100 Commits

This Branch

This Branch

All Branches

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	35954dfa1d	Write a panic down where it can still be read, with nothing in it that names the user ... NFR-OPS-2 is two sentences — local crash capture always, upload only on explicit opt-in — and what existed was one `log::error!` in the Android entry point and nothing at all on desktop. So a panic on desktop went to stderr and died with the terminal, and a panic on Android went to a logcat ring buffer that is gone long before anyone reports anything. What the user saw either way was a job that stopped or a control that went dead, with nothing to send. That matters more here than it would in most applications, because NFR-ARCH-4 says no worker error may panic the process and the code is written that way: errors are typed and attached to the image or job they belong to. A panic is therefore by construction a bug — an invariant this codebase believed and got wrong — and it was the one class of failure with no trace. `dr_plat::crash` writes a record to the XDG state directory: version, time, os, arch, thread, panic location, message, backtrace. In dr-plat rather than in either entry point because "where does this platform let an application keep state" is a platform question, and Android's answer is neither XDG nor `temp_dir` — `set_state_dir` takes it from `internal_data_path`, the same place `dr_sync::account::set_data_dir` gets its answer. The hook resolves the directory when it fires rather than when it is installed, which is what lets it go in before everything else and cover the startup it would otherwise miss. **The content rule is the substance of this, not the plumbing.** NFR-SEC-2 forbids credentials in logs and plain files; the same reasoning applies with more force to what this application is actually about, because a user's library is private and so is its shape. `/home/anna/Photos/2019 Divorce/` says something about a person, and a crash record is exactly the file someone attaches to a bug report while trying to be helpful. So `redact` runs over the message *and* the backtrace, and is deliberately blunt: anything containing a slash goes, `content://` and `primary:DCIM/...` included, since SAF names a library just as precisely as a path does; anything beside a word like `password` goes; a long opaque run with letters and digits in it goes, which is the shape of an app password nobody labelled. The one exception is a `.rs` path, which keeps its basename — a backtrace with no filenames is close to useless and `library.rs:1270` says nothing about anybody. Over-redaction costs legibility. Under-redaction costs a user something they cannot take back. Those are not comparable, so the boundary is not the place to be clever. NFR-SEC-5 — face data never in a crash report, under any configuration — is met structurally rather than by filtering: this module reads no catalog, opens no image, touches no account. A record is assembled from the panic hook's own arguments and `std::env::consts`, and there is no code path from here to an embedding. The message length cap is the backstop for a payload some other module formatted something large into. stderr is the one surface that still sees the message unredacted, deliberately: the previous hook is chained rather than replaced, so a developer watching a terminal does not lose the panic because the application started writing files. It is ephemeral, local, and never attached to a report. **No upload path, and not half of one** — no endpoint, no queue, no "send this later" flag. Opt-in upload needs a server to receive it and a consent flow stating what leaves the device (NFR-SEC-4, and the preview-and-consent step NFR-OPS-1 requires of the diagnostics bundle). Neither exists, and a transport built ahead of its consent is the shape of thing that later gets switched on by default. Leaves NFR-OPS-1 cheaper by three things it will want unchanged: `state_dir` (the log belongs at `state_dir()/log` beside `crash/`, so the diagnostics bundle has one directory to collect), `redact` (NFR-OPS-1's "automatic redaction of credentials and tokens" is this function), and `prune` (a size-capped rotation is this, counting bytes instead of files). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 10:34:12 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	8eeb9ba0f6	Offer the backup, and then the rebuild, when the index turns out to be damaged ... NFR-R6 asks for an integrity check at startup and two offers behind it, and none of it existed. `PRAGMA integrity_check` appeared nowhere in the tree, `Catalog::open` was `open` → `configure` → `migrate` → `backfill` and nothing else, and corruption therefore surfaced as whatever rusqlite error the first unlucky query happened to produce — "database disk image is malformed" attached to a thumbnail refresh, elided into a 34px banner, over an empty grid saying "No images found · Check the library folder". Two messages that disagreed, and no way forward but deleting catalog.sqlite by hand. The property that makes the second offer real was already here and load- bearing: the catalog is an index, not a source of truth, rebuildable from sources plus sidecars (invariant §5.2.4, cited by schema.rs, trash.rs and lib.rs). And sync.rs already knew how to take a coherent snapshot of a WAL database. What was missing was the check, the type, and the conversation. Four pieces: **The type.** `CatalogError::Corrupt`, and — the part that makes it worth having — a hand-written `From<rusqlite::Error>` that classifies rather than wraps. `SQLITE_CORRUPT` and `SQLITE_NOTADB` become `Corrupt` wherever they arise, so a background job that trips over the damage first reports the same thing the startup check would have. `SQLITE_IOERR` and `SQLITE_BUSY` deliberately do not: a dropped network mount is a different problem, and telling someone to rebuild their index would be a wrong answer delivered confidently. **The check.** `Catalog::open_verified`, `quick_check` before the open rather than after, because opening runs migrations and a damaged catalog with an intact header would otherwise have structure rewritten on top of structure that is already wrong. Bound to `open_verified` and not to `open`: the check reads every page, which is affordable once at startup where a user can answer a question, and not affordable on the dozens of opens a session's background tasks make. **The backup.** NFR-R2's second clause, taken between `configure` and `migrate` in `Catalog::open`. A migration is the one routine operation that rewrites table structure, so it is the likeliest way this file becomes unreadable, and it is the last moment the pre-migration state exists to be copied. Three generations, through SQLite's backup API after a TRUNCATE checkpoint — never `fs::copy`, which on a WAL database backs up a state older than the catalog and possibly torn. A failure to take the copy is logged, not raised: a full disk must not be what makes a library unopenable. **The conversation.** The first line of the dialogue is that the photographs and the edits are safe, before the diagnosis, because that is the question the user is actually asking. Then the two offers, which are *not* interchangeable and are not presented as if they were: a restore keeps collections, and a rebuild cannot, because a manual collection is a set of images assembled by hand and nothing in the filesystem records it (docs/catalog.md §8.1). The labels say so, and the rebuild does not take the affirmative styling while a restore is on the table. One thing that is a fix rather than a feature: `show_catalog_now` now gates the scan. `Catalog::open` succeeds on a file whose header survived, so the scan that used to start immediately afterwards would write folder ETags and image rows into damaged pages in the seconds while the user was still reading the question — turning a file that had a backup into one where the backup is the only copy left. Restore also deletes the damaged catalog's `-wal` and `-shm`. That step is easy to leave out and fatal to leave out: a journal belonging to the old file, sitting beside the new one under the same name, is replayed into it on the next open. That is not a restore, it is a fresh corruption with the evidence gone. Tested by corrupting a fixture catalog — 500 images and a collection, then every page past the second overwritten — and driving both branches. The restore is asserted on the collection, because a collection is precisely what distinguishes the two paths; the rebuild on the damaged file being kept and the next open producing an empty catalog at the current schema. Plus the `SQLITE_NOTADB` presentation, a damaged backup being refused rather than installed, and a v1 catalog whose pre-migration backup comes back reading v1 rather than v11. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 10:34:12 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	ef07e6ca3e	Give the canvas tools a rail of their own, and the column one width ... Crop, Local and Repair were chips at the head of the develop column, sharing a row with the adjustment groups and told apart from them by the shape of their highlight. Three things followed from that, and only the last is cosmetic: the column closes, so the way out of a mode went away with the way in — hence the duplicate "Done Cropping" over the canvas; the chips are generated from the operation set, so the widest thing in the sidebar was a row nobody had chosen the contents of; and a mode and a filter are different kinds of state wearing one control. They are a fixed 60px rail down the left now, generated from a single table in toolrail.slint. A tool is one row of it plus a drawing plus a ViewMode variant; nothing in app.slint is touched to add one. What is left of the strip is the group filters, so it is GroupStrip. The column stops measuring itself. Every panel published a content-width and declared it as min-width, and the column took the largest — which spent the photograph's pixels on whatever happened to be widest, and moved the image sideways when switching tools swapped one set of panels for another. It is panel-width now, one number in style.yaml. That number is 360 and it is measured, not picked: the contents report a minimum of 344 in every mode, and they do not compress below it because a Text that does not elide reports the same minimum as preferred. 320 was tried and sliced Paste down the middle. The Flickable's viewport is floored at the layout's minimum rather than its preferred width for the same reason — content that is never told how much room it has cannot adapt to having less. Removing the eight content-width declarations repairs three comments an earlier edit had spliced sentences into. The raw histogram's note on keeping its hint short is rewritten rather than dropped: an over-long hint no longer widens the column, it pushes the column's minimum past the width it has and clips the panel, which makes that constraint sharper rather than obsolete. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 09:59:50 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	9e519eb8a6	Make the thin ring the only mark a selected photograph carries ... Two treatments said "selected" and neither said it well. A selected cell got a 2px border and a lifted fill. The border is drawn on the outside of a cell whose content sits 6px in, so it ate into the thumbnail: selecting appeared to nudge the photograph. Inside it, a second thin ring marked the anchor — the end a shift-click measures from — and that ring was the clearest thing on the cell, so it read as *the* selection to everyone who had not written it. Worse, the ring outlived what it described. An anchor survives a deselection, so a thin box sat around the last photograph touched with nothing selected at all, indistinguishable from a cell that had stayed behind. That is the one thing a selection cue must never be: ambiguous about whether something is selected. So the ring is now what it already looked like. One mark, drawn inside the cell and 4px clear of its edge, so it never touches the thumbnail and never changes a dimension — selecting adds ink and moves nothing. Two pixels rather than one, because it is now carrying the whole cue across forty cells at arm's length against a thumbnail of any brightness. The outer border is hover alone. The anchor keeps no mark, and loses nothing it was earning: the bar says "Tap the last photograph" while a range is armed, which answers the question the ring existed to answer. The ordinal still lives in the controller and still decides where a range extends from; what is gone is the claim that the user needs to see it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 09:47:32 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	b120ce48ec	Float the selection bar over the grid instead of above it ... Selecting the first photograph inserted a 40px row into the view's vertical flow, so every cell in the grid moved down by it. The act of selecting shifted the thing being selected out from under the finger — and a second tap aimed at the neighbour landed on the row below it, which is the worst possible response to a gesture whose whole job is to say "this one". The bar is a floating one now, at the foot of the view. Nothing above it is re-laid out, so selecting changes what is drawn and never where. The grid's viewport grows by the same 40px while the bar is there rather than the Flickable shrinking, which is what keeps that change invisible too: every cell stays exactly where it was and there is simply further to scroll, so the last row can be brought clear of the bar instead of being trapped under it. It also swallows presses that land on it. A bar floating over the grid is a bar a thumb can reach for and miss into. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 09:47:20 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	ea88216008	Follow the raw histogram's line numbers after the module doc grew ... Five tags in dr-gpu moved by three lines when lib.rs's module doc was corrected. Coverage is unchanged at 68.2%; only the anchors moved. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 09:31:16 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	3b2bb58fa4	Say what these documents describe now, not what they described in August ... Three that had drifted past being merely out of date. `docs/outstanding.md` still marked burst grouping, Flatpak and the Android cluster as in progress, and described FR-CULL-5 as absent while listing a forward reference in calibrate.rs that "will need correcting either way" -- it needs correcting now, and differently: the comment claims bursts bootstrap the face calibration, which is still not what the code does. FR-PLAT-AND-4 and FR-PLAT-AND-6 are half-met rather than unbuilt, which is the state most likely to be reported as closed, so each says what is left. FR-PLAT-LIN-3 is packaged but still unsatisfiable by packaging. `core/dr-gpu/src/lib.rs` claimed for eight releases to hold "no pipeline, no tiling, and no masks". It holds masks, segmentation, demosaic, detail, two histograms and focus peaking. The zero-copy claim it was written to make is the part still worth making. `docs/milestone-v0.1.md` was a plan for a milestone delivered long ago and read as though it were still ahead. Committed with --no-verify, and the matrix is regenerated separately: the hook would have scanned another session's uncommitted work in this shared checkout and written its line numbers into the file. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 09:30:46 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	49787414fb	Regenerate the matrix after taking master in ... Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 09:24:38 +02:00
dtourolle	f41edc03ff	Merge master into wave-2 ... Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> # Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md	2026-08-30 09:24:37 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	091306f736	Gate the gesture vocabulary the way the matrix is gated ... Three holes, all found by the gate catching itself out. **Prose that mentions the tag was read as a tag.** `dr-ui`'s module list carries a comment saying where the generated table comes from, and it names `GESTURE:` in passing; the scan extracted that sentence fragment as a gesture with no place and no way to perform it. A tag must now *open* its comment. A line that merely mentions it is describing the mechanism, not declaring a member of it, and position is the only thing that tells the two apart — which also makes the string-literal guard fall out for free rather than being a special case. **Neither artefact was regenerated on commit.** They cite line numbers, so they go stale on anything that moves a line — the sheet commit made the document wrong about every gesture in `library.slint` without touching a single one. The pre-commit hook that already keeps the matrix in step now keeps these too, and unlike the matrix it *fails* rather than shrugging when the scan does: a matrix that will not build leaves a stale one in place, where a malformed gesture block means a user about to be told the wrong thing. **CI did not check them at all.** It does now, blocking. The matrix is read; the gesture table is *shown to somebody using the application*, and a stale one tells them to perform a gesture that no longer exists — from which they will conclude the application is broken rather than the page. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 00:51:13 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	1cd5ab6815	Put the gesture reference in the application ... The document the previous commit generates is for somebody reading the repository. The person who needs it most is holding a tablet, has just discovered that a hold does something, and has nowhere to ask what else does. So the same scan writes a table the application draws: a "Gestures" button beside Settings, a sheet with the same scrim and dismissal as the ones that file and name, and every gesture grouped by where it applies with its touch, pointer and keyboard routes side by side. Not the `why` — that is the argument for the design and belongs in the document; on a phone-sized card it would bury the one line the sheet was opened to read. The sheet's file knows nothing about what a gesture is. It draws the rows it is handed, and the rows come from the generated table, because a help screen with its text typed into it is a second description of one behaviour — and the second description is always the one that goes stale. The commit before this deleted a gesture; a hand-kept sheet would still be describing it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 00:30:21 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	04203b4a82	Regenerate the matrix after taking master in ... Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 00:25:51 +02:00
dtourolle	4b212089d2	Merge master into wave-2 ... Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> # Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md	2026-08-30 00:25:42 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	964e72bca2	Merge: the formatter's pass over the raw histogram ... Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 00:25:21 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	e38b730aa6	Reflow what rustfmt wanted in the raw histogram ... The author could not run cargo, so this is the formatter's first pass over the new module and its presentation half. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 00:25:16 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	12812452e8	Regenerate the matrix over the second wave ... 67.0% to 68.2% (122/179). FR-PLAT-AND-4 and FR-PLAT-AND-6 are the two that moved; FR-CULL-3 was already tagged by the peaking half and now has the reduction its other two bullets asked for behind the same tag. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 00:24:54 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	df90dd95a2	Merge: a histogram that reads the sensor, beside the one that reads the frame ... FR-CULL-3's other two bullets. What existed was a display histogram tagged FR-DSP-7, counting AdjustPass's 8-bit output with r == 255 clipping counters -- it says a highlight is gone precisely where this requirement needs it to say the highlight is recoverable. The new reduction runs over the demosaiced scene-linear texture on a stops-below-saturation axis: camera-native, unbalanced, unmatrixed, uncurved, normalised by the sensor's own black and white levels, so 1.0 is saturation by construction. Four series, and the fourth is the brightest channel rather than luma, because a weighted sum of unbalanced values is a number about nothing. Cached per photograph, not per frame: nothing downstream of the demosaic can move a count. Both readings are legitimate and answer different questions, so the panel offers a choice rather than replacing one with the other. ARCH 5.5 is amended to match. It specified a pre-demosaic reduction; retaining the CFA samples costs 48 MB at 24 MP and 120 MB at 60 MP resident on every photograph opened, whether or not anyone looks at the histogram, on the platform ARCH 6.2 exists for. The spec now records two reductions, why the more complete one was not worth its cost, and what the cheaper one cannot answer: it counts pixels not photosites, it cannot see above white, and it is measured after the CFA pattern is gone. Verified: clippy -D warnings clean, 98 dr-gpu tests, 556 dr-ui tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 00:14:34 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	31a3580f9d	Extract the gesture vocabulary from the code that implements it ... Every gesture the application has was documented in the comment beside the `TouchArea` that implements it. Excellent comments, and unreachable by anyone not reading the source — which is the FR-UI-4 failure in a different costume: a gesture nobody can find is a feature only its author knows about. Writing them out again in a hand-kept help page is the failure this avoids. Two descriptions of one gesture drift, and it is always the prose that drifts: the code is exercised every time somebody uses the application and the page is exercised never. A help screen confidently describing a double tap the grid stopped honouring last week is worse than no help screen — and the grid did stop honouring one, in the commit before this. So the comment beside the implementation stays the only copy, and a `GESTURE:` block beside it is scanned into two artefacts: `docs/gestures.md` for a reader, and a Rust table for the application to draw a help sheet from. Both committed, both gated, so neither can quietly stop describing the code. It lives in the traceability crate because it is the same operation on the same input — walk the tree, pull structured tags out of comments, render, fail if the committed artefact has moved. Only the vocabulary is new. It scans `ui` and `apps` alone: a gesture needs an interface to be performed on, and excluding `tools` is also what stops the scanner extracting its own worked examples as broken gestures. Fifteen gestures so far, across the library grid and the People screen. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 00:09:49 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	20c368d3fc	Give each touch gesture one meaning, and give tap-to-open back ... I broke opening a photograph. The dwell added in "Tell a tap on a photograph from a hand going past" required a finger to stay down 120 ms, and a deliberate tap is routinely quicker than that — so the grid stopped opening anything. Duration was the wrong discriminator: a tap and a brush are the same length. **Travel is what separates them, and a graze is by definition a moving contact.** A press now records where it landed and the release compares: within 12px it is a tap, beyond that the hand was going somewhere else. No dwell, so no deliberate tap can be refused, and the rule is the same for a finger and a mouse — one rule instead of two, and the `touch` argument the dwell needed goes away with it. Two real conflicts went with it, because a gesture set that overlaps itself is unlearnable however each half is documented. **A drag was also a hold.** Grabbing a cell and moving inside 450 ms left the hold timer armed underneath the drag, so it fired mid-gesture and put the grid into selection mode nobody asked for — the drag finished into a mode that changed what every later tap meant. Starting a drag now cancels it, exactly as a pinch already did. **A double tap was also a range.** In selection mode two taps on one cell selected everything back to where selecting began: no visible state, no warning, from a thing a hand does by accident. "Select to…" does that job and announces itself first, so the double tap is gone and two taps are now two toggles that land where they started. `extend_to_row` went with it — a second range implementation that only the double tap reached, where every other range goes through `apply_press`. The resulting vocabulary, one meaning each: tap opens, tap-and-slide does nothing, hold starts selecting, drag files, two fingers resize, and while selecting a tap only ever toggles. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 00:09:37 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	c57fd8ec5a	Merge: compile our own Java into the APK, and answer an image intent ... The APK carried no Java of its own -- the only dex in it was Slint's -- which blocked FR-PLAT-AND-4's foreground service and FR-PLAT-AND-6's outbound half alike. assemble-apk.sh now compiles everything under android/java against android.jar and has d8 merge it with Slint's dex into one classes.dex. With no .java in the tree the step is skipped and the APK is byte-for-byte what it was. -source 8 -target 8 -bootclasspath android.jar is load-bearing: from -target 9 javac rejects -bootclasspath, platform classes then come from the JDK instead of android.jar, and the build stays green while the device raises NoClassDefFoundError. FR-PLAT-AND-6 with it: VIEW, SEND and SEND_MULTIPLE filters, the launch Intent read over JNI before Slint is given the app, and a hand-written ExportProvider rooted at getFilesDir() rather than AndroidX FileProvider, which would have meant Gradle. singleTask, because the new filters let another app launch the activity while it runs and the default mode would start a second android_main, Slint backend and wgpu device in one process. Classes load through the activity's loader; FindClass on android_main's thread sees only the system loader. The share half has no caller yet and is deliberately untagged. The five tests read the manifest and the Java through include_str!, so they fail if a filter goes, if the activity stops being singleTask, if the provider becomes exported, or if the authority and the class drift apart. Verified: javac, d8 and a real dex merge run against the host SDK; aapt2 link over the manifest; clippy -D warnings clean; 5 tests pass. Not verified: anything needing a device. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-30 00:00:39 +02:00
dtourolle	da3b1487f9	Merge: drain the job queue that nothing was draining ... FR-PLAT-AND-4's Rust half, and FR-PLAT-AND-3's resumability with it. The queue's claim_next, complete, fail and recover_orphaned had no callers outside their own tests, so the jobs table accumulated rows nothing ever ran. It also fixes a claim that was not safe across two connections: the deferred transaction took a read lock for the SELECT and only tried to upgrade at the UPDATE, so in WAL the second worker got SQLITE_BUSY_SNAPSHOT, which a busy handler cannot retry away. It never double-claimed, but the loser errored. Now one UPDATE ... RETURNING. No handler is wired, deliberately. The only enqueue site reachable in the shipping app produces remote thumbnail jobs already served by the async grid worker, and inventing a second network path blind is not worth a requirement reading as covered on the strength of plumbing. Verified: clippy -D warnings clean, 376 dr-catalog and 548 dr-ui tests, 18 runner tests including four-thread contention and crash recovery. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> # Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md # ui/dr-ui/src/library.rs # ui/dr-ui/src/settings_ui.rs	2026-08-29 23:49:38 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	758436cc28	Keep the runner's borrow alive as long as the connection it reads ... The first compile this branch had. One borrow error, in the four-thread contention test: the `Runner` was the block's tail expression, and a tail's temporaries are dropped after the block's locals, so it outlived the `conn` it borrowed. Bound to a local, with the ordering rule written down beside it -- it is exactly the shape someone tidies back. Everything else stood: clippy clean at -D warnings, and all 18 runner tests pass, including the four-thread four-connection claim and the `UPDATE ... RETURNING` rewrite the author flagged as the riskiest line in the diff. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:48:15 +02:00
dtourolle	4b6c110816	Count the sensor's own numbers, so a cull can see headroom the render hides ... FR-CULL-3's remaining two bullets. What existed was a *display* histogram tagged FR-DSP-7: it binds AdjustPass's Rgba8Unorm output, recovers an 8-bit code value, and counts clipping as `r == 255`. Its own documentation says a clipped bin means "a highlight that is actually gone rather than one the transform might still recover", which is the opposite of what a culling decision needs. FR-CULL-3 asks for the histogram of the sensor data, on the explicit grounds that a rendered image "systematically lies about what is recoverable in the raw", and a readout that measures the render cannot answer that however it is presented. So this is a second instrument beside the first rather than a setting on it. Both are true; they are true about different things; the panel offers both behind a chip row and the words travel with the numbers, because a raw saturation figure drawn under a heading saying Highlights would be mislabelled exactly where the difference matters. **What is reduced over, and what it cost to decide.** ARCH §5.5 specified the pre-demosaic CFA samples. This reduces over the demosaiced scene-linear texture instead, and §5.5 is amended to record the choice rather than let the specification and the code disagree in silence. The texture is camera-native — unbalanced, unmatrixed, uncurved — and normalised by the sensor's own black and white levels, so 1.0 is saturation by construction and the distribution below it is the headroom question with no calibration to carry. Retaining the CFA samples would mean keeping the packed u32 buffer Demosaicer::run currently drops: 48 MB at 24 MP, 120 MB at 60 MP, resident per open photograph whether or not anyone looks at the histogram, on a platform §6.2 exists because memory is scarce on. Three things it therefore cannot say, written into the module docs and into §5.5 rather than left to be discovered: it counts pixels not photosites, so a saturated site drags its interpolated neighbours up and per-channel clipping is smeared by about a demosaic kernel; it cannot see above white, because demosaic.wgsl clamps each photosite at 1.0 for its own good reasons (a Canon 6D reads to 16383 against a declared 15070) so "at saturation" and "a stop past it" share a bin; and it is measured after the CFA pattern is gone, so it can name which colour clipped in the reconstructed image but not which photosite went first. The axis is stops below saturation, 16 bins per stop over 256 bins — the same bin count the display reduction uses, so the fold into drawable columns is shared and a divergence between the two plots would have to be deliberate. A linear axis spends half its width on the top stop, which is why nobody has ever drawn a useful linear raw histogram. The fourth series is the brightest channel rather than luma: these values are unbalanced, so any weighted sum of them is a number about nothing, and the brightest channel is the one that saturates first and so the one the headroom question is actually about. It is a property of the file and not of the render, which has two consequences. It is computed once per photograph and cached — nothing downstream of the demosaic can move a count in it — so a cull does not pay the display histogram's per-frame cost three thousand times. And it describes the whole frame rather than the visible region, deliberately opposite to DevelopSession::histogram: a crop changes what is on screen and changes nothing about what the sensor recorded. Tags are on the reduction, the type, its constructor and the presentation arithmetic, each of which has a test that fails if the behaviour goes. The Slint panel and the push from lib.rs keep their reasoning as prose: nothing asserts them, and a tag would claim coverage the assertions are not making.	2026-08-29 23:36:21 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	09dddde594	Take the photograph another app hands over, and hand an export back ... FR-PLAT-AND-6 asks for two things this app did neither of: be a receiver for image view and share intents, and share exported results out through a FileProvider. The manifest declared one activity with one MAIN/LAUNCHER filter, so nothing on the device ever offered DarkRoom for a photograph, and there was no route out at all — Android has refused file:// URIs between apps since API 24, and a content:// URI needs a provider to be behind it. Inbound. Three filters now: VIEW for a gallery or a file manager, SEND and SEND_MULTIPLE for the share sheet, all on image/*. `android_main` reads the launch Intent before it gives `app` away to Slint, and what comes back is passed to `dr_ui::run` exactly as argv is on the desktop — `startup_action` already treats a non-empty list as "the user asked for these specifically", which is what a share is. The URIs are copied into the cache before the viewer opens, and that cost is real: a shared raw file is written once, in full, on the startup path. A content:// URI is a handle into another app's provider, not a path, and the decoders take paths; the alternative is teaching the whole read path about URIs, which is FR-PLAT-AND-1's SAF connector and is not built. Outbound. ExportProvider serves one directory — getFilesDir(), which is the same path `internal_data_path` gives the Rust side — and refuses everything else by canonicalising the request and checking it is inside that root, so `../` and a planted symlink fail the same test. Not AndroidX's FileProvider, because AndroidX is a Maven artefact and this build has no resolver; what it does is a hundred lines and they are here. The share half has no caller. The provider, the URI grant and the chooser are all in place, but the control that would invoke them belongs in `ui/dr-ui`, and wiring it needs an `AndroidApp` the interface can reach. It is documented as unwired and deliberately not tagged as covering the requirement. `launchMode="singleTask"` comes with the filters and is not decoration: another app can now launch this activity while it is running, and the default mode answers that by creating a second NativeActivity in the same process — a second android_main, a second Slint backend, a second wgpu device. The cost of the fix is stated in the manifest: a share arriving while DarkRoom is already open brings it forward without opening the image, because onNewIntent has no route through android-activity's event stream. The Java is Java because Android constructs it: a ContentProvider is instantiated by the system from its manifest entry, and getIntent() exists only on an activity object. Both directions live there rather than in JNI so that what crosses the boundary is two method signatures instead of forty, each of which is a string checked at run time and nowhere else. What a test can hold: the declarations. Nothing about an Intent or a ContentProvider is reachable from `cargo test`, but an intent filter that is deleted takes the app out of every "open with" menu silently, and an authority that stops matching its class raises a SecurityException inside somebody else's app. The tests in lib.rs read the manifest and ExportProvider.java through `include_str!` and hold both to that, on the host, which is the only place in the workspace that looks at either file from Rust. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:32:48 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	846a249156	Drain the queue that nothing has ever drained ... `jobs` has been a complete durable work queue since the catalog was written, and nothing has ever taken a job out of it. `claim_next`, `complete`, `fail` and `recover_orphaned` had no callers outside their own tests; `enqueue` had three. So the table grew one row per photograph and kept it forever, and FR-PLAT-AND-3's resumability was a property of code that never ran. `runner` is the missing half. It owns no thread, no clock and no policy, and that is the whole design: on Android the process does not decide when background work may run. WorkManager does, subject to Doze, battery saver and FR-NC-6's network constraints, and it revokes permission mid-job by calling onStopped(). So the runner exposes `run_one` — claim, run, record — and `drain`, which repeats it against a budget, a deadline and a cancellation flag the host owns. A `Worker.doWork()` with ten minutes calls drain with a deadline; a desktop idle pass calls it with none. That is the seam the Android service plugs into, and it needs no Android to test. Handlers are supplied from above, because the catalog knows what needs doing and nothing about how: a thumbnail needs a decoder and a fetch needs a network stack, neither of which belongs under core/dr-catalog. A runner claims only kinds some handler declares, so a queue holding work this device cannot do is left alone rather than failed five times. Four outcomes, and only two of them are the job's fault. Done deletes the row; Retry backs off; Abandon gives up now, for a failure no retry can fix; Interrupted releases the claim with its attempt refunded and ends the drain, because the host stopped rather than the job — five backgroundings in a row must not mark good work as failed. Process death is the fifth and cannot report itself, which is what `recover` is for. Recovery is called from `show_catalog_now`, which is the one place a catalog is opened for a session and already returns early if one is open. It has to be exactly once and before any worker starts: there is no owner column, so a second pass while a worker held a claim would take it away. The attempt a dead claim consumed is deliberately kept — a job that takes the process down with it is indistinguishable from one that fails, and the attempt counter is the only evidence that survives a death. The tests cover claiming under contention twice over: sequentially across two connections, and with four threads on four connections against one catalog on disk, asserting every job ran exactly once. Plus completion, backoff, giving up, abandoning, interruption, budget, deadline, cancellation, and a job orphaned by a simulated crash being reclaimed and run once rather than lost or repeated. Not wired to a handler yet, and deliberately not: the only enqueue site the app actually reaches is the remote scan's, whose thumbnails are already served by the async grid worker, and `walk`'s two sites are reachable only from the scan_local example. Inventing a handler to make the plumbing look used is how a requirement comes to read as covered by code that does not implement it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:31:47 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	d63872e5a9	Make a claim one statement, and give the queue what a runner needs ... The claim was a deferred transaction around a SELECT and an UPDATE, and under a single connection that is fine. Under two it is not what it looks like: the SELECT takes only a read lock, the UPDATE tries to upgrade, and in WAL a worker that read the same snapshot as another gets SQLITE_BUSY_SNAPSHOT on its write. That is not an error a busy handler can retry away — the fix is to roll back and start over — so the queue was "safe" only in the sense that the loser failed loudly instead of taking a job someone else was holding. `UPDATE jobs SET state = 1, attempts = attempts + 1 WHERE id = (SELECT ...) RETURNING ...` is one statement and so one implicit transaction that takes the write lock immediately. Two workers serialise, the loser waits out its busy timeout, and neither can see a row the other already holds. The existing tests are unchanged by it, because from one connection the two forms are indistinguishable — which is exactly why it was never noticed. The rest is the surface a runner has to have and did not: - `claim_next_matching` takes only kinds a worker can actually do. Without it a device with no connector claims `FetchOriginal`, fails it, and pays five wakeups and five backoffs per photograph to reach a conclusion known before it started. Filtering after a claim cannot work: the claim has already marked the row running. - `abandon` gives up now, for failures no retry can fix. `fail` uses it for its own MAX_ATTEMPTS branch, so there is one statement that ends a job. - `release` hands a claim back with its attempt refunded, for a worker that is being stopped rather than a job that is going wrong. `attempts` stands in for the owner column the table does not have: it is bumped by every claim, so a stale worker's release matches nothing and changes nothing. - `reap_orphan_subjects` deletes jobs whose photograph is gone. Coalescing keeps the table one row per unit of work and nothing ever shrank it when the work stopped existing. `ScanFolder` is excluded because its subject is a folder id, and joining that against `images` deletes by coincidence of numbering — hence `JobKind::subject_is_image`, and `JobKind::ALL` so the next kind added cannot quietly fall out of the filter. - `counts` is the number a foreground service's notification is built from. One behaviour change worth stating: a kind this build does not recognise is now parked with an error rather than read as `ExtractMetadata`. The old `unwrap_or` would have run a job of an unknown kind as some arbitrary known one, which is worse than not running it at all. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:31:27 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	d70f5c14e0	Name rust-analyzer everywhere the toolchain is installed ... VS Code's rust-analyzer extension ships a server newer than 1.92.0 supports and prompts, on every window, to add one. Listing the component in rust-toolchain.toml makes rustup supply the server matching the pin — the same thing the pin buys everywhere else. The cost lands outside the editor, which is why this is four files rather than one. rustup reconciles that component list against the installed toolchain on the first cargo call in the work tree and downloads what is missing, inside whatever job happens to be running. An unasked-for fetch in the middle of a build step is nobody's line item and hard to find in a log. So every environment that builds this repo names it too: baked into the Android image, and in the install step of each CI job that rolls its own toolchain. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:21:44 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	2955cad654	Regenerate the matrix over a night's merges ... Coverage 59.8% to 67.0% (120/179). Eight of those came from tagging what was already built; the rest are tonight's features -- FR-CULL-3's peaking half, FR-CULL-5, FR-PLAT-AND-5. FR-PLAT-LIN-3 and NFR-COMPAT-2 stay untagged deliberately. Both were satisfied by a manifest and a document, and there is no source file to hang a tag on that would fail if the behaviour went away. This is also the first commit tonight the pre-commit hook has checked. Every branch used --no-verify, because the hook runs the traceability build and the branches were under a no-build rule; the matrix each of them left untouched is regenerated here, once, over all of them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:21:44 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	7418b040da	Refuse a scan whose root has gone, instead of reporting it empty ... FR-PLAT-AND-2, and a silent failure on both platforms. `dr_sync::scan` stepped over a NotFound or PermissionDenied the way it does for a child that vanished mid-walk -- correct for a child, wrong for the root, where it ended the walk, returned Ok with nothing in it, and reported a successful scan of a library that was no longer there. A lost root is now its own error. The images under it are marked Availability::Offline per FR-CAT-9 and no catalog row is deleted; `library::persist` clears the mark per file as each one is listed again, so a root that comes back needs no repair step. Partly satisfied rather than closed, and the gap is worth stating. The recovery half is real and reachable on Android today, because `map_status` turns Nextcloud's 403 and 404 into it and Nextcloud is how a phone actually gets a library in this build. The causes the requirement names -- revocation, reinstall, a removed card -- are properties of a persisted tree permission, and there is none: SAF does not exist here, `SourceRef::Document` is constructed only in test modules, and `LocalStorage` rejects the variant outright. When SAF lands it becomes a third producer of this error and nothing above it changes, which is why the discovery belongs in the connector. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:20:57 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	085ab766b3	Give memory back in the order the user will miss it least ... FR-PLAT-AND-5. Android asks for memory back through onTrimMemory and kills the process if it is not given; until now nothing listened, so the answer was always "no". A tiered registry answers instead: GPU caches first, then proxies, then thumbnails, driven from android_main on MainEvent::LowMemory and MainEvent::Stop. The order is the argument. A backgrounded app has no window to draw and therefore no use for a render pipeline, while its thumbnails are exactly what the user will be looking at half a second after they come back -- so going into the background frees only the GPU tier, and only being measured against death frees everything. Sinks register beside the cache they free and hold weak handles, so the registry cannot keep a controller -- and every decoded portrait in it -- alive past the interface it belonged to. `try_borrow_mut` and skip: a warning can land mid-render, freeing textures under the code drawing with them is worse than missing one, and a warning not acted on is always followed by another. The GPU test is the one that matters: an eviction must change no pixel. A freed intermediate pool whose `colour_key` promise still stands renders an empty texture, and nothing else would have caught it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:20:57 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	55cb9b5b30	Keep the test scene's own arithmetic from overflowing a u64 ... The first compile this branch ever had. `cargo fmt` reflowed four files and clippy passed at -D warnings untouched, but one test panicked: `the_signature_does_not_change_with_scale`, on "attempt to multiply with overflow". It is the fixture, not the feature. `scene()`'s little LCG multiplied the block's y by the golden-ratio constant with a plain `*` while the term beside it already used `wrapping_mul`, so any scene taller than about 104 pixels overflowed in debug. Only the scale test builds one that large, which is why 345 of 346 passed around it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:20:26 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	e5db849f04	Mark a burst in the grid, and let it be folded away ... The counterpart to the grouping: where the signatures come from, and how a group reaches a cell. Signatures are computed from the 256px thumbnails dr-thumbs already holds -- vastly more resolution than a 9x8 reduction can use -- so a library that has been browsed, or that has synced somebody else's shards, has already paid for them and no RAW is decoded for this. The consequence is stated rather than hidden: an image with no thumbnail gets no signature and never joins a burst. That is self-correcting, and it is why the pass runs when the thumbnail sweep finishes rather than on a timer. Nothing happens at import and nothing happens at query time. The mark is drawn as a child of the cell's TouchArea, for the same reason the star strip is: a click on it must not also reach `cell-clicked` and throw the user into develop, and children are hit-tested before the element they sit in. It is never hidden on hover the way the stars are -- a collapsed burst stands in for frames that are not on screen, and something has to say so whether or not a pointer is nearby. Folding changes what the grid's *query* returns rather than what its cells draw, because the grid is a window over an ordered query and the frames a fold hides are mostly not loaded. So the predicate joins VISIBLE in every query that lists or counts cells -- the window, the header's count, the run a shift-click resolves, and the ordinal a scrub lands on -- under the discipline VISIBLE's own comment sets out: present in four places of five is worse than absent, because the counts disagree with the cells and neither looks wrong on its own. There is a test for exactly that. `the_window_read_walks_the_ordering_index` now includes the burst clause. It asserts on the query plan while holding its own copy of the query, so left alone it would have gone on reporting green against a query the grid no longer runs. If the clause costs `images_grid_order` and puts the sort back, that fails here rather than becoming jitter someone measures in six months. The pass keeps its own drain timer in a thread-local instead of taking fields on the library controller, so everything the feature needs to run lives in one file and the screen that starts it holds nothing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:20:26 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	5226f7223b	Group the frames of one moment, by when they were taken and what they look like ... A burst is the commonest thing in a cull and the least interesting: twelve frames of the same gull at 10 fps occupy twelve cells, are scrolled past twelve times, and end with the photographer keeping one. FR-CULL-5 asks for them to collapse to one representative and be judged as a unit. Two signals, because neither alone survives a real library. Time alone groups a whole wedding ceremony -- a photographer working steadily never leaves the gap that would end the run. Similarity alone groups a studio setup shot across two days, which is a project rather than a moment. Together they are specific: adjacent in time *and* looks like the frame before it. Two seconds is the time bound, and the reason is worth recording because the figure looks absurd next to a 10 fps camera. `images.captured_at` is whole seconds -- EXIF's DateTimeOriginal has no sub-second field and SubSecTimeOriginal is optional and widely omitted -- so a burst arrives in the catalog as ten frames sharing one timestamp. Any threshold finer than a second is a threshold on information that is not there. Where the pace really is faster, the similarity bound is what separates the frames. Similarity is a 64-bit difference hash over a 9x8 box-averaged reduction, compared between *adjacent* frames only. Chained rather than anchored on the first frame, because by frame twenty a camera following a bird has nothing in common with frame one while no two neighbours differ by much; the time bound is what stops the chain running away. There is no all-pairs step and there must never be one -- that is what turns a grouping pass into something nobody can afford to run over 50k images. Nothing here ranks a frame. FR-CULL-5 names the failure it is avoiding, which is rejecting the only frame of an important moment because somebody blinked, so there is no sharpness score and no best-of-burst. The representative is the earliest frame -- a fact about the clock, not a judgement about the photograph -- and the user's own choice lives in its own table so that rebuilding the grouping cannot erase it. Same argument `people.ignored` makes one subsystem over: nothing short of remembering a decision survives re-clustering. A newly found burst is recorded *open*. Collapsing on discovery would be tidier, and would also mean a background pass taking photographs off the screen part way through a cull. The pass marks; the user folds. It is a pass rather than a job kind for the reason catalog.md 10.2 gives for face clustering: a burst is a property of a run of frames and has no natural subject_id, so a per-image job would rebuild the world once per photograph. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:18:46 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	d0b671d4db	Put the grouping dials where the regrouping is ... The merge probability was `dr_face`'s constant and the smallest group was a bare `< 2` in the clustering pass. Both were tuned on one library — 1,813 faces of one photographer's family — and the quantity they optimise is a property of the population, not of the model. A household at close family resemblance and two thousand strangers at a wedding want different answers, and neither of them is the reference library. The doc comment already conceded the point and pointed at `face_index --tune`; a photographer does not have a terminal. So they are `FaceSettings` now, saved per device beside the cache budgets and edited from the People screen — beside the Regroup button that applies them and the rail that shows what they did, because a value changed three screens away from its effect is one nobody can tune. Moving them is safe by construction, which is why nothing asks for confirmation: a regroup writes only the suggested half, and confirmations, names and ignores enter as anchors and come back unchanged. The smallest-group rule is applied only to groups the system invented — a group the user named or set aside survives it whatever its size, because a display preference does not overrule a judgement. **Withdrawal, without which the setting does nothing visible.** Raising the smallest group stops the pass creating small groups; it does not remove the ones a previous pass made, because those still hold their suggestions, so they are not empty, so the prune leaves them. The pass now releases every unanchored face it did not place before pruning. And a dial you cannot see the effect of is not a dial. "What would this do?" runs the same population through the clusterer without opening a transaction and reports groups, faces grouped and largest group — one row of `--tune`'s table, on the user's own library, on a worker thread. The line leads with the group count because that is the number that says which side of the right setting you are on: it climbs as fragments are gathered into people and falls as separate people start being welded, while the grouped-face count rises straight through both. The preview parks its poll timer in a slot of its own. A preview and a regroup are allowed to be in flight together, and sharing the sweep's single slot would have the second to start drop the first's timer — visible as a Regroup that finished on its worker and never said so. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:18:46 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	24bf5be574	Compile our own Java into the APK, so the classes Android constructs can exist ... The APK's only dex was Slint's. `assemble-apk.sh` found `classes.dex` under the android-activity backend's build directory and copied it in, and there was no `javac` step and no `d8` of anything of ours — package.sh's header said so outright, on the reasoning that the app has no Java because android-activity calls `android_main` directly. That reasoning holds for everything the app *calls* and fails for everything Android *constructs*. A `ContentProvider` is instantiated by the system from its manifest entry; nothing in the process ever reaches its constructor, so there is no JNI route to writing one in Rust. The launch `Intent` is the same shape of problem from the other end: it arrives through `Activity.getIntent()`, and the activity android-activity hands out is a stock `NativeActivity` rather than a subclass with room for code. FR-PLAT-AND-6 needs both, and FR-PLAT-AND-4 needs a foreground `Service`, which is a third. So: everything under `apps/darkroom-android/android/java/` goes through javac against `android.jar`, and d8 merges the classes with Slint's finished dex into one `classes.dex`. Merging rather than emitting a second dex keeps the staging and zip steps as they are — multidex is native at API 28, but two files to keep in step buys nothing at this size. The step is skipped when the tree holds no Java, which is the state this commit leaves it in. Nothing about the APK changes until a `.java` file appears. `-source 8 -target 8 -bootclasspath android.jar` is not caution about language features. It is the last combination in which javac allows the boot class path to be replaced: from `-target 9` the flag is rejected, the platform classes come from the JDK instead of from android.jar, and the build stays green while the device raises `NoClassDefFoundError` for a class Android never shipped. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:18:18 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	e465ff0c80	Put the people filter where the filters are ... Narrowing the grid to two people at once has worked since people became a selector term, and it was effectively unreachable. The only control that could add a second person lived on the People screen, behind selecting them there, and it appeared only once the grid was already narrowed to somebody — so "photographs with both of them" needed a two-screen round trip the user had to guess at. A filter belongs on the filter bar. A "People" chip there opens a tray of everyone the library knows; tapping a name adds or removes them, and the any/all chip beside it — already there, and already the thing nobody found — now has something to sit next to that explains it. The caption leads the row so a pair of chips means something before either is pressed. The tray is a strip under the bar rather than a popup, the way the develop column's film picker is: the view scrolls as one, so an inline strip is taller content and not a second overlay to dismiss. It scrolls horizontally for the same hard reason the bar above it does — a layout cannot be narrower than its children's minimums, and forty people would otherwise set the minimum width of the whole view. The roster is built on open, not kept in step: indexing and regrouping change who exists, and a list cached at startup would be stale for exactly the user who has just been naming people. Named first, then by how much of them the library holds — the catalog orders by face count alone, which puts a dozen unnamed strangers ahead of the two people the user actually cares about. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:18:07 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	6d5de21fb7	Tell a tap on a photograph from a hand going past ... A brush across the grid opened whichever photograph was under it. Travel was already answered — the Flickable claims the pointer and the press is cancelled — but a contact that neither travels nor lasts reaches a TouchArea as an ordinary press and release, and it was landing the user in develop. So a finger now has to stay down for `TAP_MIN_MS` before letting go counts as opening anything. That is the floor under a tap where the 450 ms `HOLD_DELAY_MS` is the ceiling: below is a graze, between is a tap, above is a hold that starts a selection. One scale, three gestures. Only a finger is held to it. A mouse click is a discrete decision made by a button and is routinely over in thirty milliseconds, so `cell-pressed` now reports whether a finger did it — the same finger-id convention the pinch arbitration beside it already uses — and the dwell applies to touch alone. A graze still *selects* the cell it landed on, because the press already did that. That is the right failure mode: something visible and reversible rather than a silent nothing, and rather than develop. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:18:07 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	e40f2bfee9	Let go of the keyboard when a name is finished ... Pressing Enter on a person's name committed it and then kept the field focused, so on a tablet the on-screen keyboard stayed up over the faces the user had pressed Enter to get back to. The name looked accepted and the screen looked stuck. `Field` grows `release-focus()`, the other half of the `take-focus()` it already had, and the Identity screen calls it from `accepted`. A function rather than a property for the reason the existing one gives: focus is an event, and bound to a property it would fight anything else that took it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:18:07 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	f5edd49b6b	Let a manual collection be put in the order it is meant to be seen in ... `collection_members.position` and `Sort::CollectionPosition` have been in the catalog since collections were, and nothing above dr-catalog has ever written or read either: `collections::set_order` had no callers, and the grid ordered everything by capture time whatever it was scoped to — dr-ui does not construct a `Query` at all, it has its own `GRID_ORDER` constant. So a manual collection was a set with an order nobody could see or change. Three pieces, because it could not be fewer: `grid_order_for` decides the ordering from the scope, and both readers take it from there. That is the load-bearing part. An ordinal only names a photograph relative to an ordering, so the window read and the span read have to agree — a shift-click resolved through a different ORDER BY than the cells were drawn with selects a different run than the one on screen, and the user finds out when the export runs. `read_ids_span` already stated that invariant about `GRID_ORDER`; this widens it to an ordering that depends on the scope. Only a single manual collection has one. A set draws its descendants' images too, and two children's positions are unrelated integers that interleave arbitrarily; a smart collection has no member rows to carry a position at all. Both fall back to capture time and refuse the drop rather than pretending. The drop is on the cell, on whichever half of it the finger landed — the trailing edge is the only way to name the last place in a collection, since there is no cell beyond the last one to drop in front of. `reordered` is pure and the membership is rewritten whole. `set_order` sets the positions it is given and leaves the rest, so a partial write would interleave the moved run with rows nobody touched; and it is read unfiltered, so what the filter is hiding keeps its place relative to what the user can see. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:18:06 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	9d11554c71	Make the range gesture visible, and offer the whole grid at once ... Touch has had a range gesture for as long as selection mode has: double-tap the far end. It is invisible, it is unreliable on a grid that scrolls under the second tap, and it extends from the anchor *before* the two taps moved it — a rule subtle enough that the code needs two paragraphs to explain it to itself. Nobody who was not told about it has ever used it. "Select to…" is the same operation with state you can see. Press it, the strip stops reporting and says "Tap the last photograph", and the next cell taken is the far end. It reaches Rust as shift on `cell-pressed`, so it lands in `apply_press` as the ctrl+shift it already is, and there is no third selection policy to keep in step with the other two. This is deliberately not the sweep gesture. A drag that paints cells can only reach what is on screen, and the ranges that hurt on a tablet are longer than a screenful — between the two taps here the user may scroll as far as they like, and the run is resolved by the catalog rather than by what happened to be loaded. A sweep is still worth having for short runs; it is not what this should have rested on. "Select all" beside it, asked of the catalog for the same reason: a select-all that quietly meant "the hundred cells that happen to be loaded" is a lie the user cannot see until the export runs. The double-tap stays. It is tested, and an accelerator that costs nothing is worth keeping for whoever has already learnt it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:18:01 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	d1f3b97245	Ask for the collection's name where the keyboard can reach it ... "New collection from selection" created the collection under a placeholder name and then opened the rename field in the sidebar tree. On a tablet the sidebar is not on screen. It is instantiated all the same — app.slint collapses it to zero width and `visible: false` rather than using an `if`, because an `if` there is a layout loop Slint panics on — so the rename field was created, its `init` took focus, and Android raised the on-screen keyboard over a box nobody could see. Nothing else on the screen is focusable, so the keyboard had nowhere to go: it stayed, the name could not be typed, and the collection was already written under the name the user did not want. Asked in a sheet instead, on the same card as the filing and keywording sheets, before anything is written. That also fixes what was hiding behind it: an abandoned rename used to leave a "New collection" in the tree, because the collection existed before the name did. `Field` gains `take-focus()` so a sheet whose field is the only thing to do in it can answer the keyboard for the user — a function rather than a property, because focus is an event and a bound property would re-take it on every unrelated re-evaluation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 23:17:40 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	a2a0131693	Merge: face grouping the photographer can tune, people on the filter bar, and a tap that means it ... Four fixes to the identity work, and one to the grid. The name field lets the keyboard go when a name is finished, instead of leaving it up over the faces the user pressed Enter to get back to. Filtering to two people at once has worked since people became a selector term and was unreachable behind a two-screen round trip. It is a tray on the filter bar now, where filters are. The merge probability and the smallest group the clusterer will call a person were constants tuned on one library. They are settings, edited beside the Regroup button that applies them, with a read-only preview that answers what they would do to *this* library. And a hand brushing past a photograph no longer opens it: a finger has to stay down long enough to have meant it, on a scale between the graze and the hold that starts a selection. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:53:13 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	b9891e2c04	Merge master into tablet-selection ... Two real conflicts, both from work that landed either side of the same lines rather than against them. `lib.rs`: the settings controller was hoisted above the People screen's wiring, and Android's thumbnail-tier eviction registered itself at the same point. Independent, so both stay. `library.rs`: manual collection ordering and burst folding each added a clause to the same two queries. The scoped range read now carries both — the folding matters there for one step further on than it does in the grid, because a collapsed burst is one cell, so an ordinal counted over a list still holding every frame names a photograph several places away from the one the user pointed at. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:52:42 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	23c74d7063	Put the grouping dials where the regrouping is ... The merge probability was `dr_face`'s constant and the smallest group was a bare `< 2` in the clustering pass. Both were tuned on one library — 1,813 faces of one photographer's family — and the quantity they optimise is a property of the population, not of the model. A household at close family resemblance and two thousand strangers at a wedding want different answers, and neither of them is the reference library. The doc comment already conceded the point and pointed at `face_index --tune`; a photographer does not have a terminal. So they are `FaceSettings` now, saved per device beside the cache budgets and edited from the People screen — beside the Regroup button that applies them and the rail that shows what they did, because a value changed three screens away from its effect is one nobody can tune. Moving them is safe by construction, which is why nothing asks for confirmation: a regroup writes only the suggested half, and confirmations, names and ignores enter as anchors and come back unchanged. The smallest-group rule is applied only to groups the system invented — a group the user named or set aside survives it whatever its size, because a display preference does not overrule a judgement. **Withdrawal, without which the setting does nothing visible.** Raising the smallest group stops the pass creating small groups; it does not remove the ones a previous pass made, because those still hold their suggestions, so they are not empty, so the prune leaves them. The pass now releases every unanchored face it did not place before pruning. And a dial you cannot see the effect of is not a dial. "What would this do?" runs the same population through the clusterer without opening a transaction and reports groups, faces grouped and largest group — one row of `--tune`'s table, on the user's own library, on a worker thread. The line leads with the group count because that is the number that says which side of the right setting you are on: it climbs as fragments are gathered into people and falls as separate people start being welded, while the grouped-face count rises straight through both. The preview parks its poll timer in a slot of its own. A preview and a regroup are allowed to be in flight together, and sharing the sweep's single slot would have the second to start drop the first's timer — visible as a Regroup that finished on its worker and never said so. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:32:26 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	a4b9deaf96	Put the people filter where the filters are ... Narrowing the grid to two people at once has worked since people became a selector term, and it was effectively unreachable. The only control that could add a second person lived on the People screen, behind selecting them there, and it appeared only once the grid was already narrowed to somebody — so "photographs with both of them" needed a two-screen round trip the user had to guess at. A filter belongs on the filter bar. A "People" chip there opens a tray of everyone the library knows; tapping a name adds or removes them, and the any/all chip beside it — already there, and already the thing nobody found — now has something to sit next to that explains it. The caption leads the row so a pair of chips means something before either is pressed. The tray is a strip under the bar rather than a popup, the way the develop column's film picker is: the view scrolls as one, so an inline strip is taller content and not a second overlay to dismiss. It scrolls horizontally for the same hard reason the bar above it does — a layout cannot be narrower than its children's minimums, and forty people would otherwise set the minimum width of the whole view. The roster is built on open, not kept in step: indexing and regrouping change who exists, and a list cached at startup would be stale for exactly the user who has just been naming people. Named first, then by how much of them the library holds — the catalog orders by face count alone, which puts a dozen unnamed strangers ahead of the two people the user actually cares about. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:32:10 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	2403f355d6	Tell a tap on a photograph from a hand going past ... A brush across the grid opened whichever photograph was under it. Travel was already answered — the Flickable claims the pointer and the press is cancelled — but a contact that neither travels nor lasts reaches a TouchArea as an ordinary press and release, and it was landing the user in develop. So a finger now has to stay down for `TAP_MIN_MS` before letting go counts as opening anything. That is the floor under a tap where the 450 ms `HOLD_DELAY_MS` is the ceiling: below is a graze, between is a tap, above is a hold that starts a selection. One scale, three gestures. Only a finger is held to it. A mouse click is a discrete decision made by a button and is routinely over in thirty milliseconds, so `cell-pressed` now reports whether a finger did it — the same finger-id convention the pinch arbitration beside it already uses — and the dwell applies to touch alone. A graze still *selects* the cell it landed on, because the press already did that. That is the right failure mode: something visible and reversible rather than a silent nothing, and rather than develop. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:31:45 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	bbbc23f376	Let go of the keyboard when a name is finished ... Pressing Enter on a person's name committed it and then kept the field focused, so on a tablet the on-screen keyboard stayed up over the faces the user had pressed Enter to get back to. The name looked accepted and the screen looked stuck. `Field` grows `release-focus()`, the other half of the `take-focus()` it already had, and the Identity screen calls it from `accepted`. A function rather than a property for the reason the existing one gives: focus is an event, and bound to a property it would fight anything else that took it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:31:22 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	e027d34b65	Regenerate the matrix over a night's merges ... Coverage 59.8% to 67.0% (120/179). Eight of those came from tagging what was already built; the rest are tonight's features -- FR-CULL-3's peaking half, FR-CULL-5, FR-PLAT-AND-5. FR-PLAT-LIN-3 and NFR-COMPAT-2 stay untagged deliberately. Both were satisfied by a manifest and a document, and there is no source file to hang a tag on that would fail if the behaviour went away. This is also the first commit tonight the pre-commit hook has checked. Every branch used --no-verify, because the hook runs the traceability build and the branches were under a no-build rule; the matrix each of them left untouched is regenerated here, once, over all of them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:22:01 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	82d9d077b0	Merge: answer Android's memory warnings, and stop reporting a lost root as an empty library ... FR-PLAT-AND-5 in full, FR-PLAT-AND-2 in part -- the recovery is built and live for Nextcloud roots, the SAF cause it names does not exist yet. FR-PLAT-AND-4 and FR-PLAT-AND-6 are not here, both blocked behind the same gap: assemble-apk.sh compiles no Java, so the APK cannot carry a Service or a FileProvider. The container has JDK 17 and build-tools 36; the build step is what is missing. Verified: fmt, clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings, and 1043 tests across dr-catalog, dr-sync, dr-sync-folder, dr-sync-nextcloud, dr-plat and dr-ui. The aarch64 target was checked before the branch was finished but not after; no device was available. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:19:46 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	75fd5619ca	Refuse a scan whose root has gone, instead of reporting it empty ... FR-PLAT-AND-2, and a silent failure on both platforms. `dr_sync::scan` stepped over a NotFound or PermissionDenied the way it does for a child that vanished mid-walk -- correct for a child, wrong for the root, where it ended the walk, returned Ok with nothing in it, and reported a successful scan of a library that was no longer there. A lost root is now its own error. The images under it are marked Availability::Offline per FR-CAT-9 and no catalog row is deleted; `library::persist` clears the mark per file as each one is listed again, so a root that comes back needs no repair step. Partly satisfied rather than closed, and the gap is worth stating. The recovery half is real and reachable on Android today, because `map_status` turns Nextcloud's 403 and 404 into it and Nextcloud is how a phone actually gets a library in this build. The causes the requirement names -- revocation, reinstall, a removed card -- are properties of a persisted tree permission, and there is none: SAF does not exist here, `SourceRef::Document` is constructed only in test modules, and `LocalStorage` rejects the variant outright. When SAF lands it becomes a third producer of this error and nothing above it changes, which is why the discovery belongs in the connector. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:19:38 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	2b812ebe21	Give memory back in the order the user will miss it least ... FR-PLAT-AND-5. Android asks for memory back through onTrimMemory and kills the process if it is not given; until now nothing listened, so the answer was always "no". A tiered registry answers instead: GPU caches first, then proxies, then thumbnails, driven from android_main on MainEvent::LowMemory and MainEvent::Stop. The order is the argument. A backgrounded app has no window to draw and therefore no use for a render pipeline, while its thumbnails are exactly what the user will be looking at half a second after they come back -- so going into the background frees only the GPU tier, and only being measured against death frees everything. Sinks register beside the cache they free and hold weak handles, so the registry cannot keep a controller -- and every decoded portrait in it -- alive past the interface it belonged to. `try_borrow_mut` and skip: a warning can land mid-render, freeing textures under the code drawing with them is worse than missing one, and a warning not acted on is always followed by another. The GPU test is the one that matters: an eviction must change no pixel. A freed intermediate pool whose `colour_key` promise still stands renders an empty texture, and nothing else would have caught it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:19:29 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	6246a2e346	Merge: group the frames of one moment, and let a burst fold away ... FR-CULL-5. Frames join a burst when they are adjacent in time and look like the frame before them -- both, because time alone groups a whole ceremony and similarity alone groups a studio setup across two days. Adjacent pairs only, chained; there is no all-pairs step and there must never be one. No selection of any kind. The representative is the earliest frame, a fact about the clock rather than a judgement about the photograph, and a newly found burst arrives open, so the pass never takes a row off the screen. Verified: fmt, clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings, 346 dr-catalog tests, 511 dr-ui tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:07:05 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	fc4157a1e0	Keep the test scene's own arithmetic from overflowing a u64 ... The first compile this branch ever had. `cargo fmt` reflowed four files and clippy passed at -D warnings untouched, but one test panicked: `the_signature_does_not_change_with_scale`, on "attempt to multiply with overflow". It is the fixture, not the feature. `scene()`'s little LCG multiplied the block's y by the golden-ratio constant with a plain `*` while the term beside it already used `wrapping_mul`, so any scene taller than about 104 pixels overflowed in debug. Only the scale test builds one that large, which is why 345 of 346 passed around it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:07:05 +02:00
dtourolle	91fe6cf300	Merge master into partial-preset-scope ... # Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md # ui/dr-ui/ui/app.slint	2026-08-29 22:02:03 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	754ab91347	Bring a Lightroom library across, and start with something in the list ... Two halves of the same complaint: a preset sheet that opens on "No presets yet" is homework, and a photographer with ten years of presets in Lightroom has no way to bring them. `dr-preset-xmp` reads Camera Raw `.xmp`. The mapping turned out to be mostly a rename rather than a conversion, because Adobe and this pipeline already agree: exposure is in stops in both, and contrast, the four recovery controls, clarity, texture, vibrance and saturation are all ±100 in both. That is not imitation, it is the convention raw developers converged on — `highlights_shadows.yaml` cites it in as many words. Only sharpening needed arithmetic, Adobe's 0…150 against our 0…100. The white balance does not come across, and says so rather than guessing. Adobe writes absolute Kelvin for a raw file where ours is a relative nudge from what the camera recorded, so converting needs the *target image's* as-shot white balance — exactly what a preset cannot carry, since the same preset lands on a frame shot at 3200K and one shot at 7000K. A guess would be wrong on most images and invisibly so. A folder is read as readily as a file, nested, because that is the shape an exported preset folder is in and importing ninety files one at a time is asking someone not to bother. `dr_pipeline::starter` is six presets a first run begins with, written against this pipeline in its units and deliberately mild — a starting point, not a caricature. They are seeded when the library *file* does not exist rather than when the library is empty, so deleting all six does not hand them back on the next launch. Both of these name operations, and `ui_names_no_operation` was right to stop them living in `ui/`. That test exists because the failure is silent and cumulative, and it caught exactly what it was written for: a preset called "Punch" is a statement about contrast, clarity and vibrance, and a table mapping Adobe's vocabulary to ours is a statement about the pipeline. Neither is a fact about an interface. So the starter set went into `dr-pipeline`, and the importer into its own crate — between two walls, since `dr-pipeline` depends on nothing on purpose and XMP is real XML not worth hand-rolling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 22:00:53 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	36ea53cceb	Merge: stop a subject's name from setting the width of the develop column ... Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 21:49:40 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	3e19628324	Stop a subject's name from setting the width of the develop column ... The column moved sideways the moment segmentation finished. It takes the widest minimum any panel declares, each panel publishes `layout.preferred-width` as that minimum, and `MaskPanel` gained rows whose width came from the model's output -- so a photograph the user was looking at jumped because a label said "traffic light". `overflow: elide` did not prevent it and was never going to. Eliding is what a `Text` does when it draws; at layout time it still asks for the width of its whole string, and it is the asking that reaches the column. Both the subject rows and the mask entries are bounded, because a mask is itself a segmentation result -- without the second half the column moved when a subject was clicked instead of when one was found. The bound is stated for the reason `ChipGrid` declares its width from its column count rather than from its options (ff6c313): what a panel asks for must follow from its structure, never from its data. 160px is the same judgement as that commit's 88px chip, and it is a policy rather than a measurement -- there is no harness in the tree that measures a panel's width, and the 482-to-351 figure in ff6c313 was read off the running app. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 21:49:33 +02:00
dtourolle	4a04496c78	Merge: focus peaking, so a frame can be judged without zooming to 100% ... FR-CULL-3's peaking half. The raw histogram and raw clipping indicators remain unbuilt -- what exists is a display histogram tagged FR-DSP-7, counting AdjustPass's 8-bit output, which reports a highlight as gone precisely where FR-CULL-3 needs it to report the highlight recoverable. Verified before merge: fmt clean, clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings green, 11 focus GPU tests, 79 baseline dr-gpu tests, 511 dr-ui tests. The cfg(target_os = "android") arm is unverified -- the host-target clippy never compiled it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> # Conflicts: # ui/dr-ui/src/lib.rs # ui/dr-ui/ui/app.slint	2026-08-29 21:43:35 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	2168cdd1c4	Mark what is in focus, so a frame can be judged without zooming to 100% ... FR-CULL-3's focus peaking. One compute dispatch measures local contrast in WGSL and writes an overlay texture; on desktop it reaches Slint through the same zero-copy wgpu import the canvas uses, so nothing per-pixel touches the CPU on the frame path. With peaking off the cost is zero and structurally so: focus_overlay opens with `let settings = self.peaking?;` before the frame is touched, and clearing drops both overlay textures, so no VRAM is held either. NFR-P14 is met by construction rather than by measurement -- one dispatch, no second render, no pipeline compile after session open, and a test asserting allocations stay at 2 over eight frames. The budget test asserts 50ms at 4K rather than a tight bound, deliberately: a tight bound fails on a loaded machine and gets deleted, which is worse than a loose one that still catches the regression that matters. TD-1 is amended rather than joined by a TD-6: on Android the overlay rides the readback that already exists there, roughly doubling that transfer while peaking is on, and TD-1's own "Done when" removes both because both are the same missing capability. Verified: cargo fmt clean; clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings green, which also compiles peaking.slint through dr-ui's build.rs; 11 focus GPU tests and 79 baseline dr-gpu tests pass; 511 dr-ui tests pass. Not verified: the cfg(target_os = "android") arm, which the host-target clippy never compiled. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 21:43:08 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	b52be080ff	Merge: say which requirements the code already satisfied, and which it does not ... Eight requirements were implemented and untagged; tagging them takes coverage from 59.8% to 64.2% without a line of feature code. Five more were refused rather than tagged -- R2's own acceptance criterion still reads '(figure TBD)', R5 has one of three clauses built, FR-RAW-2 meets the requirement's purpose but not its stated mechanism. docs/outstanding.md records what is genuinely unbuilt, so the gap reads as a decision rather than an oversight. It also names four requirements the matrix reports as covered that are not, including two covered only by string literals inside the traceability tool's own test fixtures. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:46:08 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	4d0ad0601c	Merge: a Flatpak that asks for no filesystem, and the channels v1 ships through ... FR-PLAT-LIN-3 and NFR-COMPAT-2. The manifest grants no filesystem permission of any kind, which is not an oversight: a folder library is chosen by typing an absolute path, nothing in the tree calls the FileChooser portal, and a static --filesystem= grant would have made that design appear to work by not testing it. docs/distribution.md records what a portal-based picker would take. No Flatpak has been built -- flatpak-builder is not installed here -- so the finish-args set is reasoned from what the binary links, not observed to be sufficient. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:46:02 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	115653a262	Mark a burst in the grid, and let it be folded away ... The counterpart to the grouping: where the signatures come from, and how a group reaches a cell. Signatures are computed from the 256px thumbnails dr-thumbs already holds -- vastly more resolution than a 9x8 reduction can use -- so a library that has been browsed, or that has synced somebody else's shards, has already paid for them and no RAW is decoded for this. The consequence is stated rather than hidden: an image with no thumbnail gets no signature and never joins a burst. That is self-correcting, and it is why the pass runs when the thumbnail sweep finishes rather than on a timer. Nothing happens at import and nothing happens at query time. The mark is drawn as a child of the cell's TouchArea, for the same reason the star strip is: a click on it must not also reach `cell-clicked` and throw the user into develop, and children are hit-tested before the element they sit in. It is never hidden on hover the way the stars are -- a collapsed burst stands in for frames that are not on screen, and something has to say so whether or not a pointer is nearby. Folding changes what the grid's *query* returns rather than what its cells draw, because the grid is a window over an ordered query and the frames a fold hides are mostly not loaded. So the predicate joins VISIBLE in every query that lists or counts cells -- the window, the header's count, the run a shift-click resolves, and the ordinal a scrub lands on -- under the discipline VISIBLE's own comment sets out: present in four places of five is worse than absent, because the counts disagree with the cells and neither looks wrong on its own. There is a test for exactly that. `the_window_read_walks_the_ordering_index` now includes the burst clause. It asserts on the query plan while holding its own copy of the query, so left alone it would have gone on reporting green against a query the grid no longer runs. If the clause costs `images_grid_order` and puts the sort back, that fails here rather than becoming jitter someone measures in six months. The pass keeps its own drain timer in a thread-local instead of taking fields on the library controller, so everything the feature needs to run lives in one file and the screen that starts it holds nothing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:39:51 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	bb35665bd2	Let a paste carry some kinds of edit and not others ... FR-DEV-6 asks for presets "covering a subset of the edit graph". What landed with the named presets covered two subsets: everything, and everything but the crop. "Match the colour but not the sharpening" had no way to be said. `Scope` is now a set of `Attribute` — the same six kinds every operation already declares and the develop panel already builds its tabs from. The photographer ticking "tone and colour" is naming the groups they navigate by, and neither this module nor the interface has to name an operation to do it (FR-DEV-3c). The pleasing part is what left. Framing used to be excluded by an explicit test against one operation's id; it is now excluded because Geometry is not in the default set. The special case dissolved into the general rule, and the argument for it — a crop is a decision about *this* photograph, and carrying it across forty destroys forty compositions — is now a statement about a kind of edit rather than about a node. All thirty-three existing preset tests pass unchanged, which is the evidence that the generalisation kept its promises. One decision that is a field rather than a rule, because the two cases genuinely differ. An operation this build cannot classify — from a newer version, arriving over sync — travels under "everything" and "everything but the crop", because those are claims about the whole edit and an unrecognised operation is part of it (FR-NC-8). It does not travel under a hand-picked set, because that is a claim about kinds, and an unknown kind is not one of the kinds that were ticked. The settings page's "Copy crop and rotation" checkbox is gone, replaced by the same chips the preset sheet draws. It asked the right first question — geometry is the kind whose accidental travel destroys work — but it was the only question a boolean could ask. The field stays in `Settings`, read exactly once to seed the new set, so anyone who had ticked it keeps their behaviour. The chips are deliberately not in the develop column. Six of them there would set the width of the whole sidebar, which is the bug `ChipGrid`'s comment records at length. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:38:19 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	d3dadbd725	Group the frames of one moment, by when they were taken and what they look like ... A burst is the commonest thing in a cull and the least interesting: twelve frames of the same gull at 10 fps occupy twelve cells, are scrolled past twelve times, and end with the photographer keeping one. FR-CULL-5 asks for them to collapse to one representative and be judged as a unit. Two signals, because neither alone survives a real library. Time alone groups a whole wedding ceremony -- a photographer working steadily never leaves the gap that would end the run. Similarity alone groups a studio setup shot across two days, which is a project rather than a moment. Together they are specific: adjacent in time *and* looks like the frame before it. Two seconds is the time bound, and the reason is worth recording because the figure looks absurd next to a 10 fps camera. `images.captured_at` is whole seconds -- EXIF's DateTimeOriginal has no sub-second field and SubSecTimeOriginal is optional and widely omitted -- so a burst arrives in the catalog as ten frames sharing one timestamp. Any threshold finer than a second is a threshold on information that is not there. Where the pace really is faster, the similarity bound is what separates the frames. Similarity is a 64-bit difference hash over a 9x8 box-averaged reduction, compared between *adjacent* frames only. Chained rather than anchored on the first frame, because by frame twenty a camera following a bird has nothing in common with frame one while no two neighbours differ by much; the time bound is what stops the chain running away. There is no all-pairs step and there must never be one -- that is what turns a grouping pass into something nobody can afford to run over 50k images. Nothing here ranks a frame. FR-CULL-5 names the failure it is avoiding, which is rejecting the only frame of an important moment because somebody blinked, so there is no sharpness score and no best-of-burst. The representative is the earliest frame -- a fact about the clock, not a judgement about the photograph -- and the user's own choice lives in its own table so that rebuilding the grouping cannot erase it. Same argument `people.ignored` makes one subsystem over: nothing short of remembering a decision survives re-clustering. A newly found burst is recorded *open*. Collapsing on discovery would be tidier, and would also mean a background pass taking photographs off the screen part way through a cull. The pass marks; the user folds. It is a pass rather than a job kind for the reason catalog.md 10.2 gives for face clustering: a burst is a property of a run of frames and has no natural subject_id, so a per-image job would rebuild the world once per photograph. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:37:54 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	8d5dc423ea	Say that all three of FR-CULL-3's bullets are unbuilt, not one ... The first draft got this half right and half wrong. It correctly said the existing histogram and clipping indicators are not FR-CULL-3's, but it described them as adjacent — as though the work left were mostly focus peaking and a relocation. They are not adjacent. The histogram reads AdjustPass's 8-bit output and counts clipping as r == 255, so it describes the frame the display is about to show, after the entire develop chain. FR-CULL-3 asks for the histogram of the sensor data, and gives its reason in the requirement itself: a rendered image "systematically lies about what is recoverable in the raw". A readout taken from the render cannot answer that question however it is presented, which means two of the three bullets need a new measurement rather than a new placement. Found by the agent building focus peaking, who had to go looking at the counters to find out. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:36:51 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	0d9f802f88	Regenerate the matrix that this branch is about ... Eight requirements gained a tag in this branch's first commit, so the generated matrix is stale until it is rerun. Coverage moves from 59.8% (107/179) to 64.2% (115/179), and the untagged list drops from 72 entries to 64. Regenerating here rather than leaving it to the pre-commit hook, because this branch's subject *is* the matrix: a reader comparing the two commits should see the number move for a stated reason. The eight are R3, R6, FR-DEV-1, FR-UI-6, FR-NC-6d, NFR-OPS-3, NFR-PORT-2 and NFR-SEC-3, and none of them is new work — every one was already satisfied by code that had simply never said so. Six of the thirteen tag sites were new `TRACES:` lines rather than additions to existing ones, so the tag count moves 896 → 902 while the covered count moves by eight. Orphan tags remain at zero. Run from source with `cargo run -p traceability -- report`, never from a prebuilt binary, and note that the tool tracks line numbers — the six prepended module tags shift every subsequent line in their own files, which accounts for the churn in this diff that is not a coverage change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:26:07 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	88ef7148d6	Write down what is not built, so the gap reads as a decision ... The traceability matrix reports one number and cannot say what it means. An untagged requirement is either one nobody built or one somebody built and did not label, and both look identical in the summary table. Eight of the second kind were tagged in the previous commit. This is the first kind, written out with the reasoning, so that the distance between the register and the binary is something a reader can see rather than reconstruct from a percentage. Eleven clusters, each verified against the tree rather than inherited from a survey. Several turned out to be more interesting than "not done": Plugins are 21 untagged requirements — nearly a third of the shortfall — and §7 already lists the Plugin API as out of scope for v1 while §3.10 spends 280 lines specifying it. The two that *are* built, FR-PLG-2 and FR-PLG-2d, are the declarative operation format, which is a plugin system that resolves at build time. The fix here is an edit to requirements.md, not code, and D16 has to be answered before any format is called stable. FR-DSP-2 is not merely unbuilt; it is under challenge. frame_budget.rs and TD-4 independently argue that tiling costs more than it saves on the interactive path, so the open question is whether the requirement should survive, not when it will be met — and the spike that would settle it, S6, has not run. NFR-A11Y-1's hard half is done and its easy half is not. LocalizedKey already keeps display strings out of core/ and labels::resolve is a single resolution point; what that point does is a hardcoded English match, so a translation needs a recompile, which is the one thing the requirement forbids. The §4.1 performance targets are unverified rather than unmet. §8 requires a per-commit benchmark suite whose regressions fail the build; there is no benches/ directory, no criterion, and no benchmark step in any of the three CI workflows. The one guard that does live in CI skips itself without a GPU adapter and asserts its CPU half only in release, while CI tests in dev. Nothing says the targets are missed. It says nobody would find out. And three requirements are reported as covered while not being met: R1 and NFR-OPS-1 are tagged only by string literals inside the traceability tool's own tests, which it scans along with everything else, and FR-CAT-13's single tag sits on keyword storage while no XMP is parsed or written anywhere. CONTRIBUTING already warns that a tag proves a tag exists; these are the specific ones. Focus peaking, burst grouping, Flatpak packaging and the Android platform integration are being built in parallel and are marked in progress rather than listed as absent, so those lines can be struck as they land. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:24:26 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	8165619065	Describe the project the README is actually in front of ... It said the status was "early", that v0.1 is a remote library viewer, and that the zero-copy display path was "not yet working" and its replacement was the highest priority. All three were true when they were written and none of them has been true for eight releases. The zero-copy line was the damaging one, because it is the project's central architectural constraint and the README stated the opposite of what happened. Desktop keeps the zero-copy path — the compute pass writes a texture Slint composites directly — and the readback survives in exactly one place, the Android develop view, because wgpu's Vulkan swapchain tears a portrait window on a tablet whose panel is mounted landscape. That is TD-1, with the on-device measurements and the three things any one of which would remove it. A reader who took the old text at face value would have gone looking for a bug that was fixed, and missed a compromise that was chosen. "Current state" now says what runs, checked item by item against the tree rather than from memory: the first draft claimed AVIF and JPEG XL export, which the settings page offers and dr-export refuses on purpose, and sixteen declared operations where there are fifteen. Both are the kind of error this commit exists to remove. The requirement count moves from 122 to 179, the documentation table gains the five documents somebody would actually want next, and the "Not built" paragraph points at docs/outstanding.md rather than leaving the reader to infer the gap from silence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:23:35 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	ab0ef6a26d	Say which requirements the code was already satisfying ... Thirteen requirements were surveyed as built but untagged. Eight of them were: R3, R6, FR-DEV-1, FR-UI-6, FR-NC-6d, NFR-OPS-3, NFR-PORT-2 and NFR-SEC-3. Each was read against its full text in requirements.md and against the code before the tag was added, because a tag that is wrong is worse than an absent one — it turns a visible gap into an invisible one. The five that were refused, and why, because the reasoning is the part worth keeping: R2 carries "(figure TBD)" in its own acceptance criterion and asks for a stated prefetch margin and cache-hit rate; neither figure exists anywhere in the tree and neither quantity is measured, while TD-2 and TD-3 both describe the thumbnail path falling short of it. R5 asks for three things and the code does one. The display pipeline does run at viewport resolution, but "only visible tiles are computed" and "panning recomputes only newly exposed tiles" need a tile scheduler that does not exist — and frame_budget.rs currently argues for striking tiled computation from the interactive path rather than building it. FR-RAW-2 asks for a trait taking a SourceRef, so that a second decoder can be added without changing callers. What exists is free functions over &[u8]. That meets the requirement's stated *purpose* — the same decoder serves a local file, a SAF document and a byte range, which is exactly why it takes bytes — but there is no trait and no second implementation seam, so the requirement should probably be amended rather than tagged. NFR-ARCH-1 asks for named executors with stated thread counts. architecture.md §7.1 states the table; nothing implements it. Workers are twenty-odd ad-hoc std::thread::spawn sites, each building its own one-worker tokio runtime, with no decode pool, no GPU-submit executor and no I/O pool. The requirement's own text says R4 and NFR-P9 "assert an outcome with no stated means", and that is still true. NFR-SEC-4 is satisfied by absence — there is no telemetry — and absence has no module to tag. A tag would point at nothing. NFR-OPS-3 was the closest call of the eight taken. The store is single, separate from the catalog, survives a catalog rebuild and does not sync between devices; it has no version *field*, deliberately, and settings.rs argues why and names the condition that would need one. The substance is met and the reasoning is recorded where it belongs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:23:16 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	a56ac87e2c	Build a Flatpak that asks for no filesystem at all ... FR-PLAT-LIN-3 says that where DarkRoom is distributed as a Flatpak, filesystem access uses portals. There was no manifest, so the sandboxed path had never been exercised and the requirement had never been tested against the code. The manifest is YAML rather than JSON because it has more to explain than to declare, and every permission in finish-args carries the argument for itself. The two that are not obvious: - --device=dri is not an optimisation. The develop pipeline is compute shaders through wgpu with nothing behind it while NFR-R8 is open, so without the render node the application starts and cannot develop. - --talk-name=org.freedesktop.secrets rather than the Secret portal. These are different things and the requirement's wording invites the wrong one: the portal hands an app a master key for a store it keeps itself, whereas the session's secret daemon is what keeps the Nextcloud app password visible to secret-tool and Seahorse, and therefore individually revocable by the user. FR-NC-2's degraded mode is what happens if nothing answers, inside the sandbox exactly as outside it. There is no --filesystem= line, and that absence is the substance rather than an oversight. It leaves the document-portal path working — a photograph opened from a file manager arrives in argv under /run/user/$UID/doc and opens with no code change — and leaves library selection broken, because dr-sync-folder takes a typed absolute path and nothing in the tree calls the FileChooser portal. --filesystem=host would fix that and is precisely what the requirement forbids; --filesystem=xdg-pictures would fix it by not testing the design, in a smaller directory. docs/distribution.md §4 records what actually closes the gap and the flatpak override to use in the meantime. The runtime version is chosen from what the binary needs rather than from what is newest. ldd on a release build names fontconfig, freetype, expat, libpng, zlib, brotli and bzip2 and nothing more: wgpu dlopens libvulkan.so.1, and x11rb and wayland-client speak the wire protocols in Rust rather than binding libxcb or libwayland. So what the runtime must supply at runtime is a Vulkan loader and an ICD, which is the GL extension's job, and freedesktop 25.08 carries a rust-stable extension at 1.98.0 — comfortably above the workspace's 1.92 minimum. That extension is not rustup, so rust-toolchain.toml's pin is ignored here; the manifest says why that is correct rather than a violation of CONTRIBUTING.md, since the pin exists to make fmt and clippy agree and neither runs in a packaging build. Like the PKGBUILD, it builds from the local checkout, so a build is of what you are working on. That needs network for cargo, which Flathub forbids — the comment says what a submission there would need instead and why generating 30,000 lines of vendored sources buys nothing yet. The LFS pointer check is carried over from the PKGBUILD for the same reason it exists there: a dir source copies a 130-byte pointer in without complaint, and the failure would land on a user's machine rather than the packager's. Not verified: nothing has been built. flatpak-builder is not installed here and the machine is under a build embargo. The manifest parses, its keys are the ones flatpak-builder reads, and the desktop entry and metainfo it installs both validate — but no Flatpak has been produced from it and no permission has been observed to be sufficient. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:18:56 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	47a40d1afa	Describe the application once, in a file every channel installs ... A desktop entry gives a software centre a name and a one-line Comment, and nothing else — no description, no licence, no age rating, no statement of what hardware the interface was laid out for. GNOME Software and Discover both show an application with no metainfo as an unexplained icon, and both packages this repository produces were in that position. packaging/paris.tourolle.darkroom.metainfo.xml is the AppStream component, and it is installed by the PKGBUILD as well as by the Flatpak manifest because the description, the licence fields and the OARS rating are facts about the application rather than about how it was packaged. Writing it twice is how the two packages start disagreeing. Two things in it are easy to get wrong and are commented in place. The two licence fields differ on purpose: metadata_license covers the file itself and has to permit the unconditional redistribution and reformatting a catalogue does, which GPLv3 does not, so it is CC0-1.0; project_license is the application's own and reads GPL-3.0-or-later to match D8. And the component id is not a fifth name but the same string as the desktop basename, the Flatpak application id, and the app_id dr_ui::run sets — a rename that misses one costs the icon or the association, and neither failure announces itself. D15's decision that the target devices are a tablet and a desktop is stated as a display_length requirement rather than left implicit, so a software centre does not offer this on hardware where the photograph and the parameter panel cannot both be on screen. Validates clean under appstream-util validate-relax; appstreamcli --pedantic reports only that the gitea URLs are unreachable from a machine that cannot see that host. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:18:35 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	95847e3a31	Say which channels v1 ships through, and that the Flatpak cannot reach a library ... NFR-COMPAT-2 asks for the v1 channels to be stated, and says why in its own second sentence: the channel decision and the storage design are coupled. There was nowhere that statement lived. packaging/ held a PKGBUILD and a desktop entry, which is a recipe rather than a decision, and the coupling the requirement points at was therefore invisible. docs/distribution.md states five channels and, more usefully, which two of them exist only as promises. It also records what every channel has to get right independently of format — the one identifier that appears in four places, the metainfo, Vulkan being a requirement rather than a preference while NFR-R8 is open, a secrets daemon being optional rather than required, and the LFS pointer check that stops a package shipping 130 bytes where an 11 MB model should be. §4 is the part worth reading. Preparing a Flatpak is what surfaced that FR-PLAT-LIN-3 is not satisfied and cannot be satisfied by packaging alone: a folder library is chosen by typing an absolute path into an EndpointOnly field that checks it with std::fs, and nothing in the tree calls the FileChooser portal. Inside a sandbox that path does not exist, so the launch screen refuses it. Import fails one step earlier, because a sandboxed process reads its own mount namespace and a card mounted on the host is not in it. That is written down rather than fixed with --filesystem=host, and the argument for not fixing it that way is §2: the Arch package and an AppImage both hand the application the same unrestricted process the developer runs it in, so Flatpak is the only Linux channel that tests whether a design assumed unrestricted access. Granting the permission removes the only reason to ship it. The reverse coupling on Android is recorded too. NFR-COMPAT-2 says Play distribution is what makes ARCH §6.9 binding; §6.9 is verified rather than assumed, so SAF is already unconditional and a sideloaded build would gain nothing by asking for more. Play is deferred over the GPLv3 question, which is a licence-reading exercise and blocks nothing in the storage design. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:18:20 +02:00
dtourolle	eb39599f12	Merge: named presets (FR-DEV-6)	2026-08-29 20:07:58 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	5a8327824f	Keep an edit under a name, not just on the clipboard ... FR-DEV-6 asks for three things — named presets, copy/paste between images, and batch-apply to a selection. The last two have been here for a while; this is the first. The format is the sidecar's, deliberately. A preset *is* the non-default half of a version, so the lines are the same lines keyed the same way, which makes the two files diffable against each other and lets someone debugging an edit paste a block from one into the other. One file rather than one per preset: a preset per file makes the name a path, and every name then has to survive a filesystem — a `/` becomes a directory, a name differing only in case collides on one platform and not another, and renaming becomes two operations that can half-fail. As a key in a document it is none of those. Unknown *parameters* needed no machinery. `Preset` already holds whatever keys it is given and resolves them against the descriptors only at apply time, so one written by a newer build survives by being stored. Only lines that are not `op.param = float` at all are preserved verbatim, which is the sidecar's version-skew promise made here too. Applying is the paste path with a different source, so a preset reaches a selection through the sidecar read-modify-write that was already there: no graph, no decode, no GPU, forty files or one. Two smaller decisions worth the record. A library that fails to parse is held empty in memory and *not* written back over — settings regenerate themselves and this is work, so a parse failure must not be the moment it is destroyed. And every save persists immediately and rolls the in-memory copy back if the write fails, so the sheet never lists a preset the file does not have. The grid's "Presets" button is gated on the selection alone, unlike the "Paste to 40" beside it. That button needs a clipboard armed this session; the preset list is whatever was saved last month, and hiding it behind an unrelated action is what makes a feature only its author knows about. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:07:14 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	574107bc39	Let a manual collection be put in the order it is meant to be seen in ... `collection_members.position` and `Sort::CollectionPosition` have been in the catalog since collections were, and nothing above dr-catalog has ever written or read either: `collections::set_order` had no callers, and the grid ordered everything by capture time whatever it was scoped to — dr-ui does not construct a `Query` at all, it has its own `GRID_ORDER` constant. So a manual collection was a set with an order nobody could see or change. Three pieces, because it could not be fewer: `grid_order_for` decides the ordering from the scope, and both readers take it from there. That is the load-bearing part. An ordinal only names a photograph relative to an ordering, so the window read and the span read have to agree — a shift-click resolved through a different ORDER BY than the cells were drawn with selects a different run than the one on screen, and the user finds out when the export runs. `read_ids_span` already stated that invariant about `GRID_ORDER`; this widens it to an ordering that depends on the scope. Only a single manual collection has one. A set draws its descendants' images too, and two children's positions are unrelated integers that interleave arbitrarily; a smart collection has no member rows to carry a position at all. Both fall back to capture time and refuse the drop rather than pretending. The drop is on the cell, on whichever half of it the finger landed — the trailing edge is the only way to name the last place in a collection, since there is no cell beyond the last one to drop in front of. `reordered` is pure and the membership is rewritten whole. `set_order` sets the positions it is given and leaves the rest, so a partial write would interleave the moved run with rows nobody touched; and it is read unfiltered, so what the filter is hiding keeps its place relative to what the user can see. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 20:04:17 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	6d25d85f18	Make the range gesture visible, and offer the whole grid at once ... Touch has had a range gesture for as long as selection mode has: double-tap the far end. It is invisible, it is unreliable on a grid that scrolls under the second tap, and it extends from the anchor *before* the two taps moved it — a rule subtle enough that the code needs two paragraphs to explain it to itself. Nobody who was not told about it has ever used it. "Select to…" is the same operation with state you can see. Press it, the strip stops reporting and says "Tap the last photograph", and the next cell taken is the far end. It reaches Rust as shift on `cell-pressed`, so it lands in `apply_press` as the ctrl+shift it already is, and there is no third selection policy to keep in step with the other two. This is deliberately not the sweep gesture. A drag that paints cells can only reach what is on screen, and the ranges that hurt on a tablet are longer than a screenful — between the two taps here the user may scroll as far as they like, and the run is resolved by the catalog rather than by what happened to be loaded. A sweep is still worth having for short runs; it is not what this should have rested on. "Select all" beside it, asked of the catalog for the same reason: a select-all that quietly meant "the hundred cells that happen to be loaded" is a lie the user cannot see until the export runs. The double-tap stays. It is tested, and an accelerator that costs nothing is worth keeping for whoever has already learnt it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 19:46:44 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	9ac1447139	Ask for the collection's name where the keyboard can reach it ... "New collection from selection" created the collection under a placeholder name and then opened the rename field in the sidebar tree. On a tablet the sidebar is not on screen. It is instantiated all the same — app.slint collapses it to zero width and `visible: false` rather than using an `if`, because an `if` there is a layout loop Slint panics on — so the rename field was created, its `init` took focus, and Android raised the on-screen keyboard over a box nobody could see. Nothing else on the screen is focusable, so the keyboard had nowhere to go: it stayed, the name could not be typed, and the collection was already written under the name the user did not want. Asked in a sheet instead, on the same card as the filing and keywording sheets, before anything is written. That also fixes what was hiding behind it: an abandoned rename used to leave a "New collection" in the tree, because the collection existed before the name did. `Field` gains `take-focus()` so a sheet whose field is the only thing to do in it can answer the keyboard for the user — a function rather than a property, because focus is an event and a bound property would re-take it on every unrelated re-evaluation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 19:42:33 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	5133e53bc8	Give back what a straighten took, when the angle comes back ... The auto-crop only ever shrank. Straighten to 20 degrees and the corners are cropped away correctly; come back to 3, or all the way to zero, and the crop stays at the size 20 degrees demanded. Nothing on screen explains why the photograph is still small, and the only way back was undo. The cause was that each correction was computed from the previous correction's output, so it accumulated: every angle the slider rested at took its cut and none was ever returned. The fix is to stop accumulating and recompute. The applied crop is now always the user's own rectangle fitted into the current angle's safe area, so as the angle falls and that area opens up the crop grows back — and stops, exactly, at the rectangle they chose. At zero the safe area is the whole frame and the fit is the identity, which is what carries it the last of the way home. There is deliberately no early exit for the upright case now: that exit is precisely what would strand the crop small. **The intent is remembered as a pair, so it repairs itself.** The session keeps `(applied, intended)` — what the correction wrote, and what it was derived from — and trusts the remembered intent only while the graph still holds `applied`. Every other route to the crop leaves something else there: a handle dragged, a ratio chosen, a sidecar loaded, a paste, an undo. That mismatch is the signal the memory is stale, and the current rectangle becomes the new intent. The alternative was a write into this field from each of those paths, which is the kind of bookkeeping that is correct until someone adds a seventh path. Dragging a handle therefore *is* the user choosing, including at a non-zero angle: the correction will not later grow the crop past what they dragged it to. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 19:16:43 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	ff6c313bab	Wrap the chip rows, so one six-choice parameter stops sizing the sidebar ... The develop column asked for 482px. Every comment in it, a dozen of them, describes it as a 280px column — and on a tablet it was taking 40% of the screen from the photograph it exists to serve. Measured rather than guessed, because none of it is visible in the source: the column takes the widest width any panel declares, `AdjustPanel` wanted 482 of it, its rows wanted 458, and after the 44px scroll gutter the widest single row was 414. That row is `film_sim`'s `format` — six film formats from 35mm to 8x10, laid out by `Segmented` as six 64px chips in a `HorizontalLayout` that cannot wrap. 6 x 64 + 5 x 6 = 414, exactly. Nothing about that is the film simulation's fault. An operation declares its parameters and the panel decides how to draw them (FR-DEV-3a), so a node is entitled to offer six choices; it is the drawing that has to cope. Any future operation with a five-choice enum would have done the same thing, silently, to every screen in the application. `ChipGrid` is the general answer: chips placed by index arithmetic inside a plain `Rectangle`, wrapping at a column count, declaring a width that depends on the columns rather than on the number of choices. `Segmented` takes a `columns` property and uses it when asked — zero, one row however many chips, stays the settings page's behaviour, where the page is full-width and reading the alternatives side by side is the whole argument for chips over a dropdown. The generated enum rows and the curve-channel picker now wrap at three, and the crop ratio chips use the shared grid instead of the private copy of it they shipped with last week. The column measures 351 now, down from 482, and what sets it is the mode strip rather than a parameter — which is a control the user chose to have on screen rather than an accident of one node's variant list. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 19:16:43 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	bbd26f05f9	Release 0.9.0 ... Thirty-five commits since 0.8.0, and two of them are the reason this is a minor rather than a patch. **Storage became pluggable.** A folder backend now sits beside the Nextcloud one behind the same seam, proved by a test rather than by a trait, and the launch screen offers three routes into a library instead of one. **Faces gained a confidence that means something.** A suggestion is scored against the people the user has actually named, the curve it came from is stated rather than implied, and a regroup runs roughly three times faster — the similarity scan and the merge engine both use the machine's own SIMD kernel now, measured on the tablet where the NEON path is the one that runs. Alongside those, the framing tools got the quality-of-life pass this release is named for: a crop can be held to a ratio, a straighten crops away the corners it exposed, an export can be pinned to an exact resolution with the common panel sizes offered as buttons, and dragging the crop rectangle no longer tracks the pointer at half speed. `pkgrel` returns to 1: a new `pkgver` is a new archive name, so there is nothing left for a release number to disambiguate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:53:19 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	bd33487054	Say which axis each export dimension is, in the one place that renders ... The box modes put two numeric fields one above the other, and on screen they are two anonymous numbers: `TextRow` draws its label behind the field rather than above it, so "Width" and "Height" never appear. That fault is older than this feature — the storage panel's cache sizes have the same missing labels, and the single "Size value" row always did — and it belongs in its own change rather than being fixed under cover of this one. But one unlabelled number is survivable and two are not, so the axis goes where the page does render it: the unit. It reads "3840 px wide" above "2160 px high", which is the sentence the user is trying to write anyway. The `label` bindings stay correct and stay where they are, so this becomes redundant rather than wrong the day `TextRow` is fixed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:49:21 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	c38df01bf7	Hang the auto-crop off the slider's commit, not off the pointer passing over ... The straighten auto-crop worked once and then stopped. It was keyed on `PlainSlider::drag-changed`, whose name is a lie inherited from what it forwards: `SliderTrack` defines `engaged` as `has-hover || claimed`, and it has to — a `Flickable` withholds the press for 100ms, so hover is the only signal that arrives in time to stand the scrolling ancestor down. That is the right definition for the job it was written for and the wrong one for this. Keyed on hover, the correction fires when the pointer first crosses the track — before anything has been dragged — and then does not fire again for as long as the pointer stays on it, however many times the angle is changed. Which is exactly what "it only works once" looks like. `SliderTrack` already publishes the signal this wants. `committed` fires on release, once per gesture, after the final `changed`, and its doc comment says so in as many words. It was simply not forwarded through `PlainSlider`, so it now is, and the geometry panel's callback is a `committed(float)` rather than a `drag-changed(bool)`. The angle needs no re-applying here: the track emits its last `changed` before it commits, so the value is already in the graph by the time this runs. What is left is the correction that has to happen exactly once. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:49:21 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	2c8768ac29	Lay the ratio chips out by hand, because Slint will not lay them out ... The ratio chips shipped inside a `GridLayout` with `row` and `col` computed from the repeater's index. It compiles. On screen every chip piles into a single row that runs off the panel, and the terminal fills with Internal error in Slint: RepeatedItemTree::grid_layout_input_data() not implemented once per frame. A `for` inside a `GridLayout` is not supported, and nothing says so until it is running. A `HorizontalLayout` is not the answer either: six chips side by side need over 400px, and this column's width is the largest width any panel declares — so one row would widen every other panel in the application to fit a control that is on screen only while cropping. So the grid is arithmetic over the index inside a plain `Rectangle`. It costs the layout engine nothing, it wraps a seventh ratio onto a third row by itself, and — because a bare `Rectangle` declares no preferred width — it takes the width the column already has instead of setting it. The Portrait chip gets a container of its own for the same reason: a `ChoiceChip` dropped straight into a `VerticalLayout` is stretched the full width of the panel and reads as a button for the section rather than as one more chip. The three conditional pieces are also now individually-conditional children of the one layout rather than a nested layout under a single `if`, which is the convention `app.slint` and `masks.slint` already carry notes about: a conditional nested layout under-reports its height here and the panels below it draw on top of one another. All of this was invisible in the source and obvious in a screenshot. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:49:20 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	52c655e6cf	Turn the ratio lock with the photograph when it is turned ... A quarter turn carries the crop with it — that is what makes turning a photograph keep its composition rather than sliding the selection onto a different part of the picture. So a rect locked to 16:9 comes out of the turn at 9:16, of a frame whose axes have also swapped, and the lock was left claiming landscape over a portrait rect. The next drag would then snap it back upright and undo what the turn had just done. The orientation switch now turns with it, on odd numbers of quarters. `Original` is deliberately excluded, and getting that wrong flips it twice: it is resolved against the framed size every time it is asked for, and the turn has already swapped that frame's axes — so it has turned by the time anything asks. `turns_with_the_frame` is the one predicate that separates the two cases, with a test that pins both. `CropAspect` arrived without tests of its own; it has them now, including the round trip this fixes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:49:20 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	3bb68cff69	Export at an exact resolution, and offer the panels worth naming ... Export sizing could bound an image but not fix it. Long edge, short edge and percentage all preserve the aspect ratio by letting one dimension fall where it may, which is right for most work and useless against a display that accepts one resolution and rejects everything else — a television's art mode, a digital frame, a wallpaper slot. FR-EXP-3 has always listed both halves of the answer, and this adds them. **Fit box** scales to fit inside a width and height, so nothing is thrown away and the result is smaller than the box on one axis unless the crop already matches it. **Fill box** scales to cover the box and cuts the overhang off the middle, so the file is exactly the pixels asked for. Fill is the only mode in the file that discards image data, so two things about it are worth stating. The overhang comes off symmetrically: the crop tool is where a photographer decides which part of a frame survives, and this stage having an opinion of its own would fight it. And locking the crop to the same ratio leaves nothing here to cut, which is the workflow the two features are meant to be used in. With upscaling off and a source too small to cover, a fill box keeps its *shape* rather than falling back to the source's: exporting a 3:2 file where 16:9 was asked for is silently wrong in exactly the way the mode exists to prevent, so the box shrinks instead. The existing rule — clamp, never fail — is otherwise unchanged. Four panel sizes are offered as buttons beside the fields. Getting 3840 x 2160 by typing four digits twice is a step at which the mistake is discovered after the upload rather than before it. They fill in the numbers and nothing else, in particular not the fit/fill choice: both are legitimate against a screen, and guessing would discard the edges of a photograph for a user who wanted them. The list is panels rather than platforms, because a screen has one exact pixel count for ever where "what a photo site wants" would rot in the file. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:49:20 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	d9eb8faffd	Crop away the corners a straighten exposed, once the slider is let go ... Turning a rectangle inside its own bounds exposes its corners: there is no source pixel out there, and the shader renders it black. Nothing in the render prevents that, deliberately — a free angle does not change the output size, which is what leaves the frame where the user put it while the slider moves. Correct during the drag; four black wedges on the finished photograph. Letting go of the slider now pulls the crop inside the area the angle leaves defined. `Framing::max_inscribed_crop` already computed that bound and had no caller; this is the caller its doc comment described. **Once, at the end of the gesture.** Applied per frame it would shrink the crop on every step of the slider and never grow it back, so a user who overshot to 20° and came back to 3° would be left with a crop ratcheted down by the excursion rather than by the angle they settled on. Per gesture it is bounded by the angles actually rested at, and undo steps back through them. **The crop is fitted into the bound, not replaced by it.** A crop placed deliberately off-centre is a decision, and an automatic correction that recentred it would undo the user's work to fix a problem they did not have. `CropRect::fitted_into` scales only as far as the bound demands and then slides the rect the shortest distance needed to be inside — so a ratio locked in the crop panel survives the straighten too, since the shape is never touched. It returns the rect unchanged, bit for bit, when nothing needed to move. That matters more than it looks: this runs on every release of the slider, including releases at zero, and a rect that drifted by a rounding error each time would be an edit recorded for no reason. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:49:19 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	e6ad906bc1	Let the crop be held to a ratio while it is dragged ... A photographer cropping for a print, a phone wallpaper or a 16:9 frame is not choosing four edges — they are choosing one edge and a known shape. Free-dragging every corner made them do that arithmetic by eye on every drag, and get it slightly wrong. The panel now offers Free, Original, 1:1, 3:2, 4:3 and 16:9, with a Portrait switch for the ones that have two orientations. Original follows the frame rather than naming a number, so it stays right on the next photograph from another body and after a quarter turn. **The ratio is of output pixels, and the rect is not.** `CropRect` is stored in fractions of a frame that is not itself square, so holding a shape needs the frame's size — `ratio * height / width` of the frame. Skipping that gives a "1:1" crop that is square only on a square photograph, which is the one case nobody would test on, so the conversion lives in `CropRect::with_aspect` where it is explained and pinned by a test that asserts the fractions are *not* equal. Two decisions worth recording: The reshaped rect **grows** onto the ratio rather than shrinking onto it, then scales down only as far as the frame's edge demands. Fitting inside instead makes a one-axis drag do nothing at all — the other axis clamps the first straight back, and the handle simply refuses to move. The overlay now reports **which corner the drag is holding**, because reshaping onto a ratio has to know which corner is nailed down and only the handle that took the press knows that. A move reports no corner and keeps its shape: reshaping about a centre would pull an over-moved rect smaller instead of sliding it along the edge. The lock lives with the window rather than the session. A `DevelopSession` is per image, and cropping a set of frames to one shape is exactly when the lock earns its place. It is not an edit and reaches no sidecar — what is saved is the rectangle it produced. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:48:51 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	dbaf5358d1	Measure a crop drag against the frame, not against the rect it is moving ... Dragging the crop rectangle tracked the pointer at half speed: the rect slid out from under the cursor, and the handle being held stopped being the one under the finger. On a photograph where the whole point is to place an edge by eye, that made the tool close to unusable. The cause is that a `TouchArea` reports `mouse-x` relative to itself, and every area in the overlay is positioned *by the very rect the drag is editing*. Rust echoes the applied rect back on each step, so the area moves under the pointer and the reported position falls by exactly the amount it had just risen. `mouse-x - pressed-x` therefore subtracts the drag from itself, and the fixed point of that feedback is a rect that moves half as far as the pointer does — which is why it looked like sluggish tracking rather than like a coordinate bug. Both terms are now taken in the frame's own coordinates: `parent.x + mouse-x`, where `parent.x` tracks precisely the movement `mouse-x` lost, with the press captured in those same coordinates on the way down. The two movements cancel and the rect follows the pointer exactly. `GradientHandles` in masks.slint was already written this way, and for the same reason — its handles are placed by the mask they drag. The header note here now says why the shape matters, since the wrong version compiles, looks plausible, and is only wrong once the rect starts moving. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:48:44 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	480c46c41a	Quote the percentile the measurement can actually support ... The before/after published a p99 ratio of 6.0x at 4K. It is not supported and the correction is worth more than the number was. The baseline run's `fit` rows spread 2.3x between median and 99th percentile while every row of the after run spreads about 1.1x. A stage costing `radius x pixels` has no reason to be bimodal, and `fit` is the memory-bound configuration — it walks the whole 482 MB source on a stride where `1:1` reads a contiguous window. Something else had the machine. The merge brings in the cross-check that settles it: "Try every GPU, not only the fastest one" measured the same baseline code on the same card and reports 4.67 ms p99 for M3 clarity fit at 2560x1600, against 10.40 ms here. Two measurements of one thing differing by 2.2x mean the noisier one is wrong. So both percentiles are now published and the p50 column is the claim: 2.8x at 4K rather than 6.0x. The p99 improvement is real and larger; this run cannot say by how much, and says so. What the caveat does not touch: every after figure is inside the 16 ms budget with a p99 within 26% of its median at every size and both views, and clarity against all-four is a within-run comparison. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:28:41 +02:00
dtourolle	30162e80df	Merge branch 'master' into clarity-reduced-base ... # Conflicts: # docs/traceability.md	2026-08-29 13:27:04 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	8b251b84a0	Record what the reduced base actually bought ... TD-4 asked for the measurement as well as the change, and this is it: 25.05 ms to 4.17 ms at 3840 x 2160, six times faster, with clarity no longer dominating the neighbourhood stage it used to be 97% of. Measured before and after on the same machine and the same adapter minutes apart, baseline at the branch's merge-base, so the only variable is the change. That adapter is not the RTX 3050 the rest of this document was measured on, so the new table says to read it on its own rather than against the ones above — the before/after is comparable, the absolute figures are not, and quietly replacing the existing tables would have changed the instrument. Also recorded: the declared halo is now quantised to multiples of the output scale, because the 2-sigma truncation rounds on the reduced grid. 29 px becomes 28 at 1920x1200 and 38 becomes 40 at 2560x1600. It is inside what the cross-form test holds — 0.03 stops of peak, 2% of reach — but it is a change in reach and not only in cost, and a tile scheduler would be handed it. Better written down now than found later as a seam. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:18:37 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	bff95e25ad	Let clarity's base be computed where it is still fully determined ... Clarity's Gaussian sigma is 1.2% of the frame's shorter edge, so its radius is a property of the viewport: 52 render pixels at 4K, two separable passes of 105 taps each over 8.3 M pixels. That measured 33.9 ms — seven times the entire fused point chain, for one slider — and is docs/technical-debt.md TD-4. A detail pass may now declare `output_scale`, and clarity's base is computed on a grid a quarter the size on each axis. The pass that combines needs the blur *and* the full-resolution colour, and a colour that has been through a quarter-scale target is no longer full resolution. So a scaled pass cannot simply join the ping-pong: there are two chains now. The full-resolution one carries the colour and no scaled pass touches it; the reduced one carries the base and reaches the combining pass through a second binding as `reduced_at()`. The reduce is a dispatch of its own rather than something the first blur half does on the way past, and that is the whole difference between this and the strided kernel the module documentation rules out. A stride samples an image that is not band-limited and aliases high-frequency content down into the base, which is then subtracted, and arrives in the output as mottling across smooth gradients. This band-limits first and samples after. What is discarded is content the base could not represent at any resolution, because a Gaussian at sigma = 26 px holds nothing above one cycle per 26 px and the quarter-scale grid carries one per 8 — so the reduced base is not an approximation of the full-resolution one, it is the same function sampled where it is still determined. Which is also why the scale belongs to the band rather than to the stage. Texture's sigma is a decade finer, so the reduce pass's own box would be wider than the Gaussian it was prefiltering; texture never reduces. And clarity steps 4 -> 2 -> 1 as sigma falls, because a quarter of a small sigma is not a Gaussian either — the case that gives up is the one that was already cheap. `radius` stays in each pass's own pixels and `ComposedDetail::radius` multiplies it back up, so 13 reduced pixels at scale 4 still report the 52 render pixels a tile would have to be grown by. The halo a scheduler sees does not move. The halo tests pass unchanged, which was TD-4's stated bar; they render at 1024 px and so exercise the reduced path rather than stepping around it. Added `crossing_the_reduction_threshold_does_not_change_the_picture`, because nothing yet compared the reduced form against a *less* reduced one — every other test measures one form against itself. It renders the same edit either side of the 4 -> 2 step-down and holds the peak excursion to 0.03 stops and the reach to 2% of the frame. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:12:29 +02:00
dtourolle	3b5d564495	Try every GPU, not only the fastest one ... `request_adapter` with `HighPerformance` returns one adapter and no second chance. That is right on a healthy machine and wrong on one with a sick GPU, which is not rare: observed 2026-08-29 on a laptop whose discrete card had hit an NVRM assertion failure and a fullchip reset. The driver still advertised it, wgpu dutifully picked it as the highest performing, and the process died on it — while a working integrated GPU and a working external card sat unused in the same enumeration. A photo editor that will not start because the *fastest* GPU is broken, on a machine holding two that are not, is worse than a slow one. So: enumerate, order by preference, take the first that yields a device. The ordering reproduces what `HighPerformance` meant, so a healthy machine picks what it always picked and pays one enumeration for it. A CPU adapter sorts last rather than being excluded — software rendering is a poor experience and a working one. Which GPU to prefer is now a policy rather than an assumption, because the fastest is not obviously the right one. A 24 MP frame is ~96 MB of RGBA and every upload and export readback crosses PCIe on a discrete card, where an integrated GPU shares memory and crosses nothing — and does not empty a battery. Measured before choosing a default, on this machine's Iris Xe against its RX 5700 XT. The fused colour pass is within 1.5x, which is the shape shared memory suits. The neighbourhood stage is 5-8x slower, and that decides it: clarity at 1920x1200 costs 20 ms on the iGPU, over the budget on its own at the smallest size tested. So `Performance` stays the default and `Efficiency` is offered rather than chosen (`DARKROOM_GPU=integrated`). docs/frame-budget.md carries the table, and says what it does *not* show: the harness renders from a resident texture and never uploads or reads back, so the transfer cost an iGPU avoids appears in none of it. Import, export and the thumbnail sweeps may well go the other way. What this cannot fix: a GPU sick enough to accept `request_device` and segfault afterwards, which arrives as a driver crash rather than an error. It moves the boundary from "the preferred adapter is unusable" to "unusable and dishonest about it".	2026-08-29 12:43:10 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	0407fb8d2d	Format the two new examples ... They were written after the last fmt run and CI gates on --check. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 12:33:23 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	3944e17aa5	Merge: face confidences that mean something, and a regroup three times faster ... Two things the People screen was getting wrong, and then the arithmetic underneath it. It refused to show a confidence at all until the library had fitted its own calibration, which needs 200 confirmed positive pairs — made on the screen that was withholding the number used to rank them. The default curve is the reference implementation's fitted one, a published operating point rather than an invention, so the percentage is shown and the screen says which curve it came from. The number itself was the mean similarity between a face and every other member of its group, which punished well-photographed people and never asked who else the face might be. It is now the mean of the best ten matches into the identity, times that identity's share of the evidence against every other identity the user has ruled on. Leave-one-out over this library's 2,702 confirmations across 54 named people: 99.33% placed on the right person, and the number shown for the right person moves from a median of 90.4% to 99.3%. Both of those were measured rather than argued, on a copy of a real 18,143-face library, and the instrument is committed with them. Measuring is also what found the rest. A regroup went from 10.0s to 3.1s: the similarity scan was walking the whole embedding array once per row and not vectorising at all, and the agglomeration was spending 3.06s having every component scan the entire pair list for its own pairs. The scan now picks its kernel per machine — AVX2 where the CPU has it, NEON on the tablet, where the whole suite and a full regroup have both now been run. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 12:32:54 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	39c34d4e44	Say what actually counts as a rival, now that a name anchors too ... assign's denominator is the identities the user has ruled on, and it reads Cluster::person to find them. Master's "Let a name hold a group together" widened what sets that field: a confirmation, a name, or an ignore, where before it was a confirmation alone. The behaviour is right either way — a named person is exactly the identity a suggestion should be discounted against — but the module note and faces.md §9.1 both said "a confirmation", which is now too narrow. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 12:32:31 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	da20d42d33	Merge master: pluggable storage, and a name that anchors ... Conflicts were docs/traceability.md alone, and it is generated — so it was regenerated rather than hand-merged. dr-face was untouched on the other side; ui/dr-ui/src/faces.rs and identity_ui.rs auto-merged, the first around recluster's anchoring and the second around load_faces. Worth recording because the two branches met on the same problem from different ends. Master's "Let a name hold a group together" is the fix for the sixteen Catherines — fourteen of them empty — that this branch found while measuring the library and reported without fixing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 12:30:01 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	b2250cc460	Measure a regroup on the tablet, not just on the desktop ... The GPU question needed a number nobody had: how a regroup divides on the hardware whose CPU is weakest. dr-face carries no weights and touches no display, and dr-catalog's example needs only a catalog file, so both run under adb shell against a copy of a real library. On the same 18,143 faces — desktop against the tablet — scan 0.96s / 2.61s, agglomerate 1.69s / 2.16s, score 0.26s / 0.40s. The scan is half the pass on the tablet and under a third on the desktop, because twenty cores of AVX2 pull ahead of NEON much further than the merge engine's single-threaded hashing does. So a GPU GEMM is worth roughly 2× a regroup on the tablet and 1.5× here, and it is the tablet that should decide whether it is built. The two architectures agree exactly: the same 1,531,969 evidence pairs, the same 2,518 groups holding the same 16,246 faces, the same reliability table. That is a better check on the NEON kernel than the unit test can be. Two instruments, both read-only: the example now prints its phases, and dr-face gains scan_bench, which needs no library at all and so can answer "how fast is this machine" on a device with nothing on it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 12:16:48 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	f4395bd17c	Run the face tests on the tablet, where the NEON kernel actually runs ... The similarity scan picks its dot product per machine, and the NEON one is the kernel that ships to the phone and the tablet — and the one a desktop cargo test never executes. A wrong lane index or a mishandled tail there is a silent wrong answer on exactly the devices nobody runs the suite on, which is a poor place for the only untested code path. dr-face carries no weights and touches no display, so its tests are a plain ARM64 binary that runs under adb shell with nothing installed. The script builds it against the SDK's newest NDK, pushes it, runs it and cleans up. It checks for the device first, so a tablet that is not plugged in costs a second rather than the two minutes it takes to compile for it. Not wired into CI, which has no device attached. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 12:02:03 +02:00
dtourolleandClaude Opus 5	8f596262b8	Record where a regroup's time actually goes ... The §9 note said the scan was half a regroup and implied the agglomeration was an irreducible sequential walk. Both halves of that are now wrong, and the numbers are the point of the section. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 11:59:01 +02:00