but one test panicked: `the_signature_does_not_change_with_scale`, on "attempt to multiply with overflow". It is the fixture, not the feature. `scene()`'s little LCG multiplied the block's y by the golden-ratio constant with a plain `*` while the term beside it already used `wrapping_mul`, so any scene taller than about 104 pixels overflowed in debug. Only the scale test builds one that large, which is why 345 of 346 passed around it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolle
|
91fe6cf300 |
Merge master into partial-preset-scope
🐳 Android image / Build and push (push) Successful in 8s
Build and test / android-image (push) Successful in 8s
Build and test / Desktop (Linux) (push) Failing after 1h17m12s
Build and test / Layer separation (push) Successful in 56s
Traceability / Requirement traces (push) Successful in 1m33s
Build and test / Android (aarch64) (push) Successful in 1h0m38s
# Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md # ui/dr-ui/ui/app.slint |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
754ab91347 |
Bring a Lightroom library across, and start with something in the list
Two halves of the same complaint: a preset sheet that opens on "No presets yet" is homework, and a photographer with ten years of presets in Lightroom has no way to bring them. `dr-preset-xmp` reads Camera Raw `.xmp`. The mapping turned out to be mostly a rename rather than a conversion, because Adobe and this pipeline already agree: exposure is in stops in both, and contrast, the four recovery controls, clarity, texture, vibrance and saturation are all ±100 in both. That is not imitation, it is the convention raw developers converged on — `highlights_shadows.yaml` cites it in as many words. Only sharpening needed arithmetic, Adobe's 0…150 against our 0…100. The white balance does not come across, and says so rather than guessing. Adobe writes absolute Kelvin for a raw file where ours is a relative nudge from what the camera recorded, so converting needs the *target image's* as-shot white balance — exactly what a preset cannot carry, since the same preset lands on a frame shot at 3200K and one shot at 7000K. A guess would be wrong on most images and invisibly so. A folder is read as readily as a file, nested, because that is the shape an exported preset folder is in and importing ninety files one at a time is asking someone not to bother. `dr_pipeline::starter` is six presets a first run begins with, written against this pipeline in its units and deliberately mild — a starting point, not a caricature. They are seeded when the library *file* does not exist rather than when the library is empty, so deleting all six does not hand them back on the next launch. Both of these name operations, and `ui_names_no_operation` was right to stop them living in `ui/`. That test exists because the failure is silent and cumulative, and it caught exactly what it was written for: a preset called "Punch" is a statement about contrast, clarity and vibrance, and a table mapping Adobe's vocabulary to ours is a statement about the pipeline. Neither is a fact about an interface. So the starter set went into `dr-pipeline`, and the importer into its own crate — between two walls, since `dr-pipeline` depends on nothing on purpose and XMP is real XML not worth hand-rolling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
36ea53cceb |
Merge: stop a subject's name from setting the width of the develop column
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
3e19628324 |
Stop a subject's name from setting the width of the develop column
The column moved sideways the moment segmentation finished. It takes the widest minimum any panel declares, each panel publishes `layout.preferred-width` as that minimum, and `MaskPanel` gained rows whose width came from the model's output -- so a photograph the user was looking at jumped because a label said "traffic light". `overflow: elide` did not prevent it and was never going to. Eliding is what a `Text` does when it draws; at layout time it still asks for the width of its whole string, and it is the asking that reaches the column. Both the subject rows and the mask entries are bounded, because a mask is itself a segmentation result -- without the second half the column moved when a subject was clicked instead of when one was found. The bound is stated for the reason `ChipGrid` declares its width from its column count rather than from its options ( |
||
|
dtourolle
|
4a04496c78 |
Merge: focus peaking, so a frame can be judged without zooming to 100%
FR-CULL-3's peaking half. The raw histogram and raw clipping indicators remain unbuilt -- what exists is a display histogram tagged FR-DSP-7, counting AdjustPass's 8-bit output, which reports a highlight as gone precisely where FR-CULL-3 needs it to report the highlight recoverable. Verified before merge: fmt clean, clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings green, 11 focus GPU tests, 79 baseline dr-gpu tests, 511 dr-ui tests. The cfg(target_os = "android") arm is unverified -- the host-target clippy never compiled it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> # Conflicts: # ui/dr-ui/src/lib.rs # ui/dr-ui/ui/app.slint |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
2168cdd1c4 |
Mark what is in focus, so a frame can be judged without zooming to 100%
FR-CULL-3's focus peaking. One compute dispatch measures local contrast in WGSL and writes an overlay texture; on desktop it reaches Slint through the same zero-copy wgpu import the canvas uses, so nothing per-pixel touches the CPU on the frame path. With peaking off the cost is zero and structurally so: focus_overlay opens with `let settings = self.peaking?;` before the frame is touched, and clearing drops both overlay textures, so no VRAM is held either. NFR-P14 is met by construction rather than by measurement -- one dispatch, no second render, no pipeline compile after session open, and a test asserting allocations stay at 2 over eight frames. The budget test asserts 50ms at 4K rather than a tight bound, deliberately: a tight bound fails on a loaded machine and gets deleted, which is worse than a loose one that still catches the regression that matters. TD-1 is amended rather than joined by a TD-6: on Android the overlay rides the readback that already exists there, roughly doubling that transfer while peaking is on, and TD-1's own "Done when" removes both because both are the same missing capability. Verified: cargo fmt clean; clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings green, which also compiles peaking.slint through dr-ui's build.rs; 11 focus GPU tests and 79 baseline dr-gpu tests pass; 511 dr-ui tests pass. Not verified: the cfg(target_os = "android") arm, which the host-target clippy never compiled. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
7ad75dd905 |
Let a manual collection be put in the order the photographer wants
`collections::set_order` and `Sort::CollectionPosition` have been in the catalog since collections were, and nothing above dr-catalog has ever called either. A manual order existed, could not be seen, and could not be set. This is the half that was missing. Three pieces, because it needed all three to be visible at all. The catalog gains `orders_manually` and `members_in_order`. The first is the rule about *when* a manual order means anything, kept in one place with one name: a collection must be manual, and it must have no children. A set shows its descendants' images, and positions are only ever assigned within one collection — so two children's positions are unrelated integers, and ordering by them would sort the grid by a coincidence. The existing comment on `read_cells_scoped` already argued this; now something enforces it. `members_in_order` returns the *whole* membership rather than the filtered view, because `set_order` renumbers exactly what it is handed. Reordering a filtered list would renumber those and leave every hidden image on a stale position — two images sharing one, and a grid that rearranges itself the moment the filter comes off. The grid reads position where the scope qualifies and capture time everywhere else. Manual order joins the member row rather than testing membership with `IN`, which is safe from fanning out rows *because* that branch is a single collection. The gesture is a DropArea over the viewport, drawn only where a reorder means something, with a caret in the gap the photographs would go into — a line between two images rather than a highlight on one, because lighting up a cell would say the drop replaces it. The trap worth naming: `DropEvent.position` is in **window** coordinates. Slint maps it through `map_to_window` when the drag begins and hands every target the same event untranslated, so a target inside a Flickable has to subtract its own `absolute-position`. Getting that wrong is invisible until the grid is scrolled, because at the top the two frames coincide. `reordered` is pure and names its destination by the image it goes before rather than by an index, because the grid can only name a gap in what it is showing and the ids are what survive a window swap. A drop that changes nothing returns the order untouched: that counter is what a cross-device merge resolves by, and spending a revision on a no-op makes this device win an argument it did not have. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
b52be080ff |
Merge: say which requirements the code already satisfied, and which it does not
Eight requirements were implemented and untagged; tagging them takes coverage from 59.8% to 64.2% without a line of feature code. Five more were refused rather than tagged -- R2's own acceptance criterion still reads '(figure TBD)', R5 has one of three clauses built, FR-RAW-2 meets the requirement's purpose but not its stated mechanism. docs/outstanding.md records what is genuinely unbuilt, so the gap reads as a decision rather than an oversight. It also names four requirements the matrix reports as covered that are not, including two covered only by string literals inside the traceability tool's own test fixtures. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
4d0ad0601c |
Merge: a Flatpak that asks for no filesystem, and the channels v1 ships through
FR-PLAT-LIN-3 and NFR-COMPAT-2. The manifest grants no filesystem permission of any kind, which is not an oversight: a folder library is chosen by typing an absolute path, nothing in the tree calls the FileChooser portal, and a static --filesystem= grant would have made that design appear to work by not testing it. docs/distribution.md records what a portal-based picker would take. No Flatpak has been built -- flatpak-builder is not installed here -- so the finish-args set is reasoned from what the binary links, not observed to be sufficient. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
115653a262 |
Mark a burst in the grid, and let it be folded away
The counterpart to the grouping: where the signatures come from, and how a group reaches a cell. Signatures are computed from the 256px thumbnails dr-thumbs already holds -- vastly more resolution than a 9x8 reduction can use -- so a library that has been browsed, or that has synced somebody else's shards, has already paid for them and no RAW is decoded for this. The consequence is stated rather than hidden: an image with no thumbnail gets no signature and never joins a burst. That is self-correcting, and it is why the pass runs when the thumbnail sweep finishes rather than on a timer. Nothing happens at import and nothing happens at query time. The mark is drawn as a child of the cell's TouchArea, for the same reason the star strip is: a click on it must not also reach `cell-clicked` and throw the user into develop, and children are hit-tested before the element they sit in. It is never hidden on hover the way the stars are -- a collapsed burst stands in for frames that are not on screen, and something has to say so whether or not a pointer is nearby. Folding changes what the grid's *query* returns rather than what its cells draw, because the grid is a window over an ordered query and the frames a fold hides are mostly not loaded. So the predicate joins VISIBLE in every query that lists or counts cells -- the window, the header's count, the run a shift-click resolves, and the ordinal a scrub lands on -- under the discipline VISIBLE's own comment sets out: present in four places of five is worse than absent, because the counts disagree with the cells and neither looks wrong on its own. There is a test for exactly that. `the_window_read_walks_the_ordering_index` now includes the burst clause. It asserts on the query plan while holding its own copy of the query, so left alone it would have gone on reporting green against a query the grid no longer runs. If the clause costs `images_grid_order` and puts the sort back, that fails here rather than becoming jitter someone measures in six months. The pass keeps its own drain timer in a thread-local instead of taking fields on the library controller, so everything the feature needs to run lives in one file and the screen that starts it holds nothing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
bb35665bd2 |
Let a paste carry some kinds of edit and not others
FR-DEV-6 asks for presets "covering a subset of the edit graph". What landed with the named presets covered two subsets: everything, and everything but the crop. "Match the colour but not the sharpening" had no way to be said. `Scope` is now a set of `Attribute` — the same six kinds every operation already declares and the develop panel already builds its tabs from. The photographer ticking "tone and colour" is naming the groups they navigate by, and neither this module nor the interface has to name an operation to do it (FR-DEV-3c). The pleasing part is what left. Framing used to be excluded by an explicit test against one operation's id; it is now excluded because Geometry is not in the default set. The special case dissolved into the general rule, and the argument for it — a crop is a decision about *this* photograph, and carrying it across forty destroys forty compositions — is now a statement about a kind of edit rather than about a node. All thirty-three existing preset tests pass unchanged, which is the evidence that the generalisation kept its promises. One decision that is a field rather than a rule, because the two cases genuinely differ. An operation this build cannot classify — from a newer version, arriving over sync — travels under "everything" and "everything but the crop", because those are claims about the whole edit and an unrecognised operation is part of it (FR-NC-8). It does not travel under a hand-picked set, because that is a claim about kinds, and an unknown kind is not one of the kinds that were ticked. The settings page's "Copy crop and rotation" checkbox is gone, replaced by the same chips the preset sheet draws. It asked the right first question — geometry is the kind whose accidental travel destroys work — but it was the only question a boolean could ask. The field stays in `Settings`, read exactly once to seed the new set, so anyone who had ticked it keeps their behaviour. The chips are deliberately not in the develop column. Six of them there would set the width of the whole sidebar, which is the bug `ChipGrid`'s comment records at length. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
d3dadbd725 |
Group the frames of one moment, by when they were taken and what they look like
A burst is the commonest thing in a cull and the least interesting: twelve frames of the same gull at 10 fps occupy twelve cells, are scrolled past twelve times, and end with the photographer keeping one. FR-CULL-5 asks for them to collapse to one representative and be judged as a unit. Two signals, because neither alone survives a real library. Time alone groups a whole wedding ceremony -- a photographer working steadily never leaves the gap that would end the run. Similarity alone groups a studio setup shot across two days, which is a project rather than a moment. Together they are specific: adjacent in time *and* looks like the frame before it. Two seconds is the time bound, and the reason is worth recording because the figure looks absurd next to a 10 fps camera. `images.captured_at` is whole seconds -- EXIF's DateTimeOriginal has no sub-second field and SubSecTimeOriginal is optional and widely omitted -- so a burst arrives in the catalog as ten frames sharing one timestamp. Any threshold finer than a second is a threshold on information that is not there. Where the pace really is faster, the similarity bound is what separates the frames. Similarity is a 64-bit difference hash over a 9x8 box-averaged reduction, compared between *adjacent* frames only. Chained rather than anchored on the first frame, because by frame twenty a camera following a bird has nothing in common with frame one while no two neighbours differ by much; the time bound is what stops the chain running away. There is no all-pairs step and there must never be one -- that is what turns a grouping pass into something nobody can afford to run over 50k images. Nothing here ranks a frame. FR-CULL-5 names the failure it is avoiding, which is rejecting the only frame of an important moment because somebody blinked, so there is no sharpness score and no best-of-burst. The representative is the earliest frame -- a fact about the clock, not a judgement about the photograph -- and the user's own choice lives in its own table so that rebuilding the grouping cannot erase it. Same argument `people.ignored` makes one subsystem over: nothing short of remembering a decision survives re-clustering. A newly found burst is recorded *open*. Collapsing on discovery would be tidier, and would also mean a background pass taking photographs off the screen part way through a cull. The pass marks; the user folds. It is a pass rather than a job kind for the reason catalog.md 10.2 gives for face clustering: a burst is a property of a run of frames and has no natural subject_id, so a per-image job would rebuild the world once per photograph. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
8d5dc423ea |
Say that all three of FR-CULL-3's bullets are unbuilt, not one
The first draft got this half right and half wrong. It correctly said the existing histogram and clipping indicators are not FR-CULL-3's, but it described them as adjacent — as though the work left were mostly focus peaking and a relocation. They are not adjacent. The histogram reads AdjustPass's 8-bit output and counts clipping as r == 255, so it describes the frame the display is about to show, after the entire develop chain. FR-CULL-3 asks for the histogram of the sensor data, and gives its reason in the requirement itself: a rendered image "systematically lies about what is recoverable in the raw". A readout taken from the render cannot answer that question however it is presented, which means two of the three bullets need a new measurement rather than a new placement. Found by the agent building focus peaking, who had to go looking at the counters to find out. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
1cd58bcaaa |
Say where a range ends in words, instead of hiding it in a double tap
Touch has had a range gesture for as long as selection mode has: hold to
enter it, then double-tap the far cell. Nobody finds it. It is invisible,
it is unreliable on a grid that scrolls under the second tap, and it
extends from the anchor as it was *before* the two taps moved it — a rule
subtle enough to need two paragraphs of Rust to explain itself.
The deeper problem is the timer. A double tap is bounded by the double-tap
interval, so the two ends have to be on screen together. The ranges that
actually hurt on a tablet are longer than a screenful, and those are
exactly the ones it cannot describe — which is also why a drag-to-select
sweep would not have fixed this, and why it is not what went in.
So: a "Select to…" button arms the range, the strip stops reporting and
starts instructing ("Tap the last photograph — scroll first if you need
to"), and a Cancel puts it down. Nothing is timing the two taps, so the
user may scroll as far as they like between them, and the run is resolved
by the catalog rather than by what happens to be loaded.
An armed range reaches Rust as `cell-pressed`'s shift argument, because
that is what it is: `apply_press` already reads ctrl+shift as "add the run
from the anchor to here", and in selection mode ctrl is already set. So
this needs no Rust state and no third selection policy — one copy of the
rules, in the function that had them.
"Select all" goes in beside it, asked of the catalog for the same reason:
the window is a hundred cells over a library of thousands, and a select-all
that quietly meant "the hundred that are loaded" is a lie the user cannot
see until the export runs. It sets the anchor to the first frame, or a
"Select to…" straight afterwards would reach `apply_press` with no anchor,
take its shift branch, and clear everything it had just taken.
The strip is at four buttons and a count now, so "New collection from
selection" loses its tail — the sheet it opens already says "New collection
holding 12 photographs" across the top.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
ab49280614 |
Ask for the collection's name before there is a collection to name
"New collection from selection" created the collection under a placeholder name and then opened the sidebar tree's rename field to correct it. On a tablet that field is not on screen. The collections panel is always instantiated — app.slint collapses it to zero width and `visible: false` rather than using an `if`, because an `if` there is a layout loop Slint panics on — so the rename TextInput was created all the same, its `init` called `self.focus()`, and Android raised the on-screen keyboard for a box nobody could see. Nothing else on the screen is focusable, so the keyboard had nowhere to go back to: it stayed up, the name could not be typed, and the collection was already written under the name the user did not want. Asked in a sheet instead, on the same card, scrim and dismissal the filing and keywording sheets use. The field takes the keyboard as the sheet appears — over a field that is actually drawn, which is the whole difference — and the card sits a third of the way down rather than centred, because on a tablet the keyboard is the bottom half of the window. Nothing reaches the catalog until Create. That also ends a second bug the old order could not avoid: an abandoned rename used to leave a collection called "New collection" behind, because creating came first. `Field` grows a `take-focus()` for this. A function rather than a property: focus is an event, and bound to a property it would fight whatever took focus next and re-take it on every unrelated re-evaluation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
0d9f802f88 |
Regenerate the matrix that this branch is about
Eight requirements gained a tag in this branch's first commit, so the generated matrix is stale until it is rerun. Coverage moves from 59.8% (107/179) to 64.2% (115/179), and the untagged list drops from 72 entries to 64. Regenerating here rather than leaving it to the pre-commit hook, because this branch's subject *is* the matrix: a reader comparing the two commits should see the number move for a stated reason. The eight are R3, R6, FR-DEV-1, FR-UI-6, FR-NC-6d, NFR-OPS-3, NFR-PORT-2 and NFR-SEC-3, and none of them is new work — every one was already satisfied by code that had simply never said so. Six of the thirteen tag sites were new `TRACES:` lines rather than additions to existing ones, so the tag count moves 896 → 902 while the covered count moves by eight. Orphan tags remain at zero. Run from source with `cargo run -p traceability -- report`, never from a prebuilt binary, and note that the tool tracks line numbers — the six prepended module tags shift every subsequent line in their own files, which accounts for the churn in this diff that is not a coverage change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
88ef7148d6 |
Write down what is not built, so the gap reads as a decision
The traceability matrix reports one number and cannot say what it means. An untagged requirement is either one nobody built or one somebody built and did not label, and both look identical in the summary table. Eight of the second kind were tagged in the previous commit. This is the first kind, written out with the reasoning, so that the distance between the register and the binary is something a reader can see rather than reconstruct from a percentage. Eleven clusters, each verified against the tree rather than inherited from a survey. Several turned out to be more interesting than "not done": Plugins are 21 untagged requirements — nearly a third of the shortfall — and §7 already lists the Plugin API as out of scope for v1 while §3.10 spends 280 lines specifying it. The two that *are* built, FR-PLG-2 and FR-PLG-2d, are the declarative operation format, which is a plugin system that resolves at build time. The fix here is an edit to requirements.md, not code, and D16 has to be answered before any format is called stable. FR-DSP-2 is not merely unbuilt; it is under challenge. frame_budget.rs and TD-4 independently argue that tiling costs more than it saves on the interactive path, so the open question is whether the requirement should survive, not when it will be met — and the spike that would settle it, S6, has not run. NFR-A11Y-1's hard half is done and its easy half is not. LocalizedKey already keeps display strings out of core/ and labels::resolve is a single resolution point; what that point does is a hardcoded English match, so a translation needs a recompile, which is the one thing the requirement forbids. The §4.1 performance targets are unverified rather than unmet. §8 requires a per-commit benchmark suite whose regressions fail the build; there is no benches/ directory, no criterion, and no benchmark step in any of the three CI workflows. The one guard that does live in CI skips itself without a GPU adapter and asserts its CPU half only in release, while CI tests in dev. Nothing says the targets are missed. It says nobody would find out. And three requirements are reported as covered while not being met: R1 and NFR-OPS-1 are tagged only by string literals inside the traceability tool's own tests, which it scans along with everything else, and FR-CAT-13's single tag sits on keyword storage while no XMP is parsed or written anywhere. CONTRIBUTING already warns that a tag proves a tag exists; these are the specific ones. Focus peaking, burst grouping, Flatpak packaging and the Android platform integration are being built in parallel and are marked in progress rather than listed as absent, so those lines can be struck as they land. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
8165619065 |
Describe the project the README is actually in front of
It said the status was "early", that v0.1 is a remote library viewer, and that the zero-copy display path was "not yet working" and its replacement was the highest priority. All three were true when they were written and none of them has been true for eight releases. The zero-copy line was the damaging one, because it is the project's central architectural constraint and the README stated the opposite of what happened. Desktop keeps the zero-copy path — the compute pass writes a texture Slint composites directly — and the readback survives in exactly one place, the Android develop view, because wgpu's Vulkan swapchain tears a portrait window on a tablet whose panel is mounted landscape. That is TD-1, with the on-device measurements and the three things any one of which would remove it. A reader who took the old text at face value would have gone looking for a bug that was fixed, and missed a compromise that was chosen. "Current state" now says what runs, checked item by item against the tree rather than from memory: the first draft claimed AVIF and JPEG XL export, which the settings page offers and dr-export refuses on purpose, and sixteen declared operations where there are fifteen. Both are the kind of error this commit exists to remove. The requirement count moves from 122 to 179, the documentation table gains the five documents somebody would actually want next, and the "Not built" paragraph points at docs/outstanding.md rather than leaving the reader to infer the gap from silence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5
|
ab0ef6a26d |
Say which requirements the code was already satisfying
Thirteen requirements were surveyed as built but untagged. Eight of them were: R3, R6, FR-DEV-1, FR-UI-6, FR-NC-6d, NFR-OPS-3, NFR-PORT-2 and NFR-SEC-3. Each was read against its full text in requirements.md and against the code before the tag was added, because a tag that is wrong is worse than an absent one — it turns a visible gap into an invisible one. The five that were refused, and why, because the reasoning is the part worth keeping: R2 carries "(figure TBD)" in its own acceptance criterion and asks for a stated prefetch margin and cache-hit rate; neither figure exists anywhere in the tree and neither quantity is measured, while TD-2 and TD-3 both describe the thumbnail path falling short of it. R5 asks for three things and the code does one. The display pipeline does run at viewport resolution, but "only visible tiles are computed" and "panning recomputes only newly exposed tiles" need a tile scheduler that does not exist — and frame_budget.rs currently argues for striking tiled computation from the interactive path rather than building it. FR-RAW-2 asks for a trait taking a SourceRef, so that a second decoder can be added without changing callers. What exists is free functions over &[u8]. That meets the requirement's stated *purpose* — the same decoder serves a local file, a SAF document and a byte range, which is exactly why it takes bytes — but there is no trait and no second implementation seam, so the requirement should probably be amended rather than tagged. NFR-ARCH-1 asks for named executors with stated thread counts. architecture.md §7.1 states the table; nothing implements it. Workers are twenty-odd ad-hoc std::thread::spawn sites, each building its own one-worker tokio runtime, with no decode pool, no GPU-submit executor and no I/O pool. The requirement's own text says R4 and NFR-P9 "assert an outcome with no stated means", and that is still true. NFR-SEC-4 is satisfied by absence — there is no telemetry — and absence has no module to tag. A tag would point at nothing. NFR-OPS-3 was the closest call of the eight taken. The store is single, separate from the catalog, survives a catalog rebuild and does not sync between devices; it has no version *field*, deliberately, and settings.rs argues why and names the condition that would need one. The substance is met and the reasoning is recorded where it belongs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |